Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T21:45:58.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucratic entrepreneurship: how frontline bureaucrats promote policy innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2024

Xuefan Zhang Open the ORCID record for Xuefan Zhang [Opens in a new window]  and
Yanling He Open the ORCID record for Yanling He [Opens in a new window]
Xuefan Zhang
Affiliation:
Center for Chinese Public Administration, School of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Yanling He*
Affiliation:
School of Government, Peking University, National Academy of Development and Strategy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
*
Corresponding author: Yanling He; Email: 2006hyl@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contrast to other studies on policy entrepreneurship that address frontline officials’ roles in formal legislative procedures, this case study focuses on how frontline officials promote policy innovation within inconspicuous administrative routines. Because frontline officials have no legislative power, they must overcome officialism by using bureaucratic skills and seeking consensus among multiple stakeholders. “Citizen agents” and “state agents” are both necessary roles. This case provides administrative details on how a deadlocked policy was gradually enlivened within undramatic administrative routines. The findings bridge the legislative–administrative gap and improve the understanding of the long-term effects of frontline administrative activities on policy innovations.

Keywords

bureaucracyofficialismpolicy entrepreneurshipstreet-level bureaucrats
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2024 , pp. 411 - 435
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnold, G. 2015. “Street-Level Policy Entrepreneurship.” Public Management Review 17 (3): 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC. 2008. “10,000 Taxis in Guangzhou Went on a Collective Strike [Guangzhou yiwanliang chuzuche jiti bayun].” BBC Chinese. http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/simp/hi/newsid_7750000/newsid_7758300/7758328.stm.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1954. “Patterns of Interaction among a Group of Officials in a Government Agency.” Human Relations 7 (3): 337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, R. S., and Abolafia, M. Y. 1997. “Bureaucratic Politics: The View from Below.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7 (2): 305–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R., Edwards, C., and Woodall, J. 2004. “The New Public Management and the UK Police Service: The Role of the Police Sergeant in the Implementation of Performance Management. Public Management Review 6 (3): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G., and Cohen, N. 2023. “Understanding Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Informal Collaboration: Evidence from Police Officers Across the Jurisdictional Divide. Public Management Review 25 (2): 224–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denhardt, R. B. 1981. In the Shadow of Organization. Lawrence: The Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Derthick, M. 1979. Policymaking for Social Security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Esbenshade, J., Shifrin, E., and Rider, K. 2019. “Leveraging Liminality: How San Diego Taxi Drivers Used Their Precarious Status to Win Reform.” Labor History 60 (2): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, H. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administration Review 1 (4): 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederickson, H. G., and Frederickson, D. G. 1995. “Public Perceptions of Ethics in Government.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 537 (1): 163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, J. 2015. “Pernicious Manipulation of Performance Measures in China’s Cadre Evaluation System.” The China Quarterly 223: 618–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Office of Guangzhou Municipal People’s Government. 2007. ‘Item 2’. Minutes of Municipal Government Regular Meeting 30 January 2007. General Office of Guangzhou Municipal People’s Government, p. 4.Google Scholar
Guangzhou Municipal Traffic Law Enforcement Bureau. 2020. “Traffic Law Enforcement Bureau Used Technology to Crack Down on Fake Taxis [shijiaotong xingzheng zhifaju yunyong kejishouduan daji jiamao chuzuche].” Guangzhou Municipal Transportation Bureau. http://jtj.gz.gov.cn/jtzt/jtsj/jtzhzf/content/post_5830880.html.Google Scholar
He, Y., and Wang, G. 2012. “The Negotiation without Quit: An Explanation for “The Effective Governance” in China’s Bureaucracy.” Management World [Chinese], 12: 61–72.Google Scholar
Homberg, F., Vogel, R., and Weiherl, J. 2019. “Public Service Motivation and Continuous Organizational Change: Taking Charge Behaviour at Police Services.” Public Administration 97 (1): 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hummel, R. P. 1977. The Bureaucratic Experience: The Post-Modern Challenge. New York: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hummel, R. P. 2006. “The Triumph of Numbers: Knowledges and the Mismeasure of Management.” Administration & Society 38 (1): 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Information for Decisions Magazine. 2008. “Why Do Taxi Drivers in Guangzhou Still ‘Strike’ Despite the Introduction of New Policies?” Information for Decisions Magazine [Chinese] 47: 18.Google Scholar
