Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:41:33.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lipoteichoic acid from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as an oral photoprotective agent against UV-induced carcinogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Federico S. Weill*
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 4to Piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C.P. 1113, Argentina
Eliana M. Cela
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 4to Piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C.P. 1113, Argentina
Mariela L. Paz
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 4to Piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C.P. 1113, Argentina
Alejandro Ferrari
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 4to Piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C.P. 1113, Argentina
Juliana Leoni
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 4to Piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C.P. 1113, Argentina
Daniel H. González Maglio
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 4to Piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C.P. 1113, Argentina
*
*Corresponding author: F. S. Weill, fax +54 11 4964 0024, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Probiotics are live micro-organisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host. Cell surface molecules of these micro-organisms are being studied in relation to their ability to interact with the host. The cell wall of lactobacilli possesses lipoteichoic acids (LTA) which are molecules with immunomodulatory properties. UV radiation (UVR) has been proposed as the main cause of skin cancer because of its mutagenic and immunosuppressive effects. Photoprotection with some nutrition interventions including probiotics has recently been shown. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the oral administration of purified LTA from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG can modulate the immune-suppressive effect of UVR and skin tumour development in female Crl:SKH-1-hrBR mice. For this purpose, two irradiation models were studied: (1) a chronic irradiation scheme consisting of daily irradiations during twenty consecutive days and (2) a long-term irradiation schedule, irradiating the animals three times per week, during 34 weeks for tumour development. The results showed that T-cells in the inguinal lymph node of LTA-treated mice produced higher levels of (1) interferon-γ and (2) a number of total, helper and cytotoxic T-cells compared with non-treated mice. Moreover, a significant delay in tumour appearance was found in LTA-treated mice. An increased IgA+ cell number was found in the small intestine together with a higher number of activated dendritic cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes. The latter results might be indicative of a direct effect of LTA in the gut, affecting the cutaneous immune system and restoring homeostasis through the gut–skin axis.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Elie Metchnikoff wrote his work The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies (Reference Metchnikoff1) where he stated that Bulgarians owed their longevity to the consumption of soured milk. Even if he did not use the term ‘probiotic’, which was first introduced in the 1960s(Reference Lilly and Stillwell2), Metchnikoff had already identified yogurt as a functional food with important health benefits beyond nutrition.

Probiotics are defined as ‘live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host’(3). These micro-organisms include different yeast and bacterial strains. The most studied bacterial genus within probiotics is Lactobacillus. Lactobacilli are lactic acid bacteria, associated with fermented foods mainly for their contribution to raw food preservation due to acidification and also because of their capacity to contribute to product characteristics such as flavour and texture(Reference Kleerebezem, Hols and Bernard4). Nutritional advantages of probiotics basically consist of preventive–curative effects against diseases including intestinal dysfunctions, gastrointestinal infections, inflammatory bowel disease and, possibly, colon cancer(Reference Marteau and Boutron-Ruault5).

Industrial interest on health claims related to probiotics has been a great impulse to molecular research on the host–probiotic interaction. Cell surface molecules and extracellular components of these micro-organisms are being studied in relation to their ability to interact with the host.

The cell wall of lactobacilli comprises peptidoglycan and teichoic acids. A great number of biological functions have been described for teichoic acid, e.g. surface protein binding, phage adsorption, cellular adhesion and interaction with the immune system. There are two types of teichoic acid described in lactobacilli: wall teichoic acids, which are bound to N-acetyl muramic acid of the peptidoglycan, and lipoteichoic acids (LTA), which are anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane through a glycolipid.

In terms of structure, LTA from lactobacilli are composed of poly-glycerol-phosphate (poly(Gro-P)), which are decorated by d-alanyl esters. d-Alanylation in lactobacilli is very important since it is involved in bacterial resistance to physico-chemical conditions of the gastrointestinal tract and to defensins produced by the epithelial cells of the intestine(Reference Sharpe, Davison and Baddiley6Reference Neuhaus and Baddiley9).

Regarding its immunomodulatory effect, it is known that LTA can be recognised by Toll-like receptor type 2. After ligand binding, Toll-like receptor type 2 sequentially recruits the adaptor molecules MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88), the IL-1 receptor-associated kinase and the TNF receptor-associated factor 6. In turn, these adaptor molecules activate the IκB kinase complex and the mitogen-activated protein kinases Jun N-terminal kinase, p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2, leading to the activation of NF-κB and activator protein 1, which results in the transcription of soluble mediators such as cytokines and chemokines(Reference Buckley, Wang and Redmond10, Reference Ryu, Baik and Yang11).

