Abnormal muscle contraction resulting in involuntary movements and sustained postures of the neck, shoulder, and head characterize cervical dystonia (CD). Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is the first line of treatment, with an average duration of therapeutic benefit of approximately 12 weeks.Reference Dressler, Tacik and Adib Saberi1 Although prolonged symptomatic remission in idiopathic CD, either spontaneously or with treatment, is recognized,Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2 thorough documentation of this rare but real phenomenon is lacking. A review of the records in our center revealed four cases of BoNT-associated prolonged remission of idiopathic CD. Table 1 summarizes the clinical features, treatment received, and the patients’ course.
AAO = age at onset; ALE = age at last examination; AROM = active range of motion. BoNT = botulinum toxin; CD = cervical dystonia; incoBoNT-A = incobotulinum toxin-A; N/A = not applicable; onaBoNT-A = onabotulinum toxin-A; SC = splenius capitis; SCM = sternocleidomastoid; TRAP = trapezius; U = units.
# Secondary causes of dystonia, including drug exposure, were ruled out.
† Incomplete information as patient was not seen prior to BoNT injections.
* As of last follow-up.
A 42-year-old previously healthy woman complained of an 8-month history of neck discomfort of insidious onset, eventually accompanied by pain and torticollis. Touching her forehead or occiput served as sensory tricks. Oral medications, including clonazepam, tizanidine, and trihexyphenidyl, did not provide symptomatic relief. On examination, she had right torticollis and right shoulder elevation (Video 1, segment 1). She received a single treatment with 150 units (U) of incobotulinumtoxin-A (incoBoNT-A), distributed as follows: left sternocleidomastoid (SCM): 50 U, right splenius capitis (SC): 75 U, right trapezius (TRAP): 25 U. She subsequently reported symptom improvement after 10 days, and complete symptom relief a month later (Video 1, segment 2). Subsequent examination after 7, 13, and 18 months (Video 1, segments 3–5) showed the absence of any overt dystonic posturing and a full range of motion in all directions. To date, 24 months post-treatment, she has not had any symptom recurrence.
Seven months into remission, electrophysiology studies were performed to examine for evidence of subclinical dystonia. Background activity was normal. Since she was asymptomatic, she was asked to perform neck rotation toward or opposite to her known previous null point (i.e., rightward). On turning leftward, normal surface electromyographic (sEMG) activities were seen, with a peak frequency of coherence at 9–12 Hz between the right SCM and left SC muscles (Figure 1A). On turning rightward, the peak frequency of coherence between the left SCM and right SC muscles was at 5–9 Hz (Figure 1B and C).
A 34-year-old man with an unremarkable neurologic history presented with a 7-month history of gradually progressive neck pain and left torticollis. Touching the back of his head transiently improved the abnormal posturing. Trihexyphenidyl did not provide symptom relief. Two sets of 200 U of onabotulinumtoxin-A (onaBoNT-A) provided a near-complete resolution of his symptoms. The toxin was distributed as follows: right SCM: 60 U, left SC: 100 U, left TRAP: 30 U, and right TRAP: 10 U. After the third set of injections of the same dose and muscle pattern, he had a complete resolution of his CD for 5 years. However, his symptoms gradually returned. Upon relapse, his dystonia was notably worse compared to the onset, and the phenomenology changed, with prominent retrocollis and dystonic neck tremors. He has remained responsive to higher doses of BoNT injections.
A 41-year-old previously healthy woman complained of a 2-year history of gradually progressive right torticollis, retrocollis, and occasional neck tremor. Touching her chin temporarily kept her head in a midline position. She received 100 U of incoBoNT-A (left SCM: 75 U, right SC: 20 U, right TRAP: 25 U, and left SC: 30 U), with modest improvement of the dystonic posturing and neck tremor. The dose was then increased to 150 U, with marked symptom relief, but with mild neck weakness. Nonetheless, she went into remission for about 4 years. The symptoms gradually recurred, much worse than at the onset and with left torticollis. Since then, she has been receiving regular toxin injections with a higher dose and different muscle pattern.
