The chapter examines the relevance of (international) human rights law for international arbitration. It advances the proposition that (international) human rights law is part of the fabric of international arbitration. Hence the chapter sets out firstly thehuman rights norms and human rights methodology as far it is relevant in the international arbitration context. It then discusses human rights as the means to justify the existence of international arbitration. In its main part, the chapter considers the relevant human rights norms in commercial and investment arbitration and discusses the application of international human rights law in the commercial and investment arbitration context.

This chapter synthesises the broad picture that emerges from Irish constitutional proeprty law about the mediation of property rights and social justice, and about the impact of progressively framed constitutional property guarantees on that mediation. It highlights the rewards for progressive property theory of doctrinal analysis and a wider comparative lens. Most fundamentally, it emphasises the political nature of constitutional property law in two ways. FIrst, judges gravitate away from innovative interpretation and application of ideas like social justice towards deference to the determinations of the elected branches of government. Second, constitutional property law can have political, and wider cultural effects, that do not reflect the strict legal effect of constitutional property rights as reflected in doctrine. It concludes that Irish constitutional property law demonstrates the challenges of implementing progressive property ideas in legal doctrine, but at the same time provides an illuminating example of a broadly coherent and effective attempt to implement a progressive constitutional structure for achieving partial resolutions of the tension betwene property rights and social justice.