The second-order visual mechanisms perform the operation of integrating the
spatially distributed local visual information. Their organization is
traditionally considered within the framework of the filter-rectify-filter
model. These are the second-order filters that provide the ability to detect
texture gradients. However, the question of the mechanisms' selectivity to the
modulation dimension remains open. The aim of this investigation is to answer
the above question by using visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Stimuli were
textures consisting of staggered Gabor patches. The base texture was
nonmodulated (NM). Three other textures represented the base texture which was
sinusoidally modulated in different dimensions: contrast, orientation, or
spatial frequency. EEG was recorded with 20 electrodes. VEPs of 500 ms duration
were obtained for each of the four textures. After that, VEP to the NM texture
was subtracted from VEP to each modulated texture. As a result, three different
waves (d-waves) were obtained for each electrode site. Each d-wave was then
averaged across all the 48 observers. The revealed d-waves have a latency of
about 200 ms and, in our opinion, reflect the second-order filters reactivation
through the feedback connection. The d-waves for different modulation dimensions
were compared with each other in time, amplitude, topography, and localization
of the sources of activity that causes the d-wave (with sLORETA). We proceeded
from the assumption that the d-wave (its first component) represents functioning
of the second-order visual mechanisms and activity changes at the following
processing stages. It was found that the d-waves for different modulation
dimensions significantly differ in all parameters. The obtained results indicate
that the spatial modulations of different texture parameters caused specific
changes in the brain activity, which could be evidence supporting the
specificity of the second-order visual mechanisms to modulation dimension.