We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter employs concepts of liminality, uncertainty, and precarity to analyze mismatches between the lives of immigrants and the forms of deservingness acknowledged in US immigration policy. In the current atmosphere of heightened enforcement, “deservingness” has been defined in a constrained fashion that privileges sacrifice, achievement, personal responsibility, and law abidingness and that ignores the structural conditions that shape immigrants’ lives. Educational pursuits are particularly fraught, as schooling is a protected space and life stage, yet is also shaped by economic disadvantage, immigration enforcement, and racial and ethnic disparities. The chapter draws on two sets of data: (1) interviews conducted between 2006 and 2010 with fifty young adults who immigrated to the United States as children and (2) interviews carried out between 2014 and 2017 with Latinx and Asian and Pacific Islander immigrants who either had DACA or who had hoped to apply for deferred action through programs that were never implemented. This material demonstrates the ways that structural conditions impact educational opportunities as well as the resourceful strategies through which interviewees, their families, and some educators pushed back against these forces to nonetheless pursue educational goals.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.