Dose-response experiments were designed to determine the dosage of somatostatin (SRIF) necessary to alter serum growth hormone (GH) response to administration of GH-releasing factor (1·44; GRF) in cattle. The objective of this experimentation was to develop a GRF/SRIF challenge model that might be useful in early identification of animals which are genetically superior for milk production traits. In experiment 1, calves received either 0, 5 or 10 /JLg GRF per 100 kg body weight (BW) or GRF 1·29 at 1 ug per 100 kg BW. Both the 5 and 10 ug GRF per 100 kg BW dosages increased GH concentrations (P < 0·05). In experiment 2, animals received 3 ug GRF per 100 kg BW concurrent with administration of 0, 0·5, 1 or 2 ug SRIF per 100 kg BW at 0 min, with second dosage of GRF at +120 min. Administration of SRIF in those dosages did not alter GH response to GRF. In experiment 3, animals received 5 ug SRIF per 100 kg BW at -2, -1, 0 or +1 min relative to 3 ug GRF per 100 kg BW, with a second GRF injection at +120 min. No differences (P < 0·05) were found in response due to timing of SRIF administration. In experiment 4, animals were administered 0, 5, 10 or 20 Xg SRIF per 100 kg BW concurrent with 3 ug GRF per 100 kg BW. SRIF delayed (P < 0·05) the occurrence of maximum GH concentrations but did not affect the maximum concentration nor the area under the GH response curve (AUC) following either the first or second GRF injection. Utilizing data from experiment 4, individual animal response to GRF was reasonably consistent, as repeatabilities of AUCs for 1 h following first and second GRF injections were 0·80 and 0·65, respectively. Furthermore, sufficient among-animal variation existed so that animals could be distinguished from each other. Thus we conclude the method described herein might be useful in identifying superior dairy calves but accuracy would potentially be enhanced by collecting blood samples more frequently during the 20 min immediately after GRF injection.

The effect of active immunization against somatostatin and β-agonist administration alone and in combination on growth, carcass composition and endocrine responses was investigated in young steers given a pelleted diet of dried grass and barley (0·7: 0·3) ad libitum for 16 weeks. Immunization alone increased growth rate by proportionately 0·10 but had no effect on plasma growth hormone (GH) or insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations (P > 0·10). Carcass protein content was unchanged but fat content tended to be increased. This was possibly associated with increased (P < 0·10) plasma insulin concentrations observed in these animals. Cimaterol administration significantly increased growth rate (P < 0·05) and carcass weight (P < 0·01). Carcass protein content was significantly (P < 0·01) increased and carcass fat was significantly (P < 0·001) reduced. Administration of cimaterol to immunized animals resulted in an enhancement of the repartitioning effect of the pagonist although growth rates were intermediate between the separate treatments. The mechanism by which this was achieved is unclear. Plasma IGF-1 concentrations tended (P < 0·10) to be lower in these animals compared with controls. Plasma insulin concentrations were also reduced (P < 0·05) in these animals. Both immunized animals and those given cimaterol alone showed an increased GH response to a single intravenous injection of growth hormone releasing factor (GRF) (P < 0·05). Animals given the combined treatment however showed a reduced response suggesting that the effects were not mediated through direct changes in GH secretion. The improved lean:fat ratio in the carcass was observed to be mediated through an enhancement of the lipolytic response to the /J-agonist with only small effects on protein accretion. It is suggested that immunoneutralization of somatostatin may increase the sensitivity of adipose tissue to lipolytic stimuli. This could occur through changes in the secretion of gastrointestinal or pancreatic hormones as a result of neutralization of the inhibitory influences of somatostatin. Further work is required to clarify these effects.