Introduction
Because of my participation in the U.S. Antarctic Research Program as a foreign scientist, I was able to spend two summers at McMurdo station (in 1965–66 and 1966–67) in order to carry out a field programme on glacial erosion and deposition in south Victoria Land. During these periods, the upper part of the area between Mackay and Skelton Glaciers was systematically investigated to determine the erosional and depositional activity at the boundary of the ice sheet with its outlet glaciers. The aim of this paper is to present the results of observations and analyses made on an interesting morainic field in the upper part of Ferrar Glacier. Due to favourable circumstances, this deposit throws some light on the general problem of the formation of shear moraines (Reference BishopBishop, 1957; Reference SchyttSchytt, 1961; Reference SwinzowSwinzow, 1962). Other papers concerning glacial erosion and deposition in this area will be presented elsewhere.
The term “shear moraine” has been criticized by Reference WeertmanWeertman (1961), who prefers the name “Thule–Baffin moraine” to the commonly used designation. However, I shall continue to use it not only because of its ease of usage but also because of the fact that, in the case studied, Weertman’s hypothesis, which is valid for certain parts of the morainic deposit, cannot explain it as a whole.
The shear moraine of upper Ferrar Glacier is neither wholly the result of the influence of a single shear plane appearing at the surface nor simply the result of the upwarping at the margin of the glacier (in the ablation zone) of debris layers incorporated within the ice by a freezing-in process. It is a complex depositional feature in relation to the dynamics of the margin of the ice sheet, comprising both upwarping and faulting of the ice along different planes or zones of weakness having different directions and ages.
Description of the Area
The upper Ferrar Glacier area, which is located in south Victoria Land approximately 130 km. from McMurdo station and 60 km. from the coast, consists of Beacon Sandstone plateaux dissected by large outlet glaciers coming from the ice sheet. The two outlet glaciers of the area are respectively Taylor Glacier at the north and Ferrar Glacier which is connected by small tributaries to the former (Fig. 1). The Beacon sediments rest sub-horizontally (with a slight dip towards the west) on the basement Skelton Group, which does not appear in the area considered here. Dolerite sills intrude the Beacon rocks and dykes are also present. The contrast between the dark, highly jointed dolerite and the relatively massive light-coloured sandstone is the striking feature of the area. The white-yellow cliffs of Beacon Sandstone consist of orthoquartzite (not strongly cemented, rounded quartz grains) in the Devonian part of the section. In the upper Permian part, carbonaceous siltstones are frequent, e.g. at Mount Feather which is 3 km. from the morainic field studied (personal communication from D. Matz). The altitude of the area can be easily obtained from the recent topographic map (scale 1 : 250,000; published by the U.S. Geological Survey; Taylor Glacier sheet). The surface of the glacier is at an altitude of 1,800 m. while Mount Feather, the highest point, reaches 2,985 m.
Part of the ice descending from the ice sheet and flowing in the direction of Ferrar Glacier enters, to the south-west of Altar Mountain, a large cirque cut in the Beacon rocks which are capped by a dolerite sill. The bottom of the cirque, which can be subdivided into three smaller units, is now ice-free and covered with ground and recessional moraines. The margin of that part of upper Ferrar Glacier which enters it is fringed by the important shear moraine that is discussed here.
Description of the Morainic Field
The problem of the formation of this morainic deposit can be subdivided into three parts:
-
(a) The incorporation of debris within the ice at the bed of the glacier.
-
(b) The migration of debris from the glacier bed to the surface.
-
(c) The behaviour of debris at the glacier surface and its influence on differential ablation.
Due to favourable circumstances, these three questions can be approached in the present case, but before dealing with them it is desirable to give a general description of the morainic field.
Figure 2 gives a general idea of the morainic field considered here. It can be seen that it is possible to divide it into two units: the central body (regions A and B) and the two great ridges to the east (region C).
The whole of the deposit is ice-cored and the blue glacier ice is always visible beneath several centimetres of debris. Traversing from the outer part of the central body of the morainic deposit (facing the cirque) to the inner part, the following five zones can be distinguished, especially in region A (Figs. 2 and 3):
-
a. A marginal channel filled with regelation ice at the contact between the patterned-ground moraine (a′) and zone b.
-
b. Scree deposits resulting from sliding of the moraine on glacier ice.
-
c. Glacier ice appearing at the surface as a result of sliding of the debris veneer. The slope decreases progressively so that the starting force needed for this process is no longer reached at the upper limit of zone c. Because of the appearance of the glacier ice, layers of debris are visible within the ice. The observation made in the next paragraph is essential to the understanding of the origin of this deposit.
-
d. A continuous veneer of debris resting on glacier ice. This zone could extend as far as the marginal channel (zone a) if zones b and c were to disappear. This is the case in region B of the morainic field.
-
e. A zone of well-orientated morainic ridges. At least two orientations can be distinguished. This zone is also characterized by small frozen ponds in ablation hollows and by ice pyramids covered only by a thin veneer of debris.
In contrast, the great ridges of region C (Fig. 2) do not show such a zonation. If we except their inner flanks where the alignment of drift-snow accumulations behind boulders mask the debris and give rise to a curious pattern on the windward side, the differences from one place to another are more in relation to their distance from the margin of the ridge. Near the margin, aligned upstanding blocks and slabs appear at the ice surface; then, in a second zone, small mounds (less than 1 m. high) of finer particles cover glacier ice and are surrounded by blocks and slabs generally in a horizontal position; finally, there is a third zone with hummocks and small ponds, which is transitional to the inner part of the central body of the morainic field. After this general description let us consider the information given by the debris layers of zone c (Fig. 3).
