Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:54:10.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pushforward of structure sheaf and virtual global generation

Part of: Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2024

Indranil Biswas*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Manish Kumar
Affiliation:
Statistics and Mathematics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore, India
A. J. Parameswaran
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India
*
Corresponding author: Indranil Biswas, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let $f\,:\,X\,\longrightarrow \,Y$ be a generically smooth morphism between irreducible smooth projective curves over an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic. We prove that the vector bundle $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is virtually globally generated. Moreover, $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is ample if and only if f is genuinely ramified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on Behalf of The Edinburgh Mathematical Society.

1. Introduction

Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves over an algebraically closed field k – there is no assumption on the characteristic of k – and let $f\,:\,X\,\longrightarrow \,Y$ be a generically smooth morphism. Then, we have ${\mathcal O}_Y\, \subset\, f_*{\mathcal O}_X$. In [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4] it was shown that the homomorphism of étale fundamental groups $f_*\, :\, \pi^{\rm et}_1(X)\, \longrightarrow\,\pi^{\rm et}_1(Y)$ induced by f is surjective if and only if ${\mathcal O}_Y$ is the unique maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$. We call f to be genuinely ramified if ${\mathcal O}_Y$ is the unique maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$. On the other hand, f is called primitive if the above homomorphism $f_*$ of étale fundamental groups is surjective [Reference Coskun, Larson and Vogt5]. So f is genuinely ramified if and only if it is primitive.

The main result of [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4] says the following: If $f\,:\,X\,\longrightarrow \,Y$ is genuinely ramified, and E is a stable vector bundle on Y, then $f^*E$ is also stable. This was proved by investigating the quotient bundle $(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y$.

The dual vector bundle $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is called the Tschirnhausen bundle for f (see [Reference Coskun, Larson and Vogt5]). The following is the main result of [Reference Coskun, Larson and Vogt5]: Let $f\,:\,X\,\longrightarrow \,Y$ be a general primitive degree r cover, where ${\rm genus}(X)\,=\, g$ and ${\rm genus}(Y)\,=\, h$, over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero or greater than r. Then

  1. (1) $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is semistable if $h\,=\, 1$, and

  2. (2) $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is stable if $h \,\geq \, 2$.

Note that the above mentioned result of [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4] can be reformulated as follows: Let $f\,:\,X\,\longrightarrow \,Y$ be a generically smooth morphism between irreducible smooth projective curves. Then $f^*E$ is stable for every stable vector bundle E on Y if and only if:

\begin{equation*} \mu_{\rm min}(((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*) \, \gt \, 0. \end{equation*}

(Recall that µ min denotes the slope of the smallest quotient [Reference Huybrechts and Lehn9, p. 16, Definition 1.3.2].) See [Reference Coskun, Larson and Vogt5] for more on Tschirnhausen bundles.

A vector bundle on an irreducible smooth projective curve Z is called virtually globally generated if its pullback, under some surjective morphism to Z from some irreducible smooth projective curve, is generated by its global sections; see $\S$ 3.

We prove the following (see Theorem 3.3):

Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves and:

\begin{equation*} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation*}

a generically smooth morphism. Then $(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is virtually globally generated.

Note that this implies that: $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is virtually globally generated (see Corollary 3.5).

In Remark 3.6 it is shown that Corollary 3.5 fails in higher dimensions.

We prove the following (see Corollary 3.2):

Let $f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y$ be a generically smooth morphism between two irreducible smooth projective curves. Then f is genuinely ramified if and only if $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is ample.

It may be mentioned that the condition in Theorem 3.3 and Corollary 3.2 that f is generically smooth is essential. To give an example, take Y to be a smooth projective curve of genus at least two, and let $F_Y\, :\, Y\, \longrightarrow\, Y,$ be the absolute Frobenius morphism of Y. Then $(F_{Y*}{\mathcal O}_Y))/{\mathcal O}_Y$ is in fact ample.

2. Genuinely ramified maps, direct image and ampleness

The base field k is assumed to be algebraically closed. For a vector bundle E on an irreducible smooth projective curve X, if

\begin{equation*} E_1\, \subset\, \cdots\, \subset\, E_{n-1}\, \subset\, E_n\,=\, E, \end{equation*}

is the Harder–Narasimhan filtration of E, then define $\mu_{\rm max}(E)\,:=\, \mu(E_1)$ and $\mu_{\rm min}(E)\, =\, \mu(E/E_{n-1})$ [Reference Huybrechts and Lehn9]. The subbundle $E_1\, \subseteq\, E$ is called the maximal semistable subsheaf of E.

Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves and

(2.1)\begin{equation} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation}

a dominant generically smooth morphism. It is straight-forward to check that:

(2.2)\begin{equation} \mu_{\rm max}(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)\, =\, 0. \end{equation}

Indeed, $\mu_{\rm max}(f_* {\mathcal O}_X)\, \leq\, 0$ because $\text{degree}({\mathcal O}_X)\,=\, 0$ [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12824, Lemma 2.2]. On the other hand, we have ${\mathcal O}_Y\, \subset\, f_*{\mathcal O}_X$, which implies that $\mu_{\rm max}(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)\, \geq\, 0$, and thus (2.2) holds.

The following proposition was proved in [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4].

Proposition 2.1. ([Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12828, Proposition 2.6] and [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12830, Lemma 3.1])

The following five statements are equivalent:

  1. (1) The maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$ is ${\mathcal O}_Y$.

  2. (2) $\dim H^0(X,\, f^*f_* {\mathcal O}_X)\,=\, 1$.

  3. (3) The fibre product $X\times_Y X$ is connected.

  4. (4) The homomorphism of étale fundamental groups $f_*\, :\, \pi^{\rm et}_1(X)\, \longrightarrow\,\pi^{\rm et}_1(Y)$ induced by f is surjective.

  5. (5) The map f does not factor through any nontrivial finite étale covering of Y.

Any morphism f as in (2.1) is called genuinely ramified if the (equivalent) statements in Proposition 2.1 hold [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12828, Definition 2.5].

Proposition 2.2. Let $f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y$ be a genuinely ramified morphism of smooth projective curves. Then the vector bundle $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is ample.

Proof. Since f is genuinely ramified, from Proposition 2.1 it follows that:

\begin{equation*}\mu_{\rm max}((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)\, \lt \, 0,\end{equation*}

and hence we have:

(2.3)\begin{equation} \mu_{\rm min}(((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*)\,=\, - \mu_{\rm max}((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)\, \gt \, 0. \end{equation}

When the characteristic of k is zero, a vector bundle W on Y is ample if and only if the degree of every nonzero quotient of W is positive [Reference Hartshorne7, p. 84, Theorem 2.4]. Therefore, from (2.3) we conclude that: $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is ample, when the characteristic of k is zero. However, this characterization of ample bundles fails when the characteristic of k is positive (see [Reference Hartshorne7, Section 3] for such examples).

We will inductive construct a sequence of vector bundles $\{V_i\}_{i \geq 0}$ on Y. First set $V_0\, =\, {\mathcal O}_Y$. For any $i\,\geq\,1$, let $V_i\,=\, f_*f^*V_{i-1}$. Since we have

\begin{equation*}{\mathcal O}_Y\, \subset\, V_1\,=\, f_*f^*{\mathcal O}_Y\,=\, f_*{\mathcal O}_X,\end{equation*}

it can be deduced that:

(2.4)\begin{equation} {\mathcal O}_Y\, \subset\, V_i, \end{equation}

for all $i\, \geq\, 0$. Indeed, this follows inductively, as the inclusion map ${\mathcal O}_Y\, \hookrightarrow\, V_j$ produces:

\begin{equation*} {\mathcal O}_Y \, \subset\, f_*{\mathcal O}_X \,=\, f_* f^*{\mathcal O}_Y \, \hookrightarrow\, f^*f_*V_j\,=\, V_{j+1}. \end{equation*}

This proves (2.4) inductively.

