Womens participation in the public sphere was constrained in various ways, even in liberal circles. Anne Thompson (wife of George Thompson), in conjunction with her teenage daughters and African American freedom seekers, engineered an intervention at the Great Exhibition that creatively silenced anti-abolitionists within a social space. After Louisa and Amelia Thompson married and pursued activist and writing careers, they built on such experiences in ways that represent their astute perception of performative dramatugy and ways to strategically intervene in social politics. In Amelia Chessons work life and marriage, this led to a career as the first female performance critic for a British daily newspaper. She honed her ability to describe not only theatre and music performances but also the entire mise-en-scène of complex events. Extensively networked through her own and her familys activist connections, her work as a journalist, political organiser, friend of fellow abolitionists, and matrixed liberal subject reveals a complex reformulation of how the public and private realms have been previously understood.

While the institution of private property is a central institution of the liberal state, the role of the state is necessarily, and paradoxically, de-centered in accounts of liberal property law. The rhetorical power of ownership relies on the de-politicization of property rights, positioning the question of entitlements and the protection of the status quo of private property above, or prior to, the law. In periods of relative stability the relationships between private property, political ideologies, state legitimacy and authority are relegated from the “public realm” of political and legal debate to the “private sphere” of interpersonal relations between individuals. Indeed, the resilience of the liberal state is rooted in the taken-for-granted assumption that private property rights (as defined by the dominant narrative) will, and must, be upheld. However, in an age of crisis, “settled” liberal nation states, including the USA and the UK, economic setbacks, social movement protests, and civil unrest, have called into question the relationships between property relations, on the one hand, and the authority and legitimacy of state actions and institutions, on the other. This chapter explains how “Resilient Property” approach and methodology focuses directly on state action in responding to property problems, particularly in moments of crisis.