Darwin’s theory of sexual selection has presented queer and trans theorists with a number of stumbling blocks, in that it centers heterosexual reproduction orchestrated between aggressive males and coy females. Some critics have suggested rectifying this problem by imagining sexual selection only with the pursuit of pleasure and aesthetics. But because it severs sexual selection from the “economy of nature,” this split is not able to offer a robust theory of how sexual object choices come into being or circulate. This chapter suggests that Darwin’s thinking about domestication may prove more useful for queer theory because it encompasses criteria pertinent to both sexual and natural selection and entails theorizing how it is that aesthetic criteria matter within the economy of a world in which an organism finds itself.

In 1991, I argued that, “The Puritan patrimony has exacted a heavy toll on men, a fact borne out by our present ‘crisis in masculinity,’” which second wave feminists identified as the existence of “a rape culture” in the United States. A contributing factor was the narrative of religious conversion innovated by early New England Puritanism, which required believers to become spiritual “brides of Christ” in order to be saved. This devotional rhetoric not only colored Puritan poetry but indicated deeply held attitudes about spirituality, embodied gender, and social power, which shaped subsequent US poetry. In this chapter, I revisit and update these claims in the light of trans theory, reread poetry on spiritual gender by Anne Bradstreet and Edward Taylor, early New England’s two major poets; and conclude with a discussion of Emily Dickinson, who was raised in a Puritan culture but makes irreverent, even subversive, use of this legacy.