A 45-year-old previously healthy woman presented with an insidious onset of a ‘no-no’ head tremor, which temporarily improved upon touching her chin and with head rotation to the right or left. She denied having upper limb or vocal tremors but had mild neck posturing on examination. She was diagnosed with CD, and 1 week after receiving 150 U of onaBoNT-A (right SC: 100 U and left SC: 50 U), she reported symptom improvement. Four months later, she only had non-disabling head tremor and subtle neck posturing. The benefit has been sustained since then, and she has not required any form of treatment to date, 5 years after the single treatment with BoNT.
Dystonia remission is rare, occurring in about 16.2% of cases as reported in a recent review.Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2 This prevalence rate is higher than what we have observed in our clinic, where prolonged remission was only seen in an estimated 0.3% and 1% of all dystonia and CD cases, respectively, from 2000 to 2020. The paucity of well-documented cases demonstrating dystonia remission possibly stems from the lack of operational criteria. Diagnostic criteria have recently been proposed, qualifying remission based on the degree (complete vs. partial), onset (spontaneous vs. post-treatment), and minimum duration (≥6 months for spontaneous vs. ≥12 months for post-treatment).Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2
Remission usually occurs in patients with younger age at onset, early in the disease course (within 4.5 years after symptom onset) and is seen most commonly in idiopathic CD, followed by blepharospasm, and less frequently with generalized and embouchure dystonia.Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2 All patients in our cohort had idiopathic CD, with a mean age at onset of 40 years, had a relatively short duration of symptoms (1–24 months; mean 10.3), and with remission occurring after 1–3 BoNT injection treatments. The remission duration was 2–5 years at their last examination, meeting the criteria for post-treatment remission. Interestingly, the phenomenology changed in the two cases that relapsed.
Although the observed remissions could simply represent a coincidental temporal association between treatment and a spontaneous remission, treatment with BoNT may have induced remission in our patients. It is possible that a similar response might occur when other therapies (e.g., oral medicationsReference Lang and Marsden3 or the unlikely application of early deep brain stimulation) are applied early in the disease course. Figure 2 summarizes the possible hypotheses to explain CD remission with BoNT treatment. BoNT has been shown to induce changes in cortical plasticity.Reference Kojovic, Caronni, Bologna, Rothwell, Bhatia and Edwards4 Since peripherally mediated sensory input can affect cortical excitability, muscle chemodenervation with BoNT may act via the same mechanisms as sensory tricks in improving dystonic symptoms. Our patients had sensory tricks, which suggests that their dystonic symptoms can be improved with alterations in sensory input. BoNT can alter sensory input mechanisms by blocking muscle fiber afferents from muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs.Reference Caron, Marqueste and Decherchi5 Future studies of remission in CD should document whether sensory tricks were present or absent just before the remission.
While CD is the most common focal dystonia, its prevalence does not exclusively explain why remission is more common in CD. Other suggested hypotheses include a less severe putative neural deficit associated in cases with a younger age at onset, and a decreased probability of occurrence of the specific motor programs that are also part of the dystonic manifestation.Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2 Indeed, compared to other focal forms of dystonia (e.g., task-specific focal hand dystonia), where specific motor programs are also involved in dystonic symptoms (e.g., writing), motor program specificity is a less salient feature in CD, possibly increasing the likelihood of remission.Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2 Loss of cortical inhibition, impaired somatosensory integration, and altered homeostatic plasticity are mechanisms underlying dystonia.Reference Quartarone and Hallett6,Reference Avanzino, Tinazzi, Ionta and Fiorio7 These pathophysiological mechanisms may not be well established especially early in the disease course, possibly explaining why most remissions occur within 2 years of symptom onset and the changes in the phenomenology upon relapse.
