Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 5 - Survey and Interview Methods

  • from Part II - Observational Approaches
  • Edited by Aidan G. C. Wright, University of Pittsburgh, Michael N. Hallquist, Pennsylvania State University
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology
    Published online:
    23 March 2020
    Print publication:
    02 April 2020, pp 45-53

  • Summary

    Survey and interview methods form the basis of a vast amount of the literature in clinical psychology. After all, the easiest way to infer and measure a psychological state is often to ask the person to report it directly. The chapter discusses the pros and cons of the survey/interview methods and highlights those questions for which they are well-suited, as well as those for which they are not. Although falling under the same broad umbrella, survey and interview methods are further differentiated and suggestions made as to how a researcher might choose among them. Finally, recommend are made of best practices for instrument development and a series of decision points in creating a measure within these formats are outlined.