Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:13:31.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complications after cochlear implantation in adult patients: a retrospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2022

A Dalgic*
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
E Basaran Bozkurt
Affiliation:
Cochlear Implant Center – Audiology Department, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
A Aliyeva
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
E Görgülü
Affiliation:
Cochlear Implant Center – Audiology Department, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
M E Ceylan
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Davraz Yaşam Hospital, Isparta, Turkey
D T Edizer
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
L Olgun
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent Zubeyde Hanım Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Abdullah Dalgic, Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir 35370, Turkey E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To examine the complication rate in adult patients during and after cochlear implantation.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who had undergone cochlear implantation at a tertiary referral centre between 2009 and 2018. All complications and their treatments were categorised as either minor or major, as well as intra- or post-operative.

Results

The records of 392 patients with 395 implants were reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 89 ± 65.5 months (range, 6–408 months). The mean age of patients was 46 ± 15.2 years (range, 19–84 years). Sixty-two patients (16 per cent) had minor complications and 31 (8 per cent) had major complications.

Conclusion

Although cochlear implantation has the potential for significant intra- and post-operative complications, the actual complication rate is relatively low, and it can therefore be considered a safe procedure.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

Cochlear implantation improves hearing levels and the overall quality of life of patients with profound bilateral hearing loss.Reference Vermeire, Brokx, Wuyts, Cochet, Hofkens and Van de Heyning1Reference Pasanisi, Bacciu, Vincenti, Guida, Barbot and Berghenti4 Although cochlear implantation is considered a relatively safe procedure, it may lead to complications during or after surgery.

In a seminal article published by Cohen and Hoffman in 1991 on surgical issues related to cochlear implantation,Reference Cohen and Hoffman5 a system for classifying complications as major or minor was reported.Reference Cohen, Hoffman and Stroschein6,Reference Hoffman and Cohen7 Major complications are those that are life-threatening and/or necessitate revision surgery. Minor complications are those that spontaneously resolve with minimal treatment. Details of the classification used are included in the Methods section below.

Complications of cochlear implantation include: scalp infection and necrosis; haematoma and seroma; major skin flap loss; meningitis; facial nerve injury; electrode insertion problems; and secondary cholesteatoma development.Reference Chiesa Estomba, Rivera Schmitz, Betances Reinoso, Collado, Garcia and Lorenzo8

The present study aimed to examine the complication rate, and in turn the safety of the procedure, in adult patients during and after cochlear implantation.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had undergone cochlear implantation at a tertiary referral centre between 2009 and 2018. Patients older than 18 years were included. We noted their demographic characteristics and medical history, including occurrence of hearing loss (i.e. prelingual, perilingual or postlingual, congenital or acquired), oto-microscopic findings, audiological evaluation results, follow-up duration, complications during and after the operation, and the requirement and reasons for revision surgical procedures. We obtained ethical approval from the local ethics committee (decision number: 17102018/02).

In this study, we classified post-operative complications as major or minor based on the system reported by Cohen and Hoffman.Reference Cohen and Hoffman5 Intra-operative difficulties or complications were included too. Cohen and colleagues classified major complications as: death; meningitis; surgery without reimplantation; and tinnitus, facial stimulation and pain that could not be alleviated. Minor complications included: transient facial paralysis; haematoma and infections that resolve without surgery; and tinnitus, facial stimulation and pain that did subside following electrode reprogramming.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows software, version 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive statistics (arithmetic mean, median, minimum, maximum, standard deviation and standard error) were calculated based on the obtained data. Pearson's chi-square analysis was used for between-group comparisons. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The records of 392 patients with a total of 395 implanted ears were included in this review. For percentages, the number of patients, and not ears, was used as the denominator. The patients included 212 (54 per cent) males and 180 (46 per cent) females. Right-sided implantation was performed in 240 patients (60 per cent), left-sided implantation in 149 (40 per cent) and bilateral implantation in 3 (0.7 per cent). The mean follow-up period was 89 ± 65.5 months (range, 6–408 months). Mean patient age was 46 ± 15.2 years (range, 19–84 years). Hearing loss was reported to be prelingual in 78 patients (20 per cent), perilingual in 33 (8 per cent), and postlingual in 281 (72 per cent). Hearing loss was congenital in 15 patients (4 per cent), acquired in 150 (38 per cent) and undetermined in 227 (58 per cent). The full demographic data and patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic data and characteristics of study

SD = standard deviation

There were 15 patients (4 per cent) with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, in the form of a ‘gusher’ or ‘oozing’, of which 12 (3 per cent) had inner-ear anomalies. The most common of these anomalies was a large vestibular aqueduct, which was observed in eight patients (2 per cent). Two patients had incomplete partition type 2 and two patients had incomplete partition type 3 inner-ear malformations. No other complications were reported in this group. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of CSF gushers between the patients with inner-ear anomalies (92.3 per cent) and those without (0.8 per cent) (p < 0.01).

