We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 2 deals with the rituals of penance and reconciliation. These took two main forms: the ritual of public penance prescribed by the church courts for the readmission of excommunicated persons, and the more informal rituals of reconciliation in which individuals settled interpersonal conflicts and disagreements. Public penance has often been neglected by historians of the English Reformation, who have tended to echo the complaints of puritan critics that it fell short of a fully reformed system of discipline. Yet it deserves more attention as one of the few religious rituals in which the laity, rather than the clergy, took the leading role. This chapter argues that it was flexible and effective and that it resembled, more closely than has generally been realised, the consistorial system used in the Scottish and Continental Reformed churches. It also argues that penance and reconciliation were performative rituals which depended for their validity as much on gestures as on words. They were social interactions, in which an apology had to be both offered and accepted in order for the reconciliation to take effect, and in which the body language of the penitent was closely scrutinised for signs of genuine remorse.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.