Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T21:24:53.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural Inequality in Collaboration Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2022

Rafael Ventura Open the ORCID record for Rafael Ventura [Opens in a new window]
Rafael Ventura*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, 112 Leidy Labs, 3740 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, United States
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent models of scientific collaboration show that minorities can end up at a disadvantage in bargaining scenarios. However, these models presuppose the existence of social categories. Here, I present a model of scientific collaboration in which inequality arises in the absence of social categories. I assume that all agents are identical except for the position that they occupy in the collaboration network. I show that inequality arises in the absence of social categories. I also show that this is due to the structure of the collaboration network and that similar patterns arise in two real-world collaboration networks.

Type
Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 2023 , pp. 336 - 353
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Jonathan S., Wong, Natalie Z., Matthew Symer, Gregory Eckenrode, Watkins, Anthony, and Yeo, Heather L.. 2018. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Promotion and Retention of Academic Surgeons.” American Journal of Surgery 216 (4):678–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abramo, Giovanni, D’Angelo, Ciriaco, and Caprasecca, Alessandro. 2009. “Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system.” Scientometrics 79 (3):517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Réka, and Barabási, Albert-László. 2002. “Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks.” Reviews of Modern Physics 74 (1):47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. M. 2000. “Evolutionary Explanations of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy of Science 67 (3):490–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. M., and Skyrms, Brian. 1999. “Bargaining with Neighbors: Is Justice Contagious?” Journal of Philosophy 96 (11):588–98.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul D., Scott Long, J., and Krauze, Tad K.. 1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47 (5):615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Paul D., and Stewart, John A.. 1974. “Productivity Differences among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage.” American Sociological Review 39 (4):596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, Eduardo B., Nuno, A. M., Araújo, André A. Moreira, Hans J. Herrmann, and José S. Andrade, Jr. 2017. “Gender Differences in Scientific Collaborations: Women Are More Egalitarian Than Men.” PloS One 12 (5):e0176791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axtell, Robert L., Epstein, Joshua M., and Peyton Young, H.. 2001. “The Emergence of Classes in a Multiagent Bargaining Model.” Social Dynamics 27:191–211.Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László, and Albert, Réka. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286 (5439):509–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barabási, Albert-László, Hawoong Jeong, Zoltan Néda, Ravasz, Erzsebet, Schubert, Andras, and Vicsek, Tamas. 2002. “Evolution of the Social Network of Scientific Collaborations.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 311 (3–4):590–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabási, Albert-László, and Oltvai, Zoltan N.. 2004. “Network Biology: Understanding the Cell’s Functional Organization.” Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (2):101–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batagelj, Vladimir, and Mrvar, Andrej. 2000. “Some Analyses of Erdos Collaboration Graph.” Social Networks 22 (2):173–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, Donald deBlasiis. 2004. “Does Collaborative Research Have Greater Epistemic Authority?” Scientometrics 60 (3):399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, Carl T., and Lachmann, Michael. 2003. “The Red King Effect: When the Slowest Runner Wins the Coevolutionary Race.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (2):593–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Kenneth George. 1998. Game Theory and the Social Contract: Just Playing, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bol, Thijs, de Vaan, Mathijs, and van de Rijt, Arnout. 2018. “The Matthew Effect in Science Funding.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (19):4887–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Justin P. 2019. “Minority (Dis)Advantage in Population Games. Synthese 196 (1):413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauset, Aaron, Arbesman, Samuel, and Larremore, Daniel B.. 2015. “Systematic Inequality and Hierarchy in Faculty Hiring Networks.” Science Advances 1 (1):e1400005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Carmen, Alejandro, and Bing, Robert L.. 2000. “Academic Productivity of African Americans in Criminology and Criminal Justice.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 11 (2):237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Wen-Bo, Zheng, Hao-Ran, and Hu, Mao-Bin. 2008. “Evolutionary Prisoner’s Dilemma Game on Weighted Scale-Free Networks.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 387 (14):3796–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldon, David F., James Peugh, Michelle A. Maher, Josipa Roksa, and Tofel-Grehl, Colby. 2017. “Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 16 (1):ar4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbidon, Shaun L., Taylor Greene, Helen, and Wilder, Kideste. 2004. “Still Excluded? An Update on the Status of African American Scholars in the Discipline of Criminology and Criminal Justice.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 41 (4):384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graczyk, Piotr P. 2007. “Gini Coefficient: A New Way to Express Selectivity of Kinase Inhibitors against a Family of Kinases.” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 50 (23):5773–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Shin-Kap. 2003. “Tribal Regimes in Academia: A Comparative Analysis of Market Structure across Disciplines.” Social Networks 25 (3):251–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, Dorte. 2016. “The Rise in Co-Authorship in the Social Sciences (1980–2013).” Scientometrics 107 (2):455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Bennett, and Bruner, Justin. 2017. “Experimentation by Industrial Selection.” Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1008–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Allison L., Jawitz, James W., McCarty, Christopher, Goldman, Alex, and Basu, Nandita B.. 2013. “Disparities in Publication Patterns by Gender, Race and Ethnicity Based on a Survey of a Random Sample of Authors.” Scientometrics 96 (2):515–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1990. “The Division of Cognitive Labor.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummerfeld, E., and Zollman, K. J.. 2015. “Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1057–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langel, Matti, and Tillé, Yves. 2013. “Variance Estimation of the Gini Index: Revisiting a Result Several Times Published.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176 (2):521–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larivière, Vincent, Chaoqun Ni, Yves Gingras, Cronin, Blaise, and Sugimoto, Cassidy R.. 2013. “Bibliometrics: Global Gender Disparities in Science.” Nature News 504 (7479):211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Sooho, and Bozeman, Barry. 2005. “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5):673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leskovec, Jure, Kleinberg, Jon, and Faloutsos, Christos. 2007. “Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters.” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 1 (1):article 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, David. 2003. “The Emergent Properties of a Dolphin Social Network.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270 (suppl. 2):S186–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, Carlo, and Fernández Pinto, Manuela. 2017. “Modeling the Social Organization of Science.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAvoy, Alex, Allen, Benjamin, and Nowak, Martin A.. 2020. “Social Goods Dilemmas in Heterogeneous Societies.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (8):819–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melin, Göran, and Persson, Olle. 1996. “Studying Research Collaboration Using Co-Authorships.” Scientometrics 36 (3):363–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science Are Considered.” Science 159 (3810):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohseni, Aydin, O’Connor, Cailin, and Rubin, Hannah. 2019. “On the Emergence of Minority Disadvantage: Testing the Cultural Red King Hypothesis.” Synthese 198 (6):5599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, John F. Jr. 1950. “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18 (2):155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Mark E. J. 2001. “The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2):404–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Mark E. J. 2004. “Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (suppl. 1):5200–5205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Mathias Wullum, and Peter Andersen, Jens. 2021. “Global Citation Inequality Is on the Rise.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (7):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Cailin. 2017. “The Cultural Red King Effect.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 41 (3):155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Cailin. 2019. The Origins of Unfairness: Social Categories and Cultural Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Cailin, Kofi Bright, Liam, and Bruner, Justin P.. 2019. “The Emergence of Intersectional Disadvantage.” Social Epistemology 33 (1):23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Cailin, and Bruner, Justin. 2019. “Dynamics and Diversity in Epistemic Communities.” Erkenntnis 84 (1):101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Alexander Michael, Santo Fortunato, Raj K. Pan, Kimmo Kaski, Orion Penner, Armando Rungi, Massimo Riccaboni, H. Eugene Stanley, and Fabio Pammolli. 2014. “Reputation and Impact in Academic Careers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (43):15316–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenstock, Sarita, Bruner, Justin, and O’Connor, Cailin. 2017. “In Epistemic Networks, Is Less Really More?” Philosophy of Science 84 (2):234–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Hannah, and O’Connor, Cailin. 2018. “Discrimination and Collaboration in Science.” Philosophy of Science 85 (3):380–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Francisco C., Pacheco, Jorge M., and Lenaerts, Tom. 2006. “Evolutionary Dynamics of Social Dilemmas in Structured Heterogeneous Populations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (9):3490–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, Francisco C., Santos, Marta D., and Pacheco, Jorge M.. 2008. “Social Diversity Promotes the Emergence of Cooperation in Public Goods Games.” Nature 454 (7201):213–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skyrms, Brian. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, Brian, and Zollman, Kevin J. S.. 2010. “Evolutionary Considerations in the Framing of Social Norms.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 9 (3):265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, James Owen, O’Connor, Cailin, and Bruner, Justin P.. 2020. “How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1157–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Michael, and Muldoon, Ryan. 2009. “Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Philosophy of Science 76 (2):225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Jevin D., Jennifer Jacquet, Molly M. King, Shelley J. Correll, and Carl T. Bergstrom. 2013. “The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship.” PloS One 8(7):e66212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittebolle, Lieven, Massimo Marzorati, Lieven Clement, Annalisa Balloi, Daniele Daffonchio, Kim Heylen, Paul De Vos, Verstraete, Willy, and Boon, Nico. 2009. “Initial Community Evenness Favours Functionality under Selective Stress.” Nature 458 (7238):623–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witteman, Holly O., Hendricks, Michael, Straus, Sharon, and Tannenbaum, Cara. 2019. “Are Gender Gaps Due to Evaluations of the Applicant or the Science? A Natural Experiment at a National Funding Agency.” The Lancet 393 (10171):531–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, K. Brad. 2002. “The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research.” Philosophy of Science 69 (1):150–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2007. “The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy of Science 74 (5):574–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollman, Kevin J. S. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity." Erkenntnis 72 (1):17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar