Many governments currently recommend or mandate universal use of face masks amid the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Cloth face masks and makeshift face coverings – from bandanas and scarves to do-it-yourself and commercially available masks – are being advised for source control in many countries and regions to mitigate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Unfortunately, instances of individuals inappropriately wearing masks are being witnessed in public and on social media as they have become part of our “new normal” (Figure 1).
The directives from some public health officers and the messaging by some mask advocates, though well-intended, have been overly simplistic with slogans, such as “Wear a face covering, something is better than nothing,” “Just wear a mask, it’s common sense,” and “The science behind masks is simple and clear.”1-Reference Trusler3 Also, polarizing narratives and the broad use of terms such as face covering have led to misconceptions and conflicting messages about the types of masks and the instructions for their use.
The use of masks is not intuitive, and the science behind them is not straightforward.Reference Martin, Hanna and McCartney4,Reference Escandón, Rasmussen and Bogoch5 Whereas simplistic and overconfident messaging is misleading, accurate messaging about the benefits, risks, and uncertainties is essential to gaining public support for the uptake of non-pharmaceutical interventions and thus the COVID-19 response. Based on available filtration efficacy data, the degree of protection from cloth masks is variable and greatly hinges on mask composition, thickness, permeability, electrostatic properties, and facial fit.Reference Escandón, Rasmussen and Bogoch5-Reference Taminato, Mizusaki-Imoto and Saconato7 Furthermore, masks require careful instructions (Table 1) to improve the likelihood of achieving their real-world benefits and to avoid the potential for self-contamination and mask contamination with viral particles.Reference Chughtai, Seale and MacIntyre6,8-10 Inappropriate mask wearing is likely to reduce the effectiveness of masks. Several studies have reported the challenges related to appropriate mask use, compliance, and acceptance.Reference Bakhit, Krzyzaniak and Scott9 Mask adherence does not simply reflect discipline; knowledge, risk perception, social acceptability, values, preferences, trust, and accessibility and affordability of masks play a major role.
Health education, effective scientific communication, context-sensitive policymaking, and community engagement are key tools to enhancing the understanding of masks’ benefits and downsides, encouraging health-seeking behaviors, warning against complacency, building trust in public health agencies, and avoiding judgment and shaming. Diverse and tailored information campaigns (eg, mainstream press, social media, public advertising, training seminars) and community outreach programs that incorporate surveillance around mask adherence practices are needed. Likewise, potential unintended consequences should be studied, anticipated, and addressed to maximize any benefits and minimize any downsides of widespread mask use.Reference Bakhit, Krzyzaniak and Scott9 Amid this pandemic, there are research opportunities on different approaches to information provision; attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs toward proper mask wearing; and cloth mask designs, duration of use, reuse, breathability, and disinfection methods.Reference Martin, Hanna and McCartney4
In this article, we challenge inaccurate communication on community masking and argue for the need to improve public health messaging. In contrast to the abovementioned statements, more accurate statements are: “Wearing a cloth mask correctly may help slow down viral spread,” “Wear a cloth mask when in enclosed or crowded spaces,” and “Help reserve medical masks for health care workers by not hoarding them.” Such messages provide clarity while acknowledging nuances and lingering uncertainties, rather than providing oversimplified mask indications or misleading accounts regarding the effectiveness of face masks.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author Contributions
Karina Escandón was responsible for the conceptualization and writing of the original draft. All authors were responsible for substantial contributions to the content and critical revision.