Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:22:24.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Her majesty, the queen of sounds: Cultural sustainability and heritage in organ craftsmanship and music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2021

Martin Gerner Open the ORCID record for Martin Gerner [Opens in a new window]
Martin Gerner*
Affiliation:
Centre for Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Organ craftsmanship and music are inextricably linked with each other. In Germany, a particularly rich symbiosis between craftspeople, composers, and performing artists has evolved over the centuries. In recognizing the transmission of this intangible cultural know-how from generation to generation, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) inscribed organ craftsmanship and music together in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity in 2017. This article elucidates how this inscription influences the perception and self-concept of organ craftsmanship and music, both in theoretic-intellectual and in virtual terms. Complementing the qualitative content analysis of literature and documents, narrative first-hand accounts/expert interviews with organ craftspeople/organ builders have been conducted and interpreted. Taking into account a dual nexus of cultural sustainability and intangible cultural heritage, sustainable value creation, substantial claims, multi-perspective visibility, and facilitative reassurance were analyzed and assessed vis-à-vis organ craftsmanship and music. Including organ craftsmanship and music in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity demonstrates an appreciation for sustainable value creation related to the quadruple bottom-line of sustainability – that is, addressing economic, environmental, and societal aspects, including culture as a fully integrated dimension; claims substantial rights for safeguarding and invoking/activating heritage; enhances visibility of performing organists, assigned organ builders, frequent practitioners, and nominated organ experts; and enables reassurance of passion and self-positioning with organ craftsmanship and music.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 285 - 310
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Cultural Property Society

Organ craftsmanship and music in sustainability perspective

Germany is a nation extraordinarily rich in organ craftsmanship and organ music; both constitute an inextricably symbiotic relation. Comprising roughly 50,000 playable instruments, there are approximately 400 artisan organ-building workshops, including 2,800 employees, 180 apprentices/trainees, as well as 3,500 full-time-employed and tens of thousands free-lancing and/or voluntary organists.Footnote 1 However, in addition to these figures, the following remarks highlight the fascinating art and craftsmanship of building such magnificent masterpieces in history of music.Footnote 2 As Antje Vollmer, theologian and former vice president of the German Parliament (Bundestag), explains,

[t]he sound [of an organ] makes us sometimes believe that churches had been built around their organs: Almost no boundaries to the top, to the left and to the right as much colour as possible. None other instrument provides as much cosmos.Footnote 3

Germany is considered one of the world’s leading countries of advancing pipe organ craftsmanship and music. Both combine the know-how of dealing with natural resources and traditional craftsmanship with the latest innovative technologies of the corresponding age.Footnote 4 Furthermore, organ music has been an integral part of ecclesiastical liturgy since the Middle Ages; thus, there “can be no doubt that many of the early organ-builders were ecclesiastics. Even down to a comparatively late period, … the latter continued to exercise a considerable influence over the art.”Footnote 5 Ever since, ingenious, state-of-the-art, and trend- and standard-setting organ builders, like Arp Schnitger, Andreas and Gottfried Silbermann, and Friedrich Ladegast,Footnote 6 have inspired famous composers,Footnote 7 such as Samuel Scheidt, Georg Böhm, Dietrich Buxtehude, Johann Sebastian Bach, Franz Liszt, Max Reger, and Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy, within Germany and beyond.Footnote 8 As Christoph Wulf, vice president of the Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission, describes,

[e]ach organ is one of a kind, since it is solely built for the architectural volume it is intended for to sound. The highly specialized knowledge and particular abilities required to construct organs and to perform organ music had been evolved by craftsmen, composers and musicians over centuries. Organ culture is considered a traditional mode of culture that originates in Germany, above all. In these parts the agility of organ culture of craftsmanship and music can be noticed in numerous architectural styles of locally and regionally bound organ craftsmanship, manifold compositions and performance styles as well as professional training opportunities in academia and/or confessional institutions. Involved stakeholders represent in an awe-inspiring manner and on a daily basis how tradition and innovation may accord with each other.Footnote 9

By nominating, approving, and inscribing organ craftsmanship and music (Inscription no. 01277) on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, a notional gap between cultural heritage and cultural sustainability has instantaneously been bridged.Footnote 10 Serving as a particularly vivid case for sustainable heritage, among others,Footnote 11 the nexus between intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development is particularly accentuated by addressing aspects of preservation and promotion of cultural heritage (see Figure 1).Footnote 12

Figure 1. Listing criteria for inscription of organ craftsmanship and music as intangible cultural heritage (figure provided by the author; adapted with courtesy of Waldkircher Orgelstiftung et al. Reference Orgelstiftung2018).

How does the inscription of organ craftsmanship and music in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity influence the perception and self-concept of organ craftsmanship and music, both in theoretic-intellectual and in virtual terms? In the first place, organ craftsmanship and music can be embedded into the dual contexts of cultural sustainability and intangible cultural heritage. Even though the heritage listing is primarily based on an intangible rationale of performing aspects, tangible aspects are also touched upon, including the resulting effects and instruments: “Modes of intangible heritage essentially depend upon human knowledge and capability. They both reflect creativity and inventive talent, and convey identity and continuity. They have been passed down generations, and have been reshaped time and again. Intangible heritage is often the basis for tangible cultural heritage” (see Figure 2).Footnote 13 These modalities can be subsumed under the tangibility-intangibility rationale describing practices “physical to the extent that they are experienced and that these experiences become culturally shared.”Footnote 14 With regard to organ craftsmanship and music, sustainability advocates are requested to avoid the pitfall of reducing the multifaceted complexity of the crafts music-based experience to simple sustainability propagandaFootnote 15 since “nothing is more boring than music [and its respective structure] made solely for the purpose of achieving some simple, tangible effect.”Footnote 16

Figure 2. Aspects of cultural heritage in view of organ craftsmanship and music (figure provided by the author).

The nexus of music and sustainability – music sustainability – is evident and well explored.Footnote 17 Referring to normative frameworks on the cultural dimension of sustainability both pertain to organizational cultures eligible to foster and promote creative, community-based resilience, which are commonly subsumed under cultural vitality and eco-cultural resilience.Footnote 18 They perfectly illustrate the crosscutting notion of sustainability that stands for a civilizational orientation in general. Referred to as cultures of sustainability, organ craftsmanship and music represents a musical culture of sustainability sui generis. Footnote 19 Which elements are pivotal in normative terms? First, shared musical practice enhances certain social group cohesion and equity.Footnote 20 Second, musical performance and improvisation enhances social creativity, preventing and resolving disputes, restoring peace and security, and achieving lasting peace, e.g. West-Eastern Divan Orchestra.Footnote 21 Third, it is therefore regarded key quality for sustainability transformation in organizations.Footnote 22

Liaising craftsmanship with sustainability is encouraged through cultural policies which relate to both traditional arts and handicraft, and socio-cultural traditions fostering intangible heritage through both recognizing and rewarding living national treasures.Footnote 23 Referred to as sustainable cultural diversity – that is, respecting, protecting, and maintaining the multiplicity of cultural expressions around the globe today and in the future – the principle of sustainability extends to the recognition of cultural diversity as sources of creativity and sustainable development – that is, recognizing organ craftsmanship as a culture of innovation in terms of relatively persistent and often normative patterns of thought, behavior, and relationship to raise the expectancy of social action [crafting routines] and to take on important functions of orientation, motivation, coordination, and legitimization in the course of innovation processes [technology transfer].Footnote 24 In accordance with the principle of sustainability, cultural diversity in expression, practice, and heritage is considered an asset and constitutes an essential aspect of the cultural capital of societies; thus, culture integrates into sustainable development as a resource and as property.Footnote 25

In the second place, organ craftsmanship and music can be related to sustainable development, in particular (see Figure 3). In this respect, culture has evolved from a niche topic into a meaningful driver of the international policy framework.Footnote 26 Over the intervening years, normative settings on the cultural dimension of sustainability have emerged,Footnote 27 diligently paying heed to socio-cultural indicators,Footnote 28 to the effect that culture has turned into a determining strategic driver for positioning in terms of:Footnote 29

  • • a supportive and self-promoting role (culture in sustainable development);

  • • a framing, contextualizing, and mediating mode (culture for sustainable development); and

  • • a foundational and structural framework as underlying dimension (culture as sustainable development).Footnote 30

Figure 3. The essential fourth dimension of sustainability: Culture in/for/as sustainable development (courtesy of Dessein et al. Reference Dessein, Soini, Fairclough and Horlings2015, 29).

Cultural and creative industries, such as organ craftsmanship and music, address culture for sustainable development through the promotion of sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all (Sustainable Development Goal no. [SDG] 8).Footnote 31 Both manufacturers and their artisan organ-building workshops,Footnote 32 and organ-music performers contribute to a local/regional cultural industry by providing decent and inclusive employment opportunities and sustainable livelihoods for assignments in creative, manual, and/or service-oriented fields of productive employment and/or decent work, such as cultural tourism and heritage conservation.Footnote 33 Thus, higher levels of economic productivity are to be achieved through diversification, technological upgrading, and innovation, including through a focus on high value-added and labor-intensive sectors (SDG Target 8.2) and development-oriented policies that can be promoted to support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity, and innovation and to encourage the formalization and growth of micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises, including through access to financial services (SDG Target 8.3).Footnote 34

More significantly, the intangible heritage of organ craftsmanship and music displays culture as sustainable development by making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable (SDG 11).Footnote 35 Notably by merging performing with the tangible aspects of a reasonable momentum, promising assets are available to strengthen efforts to protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and natural heritage accordingly (SDG Target 11.4).Footnote 36 Organ craftsmanship is closely attributed to specialized knowledge [quality-driven] and practices [ability] concerning nature and the use of resources.Footnote 37 Preferably applying wooden materials – that is, as “most used and most critical material in pipe organ construction … for all of the major internal parts: the wind-chests, which house the mechanisms necessary to control the pipes, the bellows, and the wooden pipes”Footnote 38 – since affordable construction components bear anticipated environmental impacts – that is, through carbon capture and sequestration – in the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage, both in the past and in the present. Thus, taking urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts (SDG 13) has always been on the unwritten agenda of responsible organ builders for pure ecological sensitivity and economic necessity.Footnote 39 Resulting from an awareness of, as well as the regulation of, harmful or ethically problematic resources for components – for example, lead, ivory, or toxic adhesives – these materials are either on decline or being managed responsibly. In addition, given the fact that organs are comparably long-lasting instruments, thus, opting for “the best and most durable materials is crucial for a pipe organ. For such a complex and costly instrument that should last for centuries, investing in quality materials is a must.”Footnote 40 Raising awareness vis-à-vis strengthening [community-based] resilience and adaptive capacity to natural disasters and climate change (SDG Target 13.1) are effectively promulgated through international stakeholder dialogues, music performances, and on-site symposia.

Ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all are part of the job descriptions of both organ builders and performing organists (SDG 4).Footnote 41 They are artists, supply-chain, production, and event-marketing managers, controllers, sales experts, and administrators simultaneously. Moreover, changing the technical and interpretative requirements calls for highly motivated youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs, and entrepreneurship (SDG Target 4.4).Footnote 42 Transmitting outstanding craftsmanship and artistic interpretation beyond cultural boundaries within a globalized contextFootnote 43 demands a sense of acquired knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development and an appreciation of cultural diversity (SDG Target 4.7) (see Figure 4).Footnote 44

Figure 4. Nexus of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) with organ craftsmanship and music (courtesy of Division for Sustainable Development Goals 2014; Division for Sustainable Development Goals 2018).

