Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:27:19.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2023

Ama Wakwella*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
Amelia Wenger
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia Global Marine Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY, USA
Aaron Jenkins
Affiliation:
Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia Centre for People Place and Planet, School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
Joleah Lamb
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California – Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
Caitlin D. Kuempel
Affiliation:
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
Danielle Claar
Affiliation:
Nearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, USA
Chris Corbin
Affiliation:
United Nations Environment Programme, Cartagena Convention Secretariat, Kingston, Jamaica
Kim Falinski
Affiliation:
Hawai’i and Palmyra Chapter, The Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, HI, USA
Antonella Rivera
Affiliation:
Western Caribbean Department, The Coral Reef Alliance, San Francisco, CA, USA
Hedley S. Grantham
Affiliation:
Science and Conservation, Bush Heritage Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Stacy D. Jupiter
Affiliation:
Melanesia Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva, Fiji
*
Corresponding author: Ama Wakwella; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tropical coastal ecosystems are in decline worldwide due to an increasing suite of human activities, which threaten the biodiversity and human wellbeing that these ecosystems support. One of the major drivers of decline is poor water quality from land-based activities. This review summarises the evidence of impacts to coastal ecosystems, particularly coral reefs, from sediments, nutrients, chemicals and pathogens entering coastal zones through surface and groundwater. We also assess how these pollutants affect the health of coastal human populations through: (1) enhanced transmission of infectious diseases; (2) reduced food availability and nutritional deficit from decline of fisheries associated with degraded habitat; and (3) food poisoning from consumption of contaminated seafood. We use this information to identify opportunities for holistic approaches to integrated watershed management (IWM) that target overlapping drivers of ill-health in downstream coastal ecosystems and people. We demonstrate that appropriate management requires taking a multi-sector, systems approach that accounts for socio-ecological feedbacks, with collaboration required across environmental, agricultural, public health, and water, sanitation and hygiene sectors, as well as across the land–sea interface. Finally, we provide recommendations of key actions for IWM that can help achieve multiple sustainable development goals for both nature and people on coasts.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact Statements

The pollution of water and waterways from land-based human activities has extensive impacts on both human and ecosystem health, contributing to significant global health burdens and loss of critical ecosystem services. Management of pollution is therefore a major focus of multiple sustainable development goals (SDGs) to achieve targets for: zero hunger (SDG 2); good health and well-being (SDG 3); clean water and sanitation (SDG 6); climate action (SDG 13); life below water (SDG 14); and life on land (SDG 15). Despite extensive and complex impacts of poor water quality, pollution control has been highly sectorised and under-resourced, with poor coordination of implementation, often across insufficient scales to realise benefits. This review provides a novel summary of the overlapping impacts of water pollution to downstream public and coastal ecosystem health to support planning and decision-making that benefits a wide range of stakeholders from government, civil society and the private sector. We provide evidence-based suggestions to optimise investments in holistic, integrated watershed management (IWM) to improve water quality and achieve overall systems health, which also provides co-benefits for biodiversity and climate. We also identify the key enabling factors required to coordinate and monitor IWM implementation to achieve desired outcomes. Specifically, the summary of pollution impacts and suggested management strategies provided in this review aim to provide awareness and tools to alleviate impacts to nutrition, water-related disease burdens and food poisoning that arise from poor water quality, which cause devastating economic and health costs disproportionately borne by the poorest countries.

Introduction

Tropical coastal ecosystems support some of the most diverse and productive environments on Earth and provide millions of people with vital ecosystem goods and services, such as food, livelihoods and coastal protection (Moberg and Folke, Reference Moberg and Folke1999; Cesar et al., Reference Cesar, Burke and Pet-Soede2003). However, with over 1.3 billion people in the tropics living within 100 km of coastlines (Sale et al., Reference Sale, Agardy, Ainsworth, Feist, Bell, Christie, Hoegh-Guldberg, Mumby, Feary, Saunders, Daw, Foale, Levin, Lindeman, Lorenzen, Pomeroy, Allison, Bradbury, Corrin, Edwards, Obura, Sadovy de Mitcheson, Samoilys and Sheppard2014), coastal ecosystems are becoming increasingly threatened by a suite of local, regional and global human activities, many of which affect water quality (Bellwood et al., Reference Bellwood, Hughes, Folke and Nyström2004; Lotze et al., Reference Lotze, Lenihan, Bourque, Bradbury, Cooke, Kay, Kidwell, Kirby, Peterson and Jackson2006; Orth et al., Reference Orth, Carruthers, Dennison, Duarte, Fourqurean, Heck, Hughes, Kendrick, Kenworthy, Olyarnik, Short, Waycott and Williams2006). Declining water quality is a primary driver of coastal ecosystem degradation (Crain et al., Reference Crain, Halpern, Beck and Kappel2009). Declines in water quality are driven mainly by pollutants from upstream human activities within watersheds flowing into coastal environments and are expected to worsen with increased coastal development and future climate change (Rabalais et al., Reference Rabalais, Turner, Díaz and Justić2009; He and Silliman, Reference He and Silliman2019).

Watershed management has received increasing focus as a tool for preserving the health of downstream coastal ecosystems, with research demonstrating critical land–sea linkages for coastal ecosystem health (Carlson et al., Reference Carlson, Foo and Asner2019; Sahavacharin et al., Reference Sahavacharin, Sompongchaiyakul and Thaitakoo2022). Despite the extensive literature and examples of decline, there are few examples of watershed management producing improvements to tropical coastal ecosystem conditions (Wear, Reference Wear2016). Challenges in achieving measurable success are largely due to the large spatial scale over which interventions often need to be applied within watersheds to adequately address multiple sources of pollution, capacity shortfalls for necessary monitoring, and the temporal lags to detect any changes in water quality and/or ecosystem health within coastal environments (Meals et al., Reference Meals, Dressing and Davenport2010).

Watershed condition also regulates a suite of processes that affect human health and wellbeing, including water filtration, flood management, and the provision of important cultural and recreational services (Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Capon, Negin, Marais, Sorrell, Parkes and Horwitz2018a). Polluted water flowing within watersheds onto coastal environments is a major contributor to global human disease burdens, with poor water quality conservatively estimated to result annually in 1.4 million deaths, 3 million disability-adjusted life years and 12 billion USD in economic losses, a cost disproportionately borne by the poorest countries (Shuval, Reference Shuval2003; Fuller et al., Reference Fuller, Landrigan, Balakrishnan, Bathan, Bose-O’Reilly, Brauer, Caravanos, Chiles, Cohen, Corra, Cropper, Ferraro, Hanna, Hanrahan, Hu, Hunter, Janata, Kupka, Lanphear, Lichtveld, Martin, Mustapha, Sanchez-Triana, Sandilya, Schaefli, Shaw, Seddon, Suk, Téllez-Rojo and Yan2022). Yet the influence of watershed management on human health is rarely considered and is largely absent from public health literature (Bunch et al., Reference Bunch, Parkes, Zubrycki, Venema, Hallstrom, Neudorffer, Berbés-Blázquez and Morrison2014).

Identifying the overlapping upstream drivers of poor water quality that also create significant risks to public health presents an opportunity to motivate action and leverage long-term and large-scale investments while simultaneously improving coastal ecosystem water quality. By facilitating both human and ecosystem health, watersheds can serve as a focal area for place-based management interventions that serve to promote overall systems health (Cadham et al., Reference Cadham, Thomas, Khawlie and Kawass2005; Parkes and Horwitz, Reference Parkes and Horwitz2009; Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Horwitz and Arabena2018b; Jordan and Benson, Reference Jordan and Benson2020). Here, we consider systems health as the emergent result of functioning interdependencies, interactions and feedbacks between ecological and socio-cultural settings, behaviour, and physiology, nested across micro-level (e.g., communities of microbes), meso-level (e.g., watersheds) and macro-level (e.g., global climate patterns) domains.

This review aims to: (1) synthesise and summarise the latest science regarding water quality impacts on coastal ecosystems (focused primarily on coral reefs); (2) identify pathways to improve systems health through policy implementation and direct management actions; and (3) provide evidence-based suggestions for strategic investments in watershed interventions across sectors that can help achieve multiple sustainable development goals (SDGs) and other global commitments and targets relating to biodiversity, marine pollution and public health.

Water quality impacts on coastal ecosystems

The quantity and quality of land-based runoff flowing into adjacent coastal ecosystems is determined by the characteristics of the watershed, such as geology, rainfall, soil type, land cover/vegetation (type and quantity) and slope (Douglas, Reference Douglas1967). There is a large body of evidence that demonstrates how human activities within watersheds alter runoff by removing native vegetation, changing the hydrology, altering microbial communities and adding/increasing pollutants within runoff (e.g., Peters and Meybeck, Reference Peters and Meybeck2000; Liao et al., Reference Liao, Yen, Guan, Ke and Liu2020).

Several broad pollutant categories are used to describe the pollutants reaching coastal waters from land-based activities. Here, we focus on the following common categories applicable to both human and coastal ecosystem health: sediments, nutrients, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), plastics and microdebris, pathogens, heavy metals, and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (Todd et al., Reference Todd, Ong and Chou2010; World Health Organization (WHO), 2016; Kroon et al., Reference Kroon, Berry, Brinkman, Kookana, Leusch, Melvin, Neale, Negri, Puotinen, Tsang and van de Merwe2020). Terrestrially derived sediments, heavy metals and nutrients are naturally transported from soils into coastal environments by ground and surface water, but due to large-scale human activities such as land-clearing (Table 1), the sources and transport into coastal waters has increased drastically, threatening over 30% of coral reefs globally (Andrello et al., Reference Andrello, Darling, Wenger, Suárez‐Castro, Gelfand and Ahmadia2021). POPs are synthetic organic chemicals that can persist in soils and water and bioaccumulate in organisms. POPs are widely produced across industries (Table 1) both intentionally, such as some insecticides, and unintentionally as by-products, such as dioxins (Weber et al., Reference Weber, de Beer, Lott, Polerecky, Kohls, Abed, Ferdelman and Fabricius2011). Other synthetic pollutants include the nonorganic plastics and microdebris, which can flow into coastal waters from numerous human sources (Table 1) such as trash, litter and weathering of materials like tires (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Love, Rochman and Neff2018; Macleod et al., Reference MacLeod, Arp, Tekman and Jahnke2021). Pathogens are disease-causing microbes and can naturally exist in coastal water and organisms but can also be introduced from land-based sources such as sewage (Table 1). Pharmaceuticals include chemicals used for personal, agricultural or animal health, such as antibiotics, while personal care products include chemicals generally used for cosmetic reasons, such as shampoos and moisturisers (Boxall et al., Reference Boxall, Rudd, Brooks, Caldwell, Choi, Hickmann, Innes, Ostapyk, Staveley, Verslycke and Ankley2012).

Table 1. Key references documenting global/regional linkages between human activities within watersheds and elevated levels of pollutants in runoff to coastal ecosystems

The primary land-based activities creating these pollutants and driving global declines in coastal water quality are land clearing, poor food production practices, urban development, mining and poor wastewater management (domestic and industrial) (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Yuan, Lu, Su, Zhang, Wang, Cao, Li, Su, Ittekkot, Garbutt, Bush, Fletcher, Wagey, Kachur and Sweijd2018). These human activities erode or release pollutants such as sediment, metals, pathogens and nutrients into surface and groundwater, which are then transported downstream to coastal environments (Crain et al., Reference Crain, Halpern, Beck and Kappel2009; Amato et al., Reference Amato, Bishop, Glenn, Dulai and Smith2016). The flow of impacts from human activities within watersheds to coastal ecosystems is summarised below (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Diagram depicting flow of impacts from key land-based activities on water quality properties that reach coral reef ecosystems.

As outlined in Table 1, pollutants can have multiple sources that can make it difficult to pinpoint which activity in a watershed is having the greatest impact on coastal ecosystems. For example, nutrients and sediments can originate from both wastewater pollution and agricultural runoff (Figure 1). Similarly, pharmaceuticals and personal care products can originate from cosmetics and medications used domestically as well as from medications used in agriculture (Table 1). In addition to the complexity of sources and types of pollutants, synergistic impacts and interactions occur when multiple pollutants are present at elevated levels, which can exacerbate the degradation of coastal ecosystems and harm associated organisms (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Yuan, Lu, Su, Zhang, Wang, Cao, Li, Su, Ittekkot, Garbutt, Bush, Fletcher, Wagey, Kachur and Sweijd2018; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Chen, Song, Deng, Shen, Chen, Zeng and Liang2021). Synergistic impacts and interactions also occur when pollutants are present with other stressors, such as climate change, disease, invasive species and overfishing. We focus on synergistic interactions on coral reefs, given the large body of research.

Herbivory is an important ecological process within coral reef ecosystems and can have complex and synergistic interactions with poor water quality (Table 2; Mumby et al., Reference Mumby, Hastings and Edwards2007). For example, in reefs with combined exposure to poor water quality and few herbivores, macroalgae and sediment-laden turfs can replace live coral as the dominant benthos (McField et al., Reference McField, Kramer, Giró Petersen, Soto, Drysdale, Craig and Rueda-Flores2020, Reference McField, Soto, Craig, Giró, Drysdale, Rueda-Flores, Castillo, Kramer and Roth2022). Sea level rise and climate-driven ocean warming are predicted to increase the sensitivity of coral reef ecosystems to poor water quality. Land-based pollution can lower the threshold for thermal stress and increase coral sensitivity to infection, resulting in increased bleaching (Fisher et al., Reference Fisher, Bessell-Browne and Jones2019), coral mortality (Claar et al., Reference Claar, Starko, Tietjen, Epstein, Cunning, Cobb, Baker, Gates and Baum2020) and outbreaks of disease on coral reefs (Vega-Thurber et al., Reference Vega-Thurber, Mydlarz, Brandt, Harvell, Weil, Raymundo, Willis, Langevin, Tracy and Littman2020). Corals that bleach from thermal stress also have reduced capacity to cope with sediment pollution (Bessell-Browne et al., Reference Bessell-Browne, Negri, Fisher, Clode and Jones2017). Nutrient pollution can result in brittle corals that are less resilient to the impacts of climate change, such as sea level rise and the increased severity and frequency of cyclones (Table 2; Rice et al., Reference Rice, Maher, Correa, Moeller, Lemoine, Shantz, Burkepile and Silbiger2020). Improving water quality through management of human activities within watersheds can therefore improve the resilience of corals to global impacts such as climate change.

Table 2. Impacts of poor water quality on humans, coral reefs, and coral reef organisms categorised by pollutant type, with key references indicated for further information

* Contaminant dynamics are complex, with different impacts and response curves observed even between contaminants in the same group (e.g., different heavy metals generate different impacts, different types of nutrients generate different impacts). Different levels of exposure also generate different responses, with some nutrient species generating positive responses under certain exposure levels. Impacts reported here are a general summary of known impacts from the introduction of each contaminant group at harmful levels observed in the environment.

Water quality impacts on human health

Many of the same drivers of declines in water quality and aquatic biodiversity, such as watershed deforestation, forest fragmentation on riverbanks and poor coverage of sanitation services, are also associated with human health impacts (Table 2). Impacts to humans from poor water quality include enhanced transmission of disease through polluted water and waterways, nutrition deficits from fisheries decline and chronic illness, and food poisoning from the contamination of important aquatic foods (Shuval, Reference Shuval2003; World Health Organization (WHO), 2015; Chase and Ngure, Reference Chase and Ngure2016). Over a million people die each year from water-related diseases, and at least 50% of these deaths are children and attributable to microbial intestinal infections (Kovacs et al., Reference Kovacs, Mullholland, Bosch, Campbell, Forouzanfar, Khalil, Lim, Liu, Maley, Mathers, Matheson, Mokdad, O’Brien, Parashar, Schaafsma, Steele, Hawes and Grove2015). Water related diseases such as diarrhoea are major contributors to global disease burdens, causing 8% of all deaths in children under the age of 5 years largely due to inadequate drinking-water quality (United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME), 2019; World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2021). Persistent endemicity and explosive outbreaks of water-related disease are often fuelled by interacting environmental factors related to climate change, land use and changing social conditions (Cann et al., Reference Cann, Thomas, Salmon, Wyn-Jones and Kay2013; Prüss-Ustün et al., Reference Prüss-Ustün, Wolf, Bartram, Clasen, Cumming, Freeman, Gordon, Hunter, Medlicott and Johnston2019). Water-related illness and travel associated with accessing safe water sources also contributes to reduced socioeconomic outcomes, such as reduced school attendance and gender equity (Fisher, Reference Fisher2008; Sorenson et al., Reference Sorenson, Morssink and Campos2011).

Communities reliant on surface and groundwater sources for drinking, bathing and household cleaning water are most at risk to water-related diseases and exposure to pollutants of emerging concern, particularly in tropical environments (Ragosta et al., Reference Ragosta, Evensen, Atwill, Walker, Ticktin, Asquith and Tate2011; World Health Organization (WHO), 2016; Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Ellis, Fisher, Golden, Johnson, Mulligan, Pfaff, Treuer and Ricketts2017). Climate change is predicted to further increase global disease burdens by altering water-related disease dynamics (Semenza, Reference Semenza2020). Changes in rainfall and temperature will threaten water security, enhance pathogen survival and virulence, and increase exposure to contaminated water through multiple pathways, including flooding (Hofstra, Reference Hofstra2011; Levy et al., Reference Levy, Smith and Carlton2018). Rates of diarrhoea are predicted to increase under warmer and/or wetter conditions, with 1°C of warming predicted to increase diarrhoeal disease by 5% in developing countries (Singh et al., Reference Singh, Hales, De Wet, Raj, Hearnden and Weinstein2001).

Although water-related diseases are more often associated with exposure on land and freshwater, polluted seawater also presents a significant risk to human health. An estimated 180 million cases of upper respiratory disease and gastroenteritis occur each year due to humans bathing in polluted ocean waters or ingesting contaminated seafood, while around 4 million cases (and 40 thousand deaths) of infectious hepatitis A and E (HAV/HEV) occur annually from contaminated seafood from polluted coastal waters (Shuval, Reference Shuval2003; World Health Organization (WHO), 2015). Additionally, seafood contaminated with methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyls can cause cardiovascular diseases in humans as well as severe impacts to infants in utero (Landrigan et al., Reference Landrigan, Stegeman, Fleming, Allemand, Anderson, Backer, Brucker-Davis, Chevalier, Corra, Czerucka, Bottein, Demeneix, Depledge, Deheyn, Dorman, Fénichel, Fisher, Gaill, Galgani, Gaze, Giuliano, Grandjean, Hahn, Hamdoun, Hess, Judson, Laborde, McGlade, Mu, Mustapha, Neira, Noble, Pedrotti, Reddy, Rocklöv, Scharler, Shanmugam, Taghian, Van De Water, Vezzulli, Weihe, Zeka, Raps and Rampal2020). The impacts of polluted seawater create a huge social and economic cost to communities, with pathogens in ocean pollution causing an estimated $19.4 billion (2022 USD) in economic losses annually because of their direct impacts on humans alone (Shuval, Reference Shuval2003).

Microplastics and debris found in wastewater pollution can also form a unique microbial community that is distinct from the surrounding water (Zettler et al., Reference Zettler, Mincer and Amaral-Zettler2013). The microbial community on plastic can include pathogenic microorganisms, such as Vibrio spp., that cause infections through contaminated water or seafood consumption (Zettler et al., Reference Zettler, Mincer and Amaral-Zettler2013; Kirstein et al., Reference Kirstein, Kirmizi, Wichels, Garin-Fernandez, Erler, Löder and Gerdts2016). In the case of some zoonotic parasitic microbes that cause illness in aquatic wildlife and illness in humans from shellfish consumption, counts of the microbes are higher on plastics than in surrounding water (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Kim, Rueda, Rochman, VanWormer, Moore and Shapiro2022). Plastics therefore potentially create a novel habitat for pathogens to be concentrated and dispersed beyond their typical range, as floating plastics can travel longer distances than natural substrates (e.g., wood and macroalgae), and sinking microplastics are readily ingested by filter-feeding shellfish (Zettler et al., Reference Zettler, Mincer and Amaral-Zettler2013; Littman et al., Reference Littman, Fiorenza, Wenger, Berry, van de Water, Nguyen, Aung, Parker, Rader, Harvell and Lamb2020; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Kim, Rueda, Rochman, VanWormer, Moore and Shapiro2022).

Polluted coastal ecosystems also affect the health of coastal human populations through fisheries decline (Hicks et al., Reference Hicks, Cohen, NAJ, Nash, Allison, D’Lima, Mills, Roscher, Thilsted, Thorne-Lyman and MacNeil2019; Li et al., Reference Li, Tian, Xu and Cheng2019). Millions of people depend on tropical coastal fisheries for essential protein and micro-nutrients (Kawarazuka and Béné, Reference Kawarazuka and Béné2010; Teh et al., Reference Teh, Teh and Sumaila2013). More than 10% of the global population is likely to face micronutrient and fatty acid deficiencies if the current trajectories of fisheries decline continue, especially in the developing nations at the Equator (Golden et al., Reference Golden, Allison, Cheung, Dey, Halpern, McCauley, Smith, Vaitla, Zeller and Myers2016). In addition, individuals already experiencing chronic health effects due to repeated exposure to pathogens will have nutrient absorption challenges, further exacerbating any micronutrient deficiencies from declining fisheries (Chase and Ngure, Reference Chase and Ngure2016). Better recognition of the economic and human health costs resulting from pollution impacts is critical for prioritising action and leveraging the necessary cross-sectoral partnerships and resources required for managing pollution at appropriate scales.

Systems approaches to watershed management

There are an array of site-based management interventions that can be implemented at nested scales within watersheds to improve water quality (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Engel, Flanagan, Gitau, McMillan and Chaubey2017; Richmond et al., Reference Richmond, Golbuu, Shelton, Wolanski, Day, Elliot and Ramachandran2019; Leder et al., Reference Leder, Openshaw, Allotey, Ansariadi, Barker, Burge, Clasen, Chown, Duffy, Faber, Fleming, Forbes, French, Greening, Henry, Higginson, Johnston, Lappan, Lin, Luby, McCarthy, O’Toole, Ramirez-Lovering, Reidpath, Simpson, Sinharoy, Sweeney, Taruc, Tela, Turagabeci, Wardani, Wong and Brown2021). Mitigation efforts typically include policy instruments and place-based interventions.

Policy instruments, such as regulations or market-based incentives, can be applied at any scale and are not necessarily spatially bound within watersheds or aimed at specific watersheds. For example, the implementation of policy instruments can control, reduce and/or prevent pollution through improved use, transport, storage and disposal of chemicals (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Pollard, Rocks and Angus2012; Olmstead and Zheng, Reference Olmstead and Zheng2021) and nutrients (UNEP, 2012). Policy instruments can also initiate the implementation of soil conservation and erosion/runoff control strategies, such as maintaining riparian buffer zones by legislating mangrove protection (Richmond et al., Reference Richmond, Golbuu, Shelton, Wolanski, Day, Elliot and Ramachandran2019).

Place-based interventions are specifically applied at a range of scales, from landscape, residential, down to individual and microbial scales (Figure 2). Traditionally, human health focused place-based interventions have been targeted at a residential and individual scale, through the application of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure improvements or behaviour change campaigns (World Health Organization (WHO), 2016; World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2021). However, there is now substantial evidence that landscape scale interventions could deliver significant human health outcomes, while also protecting ecosystem health. For example, a study involving 35 developing countries found that higher upstream tree cover in watersheds was associated with a lower probability of childhood diarrhoeal disease downstream (Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Ellis, Fisher, Golden, Johnson, Mulligan, Pfaff, Treuer and Ricketts2017). In Hawai ͑i, Ragosta et al. (Reference Ragosta, Evensen, Atwill, Walker, Ticktin, Asquith and Tate2011) demonstrated that higher riparian canopy cover was associated with lower Enterococcus concentrations in stream water. New genomics research is beginning to reveal how more intact ecosystems, from the watershed to the individual organism scale, are more likely to carry lower pathogen loads (Hess et al., Reference Hess, Wenger, Ainsworth and Rummer2015; Shore-Maggio et al., Reference Shore-Maggio, Aeby and Callahan2018; Bass et al., Reference Bass, Stentiford, Wang, Koskella and Tyler2019). Coastal ecosystems also play a key role in regulating disease risk in the marine environment, with a recent study showing that when seagrass meadows are present, there are 50% fewer potentially pathogenic bacteria capable of causing disease in humans and aquatic organisms (Lamb et al., Reference Lamb, Willis, Fiorenza, Couch, Howard, Rader, True, Kelly, Ahmad, Jompa and Harvell2017). However, coastal ecosystems themselves are vulnerable to high levels of pollution (Crain et al., Reference Crain, Halpern, Beck and Kappel2009; Wear, Reference Wear2016; Turschwell et al., Reference Turschwell, Connolly, Dunic, Sievers, Buelow, Pearson, Tulloch, Côté, Unsworth, Collier and Brown2021), underscoring the importance of implementing a system-wide approach when managing watersheds.

Figure 2. Nested scales of watershed processes.

Despite the recognition that pollution is one of the greatest threats facing coral reef ecosystems (Burke et al., Reference Burke, Reytar, Spalding and Perry2011; Andrello et al., Reference Andrello, Darling, Wenger, Suárez‐Castro, Gelfand and Ahmadia2021), there are limited examples of water quality management associated with successful recovery of coral reef ecosystems, and of those, the management interventions have primarily only tackled pollution arising from point-source pollution (Birkeland et al., Reference Birkeland, Green, Fenner, Squair and Dahl2013; Reef Resilience Network, 2021). Designing and measuring the effectiveness of policy instruments for water quality management is difficult due to lack of compliance and information on contaminant thresholds and monitoring (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Pollard, Rocks and Angus2012; Olmstead and Zheng, Reference Olmstead and Zheng2021). Place-based interventions are often impeded by difficulties in engaging stakeholders, lack of systematic/transparent planning, and funding shortfalls (Jupiter et al., Reference Jupiter, Wenger, Klein, Albert, Mangubhai, Nelson, Teneva, Tulloch, White and Watson2017; Ayala-Orozco et al., Reference Ayala-Orozco, Rosell, Merçon, Bueno, Alatorre-Frenk, Langle-Flores and Lobato2018). For example, where stakeholders are not effectively engaged, interventions can be hindered by divergent visions, interests, and tensions within and between sectors (Ayala-Orozco et al., Reference Ayala-Orozco, Rosell, Merçon, Bueno, Alatorre-Frenk, Langle-Flores and Lobato2018). Lack of engagement can also limit buy-in and uptake of interventions by groups (Oteros-Rozas et al., Reference Oteros-Rozas, Martin-Lopez, Daw, Bohensky, Butler, Hill, Martin-Ortega, Quinlan, Ravera, Ruiz-Mallen and Thyresson2015; Mitchell et al., Reference Mitchell, Mitchell, Hunt, Townsend and Lee2022). Lack of systematic/transparent planning and evaluation can generate a lack of trust, accountability and credibility from the perspective of stakeholders (Ayala-Orozco et al., Reference Ayala-Orozco, Rosell, Merçon, Bueno, Alatorre-Frenk, Langle-Flores and Lobato2018), and lead to missed opportunities for effective action (Jupiter et al., Reference Jupiter, Wenger, Klein, Albert, Mangubhai, Nelson, Teneva, Tulloch, White and Watson2017; Beer et al., Reference Beer, McKenzie, Blažek, Sotarauta and Ayres2020). Funding shortfalls and lack of personnel prohibit action at the scale and duration required (Ayala-Orozco et al., Reference Ayala-Orozco, Rosell, Merçon, Bueno, Alatorre-Frenk, Langle-Flores and Lobato2018; Beer et al., Reference Beer, McKenzie, Blažek, Sotarauta and Ayres2020). Interventions for nonpoint source pollution can be particularly challenging as pollution loading is difficult to estimate and is often attributable to many stakeholders and sectors beholden to different regulations (Shortle and Horan, Reference Shortle and Horan2001).

Kāneʻohe Bay in Hawaii is a commonly cited case-study of point-source pollution (sewage) management for coral reef ecosystems resulting in a rarely seen recovery from an algal dominated back to a coral dominated state (Bahr et al., Reference Bahr, Jokiel and Toonen2015). More recent successes include recovery of coral reef ecosystems within Faga’alu Bay in American Samoa and Molokaʻi in Hawai‘i, where harmful runoff from the upstream quarry activities (Samoa) and invasive ungulate species (Hawaiʻi) were managed through targeted watershed interventions (Vargas-Ángel and Huntington, Reference Vargas-Ángel and Huntington2020). Both regions’ intervention strategies required large and costly monitoring efforts to observe success, and both observed setbacks in recovery trajectories due to external disturbances (e.g., storm waves and bleaching; Bahr et al., Reference Bahr, Jokiel and Toonen2015; Vargas-Ángel and Huntington, Reference Vargas-Ángel and Huntington2020).

Watershed case study 1: Watershed interventions for systems health in Fiji

Low coverage of properly treated drinking water and sanitation in remote areas of Fiji leaves communities heavily reliant on the safety and security of unprotected water sources and vulnerable to water-related diseases. Severe outbreaks of water-related infectious diseases, such as leptospirosis, typhoid and dengue (hereafter LTD), are common. LTD cases and associated syndromes are correlated with environmental conditions, with large outbreaks typically occurring following heavy rainfall and flooding (Lau et al., Reference Lau, Smythe, Craig and Weinstein2010; Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Jenkins, Jupiter, Horwitz, Mangubhai, Abimbola, Ratu, Naivalulevu and Negin2022), with increased severity within degraded watersheds (Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Jupiter, Mueller, Jenney, Vosaki, Rosa, Naucukidi, Mulholland, Strugnell, Kama and Horwitz2016).

Coastal and freshwater ecosystems are also threatened by degraded watersheds in Fiji, with decreased fish, coral and seagrass cover seen downstream of cleared and developed watersheds due to the runoff of harmful pollutants (Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Jupiter, Qauqau and Atherton2010; Brown et al., Reference Brown, Jupiter, Lin, Albert, Klein, Maina, Tulloch, Wenger and Mumby2017; McKenzie and Yoshida, Reference McKenzie and Yoshida2020). These ecosystems support the livelihoods, nutrition and incomes of many rural communities (Mangubhai et al., Reference Mangubhai, Sykes, Lovell, Brodie, Jupiter, Morris, Lee, Loganimoce, Rashni, Lal, Nand, Qauqau and Sheppard2018).

The Watershed Interventions for Systems Health in Fiji (WISH Fiji) project aims to address these overlapping problems through a collaborative effort between government, academic and non-governmental organisations (NGO) partners. Project collaborators are co-designing targeted ‘up-stream’ interventions implemented across various nested scales (Figure 2) with local communities to prevent, detect and respond to LTDs, in addition to mitigating degradation of downstream resources and ecosystems (McFarlane et al., Reference McFarlane, Horwitz, Arabena, Capon, Jenkins, Jupiter, Negin, Parkes and Saketa2019). In doing so, the WISH Fiji project aims to transform both environmental and public health action from reactive to preventative, and improve the overall health of the system to maintain integrity against LTD and natural disasters.

Watershed case study 2: Wastewater management in Roatan, Honduras

Roatan Island, in the Bay Islands of Honduras, is bordered by coral reef ecosystems that attract over a million tourists into the region. Provisioning unpolluted runoff from watersheds is essential to maintaining the health of these ecosystems, but also to protect the health of Roatan communities and tourists. However, limited wastewater treatment on the island resulted in discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastewater directly onto coral reef ecosystems. Local ecological knowledge linked this wastewater runoff to outbreaks of water-related infectious disease in both humans and corals in the region, which raised fears of impacts on tourism (the main source of income in Roatan).

To combat both the human health and ecosystem impacts of untreated wastewater discharge, a collaboration between government, conservation groups and water associations identified the need for a community wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and water quality program in West End, Roatan. The West End WWTP was then built in 2011 and has since been connected to 99% of accessible homes and businesses in the area.

Critically, a water quality laboratory led by the Bay Islands Conservation Association was also built to enable testing of marine water downstream of the WWTP, allowing significant improvements in water quality to be observed. Within 7 years of the WWTP installation, the public beach downstream passed the United States EPA safe swimming standards for Enterococcus, a bacteria which can cause a variety of infections and is associated with faecal contamination. The beach has since been awarded an Ecological Blue Flag certification that validates the areas as safe for tourists. Improved metrics for coral reef ecosystem health were also observed, likely as a result of improved water quality (Coral Reef Alliance, 2020).

Key enabling factors

Cross-sectoral coordination and integrated governance

Managing watersheds offers numerous opportunities to address systems health challenges linked to achievement of multiple SDGs (Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Capon, Negin, Marais, Sorrell, Parkes and Horwitz2018a), but simultaneously tackling multiple objectives requires coordination and integrated governance. Cross-sectoral collaborations can create a more holistic understanding of the watershed system and the breadth of its impacts across sectors (Parkes et al., Reference Parkes, Morrison, Bunch, Hallström, Neudoerffer, Venema and Waltner-Toews2010). This holistic understanding can improve the efficiency of integrated watershed management (IWM) by targeting multiple problems at once, creating the potential for win–win scenarios for both coastal ecosystem health and human health (Jupiter et al., Reference Jupiter, Jenkins, Lee Long, Maxwell, Carruthers, Hodge, Govan, Tamelander and Watson2014; Jenkins and Jupiter, Reference Jenkins, Jupiter, Finlayson, Horwitz and Weinstein2015).

The success of cross-sectoral coordination and governance relies on careful participatory engagement and integrated policy development and implementation (Olsen and Christie, Reference Olsen and Christie2000; Lane, Reference Lane2008). Decision-making should be developed through engagement with a wide range of stakeholders and resource users at multiple scales, improving coordination between divisions that may typically focus on the coastline or in specific sectors (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Mang, Cai, Liu, Zhang, Wang and Innes2016). Care should be taken to incorporate information from multiple knowledge systems in planning and practice to ensure alignment with local values and objectives (Tengö et al., Reference Tengö, Brondizio, Elmqvist, Malmer and Spierenburg2014). Engagement should capture the diversity of land and water use practices, needs, goals and potential conflicts across sectors, and ensure that all involvement is participatory, transparent, accountable and culturally appropriate (Jupiter et al., Reference Jupiter, Jenkins, Lee Long, Maxwell, Carruthers, Hodge, Govan, Tamelander and Watson2014; Richmond et al., Reference Richmond, Golbuu, Shelton, Wolanski, Day, Elliot and Ramachandran2019).

