We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This volume, part of the Feminist Judgment Series, shows how feminist legal theory along with critical race theory and intersectional modes of critique might transform immigration law. Here, a diverse collection of scholars and lawyers bring critical feminist, race and intersectional insights to Supreme Court opinions that deal with the source of the power to regulate immigration, state and local regulation of immigration, citizenship law, racial discrimination, employment law, access to public education, the rights of criminal defendants, the detention of noncitizens, and more. Feminist reasoning values the perspectives of outsiders, exposes the deep-rooted bias in the legal opinions of courts, and illuminates the effects of ostensibly neutral policies that create and maintain oppression and hierarchy. One by one, the chapters in this book reimagine the norms that drive immigration policies and practices. In place of discrimination and subordination, the authors here demand welcome and equality. Where current law omits the voice and stories of noncitizens, the authors here center their lives and experiences. Collectively, they reveal how a feminist vision of immigration law could center a commitment to equality and justice and foster a country where diverse newcomers readily flourish with dignity.
Chinese labor was indispensable in the building of the Canadian Pacific Railroad (1881-1885), but their contemporary memorialization largely frames them in terms of national history. This approach obscures how their lives unfolded in a transnational lifeworld that was formed by the intersecting forces of capitalism, settler colonialism, nationalism, and racialization. This chapter revisits this history as a problem of literary representation by exploring how contemporary texts construct the Chinese railroad worker as what Georg Lukacs called a typical character, a formal device through which to grasp and represent a complex, dynamic social totality. This chapter then turns to a selection of fictional texts by Paul Yee in order to track how this figure enables the author to make sense of the heterogeneous forces that shaped Chinese migration to Canada. While his children’s story “Spirits of the Railway” accords symbolic recognition to Chinese workers who died during the building of the CPR, his young adult novella Blood and Iron explores the intersection between racial capitalism and kinship. Finally, his novel A Superior Man questions the ideology of nation-building by emphasizing transnational migrant routes and relationships between Chinese and indigenous peoples.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.