We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines the historical development and cultural significance of what has become known as “extreme violence” in western cinema: the visual depiction of violent action and its physical effects in a way that is particularly explicit when compared with cinematic norms and therefore more impactful. While there are myriad ways in which screen violence could be considered extreme, the three primary elements that usually come into play are: (1) visual—the explicit detail of physical bodily damage, often achieved through close-ups and detailed make-up special effects; (2) temporal—an uncomfortable duration in which the violence is held on screen for a period of time longer than would typically be considered narratively important; and (3) emotional—intense depiction of suffering and pain, often through close-ups of the human face in agony and the sounds of screaming. Throughout the history of western cinema various films have achieved levels of violence considered to be “extreme,” although not all of those films are still defined as such, having been surpassed by even more extreme levels of violence in contemporary filmmaking. How those definitions have changed tells us much about the interrelationships of social and political sensibilities, changing ethics, and the ever-evolving aesthetics of western filmmaking.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.