Managing watersheds for systems health often requires coordination across multiple jurisdictions and administrative units that operate within and beyond watershed boundaries. Watershed governance is thus complicated by the mismatched boundaries of biophysical processes operating within drainage basins and jurisdictional boundaries of administrative systems responsible for land use policy implementation and health systems surveillance and delivery (Davidson and De Loë, Reference Davidson and De Loë2014). Polycentric and collaborative governance approaches, particularly those involving Indigenous peoples and local communities, are appropriate in this context to bridge across sectors and jurisdictional levels and address watershed systems issues at appropriate scales (e.g., Huitema et al., Reference Huitema, Mostert, Egas, Moellenkamp, Pahl-Wostl and Yalcin2009; Morrison, Reference Morrison2017). Watershed management across multiple agencies and organisations can be coordinated by specific institutions that can serve as bridging organisations, such as catchment authorities, which operate most effectively when they have legislated mandates and operating budgets (Parkes et al., Reference Parkes, Morrison, Bunch, Hallström, Neudoerffer, Venema and Waltner-Toews2010; Davidson and De Loë, Reference Davidson and De Loë2014).

Critically, integrated policy needs to be developed based on a good understanding of the connections among systems so that evidence-based predictions and decisions can be made about how any interventions may influence outcomes in multiple sectors (Álvarez-Romero et al., Reference Álvarez-Romero, Adams, Pressey, Douglas, Dale, Augé, Ball, Childs, Digby, Dobbs, Gobius, Hinchley, Lancaster, Maughan and Perdrisat2015). It is essential to consider any potential trade-off scenarios wherein mutual benefits are not shared between sectors, or one sector may even be exposed to more harm. For example, the construction or restoration of wetlands for improving water quality and ecosystem health may have unintended consequences for mosquito-borne disease risk (Malan et al., Reference Malan, Appleton, Day and Dini2009; Horwitz and Finlayson, Reference Horwitz and Finlayson2011); and the installation of dams and weirs for improving water security and sediment pollution may have unintended consequences for freshwater ecosystems and fisheries (Dudgeon et al., Reference Dudgeon, Arthington, Gessner, Kawabata, Knowler, Lévêque, Naiman, Prieur-Richard, Soto, Stiassny and Sullivan2006; Kroon et al., Reference Kroon, Schaffelke and Bartley2014). Having a wide range of informed stakeholders sharing resources and taking an integrated approach will assist in buffering this risk and create more effective and proactive governance wherein benefits across sectors are optimised.

Sustainable financing

Improving water quality through upstream interventions is expensive and requires sustained investment (Muchapondwa et al., Reference Muchapondwa, Stage, Mungatana and Kumar2018). There is often a long lag time between implementing interventions and observing improvements in metrics of ecosystem and public health, while success can also be obscured by other disturbances, such as cyclones and coral bleaching (Richmond et al., Reference Richmond, Golbuu, Shelton, Wolanski, Day, Elliot and Ramachandran2019). Delays in realising anticipated benefits create disincentives for long-term action when program and policy targets require short-term results.

Water and watershed funds are a common financing tool used in various geographies globally to ensure a sustained source of funding (The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and Goldman, Reference Goldman2009; Kauffman, Reference Kauffman2014). These funds are often resourced through voluntary contributions of donors and water users, such as utility companies and farmers, which are then used to pay for and support upstream strategies to conserve the quality and security of water sources. Boards may invest the funding directly or use grants to identify and develop critical intervention strategies (The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and Goldman, Reference Goldman2009). Linking the needs of downstream water users with upstream communities and land users allows the funds to provide a low-cost and sustainable financing method of maintaining clean and regular water supply (The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and Goldman, Reference Goldman2009).

Examples of successful water funds are mainly from temperate regions and exclude marine ecosystems, such as the Latin American Water Funds Partnership (LAWFP). LAWFP is an agreement between a consortium of international NGOs to enhance and preserve water security in Latin America and supports 25 water funds across nine countries with varying water management goals and local funding bodies (Bremer et al., Reference Bremer, Auerbach, Goldstein, Vogl, Shemie, Kroeger, Nelson, Benítez, Calvache, Guimarães, Herron, Higgins, Klemz, León, Sebastián Lozano, Moreno, Nuñez, Veiga and Tiepolo2016). In total, LAWFP supported water funds are managing over 227,000 ha of land, potentially benefiting 89 million people, and have leveraged over $205 million USD in resources. Many funds prioritise not only water infrastructure management for humans, but also the use of nature-based solutions as a means to preserve the health of aquatic ecosystems (Kauffman, Reference Kauffman2014). However, as with many water funds (and conservation efforts), there have been limited measurements of the outcomes or baselines to fully perceive the benefits of these funds (Bremer et al., Reference Bremer, Auerbach, Goldstein, Vogl, Shemie, Kroeger, Nelson, Benítez, Calvache, Guimarães, Herron, Higgins, Klemz, León, Sebastián Lozano, Moreno, Nuñez, Veiga and Tiepolo2016).

The availability of local sources of funding for sustainable financing of a water or watershed fund will vary from region to region as beneficiaries vary. Not all communities and industries pay for water use: under these circumstances, it may be feasible to develop business cases for investment based on foregone healthcare and productivity costs if watershed improvements prevent people from getting sick. Key to developing these business plans is first assessing how much disease risk can be reduced by a portfolio of management interventions and balancing the wide range of savings in foregone costs (healthcare, missed work and education, tourism impacts) against annual investment needs. Considerations also need to be taken for the potential benefits from buffering against the influence of climate change on disease.

Various other types of conservation and climate change financing can additionally or alternatively support watershed management financing. For example, in some coral reef areas, payment for ecosystem services schemes have also been proposed as a way for downstream resource users to incentivise upstream resources users to manage water quality (Goldman-Benner et al., Reference Goldman-Benner, Benitez, Boucher, Calvache, Daily, Kareiva, Kroeger and Ramos2012; Peng and Oleson, Reference Peng and Oleson2017). Climate financing that supports nature-based solutions is commonly expected to deliver various water services, though evidence shows mixed results on base flow, annual surface runoff and water quality depending on local geographic conditions and the mix of interventions utilised (Vigerstol et al., Reference Vigerstol, Abell, Brauman, Buytaert, Vogl, Cassin, Matthews and Gunn2021; de Freitas et al., Reference de Freitas, de Moraes, da Costa, Martins, Silva, Avanzi and Uezu2022).

Conclusions/recommendations

The latest science makes it clear that unplanned development, poor land use, unsustainable agricultural practices and poor wastewater management within watersheds are significant threats to coastal populations and ecosystems. Despite the threats, incentivising improved watershed management practices for the sake of improving water quality for downstream environmental benefits has remained a challenge. In the future, it is recommended that policies and management are designed using systems health approaches that aim to restore water quality to achieve multiple benefits for human and coastal ecosystem health, while facilitating sustainable social and economic development.

Through our review, we identified a series of actionable recommendations to promote holistic approaches to watershed management for systems health (Table 3). These include best practice lessons from existing, IWM programs on: inclusive planning; implementation through cross-sectoral coordination; participatory management; monitoring to identify risks and measure progress of interventions; mobilising resources to sustain long-term action; and sharing information to promote replication and scaling of integrated approaches. To achieve SDG targets by 2030, there is increasing urgency to prioritise these types of management approaches that simultaneously deliver on benefits for nature, people and climate.

Table 3. Recommendations for planning, coordinating, monitoring, resourcing and scaling sustained investment in integrated watershed management for systems health

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2023.15.

Data availability statement

No data presented in this review.

Acknowledgements

Sarah Markes provided graphic design for Figure 1 and Haley Williams provided graphic design for Figure 2.

Author contribution

S.D.J. created the ideas and outline for the manuscript. All authors reviewed outline and provided feedback on the format and scientific content of the outline. A.Wa., S.J., A.We. and A.J. created the first written draft of the manuscript. A.Wa. edited the figures and created the tables. J.L., C.D.K., D.C., C.C., K.F., A.R. and H.S.G. provided critical revision of the scientific content of the manuscript and provided stylistic/grammatical revisions, over multiple drafts. A.Wa. addressed revisions and compiled the final manuscript.

Financial support

Manuscript development was supported by grant #53006 from Bloomberg Philanthropies to the Wildlife Conservation Society under the Vibrant Oceans Initiative.

Competing interest

No competing interest to declare.

References

Agouridis, CT, Workman, SR, Warner, RC and Jennings, GD (2005) Livestock grazing management impacts on stream water quality: A review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41, 591606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguirre-Martínez, GV, Owuor, MA, Garrido-Pérez, C, Salamanca, MJ, Del Valls, TA and Martín-Díaz, ML (2015) Are standard tests sensitive enough to evaluate effects of human pharmaceuticals in aquatic biota? Facing changes in research approaches when performing risk assessment of drugs. Chemosphere 120, 7585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahrens, MJ and Morrisey, DJ (2005) Biological effects of unburnt coal in the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology 43, 69122.Google Scholar
Albert, S, Deering, N, Tongi, S, Nandy, A, Kisi, A, Sirikolo, M, Maehaka, M, Hutley, N, Kies-Ryan, S and Grinham, A (2021) Water quality challenges associated with industrial logging of a karst landscape: Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands. Marine Pollution Bulletin 169, 112506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Álvarez-Romero, JG, Adams, VM, Pressey, RL, Douglas, M, Dale, AP, Augé, AA, Ball, D, Childs, J, Digby, M, Dobbs, R, Gobius, N, Hinchley, D, Lancaster, I, Maughan, M and Perdrisat, I (2015) Integrated cross-realm planning: A decision-makers’ perspective. Biological Conservation 191, 799808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, DW, Bishop, JM, Glenn, CR, Dulai, H and Smith, CM (2016) Impact of submarine groundwater discharge on marine water quality and reef biota of Maui. PLoS One 2016, e0165825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrello, M, Darling, ES, Wenger, A, Suárez‐Castro, AF, Gelfand, S and Ahmadia, GN (2021) A global map of human pressures on tropical coral reefs. Conservation Letters 15, e12858.Google Scholar
Ayala-Orozco, B, Rosell, JA, Merçon, J, Bueno, I, Alatorre-Frenk, G, Langle-Flores, A and Lobato, A (2018) Challenges and strategies in place-based multi-stakeholder collaboration for sustainability: Learning from experiences in the Global South. Sustainability 10, 3217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, KD, Jokiel, PL and Toonen, RJ (2015) The unnatural history of Kāne‘ohe Bay: Coral reef resilience in the face of centuries of anthropogenic impacts. PeerJ 3, e950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartley, R, Corfield, JP, Hawdon, AA, Kinsey-Henderson, AE, Abbott, BN, Wilkinson, SN and Keen, RJ (2014) Can changes to pasture management reduce runoff and sediment loss to the Great Barrier Reef? The results of a 10-year study in the Burdekin catchment, Australia. Rangeland Journal 36, 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, D, Stentiford, GD, Wang, H-C, Koskella, B and Tyler, CR (2019) The pathobiome in animal and plant diseases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 34, 9961008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beer, A, McKenzie, F, Blažek, J, Sotarauta, M and Ayres, S (2020) Every Place Matters: Towards Effective Place-Based Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, DR, Hughes, TP, Folke, C and Nyström, M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429, 827833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessell-Browne, P, Negri, AP, Fisher, R, Clode, PL and Jones, R (2017) Cumulative impacts: Thermally bleached corals have reduced capacity to clear deposited sediment. Scientific Reports 7, 2716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkeland, CE, Green, A, Fenner, D, Squair, C and Dahl, AL (2013) Substratum stability and coral reef resilience: Insights from 90 years of disturbances on a reef in American Samoa. Micronesica 2013, 116.Google Scholar
Bosch, AC, O’Neill, B, Sigge, GO, Kerwath, SE and Hoffman, LC (2016) Heavy metals in marine fish meat and consumer health: A review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96, 3248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boucher, J and Friot, D (2017) Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: A Global Evaluation of Sources. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxall, AB, Rudd, MA, Brooks, BW, Caldwell, DJ, Choi, K, Hickmann, S, Innes, E, Ostapyk, K, Staveley, JP, Verslycke, T and Ankley, GT (2012) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: What are the big questions? Environmental Health Perspectives 120, 12211229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bremer, LL, Auerbach, DA, Goldstein, JH, Vogl, AL, Shemie, D, Kroeger, T, Nelson, JL, Benítez, SP, Calvache, A, Guimarães, J, Herron, C, Higgins, J, Klemz, C, León, J, Sebastián Lozano, J, Moreno, PH, Nuñez, F, Veiga, F and Tiepolo, G (2016) One size does not fit all: Natural infrastructure investments within the Latin American Water Funds Partnership. Ecosystem Services 17, 217236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, CJ, Jupiter, SD, Lin, H-Y, Albert, S, Klein, C, Maina, JM, Tulloch, VJD, Wenger, AS and Mumby, PJ (2017) Habitat change mediates the response of coral reef fish populations to terrestrial run-off. Marine Ecology Progress Series 576, 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunch, MJ, Parkes, M, Zubrycki, K, Venema, H, Hallstrom, L, Neudorffer, C, Berbés-Blázquez, M and Morrison, K (2014) Watershed management and public health: An exploration of the intersection of two fields as reported in the literature from 2000 to 2010. Environmental Management 54, 240254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, L, Reytar, K, Spalding, M and Perry, A (2011) Reefs at Risk Revisited. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Cadham, JC, Thomas, RL, Khawlie, M and Kawass, I (2005) Environmental management of the waters of the El-Kabir River and the associated Akkar watershed. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 10, 141146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, KF, Thomas, DR, Salmon, RL, Wyn-Jones, AP and Kay, D (2013) Extreme water-related weather events and waterborne disease. Epidemiology and Infection 141, 671686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, RR, Foo, SA and Asner, GP (2019) Land use impacts on coral reef health: A ridge-to-reef perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesar, H, Burke, L and Pet-Soede, L (2003) The Economics of Worldwide Coral Reef Degradation. Zeist: Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting.Google Scholar
Chase, C and Ngure, FM (2016) Multisectoral Approaches to Improving Nutrition: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene. Water and Sanitation Program Technical Paper 102935. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Available at https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/881101468196156182/pdf/102935-WSP-Box394845B-PUBLIC-ADD-SERIES-Water-and-Sanitation-Program-WSP.pdf.Google Scholar
Claar, DC, Starko, S, Tietjen, KL, Epstein, HE, Cunning, R, Cobb, KM, Baker, AC, Gates, RD and Baum, JK (2020) Dynamic symbioses reveal pathways to coral survival through prolonged heatwaves. Nature Communications 11, 6097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coral Reef Alliance (2020) Coral Reefs in Roatán Thrive with Clean Water. Available at https://coral.org/en/blog/coral-reefs-in-roatan-thrive-with-clean-water/ (accessed 30 March 2023).Google Scholar
Cox, EF and Ward, S (2002) Impact of elevated ammonium on reproduction in two Hawaiian scleractinian corals with different life history patterns. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 12301235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crain, CM, Halpern, BS, Beck, MW and Kappel, CV (2009) Understanding and managing human threats to the coastal marine environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162, 3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, SL and De Loë, RC (2014) Watershed governance: Transcending boundaries. Water Alternatives 7, 367387.Google Scholar
de Freitas, LD, de Moraes, JFL, da Costa, AM, Martins, LL, Silva, BM, Avanzi, JC and Uezu, A (2022) How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important Brazilian watersheds? Earth 3, 748767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, I (1967) Man, vegetation and the sediment yields of rivers. Nature 215, 925928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, CA, Kramarsky-Winter, E, Segal, R, Fauth, J, Knutson, S, Bronstein, O, Ciner, FR, Jeger, R, Lichtenfeld, Y, Woodley, CM, Pennington, P, Cadenas, K, Kushmaro, A and Loya, Y (2016) Toxicopathological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), on coral planulae and cultured primary cells and its environmental contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 70, 265288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudgeon, D, Arthington, AH, Gessner, MO, Kawabata, Z-I, Knowler, DJ, Lévêque, C, Naiman, RJ, Prieur-Richard, A-H, Soto, D, Stiassny, MLJ and Sullivan, CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81, 163182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edinger, EN, Jompa, J, Limmon, GV, Widjatmoko, W and Risk, MJ (1998) Reef degradation and coral biodiversity in Indonesia: Effects of land-based pollution, destructive fishing practices and changes over time. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36, 617630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edinger, EN, Limmon, GV, Jompa, J, Widjatmoko, W, Heikoop, JM and Risk, MJ (2000) Normal coral growth rates on dying reefs: Are coral growth rates good indicators of reef health? Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 404425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, KE (2005) Effects of terrestrial runoff on the ecology of corals and coral reefs review and synthesis. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50, 125146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, J (2008) Women in water supply, sanitation and hygiene programmes. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer 161, 223229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R, Bessell-Browne, P and Jones, R (2019) Synergistic and antagonistic impacts of suspended sediments and thermal stress on corals. Nature Communications 10, 23462349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, LE, Broad, K, Clement, A, Dewailly, E, Elmir, S, Knap, A, Pomponi, SA, Smith, S, Solo Gabriele, H and Walsh, P (2006) Oceans and human health: Emerging public health risks in the marine environment: The oceans and human health. Marine Pollution Bulletin 53, 545560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, MC, Pringle, CM and Jackson, CR (2007) Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R, Landrigan, PJ, Balakrishnan, K, Bathan, G, Bose-O’Reilly, S, Brauer, M, Caravanos, J, Chiles, T, Cohen, A, Corra, L, Cropper, M, Ferraro, G, Hanna, J, Hanrahan, D, Hu, H, Hunter, D, Janata, G, Kupka, R, Lanphear, B, Lichtveld, M, Martin, K, Mustapha, A, Sanchez-Triana, E, Sandilya, K, Schaefli, L, Shaw, J, Seddon, J, Suk, W, Téllez-Rojo, MM and Yan, C (2022) Pollution and health: A progress update. Lancet Planetary Health 6, e535e547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, TS (2015) Micro- and nano-plastics and human health. In Bergmann, M, Gutow, L and Klages, M (eds), Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 343366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, RN, Chung, KW, DeLorenzo, ME and Curran, MC (2014) Individual and mixture effects of caffeine and sulfamethoxazole on the daggerblade grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio following maternal exposure. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 33, 21202125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmour, J (1999) Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation, larval survival and settlement in a scleractinian coral. Marine Biology 135, 451462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golbuu, Y, Fabricius, K, Victor, S and Richmond, RH (2008) Gradients in coral reef communities exposed to muddy river discharge in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76, 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, CD, Allison, EH, Cheung, WWL, Dey, MM, Halpern, BS, McCauley, DJ, Smith, M, Vaitla, B, Zeller, D and Myers, SS (2016) Nutrition: Fall in fish catch threatens human health. Nature 534, 317320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman-Benner, RL, Benitez, S, Boucher, T, Calvache, A, Daily, G, Kareiva, P, Kroeger, T and Ramos, A (2012) Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: Practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx 46, 5563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräslund, S and Bengtsson, BE (2001) Chemicals and biological products used in South-East Asian shrimp farming, and their potential impact on the environment—A review. Science of the Total Environment 280, 93131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, PL and Ward, S (2001) Elevated levels of nitrogen and phosphorus reduce fertilisation success of gametes from scleractinian reef corals. Marine Biology 139, 10571068.Google Scholar
He, Q and Silliman, BR (2019) Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the anthropocene. Current Biology 29, R1021R1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, D, Ellis, A, Fisher, B, Golden, CD, Johnson, K, Mulligan, M, Pfaff, A, Treuer, T and Ricketts, TH (2017) Upstream watershed condition predicts rural children’s health across 35 developing countries. Nature Communications 8, 811818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, S, Wenger, AS, Ainsworth, TD and Rummer, JL (2015) Exposure of clownfish larvae to suspended sediment levels found on the Great Barrier Reef: Impacts on gill structure and microbiome. Scientific Reports 5, 10561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, CC, Cohen, PJ, NAJ, Graham, Nash, KL, Allison, EH, D’Lima, C, Mills, DJ, Roscher, M, Thilsted, SH, Thorne-Lyman, AL and MacNeil, MA (2019) Harnessing global fisheries to tackle micronutrient deficiencies. Nature 574, 9598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstra, N (2011) Quantifying the impact of climate change on enteric waterborne pathogen concentrations in surface water. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3, 471479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, P and Finlayson, CM (2011) Wetlands as settings for human health: Incorporating ecosystem services and health impact assessment into water resource management. Bioscience 61, 678688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W, Chen, M, Song, B, Deng, J, Shen, M, Chen, Q, Zeng, G and Liang, J (2021) Microplastics in the coral reefs and their potential impacts on corals: A mini-review. Science of the Total Environment 762, 143112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huitema, D, Mostert, E, Egas, W, Moellenkamp, S, Pahl-Wostl, C and Yalcin, R (2009) Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, A, Capon, A, Negin, J, Marais, B, Sorrell, T, Parkes, M and Horwitz, P (2018a) Watersheds in planetary health research and action. Lancet Planetary Health 2, e510e511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, A, Horwitz, P and Arabena, K (2018b) My island home: Place-based integration of conservation and public health in Oceania. Environmental Conservation 45, 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, AP and Jupiter, S (2015) Natural disasters, health and wetlands. In Finlayson, CM, Horwitz, P and Weinstein, P (eds), Wetlands and Human Health. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 169191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, AP, Jupiter, S, Mueller, U, Jenney, A, Vosaki, G, Rosa, V, Naucukidi, A, Mulholland, K, Strugnell, R, Kama, M and Horwitz, P (2016) Health at the sub-catchment scale: Typhoid and its environmental determinants in central division, Fiji. EcoHealth 13, 633651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, AP, Jupiter, SD, Qauqau, I and Atherton, J (2010) Importance of ecosystem-based management for conserving aquatic migratory pathways on tropical high islands: A case study from Fiji. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20, 224238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R, Fisher, R and Bessell-Browne, P (2019) Sediment deposition and coral smothering. PLoS One 2019, e0216248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, SJ and Benson, WH (2020) Sustainable watersheds: Integrating ecosystem services and public health. Environmental Health Insights 9, EHI-S19586.Google Scholar
Jupiter, SD, Jenkins, AP, Lee Long, WJ, Maxwell, SL, Carruthers, TJB, Hodge, KB, Govan, H, Tamelander, J and Watson, JEM (2014) Principles for integrated island management in the tropical Pacific. Pacific Conservation Biology 20, 193205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupiter, SD, Wenger, A, Klein, CJ, Albert, S, Mangubhai, S, Nelson, J, Teneva, L, Tulloch, VJ, White, AT and Watson, JEM (2017) Opportunities and constraints for implementing integrated land–sea management on islands. Environmental Conservation 44, 254266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, CM (2014) Financing watershed conservation: Lessons from Ecuador’s evolving water trust funds. Agricultural Water Management 145, 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawarazuka, N and Béné, C (2010) Linking small-scale fisheries and aquaculture to household nutritional security: An overview. Food Security 2, 343357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirstein, IV, Kirmizi, S, Wichels, A, Garin-Fernandez, A, Erler, R, Löder, M and Gerdts, G (2016) Dangerous hitchhikers? Evidence for potentially pathogenic Vibrio spp. on microplastic particles. Marine Environmental Research 120, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondolf, GM (1994) Geomorphic and environmental effects of instream gravel mining. Landscape and Urban Planning 28, 225243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, K, Booth, D, Broadbent, A, Brodie, J, Bucher, D, Capone, D, Coll, J, Dennison, W, Erdmann, M, Harrison, P, Hoegh-Guldberg, O, Hutchings, P, Jones, GB, Larkum, AWD, O’Neil, J, Steven, A, Tentori, E, Ward, S, Williamson, J and Yellowlees, D (2001) ENCORE: The effect of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs. Synthesis of results and conclusions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42, 91120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacs, SD, Mullholland, K, Bosch, J, Campbell, H, Forouzanfar, MH, Khalil, I, Lim, S, Liu, L, Maley, SN, Mathers, CD, Matheson, A, Mokdad, AH, O’Brien, K, Parashar, U, Schaafsma, TT, Steele, D, Hawes, SE and Grove, JT (2015) Deconstructing the differences: A comparison of GBD 2010 and CHERG’s approach to estimating the mortality burden of diarrhea, pneumonia, and their etiologies. BMC Infectious Diseases 15, 1616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroon, FJ, Berry, KL, Brinkman, DL, Kookana, R, Leusch, FD, Melvin, SD, Neale, PA, Negri, AP, Puotinen, M, Tsang, JJ and van de Merwe, JP (2020) Sources, presence and potential effects of contaminants of emerging concern in the marine environments of the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait, Australia. Science of the Total Environment 719, 135140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroon, FJ, Schaffelke, B and Bartley, R (2014) Informing policy to protect coastal coral reefs: Insight from a global review of reducing agricultural pollution to coastal ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 85, 3341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, JB, Van De Water, JAJM, Bourne, DG, Altier, C, Hein, MY, Fiorenza, EA, Abu, N, Jompa, J and Harvell, CD (2017) Seagrass ecosystems reduce exposure to bacterial pathogens of humans, fishes, and invertebrates. Science 355, 731733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, JB, Willis, BL, Fiorenza, EA, Couch, CS, Howard, R, Rader, DN, True, JD, Kelly, LA, Ahmad, A, Jompa, J and Harvell, CD (2018) Plastic waste associated with disease on coral reefs. Science 359, 460462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landrigan, PJ, Stegeman, JJ, Fleming, LE, Allemand, D, Anderson, DM, Backer, LC, Brucker-Davis, F, Chevalier, N, Corra, L, Czerucka, D, Bottein, M-YD, Demeneix, B, Depledge, M, Deheyn, DD, Dorman, CJ, Fénichel, P, Fisher, S, Gaill, F, Galgani, F, Gaze, WH, Giuliano, L, Grandjean, P, Hahn, ME, Hamdoun, A, Hess, P, Judson, B, Laborde, A, McGlade, J, Mu, J, Mustapha, A, Neira, M, Noble, RT, Pedrotti, ML, Reddy, C, Rocklöv, J, Scharler, UM, Shanmugam, H, Taghian, G, Van De Water, JAJM, Vezzulli, L, Weihe, P, Zeka, A, Raps, H and Rampal, P (2020) Human health and ocean pollution. Annals of Global Health 86, 164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, MB (2008) Strategic coastal governance issues in Fiji: The challenges of integration. Marine Policy 32, 856866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapointe, BE, Thacker, K, Hanson, C and Getten, L (2011) Sewage pollution in Negril, Jamaica: Effects on nutrition and ecology of coral reef macroalgae. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 29, 775789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, CL, Smythe, LD, Craig, SB and Weinstein, P (2010) Climate change, flooding, urbanisation and leptospirosis: Fuelling the fire? Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 104, 631638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Grand, HM and Fabricius, KE (2011) Relationship of internal macrobioeroder densities in living massive Porites to turbidity and chlorophyll on the Australian Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 30, 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, K, Openshaw, JJ, Allotey, P, Ansariadi, A, Barker, SF, Burge, K, Clasen, TF, Chown, SL, Duffy, GA, Faber, PA, Fleming, G, Forbes, AB, French, M, Greening, C, Henry, R, Higginson, E, Johnston, DW, Lappan, R, Lin, A, Luby, SP, McCarthy, D, O’Toole, JE, Ramirez-Lovering, D, Reidpath, DD, Simpson, JA, Sinharoy, SS, Sweeney, R, Taruc, RR, Tela, A, Turagabeci, AR, Wardani, J, Wong, T and Brown, R (2021) Study design, rationale and methods of the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments (RISE) study: A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate environmental and human health impacts of a water-sensitive intervention in informal settlements in Indonesia and Fiji. BMJ Open 11, e042850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, K, Smith, SM and Carlton, EJ (2018) Climate change impacts on waterborne diseases: Moving toward designing interventions. Current Environmental Health Reports 5, 272282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X, Tian, Y, Xu, C and Cheng, B (2019) The impact of marine pollution control on the output value of marine fisheries based on the spatial econometric model. Journal of Coastal Research 98, 381384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, H, Yen, JY, Guan, Y, Ke, D and Liu, C (2020) Differential responses of stream water and bed sediment microbial communities to watershed degradation. Environment International 134, 105198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littman, RA, Fiorenza, EA, Wenger, AS, Berry, KLE, van de Water, JAJM, Nguyen, L, Aung, ST, Parker, DM, Rader, DN, Harvell, CD and Lamb, JB (2020) Coastal urbanization influences human pathogens and microdebris contamination in seafood. Science of the Total Environment 736, 139081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Engel, BA, Flanagan, DC, Gitau, MW, McMillan, SK and Chaubey, I (2017) A review on effectiveness of best management practices in improving hydrology and water quality: Needs and opportunities. Science of the Total Environment 601–602, 580593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotze, HK, Lenihan, HS, Bourque, BJ, Bradbury, RH, Cooke, RG, Kay, MC, Kidwell, SM, Kirby, MX, Peterson, CH and Jackson, JBC (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312, 18061809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loya, Y (2004) The coral reefs of Eliat-past, present and future: Three decades of coral community structure studies. In Rosenberg, E and Loya, Y (eds), Coral Reef Health and Disease. New York: Springer, pp. 134.Google Scholar
Lu, Y, Yuan, J, Lu, X, Su, C, Zhang, Y, Wang, C, Cao, X, Li, Q, Su, J, Ittekkot, V, Garbutt, RA, Bush, S, Fletcher, S, Wagey, T, Kachur, A and Sweijd, N (2018) Major threats of pollution and climate change to global coastal ecosystems and enhanced management for sustainability. Environmental Pollution 239, 670680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusher, A, Hollman, P and Mendoza-Hill, J (2017) Microplastics in Fisheries and Aquaculture: Status of Knowledge on Their Occurrence and Implications for Aquatic Organisms and Food Safety. FAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
MacLeod, M, Arp, HPH, Tekman, MB and Jahnke, A (2021) The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 373, 6165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malan, HL, Appleton, CC, Day, JA and Dini, J (2009) Wetlands and invertebrate disease hosts: Are we asking for trouble? Water SA 35, 753768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangubhai, S, Sykes, H, Lovell, E, Brodie, G, Jupiter, S, Morris, C, Lee, S, Loganimoce, E, Rashni, B, Lal, R, Nand, Y and Qauqau, I (2018) Fiji: Coastal and marine ecosystems. In Sheppard, C (ed.), World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation Volume II: The Indian Ocean to the Pacific. London: Elsevier, pp. 765792.Google Scholar
Maranho, LA, Moreira, LB, Baena-Nogueras, RM, Lara-Martín, PA, DelValls, TA and Martín-Díaz, ML (2014) A candidate short-term toxicity test using Ampelisca brevicornis to assess sublethal responses to pharmaceuticals bound to marine sediments. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 68, 237258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, RW and Wilcock, RJ (2008) Water quality and the effects of different pastoral animals. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 56, 289296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarlane, RA, Horwitz, P, Arabena, K, Capon, A, Jenkins, A, Jupiter, S, Negin, J, Parkes, MW and Saketa, S (2019) Ecosystem services for human health in Oceania. Ecosystem Services 39, 100976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McField, M, Kramer, P, Giró Petersen, A, Soto, M, Drysdale, I, Craig, N and Rueda-Flores, M (2020) 2020 Mesoamerican Reef Report Card. Healthy Reefs Initiative. Available at www.healthyreefs.org (accessed 09 January 2022).Google Scholar
McField, M, Soto, M, Craig, N, Giró, A, Drysdale, I, Rueda-Flores, M, Castillo, M, Kramer, P and Roth, L (2022) 2022 Essentail Report Card for the Mesoamerican Reef. Healthy Reefs Initiative. Available at www.healthyreefs.org (accessed 15 September 2022).Google Scholar
McGrane, SJ (2016) Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: A review. Hydrological Sciences Journal 61, 22952311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, LJ and Yoshida, RL (2020) Over a decade monitoring Fiji’s seagrass condition demonstrates resilience to anthropogenic pressures and extreme climate events. Marine Pollution Bulletin 160, 111636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, JW, Meñez, LAB, Kesner-Reyes, KN, Vergara, SG and Ablan, MC (2000) Coral reef fishing and coral-algal phase shifts: Implications for global reef status. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 572578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meals, DW, Dressing, SA and Davenport, TE (2010) Lag time in water quality response to best management practices: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 39, 8596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, JR, Mitchell, RK, Hunt, RA, Townsend, DM and Lee, JH (2022) Stakeholder engagement, knowledge problems and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Ethics 175, 7594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, F and Folke, C (1999) Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecological Economics 29, 215233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, TH (2017) Evolving polycentric governance of the Great Barrier Reef. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, E3013E3021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moustaka, M, Langlois, TJ, McLean, D, Bond, T, Fisher, R, Fearns, P, Dorji, P and Evans, RD (2018) The effects of suspended sediment on coral reef fish assemblages and feeding guilds of north-west Australia. Coral Reefs 37, 659673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchapondwa, E, Stage, J, Mungatana, E and Kumar, P (2018) Lessons from applying market-based incentives in watershed management. Water Economics and Policy 4, 1850011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A, Österlund, H, Marsalek, J and Viklander, M (2020) The pollution conveyed by urban runoff: A review of sources. Science of the Total Environment 709, 136125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumby, PJ, Hastings, A and Edwards, HJ (2007) Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Nature 450, 98101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nalley, EM, Tuttle, LJ, Barkman, AL, Conklin, EE, Wulstein, DM, Richmond, RH and Donahue, MJ (2021) Water quality thresholds for coastal contaminant impacts on corals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment 794, 148632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Negri, AP, Smith, LD, Webster, NS and Heyward, AJ (2002) Understanding ship-grounding impacts on a coral reef: Potential effects of anti-foulant paint contamination on coral recruitment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 111117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, S, Jenkins, A, Jupiter, SD, Horwitz, P, Mangubhai, S, Abimbola, S, Ratu, A, Naivalulevu, T and Negin, J (2022) Predicting climate-sensitive water-related disease trends based on health, seasonality and weather data in Fiji. Journal of Climate Change and Health 6, 100112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, J (2016) Review on Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. Government of the United Kingdom. Available at https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160525_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf (accessed 09 January 2022).Google Scholar
Olmstead, S and Zheng, J (2021) Water pollution control in developing countries: Policy instruments and empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 15, 261280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S and Christie, P (2000) What are we learning from tropical coastal management experiences? Coastal Management 28, 518.Google Scholar
Orth, RJ, Carruthers, TJB, Dennison, WC, Duarte, CM, Fourqurean, JW, Heck, KL, Hughes, AR, Kendrick, GA, Kenworthy, WJ, Olyarnik, S, Short, FT, Waycott, M and Williams, SL (2006) A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56, 987996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oteros-Rozas, E, Martin-Lopez, B, Daw, TM, Bohensky, EL, Butler, JR, Hill, R, Martin-Ortega, J, Quinlan, A, Ravera, F, Ruiz-Mallen, I and Thyresson, M (2015) Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies. Ecology and Society 20, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, MW and Horwitz, P (2009) Water, ecology and health: Ecosystems as settings for promoting health and sustainability. Health Promotion International 24, 94102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkes, MW, Morrison, KE, Bunch, MJ, Hallström, LK, Neudoerffer, RC, Venema, HD and Waltner-Toews, D (2010) Towards integrated governance for water, health and social–ecological systems: The watershed governance prism. Global Environmental Change 20, 693704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M and Oleson, KLL (2017) Beach recreationalists’ willingness to pay and economic implications of coastal water quality problems in Hawaii. Ecological Economics 136, 4152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, NE and Meybeck, M (2000) Water quality degradation effects on freshwater availability: Impacts of human activities. Water International 25, 185193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philipp, E and Fabricius, K (2003) Photophysiological stress in scleractinian corals in response to short-term sedimentation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 287, 5778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, JI and Heberling, MT (2018) The effects of source water quality on drinking water treatment costs: A review and synthesis of empirical literature. Ecological Economics 151, 195209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Primavera, JH (2006) Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean and Coastal Management 49, 531545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prüss-Ustün, A, Wolf, J, Bartram, J, Clasen, T, Cumming, O, Freeman, MC, Gordon, B, Hunter, PR, Medlicott, K and Johnston, R (2019) Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene for selected adverse health outcomes: An updated analysis with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 222, 765777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabalais, NN, Turner, RE, Díaz, RJ and Justić, D (2009) Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66, 15281537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragosta, G, Evensen, C, Atwill, ER, Walker, M, Ticktin, T, Asquith, A and Tate, KW (2011) Risk factors for elevated Enterococcus concentrations in a rural tropical island watershed. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 19101915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranjbar Jafarabadi, A, Riyahi Bakhtiari, A, Aliabadian, M, Laetitia, H, Shadmehri Toosi, A and Yap, CK (2018) First report of bioaccumulation and bioconcentration of aliphatic hydrocarbons (AHs) and persistent organic pollutants (PAHs, PCBs and PCNs) and their effects on alcyonacea and scleractinian corals and their endosymbiotic algae from the Persian Gulf, Iran: Inter and intra-species differences. Science of the Total Environment 627, 141157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redding, JE, Myers-Miller, RL, Baker, DM, Fogel, M, Raymundo, LJ and Kim, K (2013) Link between sewage-derived nitrogen pollution and coral disease severity in Guam. Marine Pollution Bulletin 73, 5763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reef Resilience Network (2021) Honduras – Wastewater Pollution: Sanitation Best Management Practices in West End, Honduras Reef Resilience Network. Available at https://reefresilience.org/case-studies/honduras-wastewater-pollution/ (accessed 09 January 2022).Google Scholar
Rehman, K, Fatima, F, Waheed, I and Akash, MSH (2018) Prevalence of exposure of heavy metals and their impact on health consequences. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 119, 157184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricardo, GF, Jones, RJ, Clode, PL, Humanes, A, Giofre, N and Negri, AP (2018) Sediment characteristics influence the fertilisation success of the corals Acropora tenuis and Acropora millepora. Marine Pollution Bulletin 135, 941953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, MM, Maher, RL, Correa, AMS, Moeller, HV, Lemoine, NP, Shantz, AA, Burkepile, DE and Silbiger, NJ (2020) Macroborer presence on corals increases with nutrient input and promotes parrotfish bioerosion. Coral Reefs 39, 409418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, RH, Golbuu, Y and Shelton, AJ (2019) Successful management of coral reef-watershed network. In Wolanski, E, Day, JW, Elliot, M and Ramachandran, R (eds), Coasts and Estuaries: The Future. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 445459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, CS (1990) Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 62, 185202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahavacharin, A, Sompongchaiyakul, P and Thaitakoo, D (2022) The effects of land-based change on coastal ecosystems. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 18, 351366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sale, PF, Agardy, T, Ainsworth, CH, Feist, BE, Bell, JD, Christie, P, Hoegh-Guldberg, O, Mumby, PJ, Feary, DA, Saunders, MI, Daw, TM, Foale, SJ, Levin, PS, Lindeman, KC, Lorenzen, K, Pomeroy, RS, Allison, EH, Bradbury, RH, Corrin, J, Edwards, AJ, Obura, DO, Sadovy de Mitcheson, YJ, Samoilys, MA and Sheppard, CRC (2014) Transforming management of tropical coastal seas to cope with challenges of the 21st century. Marine Pollution Bulletin 85, 823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semenza, JC (2020) Cascading risks of waterborne diseases from climate change. Nature Immunology 21, 484487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shore-Maggio, A, Aeby, GS and Callahan, SM (2018) Influence of salinity and sedimentation on Vibrio infection of the Hawaiian coral Montipora capitata. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 128, 6371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shortle, JS and Horan, RD (2001) The economics of nonpoint pollution control. Journal of Economic Surveys 15, 255289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, NR (2020) Impact Mitigation in Marine and Coastal Environments: Policy Challenges and Shortfalls. PhD thesis, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences. The University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Shuval, H (2003) Estimating the global burden of thalassogenic diseases: Human infectious diseases caused by wastewater pollution of the marine environment. Journal of Water and Health 1, 5364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sindermann, CJ (2006) Coastal Pollution Effects on Living Resources and Humans. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Singh, RBK, Hales, S, De Wet, N, Raj, R, Hearnden, M and Weinstein, P (2001) The influence of climate variation and change on diarrheal disease in the Pacific Islands. Environmental Health Perspectives 109, 155159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M, Love, DC, Rochman, CM and Neff, RA (2018) Microplastics in seafood and the implications for human health. Current Environmental Health Reports 5, 375386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorenson, SB, Morssink, C and Campos, PA (2011) Safe access to safe water in low income countries: Water fetching in current times. Social Science & Medicine 72, 15221526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suárez‐Castro, AF, Beyer, HL, Kuempel, CD, Linke, S, Borrelli, P and Hoegh‐Guldberg, O (2021) Global forest restoration opportunities to foster coral reef conservation. Global Change Biology 27, 52385252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundarambal, P, Tkalich, P and Balasubramanian, R (2010) Impact of biomass burning on ocean water quality in Southeast Asia through atmospheric deposition: Eutrophication modeling. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 1133711357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, KP, Shaban, S, Joyner, JL, Porter, JW and Lipp, EK (2011) Human pathogen shown to cause disease in the threatened eklhorn coral Acropora palmata. PLoS One 6, e23468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, AM, Atkinson, MJ and Atkinson, S (2004) Effects of steroidal estrogens on coral growth and reproduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 269, 121129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C, Pollard, S, Rocks, S and Angus, A (2012) Selecting policy instruments for better environmental regulation: A critique and future research agenda. Environmental Policy and Governance 22, 268292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebbett, SB and Bellwood, DR (2019) Algal turf sediments on coral reefs what’s known and what’s next. Marine Pollution Bulletin 149, 110542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teh, LSL, Teh, LCL and Sumaila, UR (2013) A global estimate of the number of coral reef fishers. PLoS One 8, e65397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tengö, M, Brondizio, ES, Elmqvist, T, Malmer, P and Spierenburg, M (2014) Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio 43, 579591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and Goldman, RL (2009) Ecosystem services and water funds: Conservation approaches that benefit people and biodiversity. Journal American Water Works Association 101, 2022.Google Scholar
Thorburn, PJ, Wilkinson, SN and Silburn, DM (2013) Water quality in agricultural lands draining to the Great Barrier Reef: A review of causes, management and priorities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 180, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, PA, Ong, X and Chou, LM (2010) Impacts of pollution on marine life in Southeast Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation 19, 10631082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuholske, C, Halpern, BS, Blasco, G, Villasenor, JC, Frazier, M and Caylor, K (2021) Mapping global inputs and impacts from of human sewage in coastal ecosystems. PLoS One 16, e0258898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, NR and Renegar, DA (2017) Petroleum hydrocarbon toxicity to corals: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 119, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turschwell, MP, Connolly, RM, Dunic, JC, Sievers, M, Buelow, CA, Pearson, RM, Tulloch, VJD, Côté, IM, Unsworth, RKF, Collier, CJ and Brown, CJ (2021) Anthropogenic pressures and life history predict trajectories of seagrass meadow extent at a global scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2110802118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations Environment Programme (2012) Convention for the Protection and Development of the Marine Environment of the Wider Caribbean Region and its Protocols: Protocol Concerning Co-operation in Combating; Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife Oil Spills in the Wider Caribbean Region; Protocol Concerning Pollution from Land-Based Sources and Activities. Kingston: Regional Coordinating Unit of the United Nations Environment Programme - Caribbean Environment Programme. Available at https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/27875 (accessed 15 September 2022).Google Scholar
United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN-IGME) (2019) Levels and Trends in Child Mortality. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund. Available at https://www.unicef.org/media/60561/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2019.pdf (accessed 06 March 2022).Google Scholar
van Dam, JW, Negri, AP, Uthicke, S and Mueller, JF (2011) Chemical pollution on coral reefs: Exposure and ecological effects. In Sánchez-Bayo, F, van den Brink, PJ and Mann, RM (eds), Ecological Impacts of Toxic Chemicals. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Meij, SET, Suharsono, and Hoeksema, BW (2010) Long-term changes in coral assemblages under natural and anthropogenic stress in Jakarta Bay (1920–2005). Marine Pollution Bulletin 60, 14421454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Woesik, R and Done, TJ (1997) Coral communities and reef growth in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 16, 103115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas-Ángel, B and Huntington, B (2020) Status and Trends Assessment for Land-Based Sources of Pollution Impacts on Benthic Reef Communities in Faga‘alu Bay, American Samoa. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-109. Honolulu: United States Department of Commerce. Available at https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/27088 (accessed 15 December 2021).Google Scholar
Vega-Thurber, R, Mydlarz, LD, Brandt, M, Harvell, D, Weil, E, Raymundo, L, Willis, BL, Langevin, S, Tracy, AM and Littman, R (2020) Deciphering coral disease dynamics: Integrating host, microbiome, and the changing environment. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8, 575927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigerstol, K, Abell, R, Brauman, K, Buytaert, W and Vogl, A (2021) Addressing water security through nature-based solutions. In Cassin, J, Matthews, JH and Gunn, EL (eds), Nature-Based Solutions and Water Security. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G, Mang, S, Cai, H, Liu, S, Zhang, Z, Wang, L and Innes, JL (2016) Integrated watershed management: Evolution, development and emerging trends. Journal of Forestry Research 27, 967994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Beusen, AHW, Liu, X and Bouwman, AF (2020) Aquaculture production is a large, spatially concentrated source of nutrients in Chinese freshwater and coastal seas. Environmental Science and Technology 54, 14641474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, YSD and Sallach, JB (2021) Investigating the exposure and impact of chemical UV filters on coral reef ecosystems: Review and research gap prioritization. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 17, 967981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wear, SL (2016) Missing the boat: Critical threats to coral reefs are neglected at global scale. Marine Policy 74, 153157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, SL, Acuña, V, McDonald, R and Font, C (2021) Sewage pollution, declining ecosystem health, and cross-sector collaboration. Biological Conservation 255, 109010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, SL and Thurber, RV (2015) Sewage pollution: Mitigation is key for coral reef stewardship. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1355, 1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M, de Beer, D, Lott, C, Polerecky, L, Kohls, K, Abed, RMM, Ferdelman, TG and Fabricius, KE (2012) Mechanisms of damage to corals exposed to sedimentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, E1558E1567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, R, Watson, A, Forter, M and Oliaei, F (2011) Persistent organic pollutants and landfills-a review of past experiences and future challenges. Waste Management & Research 29, 107121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, AS, Fabricius, KE, Jones, GP and Je, B (2015) Effects of sedimentation, eutrophication, and chemical pollution on coral reef fishes. In Mora, C (ed.), Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, AS, Harris, D, Weber, S, Vaghi, F, Nand, Y, Naisilisili, W, Hughes, A, Delevaux, J, Klein, CJ, Watson, J, Mumby, PJ, Jupiter, SD and Dhanjal‐Adams, K (2020) Best‐practice forestry management delivers diminishing returns for coral reefs with increased land‐clearing. Journal of Applied Ecology 57, 23812392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesseling, I, Uychiaoco, AJ, Aliño, PM and Vermaat, JE (2001) Partial mortality in porites corals: Variation among Philippine Reefs. International Review of Hydrobiology 86, 7785.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, K and van Woesik, R (2001) Spatial and temporal variance of river discharge on Okinawa (Japan) inferring the temporal impact on adjacent coral reefs. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42, 864872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolhouse, M, Waugh, C, Perry, MR and Nair, H (2016) Global disease burden due to antibiotic resistance - State of the evidence. Journal of Global Health 6, 010306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) Global Costs and Benefits of Drinking-Water Supply and Sanitation Interventions to Reach the MDG Target and Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75140/WHO_HSE_WSH_12.01_eng.pdf (accessed 15 September 2022).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2014) Antimicrobial Resistance: An Emerging Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Issue. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/briefing-note-antimicrobial-reistance-an-emerging-water-sanitation-and-hygiene-issue (accessed 04 March 2022).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/199350 (accessed 18 January 2021).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2016) Protecting Surface Water for Health: Identifying, Assessing and Managing Drinking-Water Quality Risks in Surface-Water Catchments. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241510554 (accessed 18 January 2021).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) Safer Water, Better Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516891 (accessed 15 September 2022).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2021) Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2020: Five Years into the SDGs. Geneva: World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Available at https://washdata.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/jmp-2021-wash-households_3.pdf (accessed 24 January 2022).Google Scholar
Wu, NC and Seebacher, F (2020) Effect of the plastic pollutant bisphenol A on the biology of aquatic organisms: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 26, 38213833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zettler, ER, Mincer, TJ and Amaral-Zettler, LA (2013) Life in the “Plastisphere”: Microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environmental Science and Technology 47, 71377146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, E, Kim, M, Rueda, L, Rochman, C, VanWormer, E, Moore, J and Shapiro, K (2022) Association of zoonotic protozoan parasites with microplastics in seawater and implications for human and wildlife health. Scientific Reports 12, 6532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Key references documenting global/regional linkages between human activities within watersheds and elevated levels of pollutants in runoff to coastal ecosystems