Formation of the Morainic Deposit
It is possible to observe the appearance of different debris layers on the convex border of the glacier, and pits show their continuity within the ice.
The first type of debris layer consists of sub-horizontal planes filled with debris and separated from one another by pure glacier ice. The slight dip towards the interior of the glacier is due to the upwarping of flow lines at the margin.
Two distinct features characterize this type of debris layer:
-
The debris is generally fine. Virtually all of the particles are less than 12 mm. in diameter and the majority consist of coarse sand as shown by the grain-size distribution curves (group 2 of Figure 4).
-
The ice contains regular trains of fine bubbles and tubular cavities aligned in the flow direction.
These two facts seem to indicate that the formation of the debris layers within the glacier is probably the result of a freezing-in process at the glacier bed and of the upwarping of the flow lines at the margin of the glacier. Reference WeertmanWeertman’s (1961) theory seems to be adequate to explain this type of debris layer.
It should also be noted that, in view of the fact that the glacier bed consists of rock fragments of different sizes, ranging from slabs and blocks to silt, a grain-size selective process is necessary to explain why only the fine fraction (less than 12 mm. in diameter) is represented in the debris layers. This fact can be conveniently explained if it is assumed that a regelation layer is formed during the freezing-in process. The formation of this regelation ice can be accompanied by incorporation of the small particles while blocks and slabs remain in an unchanged position. Then the appearance of the debris layers at the glacier surface could be the result of upwarping of the flow lines. But all of the debris layers cannot be placed in the same category.
A second type can indeed be distinguished. As shown in Figure 3, fault planes cut the first type of debris layer, interrupting their continuity. Their age is therefore more recent than the sandy and silty bands, and their dip is steep. These shear planes are oblique to the margin of the glacier. It is possible to follow them as far as zone e (Fig. 3) of the central body of the morainic field where they form rectilinear morainic ridges. Indeed, slabs and gravel appear at the surface after having been scraped from the glacier bed, carried into the ice and ultimately transported along these planes. The grain-size distribution of these debris layers is in striking contrast to that of the first type, since they lack substantially in fine particles which cannot be easily carried into the ice by the shearing process.
Two directions of such faults can be observed. They correspond roughly to the orientations of fissures in the glacier ice in the central part of region C (Fig. 2). Thermal contraction of the ice at night, when the sky is clear and radiation from the Earth is very great, is responsible for the appearance of these fissures. Everyone who has camped on blue ice-fields has heard the cracking accompanying this process. In my opinion, these thermal-contraction fissures are further transformed into faults and localized shear planes at the margin of the glacier.
A third type of debris layer is associated with major shear zones in the glacier at the boundary between stagnant and active ice. The grain-size distribution of the debris is similar to that of the previous case, except that blocks are more frequent.
The general pattern of this morainic deposit with its great ridges in the east (region C; Fig. 2) has resulted from the appearance at the surface of these major shear zones, which exhibit a general convexity towards the cirque. At the margins of the ridges one can see a marked orientation of blocks and slabs with their long axes either parallel to or perpendicular to the ridge, and with a dip of about 20° to the south.
These major shear zones have different ages; a new one is at present being formed, and it is represented in Figure 2 by a broken line. The appearance of aligned slabs at the surface reveals the shear zone in this stage.
Therefore, it is concluded that the morainic field examined here is the result of three different processes:
-
The upwarping of the ice, thereby including debris layers incorporated by a freezing-in process.
-
The role of localized faults within the ice, thus permitting the debris to arrive at the surface after having been scraped from the glacier bed.
-
The development of a shear zone between stagnant and active ice.
To these elements should be added supraglacial morainic boulders resting either directly on ice or on debris derived from the glacier bed. A good example is the occurrence in the deposit of carbonaceous siltstone boulders derived from Mount Feather. Large boulders of dolerite and Beacon Sandstone are also present. If these boulders are excluded, a petrographical study of the morainic deposit shows there is a general inversion in the debris in the different planes: dolerite fragments are abundant in the coarse fraction and quartz grains in the fine. A normal distribution is for example 90 per cent dolerite for the particles between 6 and 12 mm., 50 per cent between 500 microns and 1 mm., and 90 per cent of quartz grains between 100 and 250 microns. In a paper concerning glacial erosion in this area, it will be shown that the greater percentage of quartz grains in the fine fraction is the result of glacial abrasion of Beacon rocks, while dolente, which is less sensitive to this process, is frost-shattered and constitutes the majority of the fragments in the coarse fraction.
But granular disintegration of the Beacon Sandstone by frost action should not be forgotten. An ice hillock, entirely covered by Beacon Sandstone fragments and white derived sand, has been observed in the central part of the morainic deposit. This is supposed to have been an ancient boulder which protected the ice from ablation and has been completely disintegrated by frost action in the pores of the rock.
This ice pyramid is not the only sign of differential ablation; hollows occupied by frozen ponds are widespread on the morainic field and their size becomes larger with age. The absorption of solar radiation by the rock is the principal factor that allows such an evolutionary trend in this area, where the air temperature is constantly below freezing point.
Conclusion
The morainic deposit of upper Ferrar Glacier, near its boundary with the ice sheet in south Victoria Land, shows that both the shear hypothesis and Weertman’s views are applicable; the debris can be either scraped from the glacier bed if it is coarse or be frozen in if it is sufficiently fine at the base of the ice sheet, and both shearing and upwarping occur at the glacier margin. Because of favourable circumstances, the debris layers of Weertman have been observed to be faulted by shear planes filled with coarse deposits.