LTA is one of the most important antigens in lactobacilli, as it has a key role in the crosstalk between the host and bacteria in the intestine. The release of soluble mediators after the LTA interaction with the epithelial and immune cells present in the intestine generates an inflammatory microenvironment and the recruitment of certain cell types, such as T- and B-cells. LTA activates B-cells in the lamina propria, causing the Ig class switch of these cells with the consequent production of secretory IgA, the main Ig involved in intestinal immunity(Reference Cerutti12).

The effect of the oral administration of purified LTA has not been extensively studied. Literature data indicate its potential use in the prevention of group B streptococci infections in newborns. Cox et al. have evaluated LTA excretion and toxicity after oral administration to rabbits. In these studies, the amount of LTA administered was about 2–3 μg/g of animal weight, and they found LTA excretion in the urine and faeces until 4 d after the ingestion, with a peak of excretion at 24 h. These authors did not find any pathological alteration in the liver, spleen or kidneys of animals receiving LTA(Reference Cox, Cook and Lutcher13). Nevertheless, no study regarding LTA bioavailability has been performed to date.

UV radiation (UVR) is indispensable for life on earth; however, prolonged exposures can be dangerous for human health. UVR has been proposed as the main cause of skin cancer such as basal and squamous cell carcinoma and cutaneous malignant melanoma(Reference Armstrong and Kricker14). UVR causes direct damage to cellular DNA, tissue inflammation, immune response suppression and free radical formation with the consequent oxidation of proteins, lipids and DNA(Reference Svobodova, Walterova and Vostalova15, Reference Paz, González Maglio and Weill16). Additionally, it has been demonstrated that chronic irradiation causes epidermal hyperplasia(Reference Gonzalez Maglio, Paz and Ferrari17). Hyperplasia is a key event in skin carcinogenesis, specifically in non-melanoma tumours (mainly basal and squamous cell carcinomas) where keratinocytes are the affected cell type. Hyperplasia is a result of both increased epidermal proliferation and apoptosis suppression(Reference El-Abaseri, Putta and Hansen18). Nevertheless, the loss in proliferation control is not the only event related to UVR-induced tumorigenesis. UV-mediated immunosuppression has been recognised as a condition for skin tumour development(Reference Ullrich and Kripke19). Furthermore, another consequence of chronic UVR is increased inguinal lymph node (ILN) cellularity in the absence of antigenic stimuli(Reference Byrne and Halliday20). Even if the mechanism underlying this event is unclear, it has been postulated as a prerequisite for further immunosuppression. One possibility is that the increase in the number of cells is the result of cell migration from other organs(Reference Greene, Sy and Kripke21, Reference Gurish, Lynch and Daynes22).

Over the last 30 years, the immunosuppressive effect of UVR has been studied and described. There is growing evidence about the key role of UV-induced regulatory T-cells during photocarcinogenesis, since they are capable of inhibiting antitumoral effector functions. After UVR exposure, a cytokine cascade is initiated biasing the immune response towards a T helper 2 or T regulatory phenotype, which finally leads to the emergence of CD4+-CTLA4+ regulatory T-cells. IL-10 and IL-4 are the main cytokines involved in UV-induced immunosuppression. They are produced by T-cells, keratinocytes and other cell types in the skin after irradiation(Reference Gorman, Tan and Yerkovich23Reference Beissert and Loser25).

The relationship between the gut and the cutaneous immune systems is not clear; however, there is evidence about the existence of a crosstalk between them. The beneficial effect of probiotic consumption on atopic eczema(Reference Tang, Lahtiner and Boyle26), the development of specific IgA antibodies in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) after transcutaneous immunisation(Reference Gueniche, Benyacoub and Buetler27) and the re-establishment of skin homeostasis due to probiotic consumption after UV irradiation are evidences for the existence of a gut–skin axis susceptible to modulation with therapeutic ends(Reference Arck, Handjiski and Hagen28).