Lavee, E., and Cohen, N. 2019. “How Street-Level Bureaucrats Become Policy Entrepreneurs: The Case of Urban Renewal.” Governance 32 (3): 475–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Ni, X., and Wang, R. 2021. “Blame Aavoidance in China’s Cadre Responsibility System.” The China Quarterly 247: 681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, D. 2008. “Ten Thousand Guangzhou Taxi Drivers in Strike Collectively Drank Tea [Guangzhou wanliang chuzuche bayun siji jiti yincha].” VOA Chinese. https://www.voachinese.com/a/a-21-w2008-11-27-voa49-63008882/1041047.html.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Luo, A. 2008. “The New Taxi Policy in Guangzhou Had an Awkward Start Amid a Partial Taxi Strike [Guangzhou chuzuche xinzheng zai bufen chuzuche bayun zhong ganga kaishi]. Renmin Wang. https://news.ifeng.com/mainland/200812/1201_17_902285_1.shtml.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, S., and Musheno, M. 2000. “State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 329–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Moody, S., and Musheno, M. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Moody, S., and Musheno, M. 2006. “Stories for Research.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, eds. Yanow, D. and Schwartz-Shea, P., 316–30. New York: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Olsson, J., and Hysing, E. 2012. “Theorizing Inside Activism: Understanding Policymaking and Policy Change from Below.” Planning Theory & Practice 13 (2): 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passenger Traffic Administration Department. 2009a. “Archived Documents about Establishing a Civilized Taxi Industry in Guangzhou (Vol. I) [Chuangjian Guangzhou chuzuqiche wenming hangye wenjian huibian (shang ce)].” In Passenger Traffic Administration Department, 346–49. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China: Passenger Traffic Administration Department of Guangzhou.Google Scholar
Passenger Traffic Administration Department. 2009b. “Archived Documents about Establishing a Civilized Taxi Industry in Guangzhou (Vol. I) [Chuangjian Guangzhou chuzuqiche wenming hangye wenjian huibian (shang ce)]. In Passenger Traffic Administration Department, 275–89: Guangzhou, Guangdong, China: Passenger Traffic Administration Department of Guangzhou.Google Scholar
Passenger Traffic Administration Department. 2009, Julu 9. On the Commendation of Longdi Company and Others Who Assisted the Administrative Department to Quickly Deal with the Dispute Between the BMW Owner and Taxi Drivers [Guanyu biaozhang longdi gongsi deng jiji xiezhu zhuguan bumen kuaisu chuli baoma chezhu yu chuzuche siji jiufen de tongbao]. Passenger Traffic Administration Department (Suikeguan [2009] No.141), 1–2. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. 2005. “The Study of Policy Development.” Journal of Policy History 17 (01): 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M. 2005. “Street-Level Bureaucrats and Intrastate Variation in the Implementation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Policies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (1): 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters Staff. 2008. “New Taxi Strike Reported in southern China.” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-taxi/new-taxi-strike-reported-in-southern-china-idUSTRE4AR0NS20081128.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sohu. 2008. “Guangzhou Taxi Strike: Mayor Calls for Attention to Drivers’ Demands [Guangzhou chuzuche bayun shizhang huyu zhongshi siji shuqiu].” Sohu. http://news.sohu.com/20081203/n260986663.shtml.Google Scholar
Stazyk, E. C., and Goerdel, H. T. 2011. “The Benefits of Bureaucracy: Public Managers’ Perceptions of Political Support, Goal Ambiguity, and Organizational Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (4): 645–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taxi Association of Guangzhou. 2006, August 11. Notice on the Results of the Evaluation of the Quality of the Services of Guangzhou Taxi Companies in 2006 [Guanyu 2006 nian guangzhoushi keyun chuzuqiche qiye jingying zizhi dengji pingding jieguo de tonggao]. Taxi Association of Guangzhou (Suizuxie [2006] No.12), 1–6. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Google Scholar
Taxi Association of Guangzhou. 2007, March 20. “An Open Letter to All Our Taxi Driver Friends [Zhi guangda chuzuche siji pengyou de gongkaixin].” In Archived Documents about Establishing a Civilized Taxi Industry in Guangzhou (Vol. III), ed. Passenger Traffic Administration Department of Guangzhou (2009), 172. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China: Passenger Traffic Administration Department of Guangzhou.Google Scholar
Terry, L. D. 2005. “The Thinning of Administrative Institutions in the Hollow State.” Administration and Society 37 (4): 426–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Traffic Committee of Guangzhou. 2007, July 30. Letter to Record the Administrative Plan for Taxi Transport Capacity [Guanyu baoqing beian guangzhoushi chuzuqiche yunli toufang de han]. Guangzhou Municipal Transportation Bureau (Suijiaohan [2007] No.786), 1–14. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., and Obstfeld, D. 1999. “Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, eds. Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L., Vol. 21, 81–123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Xiong, B. 2018. “Adjudicating the Regulatory Penalties Against Nonprofessional Taxi Services in China and the European Union.” Frontiers of Law in China 13 (3): 390–411.Google Scholar
Zhai, I. 2008. “Guangzhou Taxis Strike Despite Cuts in Car Rents.” South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/article/662190/guangzhou-taxis-strike-despite-cuts-car-rents.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zhang and He supplementary material

Zhang and He supplementary material
Download Zhang and He supplementary material(File)
File 26.2 KB