We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Farhana Yamin, who advised the Marshall Islands, recounts why and how the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) was formed. Born out of the diplomatic disaster of COP 15 in 2009, where progressive countries had been “stuck in silos within their own coalitions”, the coalition grew in the context of the Cartagena Dialogue (CD) and the Climate Vulnerables Forum and was finally announced as “the HAC” in Paris. Representing a majority of parties, highly vulnerable countries, as well as major emitters, the coalition allowed for a Paris outcome that was more than just the lowest common denominator. Testifying to the HAC’s success, the Agreement came to include key demands of the vulnerable countries that had shaped it, including a temperature goal of 1.5°C. Yamin highlights the role of resources, networks, and relationships, which were formed at informal gatherings such as those in the CD. Assessing the overall HAC experience and impact, Yamin describes the demise of the HAC after COP 21 resulting from the failure of the EU and others to deliver or the election of Trump. She argues that the HAC was a time-bound strategic feature and that “next time there will be a different way of doing it”.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.