Recently, photoprotection induced by specific nutrients has been demonstrated to be successful in preventing some of the harmful effects of UVR(Reference Morganti29, Reference Bouilly-Gauthier, Jeannes and Maubert30). Over the last few years, probiotics have emerged as a new strategy in systemic photoprotection(Reference Bouilly-Gauthier, Jeannes and Maubert30). Gueniche et al. (Reference Gueniche, Benyacoub and Buetler27) showed that a 10 d supplementation with a specific probiotic (Lactobacillus johnsonii) was able to revert some of the immunosuppressive effects of UVR in female SKH:hr1 hairless mice.

Based on this bulk of knowledge, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether the oral administration of purified LTA from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (one of the most characterised probiotics)(Reference Roselli, Finamore and Britti31, Reference Goldin and Gorbach32) can modulate the immune-suppressive effect of UVR and prevent skin tumour development in female SKH:hr1 hairless mice. In this sense, anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and IL-4 were measured in cell-free culture supernatants of ILN and spleens from irradiated mice receiving LTA or PBS, or from a non-irradiated control group. Additionally, total T-cells (CD3+) were determined in the epidermis and in the ILN, as well as helper (CD3+CD4+CD8) and cytotoxic T-cells (CD3+CD4CD8+). Furthermore, the effect of LTA ingestion on GALT was analysed to study the mechanisms underlying its immunomodulatory effect. Total IgA+ cells were determined in the lamina propria, and dendritic cells (DC) (CD11c+), activated DC (CD11c+CD80+) and total activated antigen-presenting cells (CD80+) were determined in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN).

For the present analysis, two irradiation models previously described by our group were used: a chronic irradiation scheme consisting of daily irradiations during twenty consecutive days, and a long-term irradiation schedule, irradiating the animals three times a week, during 34 weeks for tumour development(Reference Gonzalez Maglio, Paz and Ferrari17, Reference Weill, Cela and Ferrari33).

Our hypothesis was that the oral administration of LTA would modulate the GALT and that through the gut–skin immune axis, this would restore skin homeostasis affected by UVR, reducing UVR-induced tumorigenesis.

Materials and methods

Lipoteichoic acid purification

LTA was isolated as described previously by Morath et al. (Reference Morath, Geyer and Hartung34). Briefly, a previously established inoculum of L. rhamnosus GG (American Type Culture Collection 53 103) was cultured for 16 h in de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe (MRS) broth (Britannia). Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and washed three times with PBS. The pellet was mixed with an equal volume of n-butanol, under stirring for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation at 13 000 g for 20 min, the aqueous phase was lyophilised, resuspended with chromatography starting buffer (15 % n-propanol in 0·1 m-ammonium acetate, pH 4·7) and centrifuged at 45 000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was subjected to hydrophobic interaction chromatography in an octyl-sepharose matrix (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) eluting LTA with an increasing gradient of propanol. LTA-containing fractions were concentrated using vacuum centrifugation (Automatic Environmental Speedvac, Savant Instruments Inc.) in order to eliminate n-propanol. LTA preparation was tested for purity by Western blot, as described previously by Dogi et al. (Reference Dogi, Weill and Perdigon35), and by spectrophotometry, as described previously by Kim et al. (Reference Kim, Seo and Han36).

Animal models and lipoteichoic acid administration

Female Crl:SKH-1-hrBR hairless mice between 8 and 12 weeks of age (20–25 g), purchased from Charles River Laboratories, were housed in quarters with a 12 h light–12 h dark cycle and maintained with water and food ad libitum.

The animals were irradiated on their back with UV light using an 8 W UVM-28 Mid-Range Wave (302 nm) lamp from Ultraviolet Products, which emits most of its energy within the UVB range (emission spectrum 280–370 nm) with a peak at 302 nm and including a 20–30 % amount of UVA. The lamp was calibrated with a UVX radiometer (Ultraviolet Products), and its power was determined as 1·2 mW/cm2. Mice subjected to the chronic irradiation schedule (twelve animals) were exposed for 42 s to generate a dose of 50 mJ/cm2 of UV corresponding to 0·25 minimal erythema dose. These animals were irradiated daily for twenty consecutive days. Mice in the long-term irradiation experiment (sixteen animals) were irradiated on their back with 50 mJ/cm2, 0·25 minimal erythema dose every 2 d for a period of 34 weeks. These irradiation models have previously been established by our group(Reference Gonzalez Maglio, Paz and Ferrari17, Reference Weill, Cela and Ferrari33). In both irradiation schedules, half of the irradiated mice received 100 μl of LTA solution orally (1 mg/ml) in PBS before the irradiation, and the other half received 100 μl PBS. The solutions were orally administered by means of a feeding needle (Thomas Scientific).