Next we will show that the subsheaf ${\mathcal O}_Y$ in (2.4) is the maximal semistable subsheaf of Vi. This will also be proved using an inductive argument.

First, ${\mathcal O}_Y$ is obviously the maximal semistable subsheaf of V 0. Next, from Proposition 2.1 we know that ${\mathcal O}_Y$ is the maximal semistable subsheaf of V 1 (recall that f is genuinely ramified). Let

\begin{equation*} {\mathcal O}_Y \,=\, E^1_1\, \subset\, E^1_2\, \subset\, \cdots\, \subset\, E^1_{n_1-1}\, \subset\, E^1_{n_1}\,=\, V_1, \end{equation*}

be the Harder–Narasimhan filtration of V 1. Since $f^*W$ is semistable if W is so (see [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, pp. 12823–12824, Remark 2.1]), we conclude that:

(2.5)\begin{equation} {\mathcal O}_X \,=\, f^*E^1_1\, \subset\, \cdots\, \subset\, f^*E^1_{n_1-1}\, \subset\, f^*E^1_{n_1}\,=\, f^*V_1, \end{equation}

is the Harder–Narasimhan filtration of $f^*V_1$.

For any vector bundle B on X, we have $\mu_{\rm max}(f_* B) \, \leq\, \mu_{\rm max}(B)/\text{degree}(f)$ [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, Lemma 2.2, p. 12824]. In view of the Harder–Narasimhan filtration in (2.5), this implies that:

\begin{equation*} \mu_{\rm max}((f_*f^*E^1_{j+1})/(f_*f^*E^1_{j})) \, \lt \, 0, \end{equation*}

for all $1\,\leq\, j\, \, \leq\, n_1-1$, because $\mu_{\rm max}((f^*E^1_{j+1})/(f^*E^1_{j})) \, \lt \, 0$. Also, as noted before, the maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$ is ${\mathcal O}_Y$. Combining these we conclude that ${\mathcal O}_Y$ is the maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*f^*V_1\,=\, V_2$.

The above argument works inductively. To explain this, let

\begin{equation*} {\mathcal O}_Y \,=\, E^\ell_1\, \subset\, E^\ell_2\, \subset\, \cdots\, \subset\, E^\ell_{n_\ell-1}\, \subset\, E^\ell_{n_\ell} \,=\, V_\ell, \end{equation*}

be the Harder–Narasimhan filtration of $V_\ell$. As before, we have:

\begin{equation*} \mu_{\rm max}((f_*f^*E^\ell_{j+1})/(f_*f^*E^\ell_{j})) \, \lt \, 0, \end{equation*}

for all $1\,\leq\, j\, \, \leq\, n_\ell-1$, because $\mu_{\rm max}((f^*E^\ell_{j+1})/(f^*E^\ell_{j})) \, \lt \, 0$. Using this together with the fact that the maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$ is ${\mathcal O}_Y$ we conclude that ${\mathcal O}_Y$ is the maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*f^*V_\ell\,=\, V_{\ell+1}$.

The projection formula (see [Reference Hartshorne8, p. 124, Ch. II, Ex. 5.1(d)], [Reference Serre11]) gives that $V_{i+1} \,=\, f_*f^*V_i\,=\, V_i\otimes (f_*{\mathcal O}_X)$ for all $i\, \geq\, 1$. This implies that:

(2.6)\begin{equation} V_i\,=\, (f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^{\otimes i}\,=\, V^{\otimes i}_1, \end{equation}

for all $i\, \geq\, 1$.

