Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:28:51.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A FIRST NAME BASIS? – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2011

David Benatar

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Think , Volume 11 , Issue 30 , Spring 2012 , pp. 115
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2011

Unfortunately, on page 5 of this paper, there is an error in the sixth line from the top. The sentence in which it occurs should read as follows:

Third, if it is suggested that dropping honorific address is a way to counter these inequalities, then we can note that more informal means of address do not remove the differentials.

We apologise for this error.

References

Benatar, D. (2011) A first name basis? Think, 10, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar