We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Throughout the post-war decades, archipelagic states such as Indonesia and the Philippines, given impetus by the Fisheries decision, stressed the organic relationship between land and sea within an archipelago – an approach in marked contrast to the existing law’s terrestrial orientation. This relationship was presented as grounds for specific claims to archipelagic waters enclosed within straight baselines. The concept was subject to various challenges: from outright opponents who resented archipelagic encroachments on the high seas and the seabed; from continental states with outlying archipelagos who wished to claim the same rights as mid-ocean archipelagos; and from the maritime powers, who wished to safeguard unimpeded passage through other states’ archipelagic waters. In the event, the United States made recognition of the concept conditional on the acceptance of archipelagic sea lanes, within which transiting vessels would enjoy extensive rights unfettered by archipelagic state control.
Internal waters, the territorial sea, international straits and archipelagic waters are marine spaces under the territorial sovereignty of the coastal State. However, the use of the marine environment for sea communication necessitates the freedom of navigation through those spaces. Consequently, marine spaces under territorial sovereignty are part of the territory of the coastal State and the highway for sea communication at the same time. The dual nature of marine spaces gives rise to the fundamental question of how it is possible to reconcile the territorial sovereignty of the coastal State and the freedom of navigation. With that question as a backdrop, this chapter will examine the following issues in particular: (1) the coastal States jurisdiction over foreign vessels in internal waters, (2) refuge for ships in distress, (3) the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea, (4) the legal regime of international straits, (5) the legal regime of archipelagic waters, and (6) the differences between the right of innocent passage, the right of transit passage and the right of archipelagic sea lane passage.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.