Introduction: It is unclear whether anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications increase the risk for intracranial bleeding in older adults after a fall. Our aim was to report the incidence of intracranial bleeding among older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a fall, among patients taking anticoagulants, antiplatelet medications, both medications and neither medication. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis, PROSPERO reference CRD42019122626. Medline, EMBASE (via OVID 1946 - July 2019), Cochrane, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects databases and the grey literature were searched for studies reporting on older adults who were evaluated after a fall. We included prospective studies conducted in the ED where more than 80% of the cohort were 65 years or older and had fallen. We contacted study authors for aggregate data on intracranial bleeding in patients prescribed anticoagulant medication, antiplatelet medication and neither medication. Incidences of intracranial bleeding were pooled using random effect models, and I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: From 7,240 publication titles, 10 studies met inclusion criteria. The authors of 8 of these 10 studies provided data (on 9,489 patients). All studies scored low or moderate risk of bias. The pooled incidence of intracranial bleeding among patients taking an anticoagulant medication was 5.1% (n = 5,016, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.1 to 6.3%) I2 = 42%, a single antiplatelet 6.4% (n = 2,148, 95% CI: 5.4 to 7.6%) I2 = 75%, both anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications 5.9% (n = 212, 95% CI: 1.3 to 13.5%) I2 = 72%, and neither of these medications 4.8% (n = 1,927, 95% CI: 3.5 to 6.2%) I2 = 50%. A sensitivity analysis restricted to patients who had a head CT in the ED reported incidences of 6.1% (n = 3,561, 95% CI: 3 to 8.3%), 8.4% (n = 1,781, 95% CI: 5.5 to 11.8%), 6.7% (n = 206, 95% CI 1.5 to 15.2%) and 6.6% (n = 1,310, 95% CI: 5.0 to 8.4%) respectively. Conclusion: The incidence of fall-related intracranial bleeding in older ED patients was similar among patients who take anticoagulant medication, antiplatelet medication, both and neither medication, although there was heterogeneity between study findings.

Introduction: Participant interviews are often considered the ‘gold standard’ for measuring outcomes in diagnostic and prognostic studies. Participant exposure data are frequently collected during study interviews, but the reliability of this information often remains unknown. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported medication exposures and outcomes to data extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) to determine reliability. Methods: This was a secondary data analysis from a prospective observational cohort study enrolling older (≥ 65 years) patients who presented to one of three emergency departments after a fall. After patients had consented to participate in the study, they were asked about their use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation medications (exposures of interest). During follow up, participants were asked if a physician had told them they had bleeding in their head (diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage). Patient-reported responses were compared to data extracted from a structured EMR review. Trained research assistants extracted medication exposure and outcome data from the hospital EMRs in duplicate for all visits to any hospital within 42 days. Inter-rater agreement was estimated using Cohen's kappa (K) statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 1275 patients completed study interviews. 1163 (91%) responded to questioning about antiplatelet use and 1159 (91%) to anticoagulant use. Exact agreement between patient reported antiplatelet use compared to EMR review was 77%, with K = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.44 to 0.55). For anticoagulation use, exact agreement was 87%, with K = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.72). 986 (78%) patients had a follow up interview after 42 days. Exact agreement between patient reported intracranial bleeding and EMR review was 95%, with K = 0.30 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.45). Using the EMR review as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of patient reported intracranial bleeding was 34% (95% CI: 20 to 52%) and 97% (95% CI: 96 to 98%), respectively. Conclusion: In this population of older adults who presented to the ED after a fall, patient reported use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications was not a reliable method to identify medication use. Patients who were diagnosed with intracranial bleeding were particularly poor at reporting this diagnosis.

Introduction: Falls are a common presentation to the emergency department among geriatric patients. The incidence of intracranial bleeding following a fall is unclear and approach to ordering a CT head scan is not standardized. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish the incidence of intracranial bleeding after a fall in geriatric patients. Methods: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. Two authors independently searched Medline and EMBASE (OVID interface) from conception till 20th June 2018. The search combined multiple MESH terms and text words for [falls], [elderly] and [brain injury]. The search was repeated in Google Scholar and recent conference abstracts were reviewed. Studies were included if > 80% of the included patients were > 65 years who presented to the emergency department after a fall on level ground. We excluded studies enrolling select populations (for example trauma team activation, neurosurgical patients or only anticoagulated patients). There were no language restrictions. The random effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis on the incidence of intracranial bleeding in geriatric patients after a fall on level ground. Results: From the 7,043 titles and abstracts, 175 full articles were reviewed and 7 studies, including 6758 patients, were included in the analysis. 2/7 studies were prospective. The studies varied in their inclusion criteria with 3/7 studies only including patients with normal neurological testing. Most retrospective studies included patients if they had a CT head scan. Neither prospective study imaged all patients but both followed the patients for a delayed diagnosis of intracranial bleeding. Risk of bias was moderate or high for the majority of studies. The random effects pooled incidence of intracranial bleeding was 5.2% (95% CI 2.8 – 8.2%), I2 96%. Conclusion: Around 1 in 20 geriatric patients who present to the emergency department after a fall have intracranial bleeding. This point estimate can be used to calculate sample size requirements for future studies on intracranial bleeding in this population.