Intangible cultural heritage aspects of organ craftsmanship

It is organ craftsmanship and music that has tremendously shaped Germany’s musical landscape and instrument-making industries for centuries. Thus, there are numerous related traditions in the country. What makes organ craftsmanship and music unique is the fact that both are closely intertwined. This is primarily because each instrument is designed and created specifically for the architectural space or context in which it is played. Consequently, each organ performance is a triple statement made by the organ builder, the performing artist, and the ambience. Hence, spatial reference is of the utmost importance.Footnote 45

As a result, there are highly specialized knowledge and technical skills related to the practice that have been developed by ingenious craftspeople, composers, and musicians collaborating over time. This process of reciprocal and collaborative value adding has made these context-bound, mostly informally transmitted knowledge and skills significant markers of group identity.Footnote 46 Taking the example of intonation as the tonal tuning of an organ, it needs to be investigated to which extent there is meaningful influence of adopting, making use of, and transmitting technical knowledge on developing specific sets of social identity of organ builders. In a similar vein, it may be discussed whether there are interdependences between the existing identities and the specific modes of dealing with know-how transfer in trade-related – that is, manually dominated – professions.Footnote 47

Trans-cultural and almost universal by its very nature, organ music is a widespread language that primarily recreates a balance of mind and is therefore prone to foster inter-religious understanding across denominations or inclinations.Footnote 48 Organs are being built and played in manifold contexts around the globe, often beyond faith-based institutions representing Christianity.Footnote 49 Constructing and playing an organ is primarily about its sound and music and, to a lesser extent, about disseminating missionary content; this idea becomes plausible when taking into account the increasing variety of organs being built beyond purely religious contexts – in concert halls, for instance.Footnote 50 Even though mostly associated with church services, concerts, and modern cultural events, organ music is additionally performed during important community-building festivities or highly contextual niches or hot spots. For instance, Johann Sebastian Bach’s Toccata and Fugue in D minor (BWV 565) is certainly not only considered one of the most famous works in the organ repertoire, proven by overwhelming reception in terms of interpretation, transcriptions/arrangements or recordings, but, at the same time, it serves as a sample of the quintessential, one-and-only, intuitive organ sound.Footnote 51 There are 400 medium-sized establishments of craftspeople in Germany that guarantee its viability, visibility, and transmission as well as some larger family-owned workshops. Materialized technical and artistic know-how is transmitted in a dual way, through a direct teacher-student experience, complemented by a training experience in vocational schools and/or universities. In such a way, apprentices gain multifaceted practical experience through organ-construction workshops and indispensable theoretical knowledge in vocational training schools at the same time.Footnote 52 Sensitizing efforts for safeguarding organ-building culture and music between tradition and innovation further include teaching at universities and music academies through conferences and presentations via the media (see Figure 5).Footnote 53

Figure 5. Characteristics of organ craftsmanship and organ music for intangible heritage inscription (provided by the author).

Both the shift of perspective toward craftsmanship and the valuation of implicit knowledge underline the tremendous sustainability and innovation potential that originates from materialized know-how. Based on a firm cultural and historic foundation, excellence in craftsmanship may successfully evolve. Both know-how and tacit knowledge play a vital role because of the fact that acquiring know-how and excellence influences people’s identity and gives distinction to their newly created items of property. Assuming that excellence does not arise from perpetuation and replication but, rather, from continuing creation, items of craftsmanship evolve within frictions of tradition and innovation.Footnote 54 Approving organ craftsmanship and music for intangible cultural heritage of humanity has several motivations, which are illustrated in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Reasons of approving organ culture for intangible cultural heritage of humanity (provided by the author; adapted with courtesy of UNESCO 2017b, 20–21).

Taking into account the described dual context of cultural sustainability and intangible cultural heritage, the intention is to elucidate how the inscription of organ craftsmanship and music – representing explicit prototypes of each context – in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity has influenced the perception and self-concept of organ craftsmanship and music, both in theoretic-intellectual and virtual terms? Including organ craftsmanship and music in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity amounts to the following research propositions:

  • • appreciating sustainable value creation vis-à-vis the quadruple bottom-line of addressing economic, environmental, societal aspects of sustainability, adding culture “as a more or less self-standing or freestanding fourth pillar”;Footnote 55

  • • claiming substantial rights for safeguarding and invoking/activating heritage;Footnote 56

  • • enhancing visibility of performing organists, assigned organ builders, frequent practitioners, and nominated organ experts; and

  • • enabling the passion and self-positioning of organ craftsmanship and music.Footnote 57

Narrative first-hand accounts with two organ craftspeople/organ builders have been conducted as expert interviews – that is, assessment referring to highly productive sources in case studies for eliciting valuable, directly relevant information for tendency-finding analysis.Footnote 58 Conducted in a semi-structured way, these interviews are evaluated in line with the principles of qualitative data analysis.Footnote 59 Selecting diverse interviewees guaranteed holistic insights on the issues and served to demonstrate different experiences and opinions.Footnote 60 Hence, interviewed experts – that is, individuals firmly rooted in specific functional or experiential knowledge systems that are clearly delimitable by issue. This allowed me to structure their particular notions and interpretations of the sphere of action in a concise, activating, and connecting manner compared to other individuals,Footnote 61 who had different, well-defined expertise.Footnote 62 The envisaged interviewees were craftspeople/organ builders in management positions in regional or international business contexts, and these interviews allowed me to obtain elucidating, up-to-date information through confidential facts and figures as well as to examine underlying notions and perceptions of organ craftsmanship and music.Footnote 63 Given these research propositions, the four focal issues illustrated in Figure 7 were represented, analyzed, and assessed in the questionnaire.

Figure 7. Propositions and fields of research (provided by the author; adapted with courtesy of Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2017; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2018b; Wünning Reference Wünning2017).

Differing in size, product-service portfolio, number of employees, sales’ revenue, business philosophy and historic stages, the two company profiles representative of organ craftsmanship and music were selected according to a twofold scope/outreach:

  • • Kristian Wegscheider of Orgelbau Wegscheider Dresden was chosen as an interviewee because he provides a rather regional perspective of organ craftsmanship;Footnote 64 and

  • • Philipp Klais of Orgelbau Klais Bonn was chosen as an interviewee because he provides an international perspective of organ craftsmanship.Footnote 65

Orgelbau Wegscheider Dresden is a medium-sized workshop of organ craftsmanship owned by Kristian Wegscheider. Founded as spin-off in 1989 in the aftermaths of German Democratic Republic, the company comprises 17 employees, today generating an annual sales’ revenue of one million euro. Due to crafting tradition, individual socialization, preferred organ style, and the specific ratio of new design in favor of historically informed restoration, the company’s managing director is particularly committed and dedicated to the Baltic region. Moreover, the workshop’s business philosophy can be described as decent, partially understated, and highly professional in terms of materials/resources used and traditional techniques applied; each instrument is one of a kind; irregularities both in surface finish and length/width of scale are purposefully applied and intended in order to prevent the resulting instruments from inanimate perfectionism. It follows from the specific understanding of cultural-artistic diversity: organs are dialects that originate from creative expression within limits. Thus, organ craftsmanship [Orgelbaukunst] is interpreted as an art form exclusively evolving within confined spaces;Footnote 66 if necessary, those limits can be redefined or stretched to a certain extent only. Projects are primarily run at the regional level within Germany and, in selected cases, beyond. The company’s range of operations is within Europe, extending to Vienna/Austria, the former German-speaking parts of Poland, Iceland, representing the organ culture native to northern Germany, or the Czech Republic with its Bohemian tradition. Innovation is the embodied reminiscence and rediscovery of ancestors’ manual and intellectual know-how. In contrast, innovation defined as technological progress – for example, making use of digitization through CAN-Bus [controller area network] interfaces or electronically supported combination pistons/buttons or sequencers on the organ console – but this is considered less significant; hence, mechanical solutions are preferred. Restoring and preserving historic masterpieces often requires collaborative efforts; thus, the company is open-mined to business joint ventures. According to the principle of all for one and one for all, some seminal restoration projects – both independent and collaborative – have been accomplished in Dresden, Hamburg-Neuenfelde, Stralsund, Merseburg, Lengefeld, and Harbke, to name just a few.Footnote 67

Orgelbau Klais Bonn, or, more precisely, Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG, represents a family-owned company, currently headed by Philipp Klais in the fourth generation. The medium-sized workshop of organ craftsmanship comprises 64 employees, including 12 trainees, with an annual sales’ revenue ranging from between 6 and 9 million euro is prestigious and rich in a long-term crafting tradition dating back to 1882. Distinct periods of style, design, and/or degree of technical innovation in craftsmanship correlate with the particular affinity of respective workshop principals. Whereas projects had predominantly been realized within Germany until the late 1990s, the company’s global expansion has increasingly shifted the company’s strategic direction since the beginning of the 2000s. In addition to its neighboring European countries, with the exception of France, critical market shares are held in the Asian countries of China, Taiwan, and South Korea and, in particular, in North and South American and Latin American countries and selected in countries of the Middle East, such as Oman and Israel. Both secular concert halls and sacred sites have commissioned organs;Footnote 68 churches still outweigh concert halls by far, even though there is reasonable momentum and promising business opportunity for the latter, stimulated through highly prestigious and visible lighthouse projects, such like Elbphilharmonie in Hamburg, the Kölner Philharmonie in Cologne, the Symphony Hall Birmingham, the Philharmonie im Gasteig in Munich, and the Georg-Friedrich Händel-Halle in Halle/Saale, Germany.

Considering the volume of each manufactured instrument, Klais organs resemble multipurpose masterpieces that are extraordinarily rich in timbres of stops.Footnote 69 Following the ideal of a complex tonal sound sculpture, recombining/blending stops renders possible the variety of artistic styles, pluralistic performing characters, and the broad range of instrumental literature, on the one hand, and a certain mainstream standard for renowned, frequent organ performers, on the other. An organ’s sound pattern is adapted to the room acoustics by intonation; sometimes, specific tone colors/stops/registers are commissioned or donated to taste in order to add a supplementary culture-bound touch. Constructing new and maintaining existing instruments is at the core of the business activities; restorations do play a vital role at the aficionado level.

To conclude, on the one hand, organ builders are past-bound custodians of cultural heritage of craftsmanship practices with broker qualities to the present, which becomes particularly manifest when preserving and restoring masterpieces of organ craftsmanship by applying traditional techniques. On the other hand, organ builders are value-based, future-thinking visionaries gifted with both true intuition of technological process innovation and entrepreneurial talent for continuing workshop existence. This past-present-future continuum of organ craftsmanship notably coincides with the notion of cultural sustainability in the context of intangible cultural heritage – that is, intergenerationally shared practice for enhancing social creativity and fostering sustainability transformation in organizations.Footnote 70

Experts’ takes on organ craftsmanship

In reference to the earlier claims, four corresponding fields of research were considered for the experts’ comments and opinions: sustainable value creation, substantial claims, multi-perspective visibility, and facilitative reassurance.

Appreciating sustainable value creation

“Craftspeople operating in organ workshops live up to passionate nerds in their professional lives, they are fully convinced, truly inspired and highly specialized aficionados.”Footnote 71 The value-adding scope of organ craftsmanship can be defined as a creative and contemporary reflection of translated or transmitted organ-building know-how in all its occurring facets by adapting to changing cultural landscapes, by requiring a historically informed attitude of respectfully dealing with instruments from the past in different regional settings, by merging the two organ strands of artistic creation with manual perfection, and through making sounds tangible/perceivable.Footnote 72 Reconciling craft with art requires the certain charming vagueness or fuzziness Footnote 73 that combines perfection orientation with intentional irregularities simultaneously. Put bluntly, too much perfectionism may potentially extinguish aura.