Simultaneously to each irradiation scheme, a group of mock-irradiated sex- and age-matched mice were used as controls, and handled in the same fashion as the irradiated animals. A total of six control female mice were included in the chronic model and eight in the long-term irradiation scheme. At 24 h after the last UV irradiation, both chronically and long-term irradiated mice were killed using a CO2 gas chamber, and dorsal skin samples, ILN and spleens were removed. From chronically irradiated mice, four MLN and a small-intestinal section were obtained. The procedures involving animals were in compliance with the research animal use guidelines established by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Argentina) and were approved by the Review Board of Ethics of the Instituto de Estudios de la Inmunidad Humoral.

Histology and epidermal thickness determination

Specimens for histological examination were obtained from the skin of the irradiated area, fixed with 4 % neutral formalin and embedded in white paraffin. Serial paraffin sections, 4 μm thick, were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. At least three independent measurements were performed in two different slides per mouse. The observation and photography were performed using an Olympus BX-51 microscope (Olympus) with a Q color 3 Olympus digital camera. Epidermal thickness was measured with Image Pro 5.1.0.2 for Windows (Media Cybernetics).

Epidermal cell isolation

Skin samples of 1 cm2 were taken from each mouse. The samples were incubated with 25 mg/ml of dispase (Invitrogen) in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium for 2 h. After incubation, the epidermis was easily separated from the dermis. The epidermis was then manually dispersed with a tissue homogeniser (Thomas Scientific), passed through a 50 μm filter and cells were counted and prepared for flow cytometric analysis.

IgA+ cell count in the lamina propria

The number of IgA+ cells was determined on small-intestinal histological sections by a direct immunofluorescence assay. After deparaffinisation by immersion in xylene and rehydration in a graded ethanol series, paraffin sections (4 μm) were incubated with a 1:100 dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-α-chain monospecific antibody (Bethyl) for 30 min and observed with an Olympus BX-51 fluorescence light microscope. The number of fluorescent cells was counted in forty fields at 1000 × .

Measurement of apoptotic cells by the TUNEL method

After deparaffinisation by immersion in xylene and rehydration in a graded ethanol series, the percentage of cells with DNA strand breaks in the assay epidermis was measured on paraffin sections (4 μm) using the TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling) method, which detects digoxigenin-labelled 3′-OH ends of genomic DNA. Briefly, cells with DNA strand breaks were detected in situ using the ApopTag Plus Peroxidase In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (CHEMICON International) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Counterstain was performed with eosin. Total and apoptotic cells in the epidermis (combined basal and suprabasal layers) were counted in ten representative 400 ×  magnification fields using an Olympus BX-51 microscope (Olympus).

In vitro proliferation

ILN and spleens from UV-irradiated or control mice were manually dispersed with a tissue homogeniser (Thomas Scientific) and cells were counted and plated in ninety-six-well plates. Cells (4 × 105) were plated in replicates of three, together with 100 μl RPMI (Gibco) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum, streptomycin (100 μg/ml) and penicillin (100 units/ml), as described elsewhere(Reference Kruisbeek, Shevach and Thornton37). Cells were incubated with the non-specific T-cell mitogen concanavalin A (ConA) (Sigma) at 4, 2, 1, 0·5 and 0·25 μg/ml. A basal proliferation control was also performed without the mitogen. After 72 h of incubation at 37°C with 5 % CO2, supernatants were collected for cytokine determination.

Cytokine quantification in culture supernatants

IL-4, IL-10 and interferon-γ levels were measured by ELISA using the OPTEIA system (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions in cell-free culture supernatants of the cells treated with 4 μg/ml of ConA.

Flow cytometric analysis

The following anti-mouse antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences: Alexa Fluor 647-anti-CD4, phycoerythrin (PE)-anti-CD8, PE-anti-CD11c, FITC-anti-CD80 and FITC-anti-CD3ɛ with their corresponding isotype controls.

For staining of surface markers, lymph nodes and epidermal cells were incubated with antibodies diluted in staining buffer (PBS, 10 % fetal calf serum) for 30 min at 4°C, washed, and then fixed in 0·2 ml of 2 % formaldehyde (in PBS). Data were acquired on a PAS III cytometer (PARTEC) and analysed using Cyflogic software 1.2.1 (CyFlo Limited).

Tumour number and size

Mice were carefully examined once per week during the whole long-term irradiation model. The location and growth of each tumour exceeding 1 mm in diameter were determined and measured with a dermatoscope (Delta 20; Heine).

Statistical analysis

All values are presented as means with their standard errors. Statistical significance was evaluated using one-way or two-way ANOVA, according to the experimental design. When variables had a normal distribution and showed homoscedasticity, a parametric ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc test were used. When samples did not have a normal distribution and did not show heteroscedasticity, a non-parametric ANOVA and Dunn post hoc test were used. Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis was performed using log-rank and Wilcoxon–Gehan analysis. Graphical and statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software) and GraphPad Instat 2.0 (GraphPad Software), respectively. Values were considered significantly different at P< 0·05.

Results

Histology and epidermal thickness determination

The effects of oral LTA administration on histological alterations produced in the epidermis by UV exposure were studied in skin sections, both in the chronic irradiation model and in the long-term irradiation scheme. An increase in epidermal thickness was observed in chronically irradiated mice receiving LTA and PBS (36·37 (se 7·20) μm and 44·69 (se 8·81) μm, respectively) compared with the control group (26·42 (se 2·82) μm) (P< 0·05). No differences were found between the LTA and PBS treatments. Similar results were observed in the long-term irradiated mice. Those animals receiving LTA and PBS had an epidermal thickness of 68·05 (se 5·56) μm and 65·92 (se 6·38) μm, respectively, whereas the value for the control group was significantly lower (18·20 (se 1·42) μm) (P< 0·05; Table 1).

Table 1 Mean epidermal thickness, epidermal CD3+ cells and inguinal lymph node (ILN) cell number in chronically and long-term irradiated mice (Mean values with their standard errors)

LTA, lipoteichoic acid.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05).

Apoptotic cell percentage in the epidermis

In both irradiation models, UV exposure induced significant levels of apoptosis. Chronically irradiated mice receiving LTA had 22·43 (se 1·38) % of apoptotic cells; this value was not significantly different from the percentages obtained in mice treated with PBS which had 22·35 (se 0·89) % (Fig. 1(a)). The percentage of apoptotic cells in the control group was 12·55 (se 0·81) %, which was significantly lower (P< 0·05) than that obtained in irradiated mice. Long-term irradiated mice receiving LTA had 31·26 (se 2·08) % of apoptotic cells, this percentage was not statistically different from that obtained in mice receiving PBS (28·76 (se 1·77) %). Percentages obtained in the control group were significantly lower than those obtained in irradiated mice (17·62 (se 1·66) %, P< 0·05; Fig. 1(b)).

Fig. 1 Percentage of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL)-positive cells in the epidermis after (a) chronic and (b) long-term irradiation from control mice and from mice receiving lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or PBS. Values are means (n 6 for chronically irradiated and n 8 for long-term irradiated mice), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05).

Epidermal T-cell number

UVR caused a decrease in epidermal T-cell percentage in both irradiation schemes. Chronically irradiated mice receiving LTA had 0·91 (se 0·18) % of epidermal T-cells; this value was not different from that obtained in mice treated with PBS which had 0·61 (se 0·05) % of T-cells. The percentage obtained in the control group was significantly higher than that observed in both irradiated groups (7·14 (se 0·49) %, P< 0·05). Long-term irradiated mice receiving LTA had 0·32 (se 0·08) % of epidermal T-cells, whereas the animals administered with PBS had 0·87 (se 0·16) %; these percentages were not statistically different from each other. However, the latter T-cell percentages were found to be lower than that obtained in the control group (P< 0·05) which was 5·99 (se 0·45) % (Table 1).

