Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 4 - Proposing a New Type of Definition

  • from Part II - The Nature of Trust
  • Markus Wolfensberger, Universität Basel, Switzerland, Anthony Wrigley, Keele University
  • Book:
    Trust in Medicine
    Published online:
    19 August 2019
    Print publication:
    22 August 2019, pp 31-38

  • Summary

    In the previous chapter, the authors argued that there is no (and possibly cannot be a) comprehensive analytic definition of ‘trust’. In this chapter they claim that even if there is no comprehensive analytic definition of a term ‘X’, we can often recognise and understand ‘X’, and that one way of doing this is by recognising the pattern of characteristic features (or ‘family resemblance’) common to different examples of ‘X’. Moreover, they argue that whereas in a definition based on necessary conditions all conditions must be met, in a pattern-based definition not all features are essential, i.e., it may still be ‘X’ if not all features of the pattern of ‘X’ are present, but the better a case fits the pattern, the more likely it is ‘X’. Not only does this approach cohere well with approaches to medical diagnosis, but as a means of approaching how to provide a definition for a disputed term it is also philosophically underpinned by the work of Frank Jackson and Ludwig Wittgenstein.