We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In comparison to Italy, chant reform in France after the Council of Trent followed a relatively haphazard path, with no centralized efforts to align chant declamation with humanist practice. At the Abbey of Montmartre, however, a cadre of clerics and nobles associated with members of the Guise family provided an environment in which chant reform may have followed strict humanist principles. Part of a strategy to bring the saint to whom the Abbey was dedicated, Saint Denis (now conflated with Saint Dionysius and even Pseudo-Dionysius), to greater prominence, the reform of this chant was also accompanied by the building of a large priory dedicated to Saint Denis and the Eucharist, and the composition (by Antoine Boësset) of a body of polyphonic music based on it. At the same time, another religious foundation, the Congregation of the Oratory of Jesus Christ, developed its own ‘reformed’ chant, this time abandoning the rhythms of antiquity for something much more flexible and ‘modern’. While both institutions were closely associated with the king, the chant of the Oratorians explicitly celebrated the idea of kingship, while the chant at Montmartre actively undermined it.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.