We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Scotch whisky industry is centuries-old and steeped in tradition. Indeed, “it has long been used as a symbol of Scottishness” (Baxter, 1985, p. 77). Recently, distillers in other countries have adopted the Scotch whisky process and have successfully imitated single malt Scotch whisky. This chapter will provide a case study of entrepreneurial history in the Scotch whisky market using the framework of Governing Knowledge Commons focusing specifically on the attempts of the entrepreneurs to legitimize their entry into the product category of Scotch. The category of Scotch, especially single-malt Scotch was developed and given credence by a small group of Scottish distillers at considerable cost. These distillers, thus, invested in an exclusionary knowledge commons between the producers and the consumers who value the spirit. On the one hand, Scottish producers understandably want to protect this investment and wish to maintain the quality of this shared resource. On the other hand, the exclusionary nature of this commons serves to restrict access to the shared resource and has limited the amount of innovation allowed. This trade-off between maintenance of and access to the shared resource will be the focus of this chapter.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.