We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter explores and juxtaposes the discussions of Byzantium and the Byzantine-Ottoman institutional (dis)continuity as well as the evolving attitudes towards cultural material heritage in the late-Ottoman and early Republican Turkish historiography. During the last decades of the Ottoman empire, the presentations of the Byzantine institutions and material heritage and the assessments of their importance for the Ottoman successor were characterised by considerable plurality, compared to the early Republican (Kermalist) period, when the robustly ethnocentric ‘Turkish History Thesis’ came to overpower the Turks’ historical imagination. The influential work of Mehmet Fuat Köprülü, rejecting Byzantine influence on the Ottomans, and his contribution to the Turkification of Ottoman imperial history is discussed.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.