Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 17 - Selectivity in International Criminal Law

  • from Part III - Consequences for the Practice of the International Criminal Court
  • Edited by Florian Jeßberger, Universität Hamburg, Julia Geneuss, Universität Hamburg
  • Book:
    Why Punish Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities?
    Published online:
    07 February 2020
    Print publication:
    20 February 2020, pp 305-322

  • Summary

    Harmen van der Wilt explains the ICC’s and the Rome Statute’s ‘design selectivity’, i.e., the ICC’s legal, structural and political limitations and well as its inherent selectivity when selecting ‘situations’ and ‘cases’. He analyzes how the problem of selectivity in international criminal law, i.e., the systematical exemption of entire categories of perpetrators from accountability, creates tensions with traditional theories of punishment. In emphasizing the shift from punishment to trial, he argues that international criminal law’s inherent selectivity can best be processed by expressivism. However, contemporary international criminal law, he concludes, conveys the ‘perverse message’ that ‘criminal responsibility depends on the party or nation one belongs to and the side on which one fights’. For the future, he calls for an approach of ‘dauntless perseverance’.