The business values lived up to in the context of organ craftsmanship comprise grassroots’ values – that is, respect in terms of fostering teamwork, coping with diversity of opinions, taking responsibility for resources and cultural contexts, articulating a traditional orientation, and convincing leadership in artistic expression, true ambition, specialized task-sharing, and a sense of cooperation/collaboration. The involved sustainability aspects are closely related to the leading principle/core activity of organ craftsmanship – that is, building instruments in a forward-looking manner, which requires the utmost duration of ecologically harmless materials in terms of environmental sustainability, adequate remuneration and locally effective policies in terms of societal sustainability, and conveyed cultural knowledge and know-how in terms of cultural sustainability, involving enthusiasm of and for performing culturally adapted music without the need for currying favor. In order to maintain a well-balanced intuition for handling such unique value chains, renowned organ builders are concerned with retaining control of their complex processes of value creation. In other words, outsourcing services or value-adding steps are associated with losing competence over generations.Footnote 74

The dual inscription of organ craftsmanship in conjunction with organ music represents the ideal synthesis of artwork with manual crafting techniques [synthesis of the arts], thus combining sacred and/or secular interiors with dedicated spaces for music performance.Footnote 75 In this respect, “constructing organs is barely considered as business model with the primary objective of value creation, but the professionalized passion to build instruments that reach people in liturgically, regionally and culturally adapted contexts.”Footnote 76 Hence, the masterpieces epitomizing organ craftsmanship mainly date back to the seventeenth century and are typically bound to central Europe.

The ever-prevailing challenge of organ craftsmanship lies in the specific technology of handling a huge mechanical dimension. Thus, the key aspects of manual abilities [handwerkliches Erfahrungswissen] connected with organ craftsmanship encompass universal manual crafting abilities and specific expert skills of the so-called touché;Footnote 77 intellectual abilities comprise profound artistic and musical understanding, a service-oriented attitude for guiding/consulting customers and organists, a manually and historically informed awareness, and the capacity for correlating recent/novel paradigms or developments/evolutions in craftsmanship with a state-of-the-art cultural organ landscape.Footnote 78 As Philipp Klais explains, “[t]he most important intellectual ability in the context of organ craftsmanship is imagining the tonal language in advance through learned techniques and lot of implemented experience.”Footnote 79 This is why the distinction between tangible and intangible, and artistic and technical/crafting, aspects in the course of creating value appears to be artificial and arbitrary; hence, more important than classifying is the conclusion that organ craftsmanship and organ music are both facilitating services,Footnote 80 they can be characterized by the uno-actu principle – that is, adding value while instantly doing something, such as crafting instruments or performing music.Footnote 81

Claiming substantial rights for safeguarding and invoking/activating heritage

The corporate mandate of safeguarding heritage is very much intertwined with the workshop philosophy,Footnote 82 since synthesizing/reconciling aspects of art with craftsmanship is at the core of the heritage-listing agenda: “First, organs are treasures of animation; they must to be used and played. Second, organs are unbiased brokers; they can liaise with people through emotions. Third, organs are change agents; they may instantly shift recipient’s habits and needs.”Footnote 83 The expectations associated with the inscription of organ craftsmanship and music include raising awareness and attention in order to increasingly take notice of organs as music, not necessarily as faith-based instruments,Footnote 84 contributing to business success, requesting rewarding opportunities in vocational training – for example, Oscar-Walcker-Schule in LudwigsburgFootnote 85 – and addressing regular or extraordinary public-sector financing.

As Kristian Wegscheider stated, “[t]hese steps have gradually changed the organ’s image in order to make queen or king approachable, tangible and inviting – in few words: lifting it from the distant platform.”Footnote 86 The intangible impacts induced by the listing – that is, beneficial responsibility or accountability effects, such as reputational gains or making organ craftsmanship and music publicly available, clearly outweigh tangible/material effects – that is, beneficial changes in economic terms, such as demand, order situation, or sales revenue; in a nutshell, listing is associated more with obligation than with award or coronation even!

The personal involvement and commitment in safeguarding organ craftsmanship is indispensable;Footnote 87 it includes close personal ties, get-togethers on a regular basis, stakeholder dialogues, and public relations for image/sponsoring purposes, coordination among performing artists and music colleges or academies of music, communicating success stories, using role models as best practices for shifting roles and recipient’s habits and needs, making sure instruments are accessible and played well, and inspiring brokers or mediators for congregations in spiritual transformation.

The individual accentuations are considered the only viable, self-reliant option to create momentum and to run self-contained activities of making the organs approachable and inviting in a down-to-earth manner,Footnote 88 as well as safeguarding policies, including programs for younger target groups, walk-in access, real organ-touching experiences, and a uniform inventory of both organs and company workshops.Footnote 89 Hence, the main associations of both craftspeople and practitioners, such as the Vereinigung der Orgelsachverständigen Deutschlands (German Association of Organ Experts, VOD), the Gesellschaft der Orgelfreunde (Society of Friends of the Organ), the Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister (Federation of German Organ Builders, BDO), and the Internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Orgeldokumentation (International Association for Organ Documentation, IAOD), are only marginally involved to date. The role of vocational training is of the utmost importance in order to provide attractive professional opportunities and to transfer know-how and enthusiasm for organ craftsmanship, complying with the three most essential requirements of quality, sustainability/future thinking, and passion.Footnote 90

The unique selling proposition for the future can be described as intrinsically driven, self-reliant, and authentic positioning that will ultimately result in higher standards and value propositions. Moreover, organ craftsmanship and music enable substantially floating spaces with sound by requiring only one single player, which tremendously facilitates the making collective experiences. As Philipp Klais shared, “[t]here is hope that inscribing organ craftsmanship raises awareness and attention at the same time in order to increasingly take notice of organs as music and not necessarily as old-fashioned, faith-based instruments.”Footnote 91

Enhancing visibility of performing organists, assigned organ builders, frequent practitioners, and nominated organ experts

Klais also explained that “[o]rgan affiliates are enabling unique collective experiences by floating spaces with sound by one single player only.”Footnote 92 However, public perception of both organ craftsmanship and music status quo is limited; currently, organ craftsmanship is hardly perceived in public, which is still slightly different to organ music; both are considered niches of cultural-artistic expression, in need of increasing publicity and affection for more embeddedness in modern, diversified and multi-cultural contexts of society;Footnote 93 the prospects as intangible heritage remain vague and ambivalent, avoiding the pitfalls to preserve techniques in a museum-like way instead of keeping traditions visibly alive. The value of the intangible cultural heritage of organ craftsmanship and music deserves more sensual attention,Footnote 94 by highlighting the charm of changing perspectives and resuming universal communication across language barriers; for this purpose, formats need to be customized, including individual lighthouse projects of enjoyable music education,Footnote 95 such as performing organ music beyond sacred spaces in unexpected surroundings and in small bits as brilliant, easy-to-digest appetizers.

The stakeholders – that is, performing organists, the assigned organ builders, the frequent practitioners, and the nominated organ experts – are conducive to preserve and promote organ craftsmanship and music.Footnote 96 As Kristian Wegscheider shared, “[n]ew formats should be provided in addition to existing ones.”Footnote 97 Related activities or policies need to be revisited in order to have an impact on enhanced recognition, branding, imaging, and appraisal; recitals need to be offered on a regular basis in a redesigned manner; innovation needs to connect with the conventional, making organ craftsmanship and music sensually tangible.

The intergenerational evolution that has shaped organ building needs to be updated in order that it can contribute to public awareness, perception, and an image for future generations, and this will mainly be achieved by providing attractive apprenticeship opportunities, which will have reciprocal appeal and success, providing adequate pre-selection of potential candidates and offering conducive mindsets of underlining joy and enthusiasm rather than burden sharing.Footnote 98 Hence, as Wegscheider explains, “promoting appeal by embodying authenticity and pride for music is a vantage point.”Footnote 99 The personalities of craftspeople of organ building are holistically balanced and enthusiastic about the fascination of connecting the intangible with tangible heritage, often adding some sense of eccentric craziness; more of these authentic brokers are called for. In a nutshell, this is the essence for embodied learning.Footnote 100

The catchy and attractive appeal of organ craftsmanship and music vis-à-vis the informed public is mainly induced by its quality of living heritageFootnote 101 that bridges the gap between cognitive messages of the spoken word and emotional impacts of music; as a result, it generates promising momentum and potential for stakeholder dialogues among future generations, provides opportunities for accessing important decision makers in politics, business, or the media, and enables broadcasting and best-practice storytelling.

Enabling reassurance of passion and self-positioning with organ craftsmanship and music

As Philipp Klais revealed, “[b]eing an organ builder is much more associated with gratitude than pride.”Footnote 102 Moreover, the mastery of organ building is also considered a cross-generational obligation. Gifted with multiple talents and tasks, craftspeople are sometimes perceived as crazy freaks,Footnote 103 who concurrently embody some functions of business people, communication managers, marketing experts, controllers, freelance musicians, or lecturers with managing qualities of balancing leadership and team play, socioeconomic responsibility and accountability, and claims of creative and evocative self-fulfillment. The professional standing or reputation compared to other professions of craftsmanship remains exotic; organ building is frequently attributed to a niche culture for a manageable group of interested/addicted stakeholders from another era. As Kristian Wegscheider puts it bluntly, “the lobbying capital of craftspeople in terms of perception and recognition is rather limited.”Footnote 104

The self-image among organ craftspeople in the light of competing companies on the market is based on respect, despite fierce competition; organ craftspeople consider themselves to be enthusiastic, variegated, and diversified artists that either reconcile different historic styles of last resort for sensual enrichment or polarize these styles with their instruments. The requirements and demands articulated by contracting bodies/clients do not exert influence on the company’s value proposition, intrinsically driven mindset, or convinced/convicted code of conduct. Put differently, within the guild, understatement is usually recommended – that is, refraining from temptations of mainstream uniformity and compensating identity-based helplessness for solely satisfying external demands.

The business activities from a short-term perspective are assumed to be influenced little by listing organ craftsmanship and music because preserving and promoting heritage is more of a perceived obligation than an opportunity; albeit, positive, disseminating effects and new opportunities are expected, particularly in the context of a company’s succession. The changing attitude toward the organ builder’s profession in line with the inscription aims at better-qualified and more inspired people. As Philipp Klais explains, “[c]urrently, organ culture is a tempting niche that enables creative liberties, particularly with respect to vocational and continuing education.”Footnote 105

The message intended for future generations of organ craftspeople is threefold: first, stay addicted to music; second, keep an eye on the details in organ craftsmanship; and, third, promote congregational singing and get-togethers. Making organ craftsmanship future-proof deserves the best, animated people, while increasing both the number and quality of stakeholder groups; this requires reasonable remuneration, attractive continuing education formats, know-how transfer with communicating interfaces, and professional documentation. The general affiliation to both instrument and organ music from an organ builder’s perspective is characterized as a tempting niche that enables creative liberties, fosters safeguarding technologies, encourages transferring know-how, calls for the documentation of workshop processes, and strives for elaborating on corresponding technical literature.Footnote 106

The specific social identity or mindset of organ builders remains vague; there is no unambiguous, societal profiling of mindset of organ craftspeople; generally speaking, most values are commonly shared among organ builders; modes of cooperation, observation, and assessment are commonly shared business practices, possibly including some charming sort of cliquism. Footnote 107

Conclusions

Linking organ craftsmanship and music with sustainability is evident, but it is novel and innovative in this field; sustainable value creation is appreciated, predominantly by addressing cultural, environmental, and societal aspects of sustainability. Currently, the visibility of organ craftsmanship and music is limited; both are niches of cultural-artistic expression and aspects of living heritage that are to be highlighted further. Yet there are promising signs and efforts to be announced and shared since

[t]he organ is the instrument of the year 2021! It is thus the first keyboard instrument to be declared Instrument of the Year. The organ is considered the queen of instruments and is the largest of all musical instruments, the deepest and highest, the loudest and quietest. In Organ Year 2021, the goal is to draw curiosity and attention to the instrument and its many facets.Footnote 108

Which conclusions can be drawn given the intention of elucidating how the inscription of organ craftsmanship and music in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity has influenced the perception and self-concept of organ craftsmanship and music, both in theoretic-intellectual and virtual terms?

