Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:05:33.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting outcomes following gastrostomy insertion using the Sheffield gastrostomy score: a prospectively devised scoring system with a validation cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

J. S. Leeds
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
S. R. Morley
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
R. Marr
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
H. E. Robson
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
J. Grant
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
F. K. T. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
M. T. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, UK
M. E. McAlindon
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
D. S. Sanders
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Several scoring systems are used in the field of gastroenterology.(Reference Rockall, Logan, Devlin and Northfield1, Reference Forrest, Evans, Stewart, Phillips, Oo, McAvoy, Fisher, Singhal, Brind, Haydon, O'Grady, Day, Hayes, Murray and Morris2) Although previous studies have demonstrated the substantial risk of death following gastrostomy insertion and some risk factors have been identified,(Reference Sanders, Carter, D'Silva, James, Bolton and Bardhan3, Reference Lang, Bardan, Chowers, Sakhnini, Fidder, Bar-Meir and Avidan4) no previous investigators have described a scoring system for gastrostomy insertion. A prospective unselected dual-centre study was undertaken in order to establish the relative importance of risk factors for mortality after gastrostomy insertion. A simple numerical scoring system to categorize patients' risk of death was then formulated and validated on an independent second cohort of patients.

All patients referred for gastrostomy are prospectively included in a database along with demographic, biochemical and outcome data. Gastrostomy insertions from two teaching hospitals from February 2004 to February 2007 were analysed. There were 887 referrals resulting in 837 gastrostomy insertions. The largest cohort was at site A and was used to construct a risk stratification scoring system. Site B was used to validate the scoring system.

Site A received 552 referrals and 403 new gastrostomies were inserted (median age 64 years, 268 males). Overall, 30 d mortality rate was fifty-one of 403 (12.7%) with the highest risk in those with dementia (40%) followed by stroke (22.2%). Univariate analysis identified that 30 d mortality was associated with age (OR 3.4), albumin (OR 5.6), cardiac comorbidity (OR 2.0) and neurological comorbidity (OR 1.7). On multivariate analysis only age and albumin remained significant (both P<0.001) and were then modelled and attributed scores, with age scoring 0 or 1 and albumin scoring 0, 1 or 2, giving composite scores from 0 to 3. Scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 gave 30 d mortalities (%) of 0 (95% CI 0, 2.1), 7 (95% CI 2.9, 13.9), 21.3 (95% CI 13.5, 30.9) and 37.3 (95% CI 24.1, 51.9) respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by total score showed a significantly increased mortality at 7 (P=0.0003), 30 (P<0.0001) and 90 (P<0.0001) d. Site B (validation cohort) received 335 referrals and inserted 153 new gastrostomies (median age 77 years, sixty-four males) with a 30 d mortality of twenty-four of 153 (15.7%). Application of the scoring system in this validation cohort gave comparable 30 d mortalities (%) of 0, 7.7, 15.6 and 29.3 for scores 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively.

The Sheffield gastrostomy score can be used to categorize patients being considered for gastrostomy insertion and to calculate risk of death at 30 d. Further external validation is required.

References

1. Rockall, TA, Logan, RF, Devlin, HB & Northfield, TC (1996) Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 38: 316321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Forrest, EH, Evans, CDJ, Stewart, S, Phillips, M, Oo, YH, McAvoy, NC, Fisher, NC, Singhal, S, Brind, A, Haydon, G, O'Grady, , Day, CP, Hayes, PC, Murray, LS & Morris, AJ (2005) Analysis of factors predictive of mortality in alcoholic hepatitis and derivation and validation of the Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score. Gut 54: 11741179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Sanders, DS, Carter, MJ, D'Silva, J, James, G, Bolton, RP & Bardhan, KD (2000) Survival analysis in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: a worse outcome in patients with dementia. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 1472–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Lang, A, Bardan, E, Chowers, Y, Sakhnini, E, Fidder, HH, Bar-Meir, S & Avidan, B (2004) Risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Endoscopy 36(6): 522526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed