Motivated by problems in percolation theory, we study the following two-player positional game. Let Λm×n be a rectangular grid-graph with m vertices in each row and n vertices in each column. Two players, Maker and Breaker, play in alternating turns. On each of her turns, Maker claims p (as yet unclaimed) edges of the board Λm×n, while on each of his turns Breaker claims q (as yet unclaimed) edges of the board and destroys them. Maker wins the game if she manages to claim all the edges of a crossing path joining the left-hand side of the board to its right-hand side, otherwise Breaker wins. We call this game the (p, q)-crossing game on Λm×n.

Given m, n ∈ ℕ, for which pairs (p, q) does Maker have a winning strategy for the (p, q)-crossing game on Λm×n? The (1, 1)-case corresponds exactly to the popular game of Bridg-it, which is well understood due to it being a special case of the older Shannon switching game. In this paper we study the general (p, q)-case. Our main result is to establish the following transition.

• If p ≥ 2q, then Maker wins the game on arbitrarily long versions of the narrowest board possible, that is, Maker has a winning strategy for the (2q, q)-crossing game on Λm×(q+1) for any m ∈ ℕ.

• If p ≤ 2q − 1, then for every width n of the board, Breaker has a winning strategy for the (p, q)-crossing game on Λm×n for all sufficiently large board-lengths m.

Our winning strategies in both cases adapt more generally to other grids and crossing games. In addition we pose many new questions and problems.

Two players take it in turn to claim edges from a graph $G$. The first player (“Maker”) wins if at any point he has claimed $s$ edges at a vertex without the second player (“Breaker”) having claimed a single edge at that vertex. If, by the end of play, this does not occur we say that Breaker wins. Our main aim is to show that for every $s$ there is a graph $G$ in which Maker has a winning strategy.

We study Maker/Breaker games on the edges of sparse graphs. Maker and Breaker take turns at claiming previously unclaimed edges of a given graph H. Maker aims to occupy a given target graph G and Breaker tries to prevent Maker from achieving his goal. We show that for every d there is a constant c = c(d) with the property that for every graph G on n vertices of maximum degree d there is a graph H on at most cn edges such that Maker has a strategy to occupy a copy of G in the game on H.

This is a result about a game-theoretic variant of the size Ramsey number. For a given graph G, $\hat{r}'(G)$ is defined as the smallest number M for which there exists a graph H with M edges such that Maker has a strategy to occupy a copy of G in the game on H. In this language, our result yields that for every connected graph G of constant maximum degree, $\hat{r}'(G) = \Theta(n)$.

Moreover, we can also use our method to settle the corresponding extremal number for universal graphs: for a constant d and for the class ${\cal G}_{n}$ of n-vertex graphs of maximum degree d, $s({\cal G}_{n})$ denotes the minimum number such that there exists a graph H with M edges where, for everyG ∈ ${\cal G}_{n}$, Maker has a strategy to build a copy of G in the game on H. We obtain that $s({\cal G}_{n}) = \Theta(n^{2 - \frac{2}{d}})$.

In this paper we analyse classical Maker–Breaker games played on the edge set of a sparse random board G ~ n,p. We consider the Hamiltonicity game, the perfect matching game and the k-connectivity game. We prove that for p(n) ≥ polylog(n)/n the board G ~ n,p is typically such that Maker can win these games asymptotically as fast as possible, i.e., within n+o(n), n/2+o(n) and kn/2+o(n) moves respectively.