A common feature of many pollutant exposure studies is that data
from these
experiments often consist of either
plant biomass or yield, and the response to the pollutant is usually based
on a simple comparison of means
determined at the end of each growing season. This type of data is now
being used to quantify critical levels for
different types of vegetation. Such an approach is, however, inappropriate
for the relatively short-term exposure
studies with trees since, due to their longevity, it is not possible to
determine a final yield. Instead these studies
should be regarded as a type of intervention experiment in which only a
small part of the life cycle of the tree is
investigated. Moreover, critical levels as they are now defined focus on
the cumulative exposure to ozone
concentrations over time. Hence, any analysis of the effects of ozone on
the growth of trees should similarly focus
on the behaviour of growth functions over time and not on a comparison
of
biomass at the end of a growing season or experiment.
Here we report on the statistical analysis of a longitudinal study,
where the term ‘longitudinal’ refers to the
analysis of repeated measurements over time, and which was used to
investigate relative differences in the growth
of Sitka spruce and Norway spruce seedlings during three summers'
exposure to ozone over three (Norway) or
four (Sitka) growing seasons. Measurements of total seedling height and
stem diameter were made at frequent
intervals over the period of the experiment and the above-ground growth
of
individual trees (as log d2h) analysed
for each growing season using a statistical model of the form:
m(t)=a+b(t−t0).
No statistically significant
differences in the growth of Norway spruce were observed after three
summers of ozone exposure. The growth
of Sitka spruce was, however, reduced by ozone during the third growing
season and in the following year, even in the absence of the pollutant.
For the Sitka spruce, the fitted model was used to calculate the
time at which a 10% reduction in growth had
occurred in the ozone-exposed trees. In combination with ozone AOT40
indices for the relevant growing seasons,
this was then used to determine a critical level of 21·3 ppm-h for
this species. Since the growth of the Norway
spruce was unaffected by exposure to ozone it was not possible to
calculate a critical level other than to surmise
that it is in excess of 30 ppm-h.