Now we assume that the characteristic of k is positive (recall that the proposition was proved when the characteristic of k is zero). Let p be the characteristic of k. Let

\begin{equation*}F_Y\, :\, Y\, \longrightarrow\, Y\end{equation*}

be the absolute Frobenius morphism of Y. For any vector bundle W on Y, we have the inclusion:

\begin{equation*} F^*_Y W\, \subset\, W^{\otimes p}, \end{equation*}

it is constructed using the map $W\, \longrightarrow\, W^{\otimes p}$ defined by $v\, \longmapsto\, v^{\otimes p}$. Therefore, from (2.6) we have

(2.7)\begin{equation} (F^n_Y)^* V_1\, \subset\, (V_1)^{\otimes np}\,=\, V_{np} \end{equation}

for all $n\, \geq\, 1$. Since ${\mathcal O}_Y$ in (2.4) is the maximal semistable subsheaf of Vi, from (2.7) we have:

\begin{equation*} (F^n_Y)^* (V_1/{\mathcal O}_Y)\,=\, ((F^n_Y)^* V_1)/{\mathcal O}_Y \, \subset\, V_{np}/{\mathcal O}_Y, \end{equation*}

and

(2.8)\begin{equation} \mu_{\rm max}((F^n_Y)^* (V_1/{\mathcal O}_Y)) \, \lt \, 0, \end{equation}

because $\mu_{\rm max}(V_{np}/{\mathcal O}_Y) \, \lt \, 0$.

From (2.8) it follows that:

\begin{equation*} \mu_{\rm min}((F^n_Y)^* (V_1/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*) \,=\, - \mu_{\rm max}((F^n_Y)^* (V_1/{\mathcal O}_Y)) \, \gt \, 0, \end{equation*}

for all $n\, \geq\, 1$. This implies that $(V_1/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*\,=\, ((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is ample [Reference Biswas1, p. 542, Theorem 2.2].

3. Virtual global generation

Let E be a vector bundle on an irreducible smooth projective curve Z. It will be called virtually globally generated if there is a finite surjective morphism:

\begin{equation*} \phi\, :\,M\, \longrightarrow\, Z, \end{equation*}

from an irreducible smooth projective curve M such that $\phi^*E$ is generated by its global sections. The vector bundle E is called étale trivializable if there is a pair $(M,\, \phi)$ as above such that ϕ is étale and $\phi^*E$ is trivializable.

If $\text{degree}(E)\, \lt \, 0$, then E is not virtually globally generated. More generally, E is not virtually globally generated if it admits a quotient of negative degree. To give a nontrivial example of vector bundle which is not virtually globally generated, let Z be a compact connected Riemann surface of genus g, with $g\, \geq\, 2$. Note that the free group of g generators is a quotient of $\pi_1(Z)$. To see this, express $\pi_1(Z)$ as the quotient of the free group, with generators $a_1,\, \cdots,\, a_g,\, b_1,\, \cdots,\, b_g$, by the single relation $\prod_{i=1}^g [a_i,\, b_i]\,=\, 1$. Then the quotient of $\pi_1(Z)$ by the normal subgroup generated by $b_1,\, \cdots,\, b_g$ is the free group generated by $a_1,\, \cdots,\, a_g$. Therefore, there is homomorphism:

\begin{equation*} \rho\, \, :\,\, \pi_1(Z)\,\, \longrightarrow\,\, \text{U}(r), \end{equation*}

where $\text{U}(r)$ is the group of r × r unitary matrices, such that $\rho(\pi_1(Z))$ is a dense subgroup of $\text{U}(r)$ (the subgroup of $\text{U}(r)$ generated by two general elements of it is dense in ${\rm U}(r)$). Let E denote the flat unitary vector bundle on Z given by ρ. This vector bundle E is stable of degree zero [Reference Narasimhan and Seshadri10]. Let M be a compact connected Riemann surface and

\begin{equation*} \phi\, :\,M\, \longrightarrow\, Z, \end{equation*}

a surjective holomorphic map. Since the image of the induced homomorphism:

\begin{equation*} \phi_*\,\, :\,\,\pi_1(M)\,\, \longrightarrow\,\, \pi_1(Z), \end{equation*}

is a subgroup of $\pi_1(Z)$ of finite index, the image of the following composition of homomorphisms:

\begin{equation*} \pi_1(M)\, \,\stackrel{\phi_*}{\longrightarrow}\, \,\pi_1(Z) \,\, \stackrel{\rho}{\longrightarrow}\,\, \text{U}(r), \end{equation*}

is a dense subgroup of $\text{U}(r)$. This implies that $\phi^*E$ is a stable vector bundle of degree zero [Reference Narasimhan and Seshadri10]. In particular, we have

\begin{equation*} H^0(M,\, \phi^*E)\,=\, 0. \end{equation*}

Hence E is not virtually globally generated.

