Effective governance is necessary in a successful constitutional democracy. This is not to deny that a central animating force in a democracy must be respect for the human individual. But a government that is not effective and seen as such is not likely to be able to protect individual rights. It is thus a mistake to conceptualize individual rights simply as in conflict with the collective goals of a democratic government: those goals are effective governance and rights preservation, and – in a democracy – these two are connected.

The framers of the US Constitution well understood that a constitutional state must act for public-regarding purposes – to “establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty.” To the extent that it fails to move in these directions, government will lose the confidence of the people. Effective government in constitutional democracies requires effective legislatures to promote all of these purposes.

Tracing the background and origins of common concern of humankind, this chapter elaborates the legal framework and normative components of a future principle of Common Concern of Humankind. While its contours have remained vague and undetermined so far, we suggest that a future principle could emerge in a process of claims and responses, consisting of essentially three dimensions. Problems actually or potentially posing a threat to international peace and stability - and thus in need to be addressed - entail obligations to consult and cooperate, beyond current disciplines of general public international law. It entails obligations to implement international obligations and commitments, in addition to domestic law which in the field, may deploy extraterritorial effects in addressing the shared problem at hand. Finally, the principle obliges states to act and take countermeasures, subject to proportionality, in response to free-riding and evasive states. The principle of Common Concern is not limited to international law, but may also deploy comparable effects within states and federations in addressing pressing shared problems. It has the potential to become an important building block of transnational federalism and multi-level governance and to assist restructuring different areas of public international law seeking greater cooperation and commitments in addressing pressing and shared regulatory needs.