Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Conclusion

  • Fabien Montcher, Saint Louis University, Missouri
  • Book:
    Mercenaries of Knowledge
    Published online:
    14 September 2023
    Print publication:
    28 September 2023, pp 268-284

  • Summary

    Did the death of Vicente Nogueira in 1654 mark a turning point between a century of improvisation and a new age of absolutism? Scholars have often characterized the mid-seventeenth century as just such a radical change. Yet, when considering the contributions that mercenaries of knowledge made to the intellectual and political life of Late Renaissance and Baroque international relations, characterizing such a transition in stark terms becomes impossible. This final chapter uses three expressions of Nogueira’s memory to tell the story of Nogueira the plotter, who dabbled in scandals at the Roman curia in the early 1650s among Portuguese circles interested in defending oppressed religious minorities and same-sex emotional communities against the Portuguese Inquisition. Like many other mercenaries of knowledge, Nogueira took extreme care throughout his life to present himself as a pious and virtuous man despite being an inveterate nonconformist. Such positions were not incompatible. In fact, ambivalence was the key to navigating an age of improvisation and doubts which was here to stay.