Theorem 3.1. Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves over k and

\begin{equation*} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation*}

a generically smooth morphism. Then $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$ fits in a short exact sequence of vector bundles on Y:

\begin{equation*} 0\, \longrightarrow\, E \, \longrightarrow\, f_*{\mathcal O}_X \, \longrightarrow\, V \, \longrightarrow\, 0, \end{equation*}

where E is étale trivializable and $V^*$ is ample.

Proof. Let

(3.1)\begin{equation} S^f\, \subset\,f_*{\mathcal O}_X, \end{equation}

be the maximal semistable subbundle. From (2.2) we know that $\text{degree}(S^f)\,=\, 0$.

The algebra structure of ${\mathcal O}_X$ produces an algebra structure on the direct image $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$. The subsheaf Sf in (3.1) is a subalgebra. Moreover, there is an étale covering $g\, :\, Z\, \longrightarrow\, Y$ such that:

  • f factors through g, meaning there is a morphism:

    (3.2)\begin{equation} h\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Z \end{equation}

    such that $g\circ h\,=\, f$, and

  • the subsheaf $g_*{\mathcal O}_Z \, \subset\,f_*{\mathcal O}_X$ coincides with Sf.

(See the proof of [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12828, Proposition 2.6] and [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12829, (2.13)].) Moreover, the map h in (3.2) is genuinely ramified [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran4, p. 12829, Corollary 2.7].

Consider the short exact sequence of vector bundles on Y:

(3.3)\begin{equation} 0\, \longrightarrow\, S^f \, \longrightarrow\, f_*{\mathcal O}_X \, \longrightarrow\, Q\,:=\,(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/S^f \, \longrightarrow\, 0. \end{equation}

The pullback $g^*Q$, where Q is the vector bundle in (3.3), is identified with $(h_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Z$, where h is the map in (3.2). From Proposition 2.2 we know that $((h_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Z)^*$ is ample, Since $((h_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Z)^*\,=\, g^*Q^*$, this implies that $Q^*$ in (3.3) is ample (see [Reference Hartshorne6, p. 73, Proposition 4.3]).

Since $Q^*$ is ample, in view of (3.3), it suffices to prove that Sf is a finite vector bundle.

Fix an étale Galois covering $\varphi\, :\, M\, \longrightarrow\, Y$ that dominates g. In other words, there is a morphism:

\begin{equation*} \beta \, :\, M\, \longrightarrow\, Z \end{equation*}

such that $g\circ\beta\,=\, \varphi$. Since φ is an étale Galois covering, the vector bundle $\varphi^*\varphi_* {\mathcal O}_M$ is trivializable. On the other hand,

\begin{equation*} S^f\,=\, g_*{\mathcal O}_Z\, \subset\, \varphi_*{\mathcal O}_M, \end{equation*}

and Sf is a subbundle of $\varphi_*{\mathcal O}_M$. Consider the subbundle

(3.4)\begin{equation} \varphi^*S^f\, \subset\, \varphi^*\varphi_* {\mathcal O}_M. \end{equation}

We have $\text{degree}(\varphi^*S^f)\,=\, 0$, because $\text{degree}(S^f)\,=\, 0$, and we also know that $\varphi^*\varphi_* {\mathcal O}_M$ is trivializable. Consequently, the subbundle $\varphi^*S^f$ in (3.4) is also trivializable. Hence Sf is étale trivializable.

Corollary 3.2. Let $f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y$ be a generically smooth morphism between two irreducible smooth projective curves. Then f is genuinely ramified if and only if $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is ample.

