We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 11 describes the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework, a landmark public health and benefit sharing agreement that was adopted to address many of the concerns raised in the preceding chapters. Under the PIP Framework regime, companies, universities, and others may still access materials from the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, but many must contribute toward its maintenance and companies especially must promise to provide access to vaccines, medicines, or intellectual property should a pandemic emerge. The authors are representatives of the World Health Organization, and they articulate how the PIP Framework might operate as a lesson for other access and benefit regimes developed under the Nagoya Protocol.
Chapter 2 analyzes how sharing of tissue samples for research and disease surveillance purposes has become urgently important. While it is clear that this is an area of intense, international controversy, there is an absence of data about what researchers themselves and those involved in the transfer of samples think about these issues, particularly in developing countries. This chapter presents results from a survey that was carried out in China, Egypt, India, Japan and the Republic of Korea to explore what researchers and others involved in research, storage and transfer of human tissue samples thought about some of the issues related to sharing of such samples. The results demonstrated broad agreement with the positions taken by developing countries in the current debate, favoring restrictions on the use of samples by researchers in developed countries.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.