Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:10:58.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) infestation and relationship with agronomic traits in selected spring wheat cultivars in northwestern Montana, United States of America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2018

Erik R. Echegaray
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 4570 Montana Highway 35, Kalispell, Montana, 59901, United States of America
Christopher R. Barbour
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 4570 Montana Highway 35, Kalispell, Montana, 59901, United States of America
Luther Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 4570 Montana Highway 35, Kalispell, Montana, 59901, United States of America
Robert N. Stougaard*
Affiliation:
Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, 4570 MT Hwy 35, Kalispell, Montana, 59901, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

The wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana Géhin (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), is a serious pest of spring wheat in North America. Currently, most commercial cultivars in the state of Montana, United States of America are susceptible. A study was conducted to assess the variability of adapted spring wheat cultivars to wheat midge infestations. A secondary objective was to determine the relationship between wheat midge infestation levels and spring wheat agronomic traits, including yield, test weight, grain protein, plant height, and heading date. This relationship was determined by evaluating 16 hard red spring wheat cultivars over a six-year period at the Northwestern Agricultural Research Center, near Kalispell, Montana. Levels of infestation had a negative impact on grain yield and test weight. Overall, the average infestation level was 40 larvae/spike with the lowest being observed with “Reeder” and the highest for “Thatcher”. Concurrently, “Reeder” had the highest yield, whereas “Thatcher” had the lowest yield and the highest grain protein, demonstrating that wheat midge infestations were positively associated with grain protein. Heading date had a positive association with midge density with higher infestations associated with later maturing cultivars. The economic injury level was estimated at 12 and 20 midge larvae/spike for a market price of USD $0.27 and USD $0.16/kg, respectively.

Type
Insect Management
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Matt O’Neal

*

Christopher R. Barbour’s address was incorrect at the time of publication. It has been updated. In addition, funding information was not included in the acknowledgment in the originally published article. It has now been added. An addendum has been published.