Proof. In view of Proposition 2.2 it suffices to show that $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/ {\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is not ample if f is not genuinely ramified. If f is not genuinely ramified, then $\text{rank}(S^f)\, \geq\, 2$ (see (3.1)). Hence $(S^f/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is a quotient of $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ (see (3.3)). But $\text{degree}((S^f/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*)\,=\, 0$ because $\text{degree}((S^f)\,=\, 0$. Now $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/ {\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is not ample because its quotient $(S^f/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is not ample.

Theorem 3.3. Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves and

\begin{equation*} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation*}

a generically smooth morphism. Then $(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is virtually globally generated.

Proof. First assume that the characteristic of k is zero. We will show that the short exact sequence in (3.3) splits. First, the inclusion map ${\mathcal O}_Z \, \hookrightarrow\, h_*{\mathcal O}_X$ splits naturally, where h is the map in (3.2); in other words,

\begin{equation*} h_*{\mathcal O}_X\,=\, {\mathcal O}_Z\oplus F\, ; \end{equation*}

the fibre of F over any $z\, \in\, Z$ is the space of functions on $h^{-1}(z)$ whose sum is zero. Now we have

(3.5)\begin{equation} f_*{\mathcal O}_X\,=\, g_*h_*{\mathcal O}_X\,=\, g_*({\mathcal O}_Z\oplus F)\,=\, (g_*{\mathcal O}_Z)\oplus g_* F\,=\, S^f\oplus g_*F. \end{equation}

From (3.3) and (3.5) it follows that the vector bundle $g_*F$ is isomorphic to Q. Therefore, from (3.5) we have

(3.6)\begin{equation} (f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*\,=\, (S^f)^*\oplus Q^*. \end{equation}

Now $(S^f)^*$ is virtually globally generated because Sf is étale trivializable, and $Q^*$ is virtually globally generated because $Q^*$ is ample by Theorem 3.1 (see [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran3, p. 46, Theorem 3.6]). Therefore, from (3.6) it follows that $(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is virtually globally generated.

Next assume that the characteristic of k is positive. As before,

\begin{equation*}F_Y\, :\, Y\, \longrightarrow\, Y\end{equation*}

is the absolute Frobenius morphism of Y. Consider the exact sequence in (3.3); recall that Sf is the maximal semistable subsheaf of $f_*{\mathcal O}_X$. Therefore, there is an integer n 0 such that for all $n\, \geq\, n_0$, we have

\begin{equation*} (F^n_Y)^*f_*{\mathcal O}_X\,=\, (F^n_Y)^* S^f\oplus (F^n_Y)^* Q \end{equation*}

[Reference Biswas and Parameswaran2, p. 356, Proposition 2.1]. Therefore,

(3.7)\begin{equation} (F^n_Y)^*(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*\,=\, (F^n_Y)^* (S^f)^*\oplus (F^n_Y)^* Q^*. \end{equation}

Now $(F^n_Y)^* (S^f)^*$ is virtually globally generated because Sf is étale trivializable and the Frobenius morphism commutes with étale morphisms. Also, $Q^*$ is virtually globally generated because $Q^*$ is ample by Theorem 3.1 (see [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran2, p. 357, Theorem 2.2]). Therefore, from (3.7) it follows that $(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is virtually globally generated.

Corollary 3.4. Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves and

\begin{equation*} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation*}

a generically smooth morphism. Then the following statements hold:

  • If the characteristic of k is zero, then

    \begin{equation*} (f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*\,=\, E\oplus A, \end{equation*}

    where E is étale trivializable and A is ample.

  • If the characteristic of k is positive, then there is an integer n such that:

    \begin{equation*} (F^n_Y)^*(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*\,=\, E\oplus A, \end{equation*}

    where E is étale trivializable and A is ample.

Proof. In view of Theorem 3.3, this follows immediately from [Reference Biswas and Parameswaran3, p. 40, Theorem 1.1].

Corollary 3.5. Let X and Y be irreducible smooth projective curves and

\begin{equation*} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation*}

a generically smooth morphism. Then $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is virtually globally generated.

