Search

Detailed analysis of the expression ‘things in general and in themselves’ reveals two further uses of ‘noumenon’ (and ‘thing in itself’) in addition to the ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ senses distinguished by Kant himself. It follows (pace various ‘reductive’ interpretations) that Kant’s transcendental distinction comprises four different contrasts. On a new resolution of the long-running ‘one or two objects?’ dispute, there follows a complete re-interpretation of Kant’s transcendental distinction as a meta-metaphysical thought experiment. It has the ‘metaphysical density’ necessary to forestall charges of ‘innocuousness’ without giving purchase to the well-known objections that have dogged Kant’s transcendental distinction from its inception.

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

1 results

Much Ado about ‘Something (Etwas)’: ‘Noumenon’, ‘Thing in Itself’, and ‘Transcendental Distinction’ in Kant’s Meta-metaphysical Thought Experiment

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

1 results

Much Ado about ‘Something (Etwas)’: ‘Noumenon’, ‘Thing in Itself’, and ‘Transcendental Distinction’ in Kant’s Meta-metaphysical Thought Experiment