Cytokine production by inguinal lymph node and spleen T-cells

When analysing cytokine production in ConA-stimulated ILN cells, chronically irradiated mice receiving LTA and PBS showed an increase in IL-4 and IL-10 production compared with the control animals (P< 0·05). IL-4 production in LTA-treated mice was 240·70 (se 37·82) pg/ml, a value that was not statistically different from the production in PBS-treated mice which was 252·20 (se 36·47) pg/ml. The production of IL-4 in the control group was 83·92 (se 17·67) pg/ml (Fig. 2(a)). In the case of IL-10, the production in mice administered with LTA was 838·50 (se 109·40) pg/ml, a value that was not different from that in PBS-administered animals which was 921·00 (se 121·50) pg/ml. The production of IL-10 in the control group was 340·70 (se 76·78) pg/ml (Fig. 2(c)). Interferon-γ production was significantly increased in mice treated with LTA (1033·10 (se 126·15) pg/ml) compared with PBS-treated (658·20 (se 73·86) pg/ml) and non-irradiated mice (733·80 (se 70·43) pg/ml) (P< 0·05; Fig. 2(e)). In long-term irradiated mice, no statistical differences were detected for any cytokine (Fig. 2(b), (d) and (f)). No statistical differences were found in cytokine production by ConA-stimulated spleen cells from none of the groups in both irradiation models (data not shown).

Fig. 2 Cytokine production in inguinal lymph node cells from (a, c, e) chronically and (b, d, f) long-term irradiated mice receiving lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or PBS and from the non-irradiated control group. Values are means (n 6 for chronically irradiated and n 8 for long-term irradiated mice), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05). IFN-γ, interferon-γ.

Total cell count in the inguinal lymph node and spleen

In the chronically irradiated animals, the number of ILN cells in LTA-treated mice was 2·10 (se 0·16) × 107, a value that was significantly higher than the number obtained in PBS-treated (1·50 (se 0·14) × 107) and control mice (1·14 (se 0·14) × 107). The long-term irradiated animals showed an increase in ILN cell number compared with control mice (0·89 (se 0·15) × 107, P< 0·05). The number of ILN cells in the PBS-treated group (4·69 (se 0·27) × 107) was also significantly higher (P< 0·05) than those in LTA-treated mice (3·35 (se 0·31) × 107) (Table 1). No differences were found in spleen cell number in either of the irradiation schemes (data not shown).

Phenotypic distribution of inguinal lymph node T-cell populations

In order to assess the effect of skin irradiation on ILN, helper (CD3+CD4+CD8), cytotoxic (CD3+CD4CD8+) and total T-cell (CD3+) number were determined by flow cytometry. After chronic irradiation, helper T-cell number was significantly higher (P< 0·05) in LTA-treated mice (19·98 (se 0·83) × 106 than in the PBS-treated (13·01 (se 2·50) × 106) and control (11·69 (se 1·35) × 106) groups. As for cytotoxic T-cells, the results were similar, with a significant increase detected in the LTA group (13·23 (se 0·73) × 106) compared with PBS-treated (6·93 (se 1·13) × 106) and control (7·19 (se 0·73) × 106) mice (P< 0·05). Total T-cell number in LTA-treated mice was 35·00 (se 1·61) × 106, this number was significantly higher (P< 0·05) than the number obtained in PBS-treated (22·12 (se 3·99) × 106) and control (22·83 (se 2·51) × 106) mice (Fig. 3(c), (e) and (g)). In the long-term irradiation model, total T-cell number was significantly increased in PBS-treated mice (37·33 (se 1·98) × 106) compared with LTA-treated (26·50 (se 2·68) × 106) and control (26·13 (se 3·16) × 106) mice (P< 0·05). Helper T-cell number was also significantly increased (P< 0·05) in PBS-treated mice (16·13 (se 0·98) × 106) compared with LTA-treated (10·64 (se 1·12) × 106) and control mice (8·02 (se 1·19) × 106). The number of cytotoxic T-cells was also significantly higher (P< 0·05) in PBS-treated mice (16·15 (se 1·12) × 106) than in LTA-treated (8·26 (se 0·88) × 106) and control (8·54 (se 1·26) × 106) mice (Fig. 3(d), (f) and (h)).

Fig. 3 T-cell populations in (c, e, g) chronically and (d, f, h) long-term irradiated mice receiving lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or PBS and in the non-irradiated control group. Values are means of total cell number (n 6 for chronically irradiated and n 8 for long-term irradiated mice), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (a) Histogram showing the CD3+ population and (b) dot plot showing the CD3+CD4+CD8 and CD3+CD4CD8+ cells. FL1, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-CD3 detection; FL2, phycoerythrin (PE) anti-CD8 detection; FL4, Alexa Fluor 647 anti-CD4 detection. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05).

IgA+ cell count in the small-intestinal lamina propria

The number of IgA-producing B-cells in the lamina propria (Fig. 4(b)) of the chronically irradiated animals treated with LTA was 804·00 (se 18·26). This value was significantly higher (P< 0·05) than the number found in PBS-treated (427·70 (se 62·76)) and control mice (528·80 (se 67·12)) (Fig. 4(a)).

