We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter explores the different types of illicit and informal economy in the two migrant communities and examines why and how Sanhe gods get involved in the gray economy. It also discusses state intervention in the communities through surveillance, raids, and compaigns as well as through gentrification projects. It ends with a discussion on Sanhe gods’ friendships in the community.
The late Samuel Huntington publicized the idea of a clash of cultures between the West and the rest. The idea of an irreducible clash has been absorbed into our angry political discourse, often conducted under the banner of “multiculturalism” pro and con. The central issue, the author writes, is how should persons with liberal views on social issues like gender equality and sexual identity and with cosmopolitan sympathies relate to groups, both native and migrant, embracing illiberal norms and practices and seeing the world through sectarian or xenophobic lenses. Should the issue be restated as: What are the proper limits of liberal tolerance? Or do liberal norms require adherents to view cultures as standing on a level plane and to accept the idea of national societies as cultural archipelagos, the position urged by Chandran Kukathas and in a more qualified way by Will Kymlicka? Can societies remain peaceful and democratic if they lack what Michael Walzer calls a common moral standpoint? The chapter explores the possible constituents of such a standpoint and illuminates the considerable overlap in values between liberal multiculturalists like Bhikhu Parekh and classical liberals like Brian Barry.
This chapter discusses Filipina/o American literature, which speak of the vexed history of Filipino migration to the United States. The circumstances of Filipina and Filipino literary production in the early twentieth century were transpacific, influenced by the occupation of the Philippines and U.S. imperial history, and by factors that range from the social and cultural to the aesthetic and representational: public discourse surrounding Filipina/o bodies in the United States, the intersection of the Filipina feminist movement with global women's suffrage, shifting notions of gender and sexuality, and experiments in literary form. Developments in Filipina transpacific feminism are conversant with, and contribute to, literary engagements with male migrant and exilic experience. The chapter deals with the works of Felicidad Ocampo, José Garcia Villa and Carlos Blouson, and others such as Bienvenido N. Santos and Yay Panlilio who highlight the gendered and classed dimensions of forming national communities in the postwar era.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.