The list of complications, as categorised into intra- and post-operative and minor and major complications, are presented in Table 2. In this study, the post-operative complication rate was 24 per cent, including post-operative minor complications in 62 patients (16 per cent) and post-operative major complications in 31 (8 per cent) (Table 2). Intra-operative minor complications occurred in 34 patients (9 per cent); there were no intra-operative major complications. Fifteen patients (4 per cent) had a CSF gusher or oozing, of which 14 were treated conservatively. One patient underwent revision surgery for a CSF gusher; this patient was also included in the post-operative major complication group. Damage to the facial nerve canal occurred in four patients; however, these patients did not have facial paralysis. Damage to the external ear canal was observed in seven patients (2 per cent), and was treated by performing bone dust or cartilage grafting during the operation. Two patients had damage to the chorda tympani and suffered taste problems on the operation side of their tongues. Iatrogenic damage to the cochlear implant electrode array occurred in one patient, which was managed using a backup implant.

Table 2. Intra- and post-operative minor and major complications

CSF = cerebrospinal fluid

Discussion

The development of better technologies and improved surgical techniques have led to a gradual decrease in cochlear implantation complications over the years. Nevertheless, the literature still contains inconsistencies regarding the rate of complications. One study reported decreased complication rates in adults.Reference Stamatiou, Kyrodimos and Sismanis9 Paediatric patients have significantly higher complication rates than adults, but only for post-operative minor complications.Reference Farinetti, Ben Gharbia, Mancini, Roman, Nicollas and Triglia10,Reference Migirov, Taitelbaum-Swead, Drendel, Hildesheimer and Kronenberg11

Farinetti et al.Reference Farinetti, Ben Gharbia, Mancini, Roman, Nicollas and Triglia10 reported a post-operative minor complication rate of 21 per cent and a post-operative major complication rate of 5 per cent in a report on 168 patients. Ciorba et al.Reference Ciorba, Bovo, Trevisi, Rosignoli, Aimoni and Castiglione12 reported a post-operative complication rate of 15 per cent (21 of 141 adult patients) for all complications. While analysing 4969 implantations, Hoffman and CohenReference Hoffman and Cohen7 reported the major complication rate as 7 per cent and the total complication rate as 12 per cent, which is consistent with the results of this study.

Post-operative minor complications occurred in 62 patients (16 per cent). The most common post-operative minor complication in this study was transient oedema, which occurred in 20 patients. It developed over the internal receiver transmitters and resolved within 10 days with a tight dressing. We believe that post-auricular transient oedema is more likely to develop in patients who do not follow post-operative recommendations, including head elevation.

In most studies, the most common post-operative minor complication reported was vestibular dysfunction.Reference Farinetti, Ben Gharbia, Mancini, Roman, Nicollas and Triglia10,Reference Lima Junior, Rodrigues Junior Fde, Calhau, Calhau and Palhano13Reference Roberts, Lin, Herrmann and Lee16 Vestibular dysfunction was reported in 19 patients (5 per cent) in this study. Sixteen patients (4 per cent) had dizziness, which resolved within 2–3 days following surgery. There were no cases of delayed dizziness. Early trauma associated with electrode insertion, acute serous labyrinthitis, foreign body rejection, endolymphatic hydrops and intra-operative perilymph loss were considered as reasonable possibilities for post-operative dizziness.Reference Louza, Mertes, Braun, Gürkov and Krause17

Three patients complained of early tinnitus, which did not prevent them from using the implant. Electrode insertion into the basal part of the cochlea can result in tinnitus as well as delayed tinnitus.Reference Akdogan, Ozcan, Ozbek and Dere18 Eight patients had facial stimulation, which happens when the electrode's electrical current emits to the cochlea and adjacent structures. All eight patients were successfully managed by reprogramming the cochlear implant.