Fig. 4 (a) IgA-positive cells in the lamina propria of chronically irradiated mice. (b) Small-intestinal samples were stained with FITC-anti-IgA antibodies and positive cells were counted in forty fields per animal. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). † Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn).

Antigen-presenting cell analysis in the mesenteric lymph nodes

Total DC (CD11c+), activated DC (CD11c+CD80+) and total activated antigen-presenting cell (CD80+) numbers in the MLN were determined by flow cytometry in the chronic irradiation model. A significant increase in activated DC (Fig. 5(d)) was detected in LTA-treated mice (2410·00 (se 427·20)) compared with PBS-treated (1451·00 (se 192·80)) and control (994·00 (se 159·40)) mice (P< 0·05). Total activated antigen-presenting cell number (Fig. 5(c)) was also significantly increased (P< 0·05) in LTA-treated mice (94 721·00 (se 14 788·00)) compared with control (43 634·00 (se 9555·00)) and PBS-treated (12 257·00 (se 734·00)) mice. No significant differences were found for the total DC number (Fig. 5(b)) between the groups.

Fig. 5 Antigen-presenting cells (APC) in the mesenteric lymph nodes of chronically irradiated mice were analysed. (b) Total dendritic cells (DC), (c) total activated APC and (d) total activated DC number were obtained from (a) the dot plot of double staining with anti-CD80 and anti-CD11c. FL1, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-CD80 detection; FL2, phycoerythrin (PE) anti-CD11c detection. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). † Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05).

Tumour appearance kinetics

Tumour appearance was simultaneous in the LTA- and PBS-treated animals and began around week 20. Nevertheless, LTA-treated mice showed a significant slower progression in tumour number, statistically compared with PBS-treated mice (Fig. 6(a)). When the appearance of the fourth tumour was taken as a death event for a death curve analysis, the difference between LTA- and PBS-treated mice was significantly different. Furthermore, the group of LTA-treated mice showed a 4-week delay in the detection of the first animal with four tumours (Fig. 6(b)). No tumour was detected in the control group throughout the study.

Fig. 6 (a) Tumour appearance kinetics, (b) death curve considering the appearance of the fourth tumour as a death event and (c) tumour size kinetics. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean values were significantly different (P< 0·05). , PBS; , lipoteichoic acid; , control.

Average tumour size was not different between the irradiated groups along the study (Fig. 6(c)).

Discussion

The intake of some micro-organisms causes alterations in the complex interactions between the immune system and intestinal microbiota, and this does not only affect the GALT and the other mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues, but it also affects, in some way or another, the whole organism.

In the present study, LTA from L. rhamnosus GG was employed. L. rhamnosus GG is one of the probiotic bacteria with the most impressive scientific support as reviewed by Goldin & Gorbach(Reference Goldin and Gorbach32). This antigen represents about 50 % of the total weight of the Lactobacillus cell wall(Reference Kleerebezem, Hols and Bernard4) and is one of the strongest immunomodulators in this group of micro-organisms.

A model of chronic irradiation, which had already been set up in our laboratory(Reference Weill, Cela and Ferrari33), was used to study, first, the effect of LTA ingestion in an irradiation scheme applied for a shorter time than that required to induce tumorigenesis.

The results demonstrated that LTA ingestion did not improve UVR-induced epidermal cell alterations, since it did not modify the increase in epidermal thickness, the number of apoptotic cells and the decrease in intraepithelial T-cells. LTA consumption did not affect IL-10 and IL-4 production by ConA-stimulated ILN T-cells, which were increased after UVR skin exposure. Nevertheless, T-cells from the LTA-treated animals showed a significant increase in interferon-γ levels, compared with the controls and mice treated with PBS. This result would indicate a partial restoration of homeostasis in the draining lymph nodes, since interferon-γ is a cytokine classically associated with inflammatory processes which would be opposing the effect of IL-10 and IL-4(Reference Shreedhar, Giese and Sung38).