References

Barker, P.S. and McKenzie, R.I.H. 1996. Possible sources of resistance to the wheat midge in wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 76: 689695.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F. 1956. Gall midges of economic importance. Volume VII: gall midges of cereal crops. Crosby Lockwood & Son, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F. and Arnold, M.K. 1960. The susceptibility of some American wheats to the wheat blossom midges. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 33: 165174.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F., Miller, B.S., and Arnold, M.K. 1959. The susceptibility of Atle wheat to attack by the wheat blossom midges. Plant Pathology, 8: 143144.Google Scholar
Basedow, T. and Schütte, F. 1973. Neue untersuchungen über eiablage, wirtschaftliche schadensschwelle und bekämpfung der Weisengallmücken (Dipt.; Cecidomyidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 73: 238251.Google Scholar
Berzonsky, W., Ding, H., Haley, S., Harris, M., Lamb, R., McKenzie, R., et al. 2003. Breeding wheat for resistance to insects. Plant Breeding Reviews, 22: 221297.Google Scholar
Blake, N.K., Stougaard, R.N., Weaver, D.K., Sherman, J.D., Lanning, S.P., Naruoka, Y., et al. 2011. Identification of a quantitative trait locus for resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin), the orange wheat blossom midge, in spring wheat. Plant Breeding, 130: 2530.Google Scholar
Chavalle, S., Censier, F., San Martin y Gomez, G., and De Proft, M. 2015. Protection of winter wheat against orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): efficacy of insecticides and cultivar resistance. Pest Management Science, 71: 783790.Google Scholar
Dexter, J.E., Preston, K.R., Cooke, L.A., Morgan, B.C., Kruger, J.E., Kilborn, R.H., and Elliott, R.H. 1987. The influence of orange wheat blossom midge (Sitodiplosis mosellana Géhin) damage on hard red spring wheat quality and the effectiveness of insecticide treatments. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 67: 697712.Google Scholar
Ding, H., Lamb, R.J., and Ames, N. 2000. Inducible production of phenolic acids in wheat and antibiotic resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 26: 969985.Google Scholar
Elliott, R.H., Olfert, O., and Hartley, S. 2011. Management practices for wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin). Prairie Soils and Crops, 4: 813.Google Scholar
Gharalari, A.H., Fox, S.L., Smith, M.A.H., and Lamb, R.J. 2009. Oviposition deterrence in spring wheat, Triticum aestivum, against orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana: implications for inheritance of deterrence. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 133: 7483.Google Scholar
Gharalari, A.H., Smith, M.A.H., Fox, S.L., and Lamb, R.J. 2011. Volatile compounds from non-preferred wheat spikes reduce oviposition by Sitodiplosis mosellana . The Canadian Entomologist, 143: 388391.Google Scholar
Helenius, J. and Kurppa, S. 1989. Quality losses in wheat caused by the orange wheat blossom midge Sitodiplosis mosellana . Annals of Applied Biology, 114: 409417.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., and Westfall, P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50: 346363.Google Scholar
Kurppa, S. 1989. Susceptibility and reaction of wheat and barley varieties grown in Finland to damage by the orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin). Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 28: 371383.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J., McKenzie, R.I.H., Wise, I.L., Barker, P.S., and Smith, M.A.H. 2000a. Resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 591605.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J., Sridhar, P., Smith, M.A.H., and Wise, I.L. 2003. Oviposition preference and offspring performance of a wheat midge Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on defended and less defended wheat plants. Environmental Entomology, 32: 414420.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J., Tucker, J.R., Wise, I.L., and Smith, M.A.H. 2000b. Trophic interactions between Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 591605.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J. and Wise, I.L. 1999. Distribution and seasonal abundance of Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat. The Canadian Entomologist, 131: 387397.Google Scholar
Lamb, R.J., Wise, I.L., Smith, M.A.H., McKenzie, R.I.H., and Thomas, J. 2002. Oviposition deterrence against Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in spring wheat (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 134: 8596.Google Scholar
Martre, P., He, J.Q., Le Gouis, J., and Semenov, M.A. 2015. In silico system analysis of physiological traits determining grain yield and protein concentration for wheat as influenced by climate and crop management. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66: 35813598.Google Scholar
McKenzie, R.I.H., Lamb, R.J., Aung, T., Wise, I.L., Baker, P., and Olfert, O. 2002. Inheritance of resistance to wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana, in spring wheat. Plant Breeding, 121: 383388.Google Scholar
Miller, B.S. and Halton, P. 1961. The damage to wheat kernels caused by the wheat blossom midge (Sitodiplosis mosellana). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 12: 391398.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, S. and Schielzeth, H. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R 2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods of Ecology and Evolution, 4: 133142.Google Scholar
Nuttall, J.G., O’Leary, G.J., Panozzo, J.F., Walker, C.K., Barlow, K.M., and Fitzgerald, G.J. 2016. Models of grain quality in wheat: a review. Field Crops Research, 202: 136145.Google Scholar
Oakley, J.N. 1994. Orange wheat blossom midge: a literature review and survey of the 1993 outbreak. Research Review 28. Home-grown Cereal Authority, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Oakley, J.N., Cumbleton, P.C., Corbett, S.J., Saunders, P., Green, D.I., Young, J.E.B., and Rodgers, R. 1998. Prediction of orange wheat blossom midge activity and risk of damage. Crop Protection, 17: 145149.Google Scholar
Olfert, O.O., Mukerji, M.K., and Doane, J.F. 1985. Relationship between infestation levels and yield loss caused by wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), in spring wheat in Saskatchewan. The Canadian Entomologist, 117: 593598.Google Scholar
Pedigo, L.P. and Rice, M.E. 2009. Entomology and pest management. 6th edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and R Core Team. 2016. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-127. Available from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme [accessed 16 March 2018].Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from www.R-project.org [accessed 16 March 2018].Google Scholar
Reeher, M.M. 1945. The wheat midge in the Pacific Northwest. Circular 732. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington District of Columbia, United States of America.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. and Bragg, D. 2012. Wheat midge: a possible new pest in Washington State. In Research reports 71st annual Pacific Northwest insect management conference. Available from http://ipmnet.org/PNWIMC/2012_PNW-Conference_Proceedings%20and%20Agenda.pdf [accessed 25 June 2018].Google Scholar
Sadras, V.O. and Lawson, C. 2013. Nitrogen and water-use efficiency of Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007. European Journal of Agronomy, 46: 3441.Google Scholar
Schotzko, D.J. and Bosque-Perez, N.A. 2002. Relationship between Hessian fly infestation density and early seedling growth of resistant and susceptible wheat. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 19: 95107.Google Scholar
Shanower, T.G. 2005. Occurrence of Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoid, Macroglenes penetrans (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae), in northeastern Montana. The Canadian Entomologist, 137: 753755.Google Scholar
Skuhravy, V., Skuhravá, M., and Brewer, J.W. 1983. Ecology of the saddle gall midge Haplodiplosis marginata (von Roser) (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 96: 476490.Google Scholar
Slafer, G.A., Andrade, F.H., and Feingold, S.E. 1990. Genetic improvement of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Argentina: relationships between nitrogen and dry matter. Euphytica, 50: 6371.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A.H. and Lamb, R.J. 2001. Factors influencing oviposition by Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on wheat spikes (Gramineae). The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 533548.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A.H., Wise, I.L., Fox, S.L., Vera, C.L., DePauw, R.M., and Lukow, O.M. 2014. Seed damage and sources of yield loss by Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in resistant wheat varietal blends relative to susceptible wheat cultivars in western Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 146: 335346.Google Scholar
Stewart, D.W. and Dwyer, L.M. 1989. Yields and protein trends of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on the Canadian Prairies, 1961–1982. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 70: 3344.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R.N., Bohannon, B., Picard, D., Reddy, G.V.P., Talbert, L., Wanner, K., and Weaver, D. 2014. Orange wheat blossom midge. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2016. Agricultural prices [online]. Available from http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1002 [accessed 16 March 2018].Google Scholar
Vera, C.L., Fox, S.L., DePauw, R.M., Smith, M.A.H., Wise, I.L., Clarke, F.R., et al. 2013. Relative performance of resistant wheat varietal blends and susceptible wheat cultivars exposed to wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 93: 5966.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Wright, A.T. and Doane, J. 1987. Wheat midge infestation of spring cereals in northeastern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 67: 117120.Google Scholar