  • • From a theoretic-intellectual point of view, the nexus between organ craftsmanship and music and sustainability in each of its quadruple aspects is evident. In practical terms, sustainable value creation is fully appreciated, predominantly by addressing cultural (conformity, landscape, technique, values, traditions), environmental (resources, components), and societal (employment, apprenticeship, remuneration) aspects of sustainability.

  • • Aspects of claiming substantial rights for safeguarding organ craftsmanship and music are implicitly considered uno actu in line with the actual, value-adding processes of crafting and/or performing (quality, future thinking, passion). In contrast, momentum and commitment of invoking and activating heritage are explicitly requested from the stakeholders involved (formats, public relations, financing, best practices).

  • • Currently, the visibility of organ craftsmanship and music is rather limited; both are niches of cultural-artistic expression, aspects of living heritage (access, tangibility, brokerage, coverage) that are to be highlighted mutually by performing organists, assigned organ builders, frequent practitioners, and nominated organ experts.

  • • Ranging from veiled pride and professionalized understated organ craftsmanship and music reveals an ambivalent image of reassurance. Multitasking aptitudes, enriched with the utmost individual passion (skills, competences, inspiration, enthusiasm, creation) are in apparent disaccord with self-effacing, matter-of-fact attributes of self-positioning (gratitude, obligation, cliquism).

Inscribing organ craftsmanship and music in UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity positively influences the perception and self-concept of organ craftsmanship and music. This concept primarily applies to fully recognizing the nexus with sustainability aspects but similarly allows drawing invaluable conclusions from the multifaceted notions of organ craftsmanship and music in terms of heritage definition, safeguarding requirements, visibility and awareness-raising, and insights into professional contexts and job profiles. Inscribed organs and organ-crafting cultures have reciprocally influenced and enriched Europe since the Baroque era. Adding to this perception, in fact, the German organ cultural tradition extends from the Netherlands to Finland, from Eastern Europe to the Balkans, and from South Tyrol to Switzerland, to Alsace-Lorraine, and, finally, to Belgium. This regional-cultural concept is consequently referred to as the landscape of organ culture, which has globally been paid tribute to in the end.Footnote 109 Presumably, most of the protagonists in the vibrant field of organ craftsmanship and music would agree that “the aim and final end of all music should be none other than the glory of God and the refreshment of the soul.”Footnote 110

Acknowledgments

Throughout this research, I have had the privilege to work with many people whose contributions deserve special mention. My appreciation goes to those who have substantially enriched this project. For that reason, it is my obligation and pleasure to convey my gratitude to all of them in this humble acknowledgment. First, I wish to record my utmost gratitude to the interviewees and organ builders Kristian Wegscheider (chief executive officer, Orgelbau Wegscheider Dresden) and Philipp Klais (chief executive officer, Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG) for their inspiring narratives, intuition, and enthusiasm, supportive advice, never-ending patience, and invaluable insights in their daily craftspeople’s routines. Special thanks are particularly due to those distinguished experts who have made considerable efforts toward the provision of valuable insider information through informal briefings, chats, or spontaneous telephone calls. In this respect, I wish to extend my appreciation and gratitude to the experts both in organ craftsmanship and in music and intangible cultural heritage: Michael Gerhard Kaufmann, member of the executive committee of the Vereinigung der Orgelsachverständigen Deutschlands (German Association of Organ Experts, VOD), Alexander Steinhilber (deputy director of the State Representation of Hamburg in Berlin and former head of the Elbphilharmonie project team), and Matthias Neef and Benjamin Hanke, both representatives of the Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission (German Commission for UNESCO, DUK). Facilitating research for learning about recent developments in intangible heritage matters has kindly been rendered possible through invaluably stimulating off-the-record exchange with my dear colleague Sylvia Maus (UNESCO Chair in International Relations, Technische Universität Dresden). Last but not least, my appreciation as passionate, freelance church musician shows for her majesty herself, the queen of sounds, for enjoying myriad, intimate audiences. Thanks for this uplifting privilege of vibrant diletti musicali!

Footnotes

1 Cf. Kaufmann Reference Kaufmann2018, 10–11.

2 For optional, contextual information and general classification on/of organ craftsmanship, see Bedos de Celles Reference de Celles1778; Phelps Reference Phelps1967; P. Andersen Reference Andersen1969; Williams Reference Williams1966/1978, Reference Williams1980; Seidel Reference Seidel1982; Sonnaillon Reference Sonnaillon1985; Hopkins Reference Hopkins1855/1987; Hopkins Reference Hopkins2012.

3 Antje Vollmer, theologian and former vice president of the German Parliament [Bundestag], quoted in Hanssen Reference Hanssen2017 Translated by the author.

4 Cf. Deutsche Welle Reference Welle2018; Kaufmann Reference Kaufmann2018, 11; Wilhelm Reference Wilhelm2018; Hopkins Reference Hopkins1855/1987, 108.

5 See Hopkins Reference Hopkins1855/1987, 48; cf. Hopkins Reference Hopkins2012.

6 Cf. Bakker et al. Reference Bakker, Danens, Ritzema and Vogel2019; Edskes et al. 2019; Arp Schnitger Gesellschaft 2017; Arp Schnitger Gesellschaft 2007; Gress et al.Reference Gress and Lange2001/2007; Ladegast Reference Ladegast1998; Busch Reference Busch1997; Hopkins Reference Hopkins1855/1987, 48, 108 et seqq.; Williams Reference Williams1966/1978.

7 For optional, contextual information and general classification on/of organ music, composers, and performing artists, see Henderson Reference Henderson2005; Anderson Reference Anderson2012.

8 Cf. CGTN 2017; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2017; Kaufmann Reference Kaufmann2018, 11.

9 Christoph Wulf, vice president of the Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission; see and cf. Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2017; Kaufmann et al. Reference Kaufmann and Weschler2016. Translated by the author.

10 See Figure 1; cf. UNESCO Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage 2017; UNESCO General Conference 2003; Blake Reference Blake2006; Blake Reference Blake2016; UNESCO 2011; UNESCO 2017a; UNESCO 2017b; Barthel-Bouchier Reference Barthel-Bouchier2013, 7 et seqq., 153 et seqq.; Auclair et al. Reference Auclair and Fairclough2015, 1 et seqq.; Gerner Reference Gerner, Lagrange, Oeter and Uerpmann-Wittzack2018.

11 Cf. Schippers and Grant Reference Schippers and Grant2016; Pryer Reference Pryer2019.

12 Cf. Ross Reference Ross2014; Duvelle Reference Duvelle2014, 29; Dessein et al. Reference Dessein, Soini, Fairclough and Horlings2015, 26 et seqq.; Khristova, Dragićević-Šešić et al. Reference Khristova, Dragićević-Šešić and Duxbury2015, 1 et seqq.; Labadi et al. Reference Labadi and Logan2016, 1 et seqq.; Logan et al. Reference Logan, Kockel and Craith2015; UNESCO 2017b; UNESCO 2017c; Grotelüschen Reference Grotelüschen2018; UNESCO 2016, 170–197.

13 See Figure 2; cf. Kuutma Reference Kuutma2018; Yusuf Reference Yusuf2018; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2017; Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien 2016b; Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien 2016a; Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien 2017.

14 See Smith Reference Smith, Albert, Bernecker and Rudolff2013, 57.

15 Cf. Kagan et al. Reference Kagan and Kirchberg2016, 1500.

16 See Pedelty Reference Pedelty2012, 203; cf. Wünning Reference Wünning2017; Steffen Reference Steffen2017.

17 Cf. Grant Reference Grant2018.

18 Cf. Kagan et al. Reference Kagan and Kirchberg2016, 1489; UNESCO 2016, 191.

19 Cf. Kagan et al. Reference Kagan and Kirchberg2016, 1490–91.

20 Cf. UNESCO 2016, 194.

21 Cf. UNESCO 2016, 195–97.

22 Cf. Kagan et al. Reference Kagan and Kirchberg2016, 1499–1500.

23 Cf. UNESCO Intangible Heritage Section 2007, 3–4; Schorlemer Reference Schorlemer2014, 121; Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017; Deacon et al. Reference Deacon and Smeets2018.

24 Cf. Kono Reference Kono2014, 108; Gerner Reference Gerner2014, 295 et seq.; Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik 2018a; Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik 2018b; Brandstätt et al. Reference Brandstätt and Angster2018; Rucz et al. Reference Rucz, Angster and Miklós2016; Angster et al. Reference Angster, Miklós and Fuchs1995; Cassidy Reference Cassidy2015, 5.

25 Cf. Throsby Reference Throsby2014, 364; Bendix Reference Bendix2018, 196–200.

26 Cf. Dessein et al. Reference Dessein, Soini, Fairclough and Horlings2015, 15; Arizpe Reference Arizpe2015, 18, 123.

27 Cf. Simma et al. Reference Simma, Khan, Mosler, Paulus, Chaitidou and Nolte2012, 1489; Brocchi Reference Brocchi2016, 49–50; Odendahl Reference Odendahl and Weller2009, 24 et seqq.; Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen e.V. 2016.

28 Cf. Pizzirani et al. Reference Pizzirani, McLaren and Seadon2014, 1325.

29 Cf. Ellson Reference Ellson2004.

30 See Figure 3; cf. Odendahl Reference Odendahl and Weller2009, 33, 154; Steinkellner Reference Steinkellner2016, 4.

31 Cf. UNESCO 2016, 183–87.

32 Cf. Sennett Reference Sennett2009, 53 et seqq.

33 Cf. Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017; Tittelbach Reference Tittelbach2017.

34 Cf. Schorlemer and Maus Reference Schorlemer and Maus2018, 27 et seqq.

35 Cf. UNESCO 2016, 191.

36 Cf. Schorlemer et al. Reference Schorlemer and Maus2018, 27 et seqq.

37 Cf. Sennett Reference Sennett2009, 241 et seqq.

38 See Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict 2014.

39 Cf. UNESCO 2016, 188–191.

40 See Central Music 2020.

41 Cf. UNESCO 2016, 180; Marchand Reference Marchand2018, 267.

42 Cf. Tittelbach Reference Tittelbach2017; Walcker-Mayer Reference Walcker-Mayer2018; Land der Ideen Management GmbH 2006.

43 For information on Propositions 9, 10, and 12 on the European and global significance of Arp Schnitger, see, for instance, Vogel Reference Vogel2019.

44 See Figure 4; cf. Tittelbach Reference Tittelbach2017.

45 UNESCO 2017b, 20.

46 Cf. Gerner Reference Gerner2013, 14.

47 Cf. UNESCO 2017b; Janke Reference Janke2018.

48 Cf. Frühauf Reference Frühauf2012; Sadoh Reference Sadoh2017; Sadoh Reference Sadoh2004, 42–74.

49 Taking a closer look at the comprehensive opus list and opus-locating map of Klais Organ Building, for instance, it becomes evident that more than 140 organs are built in secular concert halls and an additional 30 organs in privately-owned premises. Countries include China, Taiwan, Oman, Malaysia or the Philippines that are highly diverse landscapes in terms of culture and confession. Cf. Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG 2020a; Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG 2020b.

50 Personal communication with Tobias Haase; cf. Haase 26 March Reference Haase2019; Klais Reference Klais2019a.

51 Cf. ARP SCHNITGER Institut für Orgel und Orgelbau an der Hochschule für Künste Bremen 2014.

52 Cf. Marchand Reference Marchand2008, 248 et seqq.

53 See Figure 5; cf. UNESCO 2017b, 20; Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 2018; dpa et al. 2017; katholisch.de 2017; Schwarz Reference Schwarz2018; Waldkircher Orgelstiftung Reference Orgelstiftung2018a; Waldkircher Orgelstiftung Reference Orgelstiftung2018b; Waldkircher Orgelstiftung et al. Reference Orgelstiftung2018; Waldkircher Orgelstiftung et al. Reference Orgelstiftung2018c; Keggenhoff Reference Keggenhoff2018; Kaufmann Reference Kaufmann2018, 11–13.

54 See Figure 6; cf. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 2018; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2018a.

55 See Elkington Reference Elkington2002, 69 et seqq.; cf. Jeurissen Reference Jeurissen2000, 229; Pizzirani et al. Reference Pizzirani, McLaren and Seadon2014, 1324; Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen e.V. 2016; International Criminal Court 2016, 324; Fischler Reference Fischler, Weidinger, Schmidpeter and Fischler2014, 18; Dessein et al. Reference Dessein, Soini, Fairclough and Horlings2015, 24–25, 28, 33; Montella Reference Montella2015, 16; Scovazzi Reference Scovazzi2015, 107, 114, 121.

56 Cf. Silverman et al. Reference Silverman, Waterton and Watson2017, 14; Escallon Reference Escallon2017, 66; Stefano Reference Stefano2012.

57 See Figure 7; cf. Kaufmann Reference Kaufmann2017.

58 Cf. Interview with Philipp Klais, Bonn, 7 August 2018; Interview with Kristian Wegscheider, Dresden, 5 July 2018; cf. Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b; Klais Reference Klais2018c.

59 Cf. Kuckartz Reference Kuckartz2016, 97 et seqq.; Helfferich Reference Helfferich2011, 55 et seqq.; Atkinson Reference Atkinson2017, 136 et seqq.

60 Cf. Meffert et al. Reference Meffert, Hensmann and Marketing2014, 24.

61 Adapted from Bogner et al. Reference Bogner, Littig and Menz2014, 13, 15.

62 Cf. Gläser et al. Reference Gläser and Laudel2012, 111 et seqq.; Bogner et al. Reference Bogner, Littig and Menz2014, 17–26.

63 Cf. Bohnsack Reference Bohnsack2007; Cropley Reference Cropley2005; Deppermann Reference Deppermann2001; Flick et al. Reference Flick, von Kardorff and Steinke2005; Hopf Reference Hopf2005; Schmidt Reference Schmidt2005; Strati Reference Strati2000; Strauss Reference Strauss1998.

64 Cf. Wegscheider, Reference Wegscheider2018a; Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

65 Cf. Klais Reference Klais2018a; Klais Reference Klais2018b; Klais Reference Klais2018c; Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG 2018; Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2018c; Schlegelmilch Reference Schlegelmilch2017; Gassmann Reference Gassmann2020.

66 Cf. Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

67 Cf. Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

68 Cf. Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017.

69 Cf. Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017.

70 Cf. Böhm Reference Böhm2013; Miklós Reference Miklós2010; Kreienbrink Reference Kreienbrink2021.

71 Kristian Wegscheider; see Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

72 Cf. Rucz et al. Reference Rucz, Augusztinovicz, Angster, Preukschat and Miklós2015; Angster et al. Reference Angster, Rucz and Miklós2017, 16; Angster Reference Angster2020, 11 et seqq.

73 See Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

74 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c; cf. Mörchen Reference Mörchen2021.

75 Cf. Klais Reference Klais2019b.

76 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

77 Cf. Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

78 Cf. World Heritage Centre 2018; Smith Reference Smith, Albert, Bernecker and Rudolff2013, 55; Schorlemer Reference Schorlemer, Delbrück, Giegerich and Zimmermann2008, 329; 333 et seqq.; Schorlemer Reference Schorlemer and Nafziger2012.

79 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

80 Cf. Marchand Reference Marchand2017.

81 Cf. Klais Reference Klais2018c; Marchand Reference Marchand, Edmonds and Warburton2016.

82 Cf. Sennett Reference Sennett2009, 286 et seqq.

83 Kristian Wegscheider; see Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

84 Cf. Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017.

85 See Oscar-Walcker-Schule 2018b; Oscar-Walcker-Schule 2018a; Kaufmann Reference Kaufmann2018, 12.

86 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

87 Cf. Verein Kirchenklang e.V. 2018; Land der Ideen Management GmbH 2010; VolkswagenStiftung 2017; Land der Ideen Management GmbH 2012.

88 Cf. Sennett Reference Sennett2009, 1 et seqq.

89 Cf. Kares Reference Kares2018; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission et al. 2018; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2018b; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2018d.

90 Cf. Tittelbach Reference Tittelbach2017.

91 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

92 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

93 Cf. Bach 1753/2014, 122; Melsop Reference Melsop2013, 3–4.

94 Cf. Sokoliuk Reference Sokoliuk2014.

95 Cf. Gutsch Reference Gutsch2018.

96 Cf. Krämer et al. Reference Krämer and Graumann2017; Waldkircher Orgelstiftung et al. Reference Orgelstiftung2018; Waldkircher Orgelstiftung et al. [Reference Orgelstiftungin preparation].

97 Kristian Wegscheider; see Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

98 Cf. Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b; Marchand Reference Marchand2008; Downey et al. Reference Downey, Dalidowicz and Mason2014, 187 et seqq.

99 Kristian Wegscheider; see Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

100 Cf. Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b; Marchand Reference Marchand2018; Downey et al. Reference Downey, Dalidowicz and Mason2014, 192.

101 See Baghli Reference Baghli2004, 15–16.

102 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

103 See Driessen Reference Driessen2015.

104 Kristian Wegscheider; see Wegscheider Reference Wegscheider2018b.

105 Philipp Klais; see Klais Reference Klais2018c.

106 Cf. Bedos de Celles Reference de Celles1985.

107 See Driessen Reference Driessen2015; Klais Reference Klais2018c.

108 See Berlin Tourismus & Kongress GmbH Reference Tourismus and Kongress2021; cf. SWR2 2021.

109 Personal communication with Michael G. Kaufmann, 26 July Reference Kaufmann2018; cf. Kaufmann 26 July Reference Kaufmann2018.

