The polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB, or hnRNP I) contains four RNA-binding domains of the ribonucleoprotein fold type (RRMs 1, 2, 3, and 4), and mediates the negative regulation of alternative splicing through sequence-specific binding to intronic splicing repressor elements. To assess the roles of individual RRM domains in splicing repression, a neural-specific splicing extract was used to screen for loss-of-function mutations that fail to switch splicing from the neural to nonneural pathway. These results show that three RRMs are sufficient for wild-type RNA binding and splicing repression activity, provided that RRM4 is intact. Surprisingly, the deletion of RRM4, or as few as 12 RRM4 residues, effectively uncouples these functions. Such an uncoupling phenotype is unique to RRM4, and suggests a possible regulatory role for this domain either in mediating specific RNA contacts, and/or contacts with putative splicing corepressors. Evidence of a role for RRM4 in anchoring PTB binding adjacent to the branch site is shown by mobility shift and RNA footprinting assays.

The spliceosomal proteins U1A and U2B′′ each use a homologous RRM domain to bind specifically to their respective snRNA targets, U1hpII and U2hpIV, two stem-loops that are similar yet distinct in sequence. Previous studies have shown that binding of U2B′′ to U2hpIV is facilitated by the ancillary protein U2A′, whereas specific binding of U1A to U1hpII requires no cofactor. Here we report that U2A′ enables U2B′′ to distinguish the loop sequence of U2hpIV from that of U1hpII but plays no role in stem sequence discrimination. Although U2A′ can also promote heterospecific binding of U1A to U2hpIV, a much higher concentration of the ancillary protein is required due to the ∼500-fold greater affinity of U2A′ for U2B′′. Additional experiments have identified a single leucine residue in U1A (Leu-44) that is critical for the intrinsic specificity of this protein for the loop sequence of U1hpII in preference to that of U2hpIV. Our data suggest that most of the difference in RNA-binding specificity between U1A and U2B′′ can be accounted for by this leucine residue and by the contribution of the ancillary protein U2A′ to the specificity of U2B′′.