Collective pension schemes are the dominant form of saving for retirement in the Netherlands. We investigate the introduction of individual choices into a collective pension system without affecting the generally accepted advantages of a collective agreement. Increasing individual choices can be beneficial, as it prevents pension plans from making decisions for the average plan participant that may not be optimal for individual participants. We argue for a system in which individuals choose from a set of low-cost balanced index funds, together with a level of intergenerational guarantees that are exchange-traded. This system maintains the two primary advantages of collective agreements: risk sharing and low implementation costs, while facilitating different risk taking behavior at the individual level. To facilitate individual choices within collective pension schemes, it is important to enhance the transparency associated with intergenerational guarantees to all participants in the scheme, both in terms of their price and quantity. We argue that the current system, in which long-term guarantees are given by the young to the old within a specific fund but not across pension funds, is not transparent and we argue that it can be suboptimal. We propose a system of Pension Guarantee Exchanges (PGEs) that increase transparency and allow pension funds with different age distributions to trade with each other. Knowing the price of such guarantees facilitates the introduction of individual portfolio choices within collective pension schemes.

A formal definition of investment risk in actuarial investigations is given. Case studies estimating the investment risk associated with different investment strategies for defined benefit pension funds using historic market data are presented. It is shown that a few decades ago, when bond markets only extended in depth to 20-year maturities, the investment risk of investing in equities was of the same order of magnitude as the investment risk introduced by the duration mismatch from investing in bonds for immature schemes. It is shown that now, with the extension of the term of bond markets and introduction of strippable bonds, the least risk portfolio for the same pension liability is a bond portfolio of suitable duration. It is argued that investment risk voluntarily undertaken in defined benefit pension plans has grown markedly in recent decades, at a time when the ability to bear the investment risk has diminished. Investment risk in pension funds is quite different to investment risk for other investors, which leads to the possibility that current portfolios are not optimised — that is, there exist portfolios which increase the expected surplus without increasing risk. The formalising of our intuitive concept of investment risk in actuarial applications is a first step in the identification of more efficient portfolios.