We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides a brief account of political appointments in the South Korean government, with a particular attention to presidential appointments. We also demonstrate why appointments of cabinet ministers warrant further scholarly attention. Then, we assess presidential appointments of ministers in an empirical manner. In the analytical section of the chapter, we first describe in detail how we have constructed a novel dataset. In presenting the analysis results, we first describe major demographic characteristics of the country’s past cabinet ministers and illustrate their major career paths prior to their ministerial appointments. We also categorize the past appointments into the six types of political patronage per Peters’ typology. Our findings reveal that, in South Korea, programmatic technocrats are the dominant group of presidential appointees regardless of regime and ministry. Among those programmatic technocrats, nearly half are former bureaucrats. Our findings also suggest that, while the vast majority of the South Korean ministers are programmatic technocrats, there are some notable differences across regimes and ministries.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.