sEMG in case 1 demonstrated electrophysiological findings consistent with dystonia although she was asymptomatic at the time of testing. When turning in the direction of the null point, the peak frequency of coherence was at 5–9 Hz between dystonic agonistic muscle pairs, similar to that reported in CD.Reference Tijssen, Marsden and Brown8 This was not observed with head turn in the opposite direction. These findings suggest that she might have had subclinical dystonia and that there might be mechanisms that prevent the abnormal motor output from manifesting as overt dystonic symptoms. However, another study failed to confirm that intermuscular electromyography coherence analysis can reliably discriminate patients from controlsReference Nijmeijer, de Bruijn and Forbes9 and so this finding needs to be interpreted with caution. Further similar studies in controls and other CD patients with and without apparent full clinical remission will be required to determine the meaning and utility of this electrophysiological finding.
Although spontaneous or treatment-associated remission could be a feature suggestive of the possibility of a functional movement disorder (FMD), our patients had no clinical features of FMD, including abrupt symptom onset, antecedent events, unstable psychiatric comorbidities, fixed posturing, or absence of geste antagoniste. Reference Ganos, Edwards and Bhatia10 Furthermore, our patients had an onset of benefit similar to patients with idiopathic CD whereas, when FMD patients are treated with BoNT, they may have an immediate dramatic response, suboptimal subjective response, transient benefit, and need for repeated trials.Reference Ganos, Edwards and Bhatia10
In summary, we described four cases of idiopathic CD with BoNT-associated prolonged remission, occurring within 2 years of symptom onset, and lasting for as long as 5 years. In the two cases that relapsed, subsequent symptoms remained responsive to regular BoNT injections. Considering the rarity of dystonia remission, thorough reporting is needed, preferably applying the recently proposed criteria.Reference Mainka, Erro, Rothwell, Kühn, Bhatia and Ganos2 The mechanism underlying BoNT-associated remission of idiopathic CD could be related to the ability of BoNT to alter sensory input by blocking muscle spindle afferents. However, there is no certainty whether the observed remission was induced by BoNT injections as spontaneous remission is also a known, albeit rare, phenomenon in dystonia. Further studies are needed to completely elucidate factors that lead to remission and its underlying mechanisms. Finally, BoNT-associated remission also has valuable clinical and economic implications. Patients with prolonged treatment benefit can delay follow-up visits and subsequent injections for as long as they remain asymptomatic, minimizing the risk of complications and reducing healthcare costs.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the patients for their cooperation, and Ms. Deborah Mancini for her help in this project.
Funding
This study was supported in part by the Parkinson’s Foundation and the Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson’s Disease through its support of the fellowship training of GS.
Disclosures
The fellowship training of Dr. Gerard Saranza is supported by the Parkinson’s Foundation. Dr. Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen has nothing to disclose. Dr. Christos Ganos holds a research grant from the VolkswagenStiftung (Freigeist Fellowship) and received honoraria from Lundbeck and Actelion Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Lorraine V. Kalia is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Clinician Scientist Award and received honoraria from the National Institutes of Health and Takeda. Dr. Robert Chen is a consultant for Allergan, Merz and Ipsen. Dr. Lang reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from AFFiRis, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Sun Pharma, personal fees from Corticobasal Solutions, personal fees from Sunovion, personal fees from Paladin, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Theravance, personal fees from Lundbeck, personal fees from Retrophin, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from PhotoPharmics, outside the submitted work.
Statement of Authorship
Dr. Gerard Saranza managed case 1, acquired data for the other cases, and drafted the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen performed the electrophysiology studies for case 1 and revised the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Christos Ganos revised the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Lorraine Kalia managed case 4 and revised the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Robert Chen performed the electrophysiology studies for case 1 and revised the manuscript for intellectual content. Dr. Anthony Lang managed case 1, conceptualized the study, and revised the manuscript for intellectual content.
Ethical Compliance Statement
The authors confirm that this study was approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board (Reference No. 20-5896). Informed consent was not necessary for the patients to be included in the case series. Informed consent was obtained for the videos taken as part of the clinical evaluation as per standard policy in the Toronto Western Hospital Movement Disorders Clinic. We confirm that we have read the journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
Supplementary Material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2020.280.