110 See Spitta Reference Spitta1738/1880, 916.

References

Akagawa, Natsuko, and Smith, Laurajane, eds. 2018. Safeguarding Intangible Heritage: Practices and Policies. First edition. Key Issues in Cultural Heritage. London: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Poul-Gerhard. 1969. Organ Building and Design. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher. 2012. Twentieth-Century Organ Music. Routledge studies in musical genres. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Angster, Judit. 2020. Angewandte Orgelforschung am Fraunhofer IBP in Stuttgart. Akustik Journal 3. https://www.dega-akustik.de/fileadmin/dega-akustik.de/publikationen/akustik-journal/20-03/akustik_journal_2020_03_online_artikel1.pdf (accessed April 30, 2021).Google Scholar
Angster, Judit, Miklós, András, and Fuchs, H. V.. 1995. Klangdokumentation für historische Orgeln mittels neuer Meßtechnik. IBP-Mitteilung 22 (278): 2.Google Scholar
Angster, Judit, Rucz, Péter, and Miklós, András. 2017. Acoustics of Organ Pipes and Future Trends in the Research. Acoustics today 13 (Nr.1): 10–18. https://acousticstoday.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Acoustics-of-Organ-Pipes-and-Future-Trends-in-the-Research-Judit-Angster-1.pdf (accessed July 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Arizpe, Lourdes. 2015. Culture, Diversity and Heritage: Major Studies. Springer Briefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice 12. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Arp Schnitger Gesellschaft (ASG). 2007. Die Schnitger-Vision: Zur Eröffnung des Arp Schnitger Centrum in Golzwarden 2007. https://www.arp-schnitger-gesellschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Die_Schnitger-Vision.pdf (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Arp Schnitger Gesellschaft (ASG). 2017. Arp Schnitger und sein Werk in Geschichte, Gegenwart und Zukunft: Arp-Schnitger-Orgeln – Kulturerbe von weltweiter Bedeutung. 5 Thesen. https://www.arp-schnitger-gesellschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PositionspapierAnhoerung.pdf (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
ARP SCHNITGER Institut für Orgel und Orgelbau an der Hochschule für Künste Bremen. 2014. KULTURERBE und KLANGGEDÄCHTNIS: Internationale Konferenz zur Erforschung und Erhaltung der historischen Orgeln Norddeutschlands. https://www.arp-schnitger-gesellschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/protokoll_kulturerbe-klanggedaechtnis.pdf (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Atkinson, Caroline. 2017. Assessing the Relationship Between Corporate Environmental Reporting and the Embedding of Corporate Social Responsibility in Organisations. Edited by University of Technology Sydney. Sydney, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Auclair, Elizabeth, and Fairclough, G. J., eds. 2015. Theory and Practice in Heritage and Sustainability: Between Past and Future. Routledge Studies in Culture and Sustainable Development. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Carl Philipp Emanuel. 1753/2014. Versuch über die wahre Art das Clavier zu spielen. With the assistance of W. Horn. Faksimile-Reprint der Ausgabe von Teil 1, Berlin 1753 und Teil II, Berlin 1762. Kassel: Bärenreiter-Verlag. http://conquest.imslp.info/files/imglnks/usimg/6/65/IMSLP59566-PMLP122122-Bach,_C.P.E.,_Versuch_%C3%BCber_die_wahre_Art_das_Clavier_zu_spielen_1753.pdf (accessed August 21, 2018).Google Scholar
Baghli, Sid Ahmed. 2004. The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and New Perspectives for the Museum. Keynote Speeches. ICOM NEWS (4): 15–17.Google Scholar
Bakker, Ellen, Danens, Robert, Ritzema, Stieneke, and Vogel, Harald. 2019. In den Fußspuren Schnitgers. Brake. https://www.arp-schnitger-gesellschaft.de/in-den-fussspuren-schnitgers/. (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Barthel-Bouchier, Diane L. 2013. Cultural Heritage and the Challenge of Sustainability. Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast Press Inc.Google Scholar
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien (BKM). 2016a. Fördergrundsätze Programm zur Sanierung und Modernisierung national bedeutsamer Orgeln 2016. https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/_Anlagen/BKM/2016/2016-02-01-foerdergrundsaetze-denkmalschutzsonderprogramm.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.Google Scholar
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien (BKM). 2016b. Kulturstaatsministerin Grütters fördert national bedeutsame Orgeln mit 5 Millionen Euro. News release. September 22. https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Pressemitteilungen/BPA/2016/09/2016-09-22-bkm-orgeln.html (accessed July 10, 2018).Google Scholar
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien. 2017. 40 Millionen Euro für national bedeutsame Denkmäler und Orgeln. 2017. News release. April 5, 2017. https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Pressemitteilungen/BPA/2017/04/2017-04-05-bkm-denkmaeler-orgeln.html (accessed July 10, 2018).Google Scholar
de Celles, Bedos, François. 1778. L’art Du Facteur D’orgues. Descriptions des arts et metiers. Paris: L. F. Delatour. http://data.onb.ac.at/ABO/%2BZ182566604 (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
de Celles, Bedos, François. 1985. Die Kunst des Orgelbauers. Lauffen am Neckar: ISO-Information, Orgelbau-Fachverlag.Google Scholar
Bendix, Regina. 2018. Culture and Value: Tourism, Heritage, and Property. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourismus, Berlin & Kongress, GmbH. 2021. Organ Year 2021. https://www.visitberlin.de/en/event/organ-year-2021 (accessed May 07, 2021).Google Scholar
Blake, Janet E. 2006. Commentary on the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.Google Scholar
Blake, Janet E. 2016. Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Urban Environment: Some Experiences Gained from Implementing UNESCO’s 2003 Convention. In: Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability: International Frameworks, National and Local Governance, edited by Sophia Labadi and William Logan, 114–34. Key Issues in Cultural Heritage. London, New York NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Bogner, Alexander, Littig, Beate, and Menz, Wolfgang. 2014. Interviews mit Experten: Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
Böhm, Roland. 2013. Königin der Instrumente lässt tief blicken. Hannoversche Allgemeine, December 23, http://www.haz.de/Nachrichten/Wissen/Uebersicht/Wo-die-Koenigin-der-Instrumente-tief-blicken-laesst (accessed July 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Bohnsack, Ralf. 2007. Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung: Einführung in Qualitative Methoden. UTB Erziehungswissenschaft Sozialwissenschaft 8242. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
Brandstätt, Peter, and Angster, Judit. 2018. Forschung und Entwicklung in der musikalischen Akustik. https://www.ibp.fraunhofer.de/de/Kompetenzen/akustik/musikalische-akustik.html (accessed July 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Brocchi, Davide. 2016. Nachhaltigkeit als kulturelle Herausforderung. In: Steinkellner 2016, 41–70.Google Scholar
Busch, Hermann J. 1997. Friedrich Ladegast und Silbermann. In: Beiträge Zum Orgelbau und Orgelmusik im 19. Jahrhundert, edited by Magdalena Czolbe, 60–68. Freiberger Studien zur Orgel 5. Altenburg: Kamprad.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Tracy. 2015. The Value of Design in Craft for a More Sustainable Future. Making Futures Journal 4: 1–10.Google Scholar
Central Music, Inc. 2020. Materials – Church Organ. https://www.centralmusic.biz/organs/fratelli-ruffatti/materials/ (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
CGTN. 2017. German Organ Music and Craftsmanship Have Been Added to the UNESCO List as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. It Was Chosen at the 12th Session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Which Took Place from December 4 to 9 in South Korea’s Jeju Island. https://news.cgtn.com/news/31597a4e30637a6333566d54/share_p.html (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
Cropley, Arthur J. 2005. Qualitative Forschungsmethoden: Eine praxisnahe Einführung. Eschborn bei Frankfurt am Main: Klotz.Google Scholar
Deacon, Harriet, and Smeets, Rieks. 2018. Intangible Heritage Safeguarding and Intellectual Property Protection in the Context of Implementing the UNESCO ICH Convention. In: Akagawa and Smith 2018, 36–53.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2001. Gespräche Analysieren: Eine Einführung. Qualitative Sozialforschung 3. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessein, Joost, Soini, Katriina, Fairclough, Graham, and Horlings, Lummina, eds. 2015. Culture In, for and as Sustainable Development: Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 – Investigating Cultural Sustainability. With the assistance of K. Soini, E. Battaglini, I. Birkeland, N. Duxbury, G. Fairclough, L. Horlings and J. Dessein. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä IS1007. http://www.culturalsustainability.eu/conclusions.pdf (accessed June 09, 2017).Google Scholar
Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Vereinten Nationen e.V. 2016. Ziele Für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (SDGs) – Menschliche Entwicklung Stärken: Der Post-2015-Prozess Und Die Ziele Für Nachhaltige Entwicklung.Google Scholar
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. 2017. Hochspezialisiertes Erfahrungswissen und besondere Fähigkeiten. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-weltweit/orgelbau-und-orgelmusik (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. 2018a. Handwerkliches Erfahrungswissen zwischen Tradition und Innovation. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-weltweit/portraet (accessed July 06, 2018).Google Scholar
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. 2018b. Mit Innovationen zum Erfolg. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-weltweit/mit-innovationen-zum (accessed July 02, 2018).Google Scholar
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. 2018c. Orgelbauer Klais über handwerklich-künstlerisches Wissen und Können. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-weltweit/nominierung-orgelbau (accessed July 06, 2018).Google Scholar
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. 2018d. Register guter Praxisbeispiele der Erhaltung immateriellen Kulturerbes. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-deutschland/bundesweites-70 (accessed July 12, 2018).Google Scholar
Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission, and Vereinigung der Orgelsachverständigen Deutschlands. 2018. Immaterielles Kulturerbe: Orgelbau und Orgelmusik. Bundesweites Verzeichnis Immaterielles Kulturerbe. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-deutschland/bundesweites-65 (accessed July 03, 2018).Google Scholar
Welle, Deutsche. 2018. Deutscher Orgelbau ist Weltkulturerbe. June 20, 2018. Euromaxx. https://www.dw.com/de/deutscher-orgelbau-ist-weltkulturerbe/av-44278616 (accessed July 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Division for Sustainable Development Goals. 2014. Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html (accessed July 02, 2018).Google Scholar
Division for Sustainable Development Goals. 2018. Sustainable Development Goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs (accessed July 02, 2018).Google Scholar
Downey, Greg, Dalidowicz, Monica, and Mason, Paul H.. 2014. Apprenticeship as Method: Embodied Learning in Ethnographic Practice. Qualitative Research 15 (2): 183–200. doi:10.1177/1468794114543400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
dpa, AFP, KNA, and fin. 2017. UNESCO: Orgelbau und Orgelmusik zählen zum Kulturerbe. ZEIT online, December 7. https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2017-12/unesco-orgelbau-tradition-immatrielles-kulturerbe-aufgenommen (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
Driessen, Christoph. 2015. Die Liebhaber von Orgeln sind irgendwie bekloppt: Nordrhein-Westfalen: Weltkulturerbe. Welt, July 30. https://www.welt.de/regionales/nrw/article144598876/Die-Liebhaber-von-Orgeln-sind-irgendwie-bekloppt.html (accessed July 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Duvelle, Cécile. 2014. A Decade of Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Ethnologies 36 (1): 27–46. doi:10.7202/1037598ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edskes, Cornelius H., Vogel, Harald, and Schnitger, Arp. 2013. Arp Schnitger und sein Werk: Bildband mit den erhaltenen Orgeln und Prospekten Arp Schnitgers. Bremen: Hauschild.Google Scholar
Elkington, John. 2002. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
Ellson, Tony. 2004. Culture and Positioning as Determinants of Strategy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escallon, Maria Fernanda. 2017. The Formation of Heritage Elites: Talking Rights and Practicing Privileges in an Afro- Colombian Community. In: Silverman, Waterton, and Watson 2017, 63–74.Google Scholar
Fischler, Franz. 2014. Sustainability: The Concept for Modern Society. In: Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Business Success Through Sustainability, edited by Weidinger, Christina, Schmidpeter, René, and Fischler, Franz, 13–22. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Imprint: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flick, Uwe, von Kardorff, Ernst, and Steinke, Ines, eds. 2005. Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch. Rororo Rowohlts Enzyklopädie 55628. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik. 2018a. Dimensionierung von Orgelpfeifen: Entwicklung eines innovativen Verfahrens zur Planung von Orgelpfeifen. https://www.ibp.fraunhofer.de/de/Kompetenzen/akustik/Projekte/Dimensionierung-von-Orgelpfeifen.html (accessed July 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Fraunhofer-Institut für Bauphysik. 2018b. Klanggestaltung von Orgelpfeifen: Innovative Verfahren und Werkzeuge zur Klanggestaltung und Dimensionierung von Orgelpfeifen.Google Scholar
Frühauf, Tina. 2012. The Organ and Its Music in German-Jewish Culture. 1st issued as an Oxford University Press paperback. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gassmann, Michael. 2020. Orgelbauer Hans Gerd Klais: Meister der langen Strecke. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), December 2. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/orgelbauer-hans-gerd-klais-wird-90-17079954.html (accessed January 08, 2021).Google Scholar