Proof. From Theorem 3.3 we know that there is a finite surjective map:

\begin{equation*} \phi\, :\,M\, \longrightarrow\, Y, \end{equation*}

such that $\phi^*(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is generated by its global sections. We have the short exact sequence of vector bundles on M:

(3.8)\begin{equation} 0\, \longrightarrow\, \phi^*((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^* \, \longrightarrow\, \phi^*(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^* \, \longrightarrow\, \phi^*({\mathcal O}_Y)^*\,=\, {\mathcal O}_M \, \longrightarrow\, 0. \end{equation}

Since $\phi^*(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is generated by its global sections, it has a section that projects to a nonzero section of ${\mathcal O}_M$. Choosing such a section we obtain a splitting of (3.8). Since $\phi^*(f_*{\mathcal O}_X)^*$ is generated by its global sections, its direct summand $\phi^*((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is also generated by its global sections.

Remark 3.6. Corollary 3.5 is not valid in higher dimensions. To give an example, let X denote ${\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}^2$ blown up at the point $(1,\, 0,\, 0)$. The involution of ${\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}^2$ defined by $(x,\, y,\, z)\, \longmapsto\, (x,\,-y,\, -z)$ lifts to X; let

\begin{equation*} \tau\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, X, \end{equation*}

be this lifted involution. Set $Y\,:=\, X/({\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z})$ to be the quotient of X for the action of ${\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z}$ given by τ. Let

\begin{equation*} f\, :\, X\, \longrightarrow\, X/({\mathbb Z}/2{\mathbb Z})\,=\, Y, \end{equation*}

be the quotient map. Then the line bundle $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is not virtually globally generated. To see this, first note that the line bundle $f^*(((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*)$ is virtually globally generated if $((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*$ is virtually globally generated. But

\begin{equation*}f^*(((f_*{\mathcal O}_X)/{\mathcal O}_Y)^*)\, =\, {\mathcal O}_{X}(D_e+D_\infty),\end{equation*}

where $D_e\, \subset\, X$ is the exceptional divisor and $D_\infty\, \subset\, X$ is the inverse image of

\begin{equation*} \{(0,\, y,\, z)\,\in\, {\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}^2\,\, \mid\,\, y,\, z\, \in\, {\mathbb C}\}\, \subset\, {\mathbb C}{\mathbb P}^2. \end{equation*}

It is easy to see that ${\mathcal O}_{X}(D_e+D_\infty)$ is not virtually globally generated. Indeed, if

\begin{equation*}\varpi\, :\, Z\, \longrightarrow\, X\end{equation*}

is a finite surjective proper map, then every section of $\varpi^*{\mathcal O}_{X}(D_e+D_\infty)$ vanishes on $\varpi^{-1}(D_e)$.

Funding statement

The first author is partially supported by a J. C. Bose Fellowship (JBR/2023/000003).

Competing interests

None declared.

References

Biswas, I., A criterion for ample vector bundles over a curve in positive characteristic, Bull. Sci. Math. 129 (2005), 539543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, I. and Parameswaran, A. J., On the ample vector bundles over curves in positive characteristic, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 339 (2004), 355358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, I. and Parameswaran, A. J., A criterion for virtual global generation, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 5 (2006), 3953.Google Scholar
Biswas, I. and Parameswaran, A. J., Ramified covering maps and stability of pulled back bundles, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2022(17) (2022), 1282112851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coskun, I., Larson, E. and Vogt, I., Stability of Tschirnhausen bundles, arXiv:2207.07257.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, R., Ample vector bundles on curves, ample vector bundles, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 29 (1966), 6394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, R., Ample vector bundles on curves, Nagoya Math. J. 43 (1971), 7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, R., Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 52 (Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huybrechts, D. and Lehn, M., The Geometry of Moduli Spaces of Sheaves, Aspects of Mathematics, E31 (Friedr. Vieweg & Sons, Braunschweig, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, M. S. and Seshadri, C. S., Stable and unitary vector bundles on a compact Riemann surface, Ann. Math. 82 (1965), 540567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serre, J.-P., Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique, Ann. Inst. Fourier 6 (1956), 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar