A 1965 note by Heidegger makes an unlikely connection with Henry Miller’s famed account of his travels to Greece at the outbreak of World War Two, The Colossus of Maroussi (1941). Heidegger reads this in light of his own “travelogue” of Greece, Sojourns (1962). Comparing the two through the lens of this note shows how both authors attempt what Heidegger calls a “phenomenology of the inapparent,” an attentiveness to what does not show itself in the phenomena at hand, something quite distinct from objective description. The chapter concludes with reflections on Germany’s relation to Greece at this time.

The previous chapters established the centrality and importance of Kant’s theory of magnitudes. Before investigating Kant’s views more deeply, Chapter 6 provides critical background concerning the theory of magnitude, which is rooted in Euclid’s Elements. It describes the organization and deductive structure of the Elements to explain tensions between Euclid’s account of number and continuous spatial magnitude that persisted into the eighteenth century. It then explains the theory of proportions, in particular, the crucial definition of sameness of ratio. It also describes the mathematical nature of the continuous spatial magnitudes implicitly defined by that theory, including their homogeneity. Euclid also covers number and arithmetic and he regards numbers as collections of units. Much of the theory of proportions covers numbers as well as continuous spatial magnitudes, although Euclid gives numbers a separate treatment. This commonality inspired the search for a universal mathematics that covered continuous magnitudes more generally as well as number. The chapter traces the history and development of these themes in the Euclidean mathematical tradition, and describes its influence on three of Kant’s immediate predecessors: Wolff, Kästner, and Euler. It explains why these philosophers and mathematicians regarded mathematics as a science of magnitudes and their measurement.