Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • Part III - World War

  • Edited by Jay Winter, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book:
    The Cambridge History of the First World War
    Published online:
    05 December 2013
    Print publication:
    09 January 2014, pp 401-556

  • Summary

    The First World War is a good example of the dialectic of norm, conflict and revision and of the passions and polemics that accompany it. During the war, the habitual charge that the enemy-committed atrocities was translated into charges that could be tried under international law. The norms of warfare in the pre-war period served to judge the escalating violence of the war but also to blame the enemy for the worst transgressions, which occurred in various contexts, war on land, invasions and occupations, the home front, war at sea and war in the air. Land warfare immediately revealed that the protected status of the legitimate combatant, the soldier or sailor who was wounded or taken prisoner, was far from secure. The French accused the Germans of using the Red Cross flag as a ruse in battle and of executing an immense number of wounded soldiers.

  • Portugal v. Germany.

  • Special Arbitral Tribunals. 30 June 1930
  • Journal:
    Annual Digest of Public International Law Cases / Volume 5 / 1936
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 January 2021, pp. 150-152
    Print publication:
    1936

  • Measure of Damages-Acts Authorised and Prohibited by International Law — Requisitions and Pillage — Burden of Proof.

    Evidence — Burden of Proof — Measure of Damages.

    Land Warfare — Requisitions — When Contrary to International Law — Article 52 of Hague Convention No. IV.

    State Responsibility — Basis of — Direct and Indirect — Respect of Private Property — Neutral Property — Requisitions — Article 52 of Hague Convention No. IV — Measure of Damages — Burden of Proof.