Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 5 - Shakespeare, Johnson and Philosophy

  • from Part III - Johnson, Dramatic Poetry and Thinking
  • Philip Smallwood, Birmingham City University
  • Book:
    The Literary Criticism of Samuel Johnson
    Published online:
    07 September 2023
    Print publication:
    21 September 2023, pp 93-110

  • Summary

    Johnson found Shakespeare full of truths; but how far Shakespeare thinks philosophically has been debated. This chapter considers how Shakespeare has been considered a thinker in dramatic form. He enacts morals via character and dramatic situation. Johnson generates no philosophical aesthetics. Indeed, his criticism is a counterweight to contemporary analysis of such concepts as the “sublime,” or “genius.” However, he does appreciate the ways in which Shakespeare thinks and the senses in which the plays help us to think rationally about life. Johnson’s praise of Shakespeare as “the poet of nature” forms a contrast with major eighteenth-century philosophers. They did not always think highly of Shakespeare. Yet Kant’s ambition not to “allow my judgement to be determined by a priori proofs” suggests a philosophical analogue for both Pope and Johnson. They were aware that Shakespeare can deliver in the moment an experience that no thought or theory could seem to precede, explain or predict, but that once experienced, appears natural and universal.