The discontinuities of phase-shifted abutting line gratings give rise
to perception of an “illusory contour” (IC) along the line
terminations. Neuronal responses to such ICs have been interpreted as
evidence for a specialized visual mechanism, since such responses cannot
be predicted from conventional linear receptive fields. However, when the
spatial scale of the component gratings (carriers) is large compared to
the neuron's luminance passband, these IC responses might be evoked
simply by the luminance edges at the line terminations. Thus by presenting
abutting gratings at a series of carrier spatial scales to cat A18
neurons, we were able to distinguish genuine nonlinear responses from
those due to luminance edges. Around half of the neurons (both simple and
complex types) showed a bimodal response pattern to abutting gratings: one
peak at a low carrier spatial frequency range that overlapped with the
luminance passband, and a second distinct peak at much higher frequencies
beyond the neuron's grating resolution. For those bimodally
responding neurons, the low-frequency responses were sensitive to carrier
phase, but the high-frequency responses were phase-invariant. Thus the
responses at low carrier spatial frequencies could be understood
via a linear model, while the higher frequency responses
represented genuine nonlinear IC processing. IC responsive neurons also
demonstrated somewhat lower spatial preference to the periodic contours
(envelopes) compared to gratings, but the optimal orientation and motion
direction for both were quite similar. The nonlinear responses to ICs
could be explained by the same energy mechanism underlying responses to
second-order stimuli such as contrast-modulated gratings. Similar neuronal
preferences for ICs and for gratings may contribute to the form-cue
invariant perception of moving contours.