Figure 1

Figure 1. Diagram depicting flow of impacts from key land-based activities on water quality properties that reach coral reef ecosystems.

Figure 2

Table 2. Impacts of poor water quality on humans, coral reefs, and coral reef organisms categorised by pollutant type, with key references indicated for further information

Figure 3

Figure 2. Nested scales of watershed processes.

Figure 4

Table 3. Recommendations for planning, coordinating, monitoring, resourcing and scaling sustained investment in integrated watershed management for systems health

Author comment: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R0/PR1

Comments

Prof. Tom Spencer

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures

Dear Dr Spencer,

We wish to submit a standard review article entitled “Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people” to be considered for publication in your Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures journal. This review article was originally commissioned on the 6th of April 2022 by your senior editor, Martin Le Tissier, to be published with the journal’s launch in January 2023.

In this review, we provide a novel summary of the overlapping impacts of water pollution on both human and coastal ecosystem health, focusing primarily on the tropics and coral reef ecosystems. We use this information to identify holistic approaches to integrated watershed management that target overlapping drivers of ill-health in downstream coastal ecosystems and people. We provide recommendations of key actions for integrated watershed management that can help achieve multiple Sustainable Development Goals for both nature and people on coasts.

Given the extensive and multidisciplinary impacts of water pollution on coastal environments globally, we believe the summary and recommendations provided in our article will appeal to the future readership of Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures. Despite the extensive impacts of poor water quality, previous pollution control methods have been highly sectorised and under-resourced, with poor coordination of implementation, often across insufficient scales to realise benefits. This review will allow your readers to understand the cross-sectoral impacts and drivers of water pollution, and provide evidence-based management actions to support planning and decision-making for a wide range of stakeholders in coastal environments from government, civil society, and the private sector.

Please address all correspondence concerning this manuscript to me at <u>[email protected]</u>.

Thank you for your consideration of this article.

Sincerely,

Ama Wakwella, PhD Candidate

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences

Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science

The University of Queensland

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Amelia Wenger

Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Marine Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Aaron Jenkins

The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia

Edith Cowan University, School of Science, Centre for People Place and Planet, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Asst. Prof Joleah Lamb

University of California - Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA 92657, USA

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Caitlin Kuempel

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 2072, Australia

Griffith University, School of Environment and Science, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Danielle Claar

Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, USA

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Chris Corbin

United Nations Environment Programme, Cartagena Convention Secretariat, Kingston, Jamaica

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Kim Falinski

The Nature Conservancy, Hawai`i and Palmyra Chapter, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Antonella Rivera

The Coral Reef Alliance, Mesoamerican Region, 548 Market Street, Suite 29802, San Francisco, CA 94104-5401, USA

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Assoc. Prof Hedley Grantham

Bush Heritage Australia, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

University of New South Wales, Centre for Ecosystem Science, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

<u>[email protected]</u>

Co-author

Dr Stacy Jupiter

Wildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Program, Suva, Fiji

<u>[email protected] </u>

Review: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

I have no competing interest.

Comments

Comments to Author: The manuscript represent a review article compiling the literature regarding watershed management and synergic effects on coastal waters and coral reefs. High quality figures and summarizing tables are very useful for readers. Minor suggestions are as follow.

Figure 1 and Table 1 present the same information in different ways. Table 1 brings a reference list although Figure 1 is very beautiful in synthetizing information. Even keeping both, they should be better explored on text. On Figure 1, merge heavy metals with persistent organic pollutants in the same box. Consider change “Personal care products & pharmaceuticals” to “Personal care, cosmetic and pharmaceutical products”.

Paragraph starting on line 122. Consider change paragraph beginning to “Pour water quality have synergic effects with herbivory…”. On line 129, revise citation Vegas-Thurben.

Table 2. Blue/green colors are will become very similar for black/white printing.

Lines 170-173. Association among microplastic and pathogens should be explained in details as a new and not obvious relationship (I did not followed related references). It seems to me that the relationship could be simple correlation (more polluted water have more pathogens) instead some kind of synergic effect (microplastic could adherirse to microbial and protect them from UV, enhancing survival). Consider present the nature of the relationship as suggested by the references.

Line 217. Change Hawai ‘i to Hawaii. The same for line 244. Although Hawai’i seams correct to native language, it is not usual for regular English.

Line 230. Correct 2020)).

Lines 236 to 238. There is something missing here.

Line 248. Two opening parenthesis.

Line 251. Is WISH “Water Innovation and Sustainability Hub”. Please, define properly.

Line 268. Define NGO (Non-Governmental Organizations).

Lines 399 to 403. Consider breaking the sentence in two.

Recommendation: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R0/PR3

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R1/PR5

Comments

Ama Wakwella

The University of Queensland

St Lucia QLD 4072 Australia

Email: [email protected]

Prof. Tom Spencer

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures

April 6, 2023

Dear Dr Spencer,

We wish to resubmit the standard review article entitled “Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people” to be considered for publication in your Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures journal. This review article was originally commissioned on the 6th of April 2022 by your senior editor, Martin Le Tissier, to be published with the journal’s launch in January 2023. After the original submission of our manuscript in September 2022, we received helpful comments from a reviewer in March 2023 to improve the review. The reviewer recommended minor revisions, which we have now incorporated into the manuscript.

As mentioned in our original submission, this review provides a novel summary of the overlapping impacts of water pollution on both human and coastal ecosystem health, focusing primarily on the tropics and coral reef ecosystems. Importantly, we provide a summary of the cross-sectoral challenges of water pollution alongside evidence-based management recommendations to support planning and decision-making, which we believe will appeal to the future readership of Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures.

The reviewer’s feedback greatly assisted us in improving our manuscript from the original submission. Primarily, the reviewer’s comments allowed for further clarity and depth in our discussion of the species and sources of pollutants, which also lead to significant improvements in our Figure 1 and Table 2 of the manuscript.

Please address all correspondence concerning this manuscript resubmission to me at [email protected].

Thank you for your consideration of this article once again.

Sincerely,

Ama Wakwella, PhD Candidate

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences

Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science

The University of Queensland

E [email protected]

Co-author

Dr Amelia Wenger

Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Marine Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Aaron Jenkins

The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, Camperdown NSW 2006, Australia

Edith Cowan University, School of Science, Centre for People Place and Planet, Joondalup WA 6027, Australia

[email protected]

Co-author

Asst. Prof Joleah Lamb

University of California - Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA 92657, USA

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Caitlin Kuempel

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 2072, Australia

Griffith University, School of Environment and Science, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan QLD 4111, Australia

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Danielle Claar

Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, USA

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Chris Corbin

United Nations Environment Programme, Cartagena Convention Secretariat, Kingston, Jamaica

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Kim Falinski

The Nature Conservancy, Hawai`i and Palmyra Chapter, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Antonella Rivera

The Coral Reef Alliance, Mesoamerican Region, 548 Market Street, Suite 29802, San Francisco, CA 94104-5401, USA

[email protected]

Co-author

Assoc. Prof Hedley Grantham

Bush Heritage Australia, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

University of New South Wales, Centre for Ecosystem Science, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia

[email protected]

Co-author

Dr Stacy Jupiter

Wildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Program, Suva, Fiji

[email protected]

Recommendation: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R1/PR6

Comments

Comments to Author: The authors have undertaken a thorough review of all comments received and clearly reported on the changes made. The paper can now be accepted for publication. The question of Hawai’i v. Hawaii will be a decision for the publisher.

Decision: Integrated watershed management solutions for healthy coastal ecosystems and people — R1/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.