We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In Chapter 4, I explore the concept of local ownership advanced in the project plans and argue that divergent perspectives of value and ownership among actors were at the heart of sustainability challenges. The Millennium Challenge Corporation sought to inspire community ownership through participation, voluntary management, and payment for water. Tensions with its neoliberal and community development approach skewed the balance of rights and responsibilities maintained by water users at rivers and wells. The project brought communities new burdens and also restricted their rights and control over the water. Likewise, the district government offices were tasked with maintaining the pumps over the long term, yet they were not consulted during the planning stages and had minimal capacity and resources. The rural water project focused on the legal/economic layers of property rights while ignoring the social practices, ideologies, and social relations that shaped the way people related to water in Nampula. The project’s attempts to commodify water were mediated by social relations in the community; water payments created conflicts between certain groups, inspired suspicion and distrust, and led to the breakdown of the water committees.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.