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. 2018. Objekte Der Könner – OMAHETI: Materialisierungen handwerklichen Erfahrungswissens zwischen Tradition und Innovation. https://omaheti.wordpress.com/ (accessed July 02, 2018).Google Scholar
Gerner, Martin. 2013. Lead Agency: UNESCO’s Global Leadership and Co-Ordination Role for the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development Band 17. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03028-0.Google Scholar
Gerner, Martin. 2014. Article 10. Education and Public Awareness. In: Schorlemer and Stoll 2014, 283–306.Google Scholar
Gerner, Martin. 2018. Managing Cultural Sustainability: Safe Haven, Cultural Property, and Sustainability in Best Practice. In: Cultural Heritage and International Law: Objects, Means and Ends of International Protection, edited by Lagrange, Evelyne, Oeter, Stefan, and Uerpmann-Wittzack, Robert, 175–208. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-78789-3_9.pdf (accessed September 18, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gläser, Jochen, and Laudel, Grit. 2012. Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Golinelli, Gaetano M., ed. 2015. Cultural Heritage and Value Creation: Towards New Pathways. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Catherine. 2018. Music Sustainability. Oxford Bibliographies in Music. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199757824-0105.Google Scholar
Gress, Frank-Harald, and Lange, Michael. 2001/2007. Die Orgeln Gottfried Silbermanns. Veröffentlichung der Gesellschaft der Orgelfreunde 177. Dresden: Sandstein.Google Scholar
Grotelüschen, Frank. 2018. Die Orgel-Detektive. hr-iNFO. With the assistance of R. Oehler. January 1, 2018. Wissenswert.Google Scholar
Gutsch, Ina. 2018. Königskinder auf den Spuren des Kulturerbes. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 32–33.Google Scholar
Haase, Tobias. 2019. e-mail, March 26.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Frederik. 2017. Orgelbau als Weltkulturerbe: Krönung der Königin. In: Der Tagesspiegel, December 7, 2017. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/kultur/orgelbau-als-weltkulturerbe-kroenung-der-koenigin/20683796.html (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
Helfferich, Cornelia. 2011. Die Qualität qualitativer Daten: Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews. Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, John Christopher. 2005. A Directory of Composers for Organ. Swindon: John Henderson (Pub.) Ltd.Google Scholar
Hopf, Christel. 2005. Forschungsethik und Qualitative Forschung. In: Flick, Kardorff, and Steinke 2005, 589–600.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Edward. 1855/1987. The Organ, Its History and Construction. Pimlico, Buren: Knuf. https://archive.org/details/dli.granth.93718 (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Edward J. 2012. Organ, Its History and Construction: A Comprehensive Treatise on the Structure and Capabilities of the Organ. Swindon, Wiltshire: Orchard Press.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court 2016. Situation in the Republic of Mali in the Case of the Prosecutor V. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, ICC-01/12-01/15. International Criminal Court, September 27, 2016. https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2016_07244.PDF (accessed November 03, 2016).Google Scholar
Janke, Reiner. Kopie und Intonation: Erfahrungswissen von Reiner Janke: Materialisierungen handwerklichen Erfahrungswissens zwischen Tradition und Innovation (OMAHETI). Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, 2018. https://omaheti.wordpress.com/lehrfilme/ (accessed July 02, 2018).Google Scholar
Jeurissen, Ronald. 2000. John Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. In: J Bus Ethics 23 (2): 229–31. doi:10.1023/A:1006129603978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG. 2018. Impulse für den Orgelbau: Seit über 100 Jahren prägt die Familienwerkstatt Klais den Orgelbau. https://www.klais.de/m.php?pid=4 (accessed August 09, 2018).Google Scholar
Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG. 2020a. Opus List. https://klais.de/_klais/bilder/pdf/Opusliste.pdf (accessed August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
Johannes Klais Orgelbau GmbH & Co. KG. 2020b. Opus Map. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1JRkNbFg7tgK3kLC1usZz0dqy6Qg&ll=20.002981330810112%2C22.76367187499998&z=3 (accessed August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
Kagan, Sacha, and Kirchberg, Volker. 2016. Music and Sustainability: Organizational Cultures Towards Creative Resilience – a Review. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 135:1487–1502. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kares, Martin. 2018. Vereinigung der Orgelsachverständigen Deutschlands (VOD). In: Die Krönung des deutschen Orgelbaus: Weltkulturerbe – Hintergründe – Werkstätten. Deutsche Orgelstraße 1, Waldkirch: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 28–31.Google Scholar
katholisch.de. 2017. Königin der Instrumente ist jetzt Kulturerbe: Interview mit Michael G. Kaufmann. http://katholisch.de/aktuelles/aktuelle-artikel/konigin-der-instrumente-ist-jetzt-kulturerbe (accessed July 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael G. 2018. e-mail, July 26.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael G. 2017. Organ Craftsmanship and Music – Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://organpromotion.de/en/32-kategorie/home/174-organ-craftsmanship-and-music-intangible-cultural-heritage (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael G. 2018. Die Orgel ist Welterbe!. In: Die Krönung des deutschen Orgelbaus: Weltkulturerbe – Hintergründe – Werkstätten. Deutsche Orgelstraße 1, Waldkirch: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 10–15.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Michael Gerhard, and Weschler, Cornelia. Orgelbau und Orgelmusik Tradition und Innovation: Immaterielles Kulturerbe der Menschheit: UNESCO-Antrag Orgelbau und Orgelmusik als immaterielles Kulturgut. With the assistance of S. Pfeffer: Pfeffer-Media, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79d9Dd2Cz-g (accessed July 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Keggenhoff, Christoph. 2018. Orgeltag. http://www.orgeltag.de/orgeltag.html (accessed July 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Khristova, Svetlana, Dragićević-Šešić, Milena, and Duxbury, Nancy, eds. 2015. Cultural and Sustainability in European Cities: Imagining Europolis. Routledge Studies in Culture and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klais, Philipp. 2018a. Bonn: Johannes Klais Orgelbau. In: Die Krönung des deutschen Orgelbaus: Weltkulturerbe – Hintergründe – Werkstätten. Deutsche Orgelstraße 1, Waldkirch: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 66–67.Google Scholar
Klais, Philipp. 2018b. Orgelbau Klais Bonn. https://www.klais.de/index.php?newlang=english (accessed July 12, 2018).Google Scholar
Klais, Philipp. 2018c. Interview by M. Gerner. August 7, 2018. Bonn. Organ craftsmanship and music.Google Scholar
Klais, Philipp. 2019a. Concert Hall Organs Made by Klais. https://www.klais.de/m.php?pid=9 (accessed March 27, 2019).Google Scholar
Klais, Philipp. 2019b. Respect for a Gesamtkunstwerk. https://www.klais.de/m.php?pid=20 (accessed March 27, 2019).Google Scholar
Kono, Toshiyuki. 2014. Article 2. Guiding Principles. In: Schorlemer and Stoll 2014, 83–116.Google Scholar
Krämer, Klaus, and Graumann, Gesa. 2017. Orgelbauerin Graumann: Herrin über 10.000 Pfeifen. Deutsche Welle. December 7, 2017. https://www.dw.com/de/orgelbauerin-graumann-herrin-%C3%BCber-10000-pfeifen/a-41694717 (accessed August 09, 2018).Google Scholar
Kreienbrink, Matthias. 2021. Aufgewachsen Unter Orgelpfeifen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), January 7. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/2021-ist-das-jahr-der-orgel-17130894.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2 (accessed January 08, 2021).Google Scholar
Kuckartz, Udo. 2016. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
Kuutma, Kristin. 2018. Inside the UNESCO Apparatus: From Intangible Representations to Tangible Effects. In: Akagawa and Smith 2018, 68–83.Google Scholar
Labadi, Sophia, and Logan, William, eds. 2016. Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability: International Frameworks, National and Local Governance. Key Issues in Cultural Heritage. London, New York NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Ladegast, Walter, ed. 1998. Friedrich Ladegast: Der Orgelbauer von Weissenfels. Stockach am Bodensee: Weidling.Google Scholar
Land der Ideen Management GmbH. 2006. Orgelwelt Waldkirch: 365 Orte 2006. https://land-der-ideen.de/projekt/orgelwelt-waldkirch-1412 (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Land der Ideen Management GmbH. 2010. OrgelMarathon Erzgebirge 2010: 365 Orte 2010. https://land-der-ideen.de/projekt/orgelmarathon-erzgebirge-2010-1515 (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Land der Ideen Management GmbH. 2012. Forschungsorgel des Fraunhofer-Instituts für Bauphysik: 365 Orte 2012. https://land-der-ideen.de/projekt/forschungsorgel-des-fraunhofer-instituts-fuer-bauphysik-2472 (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Logan, William, Kockel, Ullrich, and Craith, Máiréad Nic. 2015. The New Heritage Studies: Origins and Evolution, Problems and Prospects. In: A Companion to Heritage Studies, edited by William Logan, Máiréad Nic Craith, and Ullrich Kockel, 1–26. Wiley Blackwell companions to anthropology. Chichester West Sussex UK, Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marchand, Trevor. 2016. Trevor Marchand on Craft. In: Big Ideas in Social Science, edited by Edmonds, David and Warburton, Nigel, 118–27. Los Angeles: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2017. Craftwork as Problem Solving: Ethnographic Studies of Design and Making. In: Making Futures Journal (3), 1-4. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42547257.pdf (accessed August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2008. Muscles, Morals and Mind: Craft Apprenticeship and the Formation of Person. In: British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (3): 245–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00407.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2018. Embodied Learning. In: International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1–10. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1905.Google Scholar
Meffert, Heribert, and Hensmann, Jan. 2014. Entwicklungsstufen des Nachhaltigkeitsmanagements. In: Marketing, Sustainable Management: Grundlagen und Cases, edited by Heribert Meffert, Peter Kenning, and Manfred Kirchgeorg, 21–36. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
Melsop, Susan. 2013. Craft and Affective Domains of Meaning Making: Engaging Hand, Head and Heart for Transformative Sustainability Learning. Making Futures Journal 3.Google Scholar
Miklós, Noémi Bognár. 2010. Josef Angster and the Angster Organ Factory: The Life and Legacy of the Most Important Figure of Hungarian Organ Building. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Musica 55 (1): 27–40.Google Scholar
Montella, Massimo. 2015. Cultural Value. In: Golinelli 2015, 1–51.Google Scholar
Mörchen, Raoul. 2021. Orgel – Quo Vadis? Organisten, ihr Instrument und dessen Zukunft. Deutschlandfunk. April 30, 2021. https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/orgel-quo-vadis-organisten-ihr-instrument-und-dessen-zukunft.1992.de.html?dram:article_id=495495 (accessed April 30, 2021).Google Scholar
Odendahl, Kerstin. 2009. Der Schutz der wertvollsten Kulturgüter der Menschheit: Aktuelle völkerrechtliche Entwicklungen. In: Kulturgüterschutz – Künstlerschutz: Tagungsband des zweiten Heidelberger Kunstrechtstags am 5. und 6. September 2008 in Heidelberg, edited by Weller, Matthias. 23–48. Schriften zum Kunst- und Kulturrecht 4. Baden-Baden, Zürich, Wien: Nomos; Dike; Facultas.wuv.Google Scholar
Oscar-Walcker-Schule (OWS). 2018a. Immaterielles Kulturerbe an der OWS: Südkorea: Die UNESCO erklärt deutschen Orgelbau und die Orgelmusik zum immateriellen Kulturerbe. News release. February 21, 2018. https://www.ows-lb.de/index.php?id=148&tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=94&tx_news_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=News&tx_news_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&cHash=8b9020b04ca604926c6a47aa32cee005 (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Oscar-Walcker-Schule (OWS). 2018b. Orgel- und Harmoniumbauer/in. https://www.ows-lb.de/index.php?id=133 (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Pedelty, Mark. 2012. Ecomusicology: Rock, Folk, and the Environment. Philadelphia, Pa. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Phelps, Lawrence. 1967. A Short History of the Organ Revival. St. Louis: Concordia Pub. House. http://www.lawrencephelps.com/Documents/Articles/Phelps/ashorthistory.shtml (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Pizzirani, Stefania, McLaren, Sarah J., and Seadon, Jeffrey K.. 2014. Is There a Place for Culture in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment? In: Int J Life Cycle Assess 19 (6): 1316–30. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0722-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryer, Anthony. 2019. Musical Heritage as a Cultural and Global Concept. In: Music as Heritage: Historical and Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Barley Norton and Naomi Matsumoto, 19–41. SOAS musicology series. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ross, Susan. 2014. CDNS 4901/5003 Heritage Conservation and Sustainability. Sustainable Heritage Case Studies. https://sustainableheritagecasestudies.wordpress.com/ (accessed August 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Rucz, Péter, Angster, Judit, and Miklós, András. 2016. Examination of a Novel Organ Pipe Construction with Blown Open Tongue. In: Fortschritte der Akustik – DAGA 2016: 42. Jahrestagung Für Akustik, 14. Bis 17. März 2016, Aachen, edited by Michael Vorländer and Janina Fels, 1292–95. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik e. V. (DEGA).Google Scholar
Rucz, Péter, Augusztinovicz, Fülöp, Angster, Judit, Preukschat, Tim, and Miklós, András. 2015. A Finite Element Model of the Tuning Slot of Labial Organ Pipes. In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (3): 1226–37. doi:10.1121/1.4913460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadoh, Godwin. 2017. Intercultural Elements in the Organ Works of Fela Sowande. In: The Diaspon. https://www.thediapason.com/content/intercultural-elements-organ-works-fela-sowande (accessed August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
Sadoh, Godwin Simeon. 2004. The Organ Works of Fela Sowande: A Nigerian Organist-Composer. Edited by Louisiana State University. LSU Doctoral Dissertations 2883: 2004.Google Scholar
Schippers, Huib, and Grant, Catherine, eds. 2016. Sustainable Futures for Music Cultures: An Ecological Perspective. First edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegelmilch, Renardo. 2017. Orgelbauer: Was sein Instrument zur Königin macht: Wir müssen sie zukunftsfähig machen. domradio. Philipp Klais (Johannes Klais Orgelbau aus Bonn). December 4, 2017. https://www.domradio.de/themen/kultur/2017-12-04/orgelbauer-was-sein-instrument-zur-koenigin-macht (accessed July 10, 2018).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Christiane. 2005. Analyse von Leitfadeninterviews. In: Flick, Kardorff, and Steinke 2005, 447–56.Google Scholar
vonSchorlemer, Sabine. 2008. Compliance with the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: Reflections on the Elbe Valley and the Dresden Waldschlösschen Bridge. In: German Yearbook of International Law/Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht. Vol. 51, edited by Delbrück, Jost, Giegerich, Thomas, and Zimmermann, Andreas, 321–90. German Yearbook of International Law / Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht v.51. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. http://www.gyil.org/?page_id=25 (accessed April 07, 2016).Google Scholar
vonSchorlemer, Sabine. 2012. Compliance with the UNESCO World Heritage Convention: Reflections on the Elbe Valley and the Dresden Waldschlösschen Bridge. In: Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Nafziger, James A. R., 189–258. International law series 2. Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
vonSchorlemer, Sabine. 2014. Article 3. Scope of Application. In: Schorlemer and Stoll 2014, 117–32.Google Scholar
vonSchorlemer, Sabine, and Maus, Sylvia. 2018. Die SDGs – Schnittstellen Zur Kultur? In: Entwicklungspolitik in Zeiten Der SDGs: Essays zum 80. Geburtstag von Franz Nuscheler, edited by Tobias Debiel and Franz Nuscheler, 26–34. Duisburg, Duisburg: Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden.Google Scholar
Schorlemer, Sabine, and Stoll, Peter-Tobias, eds. 2014. The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Explanatory Notes. 2012. Berlin: Springer Berlin.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Rainer. Orgelbau ist UNESCO Weltkulturerbe: Einzige Berufsschule hierfür ist in Ludwigsburg. kirchenfernsehen.de. With the assistance of E. Perkovic. Stuttgart: Evangelisches Medienhaus GmbH, 2018. https://kirchenfernsehen.de/video/orgelbau-unesco-weltkulturerbe-berufsschule-ludwigsburg/ (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Scovazzi, Tullio. 2015. Intangible Cultural Heritage as Defined in the 2003 UNESCO Convention. In: Golinelli 2015, 105–26.Google Scholar
Seidel, Johann Julius. 1982. The organ and its Construction: A Systematic Handbook for Organists, Organ Builders etc. Da Capo Press music reprint series. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. 2009. The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Helaine, Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve. 2017. An Introduction to Heritage in Action. In: Silverman, Waterton, and Watson 2017, 3–16.Google Scholar
Silverman, Helaine, Waterton, Emma, and Watson, Steve. eds. 2017. Heritage in Action: Making the Past in the Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer international pu; Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel E., Mosler, Hermann, Paulus, Andreas L., Chaitidou, Eleni, and Nolte, Georg, eds. 2012. The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Julian. 2013. Cultural Landscape Theory and Practice: Moving from Observation to Experience. In: Understanding Heritage: Perspectives in Heritage Studies, edited by Albert, Marie-Theres, Bernecker, Roland, and Rudolff, Britta, 49–66. Heritage Studies 1. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoliuk, Niko. Orgelbauer aus Leidenschaft. kirchenfernsehen.de. With the assistance of A. Weiß. Stuttgart: Evangelisches Medienhaus GmbH, 2014. https://kirchenfernsehen.de/video/orgelbauer-aus-leidenschaft/ (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Sonnaillon, Bernard. 1985. King of Instruments: A History of the Organ. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Spitta, Philipp. 1738/1880. Johann Sebastian Bach. 2 vols. 2. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. http://www.zeno.org/Musik/M/Spitta,+Philipp/Johann+Sebastian+Bach/Zweiter+Band/Anhang+A+und+B/Anhang+B/12 (accessed August 27, 2018).Google Scholar
Stefano, Michelle L., ed. 2012. Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage. 1. publ. Heritage matters 8. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Steffen, Tilman. 2017. UNESCO-Weltkulturerbe: Journalist an Orgelbauer. In: ZEIT online, December 7. https://www.zeit.de/kultur/musik/2017-12/unesco-kulturerbe-orgelbau-orgelmusik (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
Steinkellner, Vera. 2016. Corporate Cultural Responsibility: Eine Einführung. In: Steinkellner 2016, 3–30.Google Scholar
Steinkellner, Vera. ed. 2016. CSR und Kultur: Corporate Cultural Responsibility als Erfolgsfaktor in ihrem Unternehmen. With the assistance of R. Schmidpeter. Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strati, Antonio. 2000. Theory and Method in Organization Studies: Paradigms and Choices. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm Leonard. 1998. Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung: Datenanalyse und Theoriebildung in der empirischen soziologischen Forschung. UTB für Wissenschaft 1776, Soziologie. München: Fink.Google Scholar
SWR2. 2021. Die Königin der Instrumente: Die Orgel ist Instrument des Jahres 2021. Die Orgel in Deutschland – ein Panorama. https://www.swr.de/swr2/musik-klassik/instrument-des-jahres-2021-die-koenigin-der-instrumente-die-orgel-100.html (accessed May 07, 2021).Google Scholar
Throsby, David. 2014. Article 13. Integration of Culture in Sustainable Development. In: Schorlemer and Stoll 2014, 361–70.Google Scholar
Tittelbach, Sebastian. 2017. Weltkulturerbe Orgeln aus Bonn in die Welt: Orgelhandwerk in immaterielles UNESCO-Weltkulturerbe aufgenommen. Westdeutscher Rundfunk WDR 1. December 8, 2017.Google Scholar
UNESCO General Conference. 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: Doc. MISC/2003/CLT/CH/14. In: Basic Texts of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/treaties/en/unesco10/trt_unesco10.pdf (accessed April 30, 2021).Google Scholar
UNESCO Intangible Heritage Section. 2007. Guidelines for the Establishment of National Living Human Treasures Systems. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/00031-EN.pdf (accessed August 18, 2020).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2011. Implementing the Convention for the Safeguarding of ICH. ICH Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/01853-EN.pdf (accessed July 03, 2018).Google Scholar
UNESCO Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. 2014. List of Cultural Property Under Enhanced Protection. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/19542P-enhanced-protection-list-en_20140320.pdf (accessed July 05, 2016).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2016. Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage: Adopted by the General Assembly of the States Parties to the Convention at Its Second Session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 16 to 19 June 2008), Amended at Its Third Session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 22 to 24 June 2010), Its Fourth Session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 4 to 8 June 2012), Its Fifth Session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 2 to 4 June 2014) and Its Sixth Session (UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 30 May to 1 June 2016). https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/ICH-Operational_Directives-6.GA-PDF-EN.pdf (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
UNESCO Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. 2017. Nomination file no. 01277 for inscription in 2017 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/download.php?versionID=43789 (accessed June 4, 2018).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2017a. Nomination File No. 01277 for Inscription in 2017 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity: Twelfth Session Jeju Island, Republic of Korea 4 to 8 December 2017. Representative List. https://ich.unesco.org/doc/download.php?versionID=43789 (accessed July 04, 2018).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2017b. Organ Craftsmanship and Music. Decision 12.COM 11.b.10. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/organ-craftsmanship-and-music-01277 (accessed June 04, 2018).Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2017c. Intangible Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002434/243402e.pdf (accessed June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Verein Kirchenklang e.V. 2018. OrgelArena – Mit Matthias Grünert. https://orgelarena.de/ (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Vogel, Harald. 2019. 12 Thesen zu Schnitgers Europäischer und globaler Bedeutung. https://www.arp-schnitger-gesellschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/12ThesenSchnitger.pdf (accessed August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
VolkswagenStiftung. 2017. Die Orgel als Erklärungsmodell für Kulturphänomene von der Aufklärung bis in die Gegenwart – Betrachtungen von Transformationen und Paradigmenwechsel im kulturhistorischen Diskurs. Projekt. http://portal.volkswagenstiftung.de/search/projectDetails.do?ref=93032 (accessed July 30, 2018).Google Scholar
Walcker-Mayer, Gerhard. 2018. UNESCO Orgelbau, jetzt die Kommerzialisierung und der Kitsch. http://blog.walcker.com/ (accessed July 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Orgelstiftung, Waldkircher. 2018a. Deutsche Orgelstraße. https://www.deutsche-orgelstrasse.de/ (accessed July 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Orgelstiftung, Waldkircher. 2018b. KönigsKinder machen das Welterbe Orgel quicklebendig: Ein Projekt der Deutschen Orgelstraße. https://www.koenigskinder.online/ (accessed July 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Orgelstiftung, Waldkircher, and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V., eds. (in preparation). Die Krönung der deutschen Orgelmusik: Weltkulturerbe – Entwicklung – Organisten. Deutsche Orgelstraße 2. Waldkirch: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung. https://www.deutsche-orgelstrasse.de/fileadmin/MedienDeutscheOrgelstrasse/News/2018/2018_06_26-DieKroenungDesOrgelbaus/Buchbeschreibung.pdf (accessed July 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Orgelstiftung, Waldkircher, and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V., eds. 2018. Die Krönung des deutschen Orgelbaus: Weltkulturerbe – Hintergründe – Werkstätten. Deutsche Orgelstraße 1. Waldkirch: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung. https://www.deutsche-orgelstrasse.de/fileadmin/MedienDeutscheOrgelstrasse/News/2018/2018_06_26-DieKroenungDesOrgelbaus/Buchbeschreibung.pdf (accessed July 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Orgelstiftung, Waldkircher, and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V., eds. 2018c. Musikhochschulen – Conservatories of Music. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 124–25.Google Scholar
Wegscheider, Kristian. 2018a. Dresden: Orgelwerkstatt Kristian Wegscheider. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 42–43.Google Scholar
Wegscheider, Kristian. 2018b. Interview by M. Gerner. July 5, 2018. Dresden. Organ craftsmanship and music.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Thomas. 2018. Die Geschichte Der Orgel. In: Waldkircher Orgelstiftung and Bund Deutscher Orgelbaumeister e.V. (BDO) 2018, 16–21.Google Scholar
Williams, Peter. 1966/1978. The European Organ, 1450-1850. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Peter. 1980. A New History of the Organ: From the Greeks to the Present Day. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
World Heritage Centre. 2018. Cultural Landscapes. http://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape (accessed July 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Wünning, Georg. 2017. Interview by K. Kloth. 10/2017. Großolbersdorf. Interview mit Orgelbauer Georg Wünning. https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/immaterielles-kulturerbe/immaterielles-kulturerbe-sein/kulturtalent-des-2 (accessed June 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Yusuf, Abdulqawi A. 2018. Cultural Relations: The Notion of Cultural Heritage in International Law. Lecture Series, New York, 2018. http://legal.un.org/avl/ls/Yusuf_CR.html# (accessed July 03, 2018).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Listing criteria for inscription of organ craftsmanship and music as intangible cultural heritage (figure provided by the author; adapted with courtesy of Waldkircher Orgelstiftung et al. 2018).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Aspects of cultural heritage in view of organ craftsmanship and music (figure provided by the author).

Figure 2

Figure 3. The essential fourth dimension of sustainability: Culture in/for/as sustainable development (courtesy of Dessein et al. 2015, 29).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Nexus of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) with organ craftsmanship and music (courtesy of Division for Sustainable Development Goals 2014; Division for Sustainable Development Goals 2018).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Characteristics of organ craftsmanship and organ music for intangible heritage inscription (provided by the author).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Reasons of approving organ culture for intangible cultural heritage of humanity (provided by the author; adapted with courtesy of UNESCO 2017b, 20–21).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Propositions and fields of research (provided by the author; adapted with courtesy of Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2017; Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission 2018b; Wünning 2017).