Eight patients (2 per cent) had wound infections, which were treated via appropriate intravenous antibiotic treatment. Four patients (1 per cent) had haematoma in the early post-operative period, which was treated conservatively. Lima Junior et al.Reference Lima Junior, Rodrigues Junior Fde, Calhau, Calhau and Palhano13 reported the minor haematoma rate as 0.4 per cent in their study. Reviews of the literature have revealed that the incidence of haematoma is very low in adult populations,Reference Terry, Kelt and Jeyakumar19,Reference Gawęcki, Karlik, Borucki, Szyfter-Harris and Wróbel20 similar to the results of this study. Three patients developed temporary facial paralysis, which is typically associated with oedema or transient nerve injury during drilling or manipulation. This is consistent with the findings of Roberts et al.Reference Roberts, Lin, Herrmann and Lee16 and Farinetti et al.,Reference Farinetti, Ben Gharbia, Mancini, Roman, Nicollas and Triglia10 who reported two and one cases, respectively.

Post-operative major complications were observed in 31 patients (8 per cent). Software failure of the device was the most common major complication and was observed in 17 patients (4 per cent). In their review, Terry et al.Reference Terry, Kelt and Jeyakumar19 observed device failure in 507 of 14 704 patients with cochlear implantation (3 per cent), which was the second most common complication. Farinetti et al.Reference Farinetti, Ben Gharbia, Mancini, Roman, Nicollas and Triglia10 reported 7 device failure cases in 21 patients with major complications. Ciorba et al.Reference Ciorba, Bovo, Trevisi, Rosignoli, Aimoni and Castiglione12 reported nine (2 per cent) device failure complications, whereas Lima Junior et al.Reference Lima Junior, Rodrigues Junior Fde, Calhau, Calhau and Palhano13 reported three cases (1 per cent).

In this study, one patient had skin flap failure and another had implant body migration under the scalp. These two patients underwent revision surgery without device extraction. One patient had severe infection that required hospitalisation and intravenous antibiotic treatment. One patient had extrusion of the implant body (internal receiver–transmitter) through the scalp following head trauma. Management of skin flap complications seems difficult in cochlear implantation cases. Flap complications may appear secondary to inflammatory and/or infectious processes around the implant body, and staged surgical interventions along with broad-spectrum antibiotics may be required for appropriate management. Major skin flap complications have been reported to range between 1.1 per cent and 8.2 per cent in the literature.Reference Gawęcki, Karlik, Borucki, Szyfter-Harris and Wróbel20

Two patients had chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation, and underwent tympanoplasty. One patient had chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma after cochlear implantation, and the implant was extruded. Cochlear implantation for patients with chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma can be performed in a staged manner following tympanoplasty. We prefer to perform either closed tympanoplasty or subtotal petrosectomy and cul de sac closure, with follow up for at least six months to monitor for any residual or recurrent disease. We perform cochlear implantation if the patient is disease-free. A similar staged approach is also recommended for patients who develop chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma following cochlear implantation.Reference Vincenti, Pasanisi, Bacciu, Bacciu and Zini21

In this study, two patients developed problems with the magnetic attachment of the external part of the cochlear implant. Flap reduction surgery was performed in these two patients to manage this problem.

A ‘gusher’ is the sudden exit of high-flow CSF. ‘Oozing’ is the intermittent and low-flow exit of CSF that ceases after a few minutes. A CSF gusher usually lasts for 10–20 minutes and is generally treated conservatively. In this study, only one patient needed revision surgery for a CSF gusher that could not be managed conservatively. In this study, the incidence of a CSF gusher or oozing was 4 per cent, corresponding with the incidence of CSF gushers reported in a previous report, in the range of 1–5 per cent.Reference Ding, Tian, Wang and Zhang22

Five patients (1 per cent) had problems with electrode migration. Terry et al.Reference Terry, Kelt and Jeyakumar19 reported a similar rate of 0.7 per cent. These five patients underwent revision surgery. In order to avoid this complication, it may be necessary to secure the device with stitches, create a bed for the implant body within the bone, or create a smaller or tighter subperiosteal pocket.

This study has some limitations, including its retrospective design and relatively small cohort of patients. In addition, the analysis of functional results was limited.

  • The actual complication rate of cochlear implantation is relatively low

  • Cochlear implantation should be considered a safe procedure

  • Cochlear implantation is being performed with increasing frequency and has good success

Cochlear implantation is being performed with increasing frequency, and it is successful in terms of improving patients’ hearing levels and quality of life. Although the procedure has potential for significant intra- and post-operative complications, the complication rate is relatively low. Therefore, cochlear implantation can be considered a safe procedure.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Dr A Dalgic takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Abstract of the study presented at the 11th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences, 19–22 September 2017, Famagusta, Cyprus.

References

Vermeire, K, Brokx, JP, Wuyts, FL, Cochet, E, Hofkens, A, Van de Heyning, PH. Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:188–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djalilian, HR, Smith, SL, King, TA, Levine, SC. Cochlear implantation in the elderly: results and quality-of-life assessment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:890–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labadie, RF, Carrasco, VN, Gilmer, CH, Pillsbury, HC 3rd. Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:419–2410.1067/mhn.2000.109759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasanisi, E, Bacciu, A, Vincenti, V, Guida, M, Barbot, A, Berghenti, MT et al. Speech recognition in elderly cochlear implant recipients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:154–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, NL, Hoffman, RA. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:708–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, NL, Hoffman, RA, Stroschein, M. Medical or surgical complications related to the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1988;135:813CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, RA, Cohen, NL. Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:420–2Google ScholarPubMed
Chiesa Estomba, CM, Rivera Schmitz, T, Betances Reinoso, FAB, Collado, LD, Garcia, ME, Lorenzo, AIL. Complications after cochlear implantation in adult patients. 10-year retrospective analysis of a tertiary academic centre. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017;44:40–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamatiou, GA, Kyrodimos, E, Sismanis, A. Complications of cochlear implantation in adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:428–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farinetti, A, Ben Gharbia, D, Mancini, J, Roman, S, Nicollas, R, Triglia, JM. Cochlear implant complications in 403 patients: comparative study of adults and children and review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014;131:177–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Migirov, L, Taitelbaum-Swead, R, Drendel, M, Hildesheimer, M, Kronenberg, J. Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: surgical and audiological outcome. Gerontology 2010;56:123–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciorba, A, Bovo, R, Trevisi, P, Rosignoli, M, Aimoni, C, Castiglione, A et al. Postoperative complications in cochlear implants: a retrospective analysis of 438 consecutive cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:1599–603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima Junior, LR, Rodrigues Junior Fde, A, Calhau, CM, Calhau, ACDF, Palhano, CTDB. Postoperative complications in implanted patients in the Cochlear Implant Program of Rio Grande do Norte-Brazil. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2010;76:517–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, DS, Clarett, DM, Li, L, Bowditch, SP, Niparko, JK, Lin, FR. Cochlear implantation in older adults: long-term analysis of complications and device survival in a consecutive series. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:1272–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Migirov, L, Muchnik, C, Kaplan-Neeman, R, Kronenberg, J. Surgical and medical complications in paediatric cochlear implantation: a review of 300 cases. Cochlear Implants Int 2006;7:19420110.1179/cim.2006.7.4.194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, DS, Lin, HW, Herrmann, BS, Lee, DJ. Differential cochlear implant outcomes in older adults. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1952–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louza, J, Mertes, L, Braun, T, Gürkov, R, Krause, E. Influence of insertion depth in cochlear implantation on vertigo symptoms and vestibular function. Am J Otolaryngol 2015;36:254–810.1016/j.amjoto.2014.11.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akdogan, O, Ozcan, I, Ozbek, C, Dere, H. Tinnitus after cochlear implantation. Auris Nasus Larynx 2009;36:210–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, B, Kelt, RE, Jeyakumar, A. Delayed complications after cochlear implantation. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;141:1012–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawęcki, W, Karlik, M, Borucki, Ł, Szyfter-Harris, J, Wróbel, M. Skin flap complications after cochlear implantations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:4175–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincenti, V, Pasanisi, E, Bacciu, A, Bacciu, S, Zini, C. Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media and previous middle ear surgery: 20 years of experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2014;34:272–7Google ScholarPubMed
Ding, X, Tian, H, Wang, W, Zhang, D. Cochlear implantation in China: review of 1,237 cases with an emphasis on complications. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2009;71:192–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic data and characteristics of study

Figure 1

Table 2. Intra- and post-operative minor and major complications