Flow cytometric analysis of ILN T-cell populations showed an increase in total, helper and cytotoxic T-cells in mice treated with LTA. This phenomenon could be associated with the increased number of activated DC, which is also observed in the MLN of these mice. Indeed, activated DC activate T-cells that express α4β7 integrin, which binds mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1, a molecule constitutively expressed in the mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues(Reference Hooper and Macpherson39). Recently, Ohmatsu et al. (Reference Ohmatsu, Kadono and Sugaya40) have shown that this integrin mediates lymphocyte migration to the skin under inflammatory conditions. Therefore, it is possible that after UVR-induced tissue damage, T-cells already activated in the MLN may migrate to the cutaneous immune system. This phenomenon, in association with the higher number of activated DC in the MLN of LTA-treated mice, might be responsible for the increased number of T-cells in the skin-draining lymph nodes of these animals.

In order to assess the effect of LTA on the intestinal immune cells, lamina propria IgA+ cells were counted. After LTA consumption, a significant increase in the number of these cells was observed. B-cell activation by LTA can occur by its binding to Toll-like receptor type 2 or by crosslinking B-cell receptors. LTA can reach lamina propia B-cells directly by diffusion through the intestinal epithelial cells or by internalisation (non-degradative endocytosis) into DC which afterwards present LTA to B-cells in the lamina propria. Once the lamina propria B-cells are activated, they produce IgA with multiple specificities and low affinity. These Ig mediate commensal bacteria exclusion and protection from some pathogens such as rotaviruses and Salmonella typhimurium (Reference Cerutti12). These results indicate that the oral administration of LTA had a direct effect on the GALT, in particular on B-cells.

Considering the photoprotective effects of LTA administration on the chronic irradiation model, we decided to evaluate its use in a tumorigenic irradiation model, which we had previously characterised studying non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(Reference Gonzalez Maglio, Paz and Ferrari17). The results found in this model showed that LTA consumption delays tumour appearance. The kinetics in the appearance of tumours was significantly slower in the LTA-treated animals, since there was a 4-week difference between the appearance of the first animal with four tumours in the PBS-treated group v. the LTA-treated group. This period of time is clinically relevant considering life expectancy in hairless mice, which is about 2 years. The effect on tumorigenesis was exclusively associated with the delay in tumour appearance since, once installed, LTA consumption did not affect tumour size progression. The increased cellularity found in the skin-draining lymph nodes of PBS-treated mice, associated with the rise in the number of total, helper and cytotoxic T-cells, is probably the consequence of the higher tumour number in this group of animals compared with the LTA-treated or the control group.

The amount of LTA given to mice in the present study was based on toxicity assays done by Cox et al.(Reference Cox, Cook and Lutcher13), who safely administered about 2–3 μg LTA/g of animal weight. In mice weighing about 30–35 g, the amount of LTA represents approximately 100 μg. The animals receiving the LTA solution behave exactly in the same usual way after oral administration as did PBS-treated mice. Since LTA was obtained from a probiotic bacteria and was administered in an isotonic solution, no acute responses from mice were expected. Nevertheless, further studies considering different doses should be performed.

Finally, in the present study, we found a photoprotective effect of the consumption of an immunostimulant antigen from L. rhamnosus GG, a micro-organism with recognised probiotic characteristics, the consumption of which is safe and massive nowadays. This effect is reflected in tumour development delay, and it could be mediated by a transitory increase in cytotoxic and helper T-cells in the draining lymph nodes, as observed in the chronic irradiation model. Even though it is clear that the probiotic effect of a bacterium cannot be just limited to one of its antigens, it is interesting to consider the beneficial effect of the administration of subcellular fractions of these micro-organisms on the host's health. Further studies on the molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying the effects observed are needed. Moreover, it is also very important to explore new applications and, from the industrial point of view, to develop technologies that allow improving the production and the incorporation of these molecules to food matrices.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the University of Buenos Aires (UBACyT B023 grant). The authors would also like to thank the following individuals: Dr Victoria Preciado and Ms Pamela Valva for their assistance with the TUNEL assays; Ms Dolores Campos, Ms Carolina Mourelle and Ms Angélica Miranda for their technical support and advice in relation to mice care and management; Dr Daniela Ureta for her assistance in flow cytometry determinations and Dr Guillermo Nuñez for his collaboration with the manuscript revision. The authors’ contributions were as follows: F. S. W. participated in the study design, carried out the animal experiments, performed the analytical determinations and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript; E. M. C. participated in the animal experiments, cellular assays and flow cytometry determinations; M. L. P. participated in the cell preparation for the flow cytometry assays and LTA administration to mice; A. F. participated in the statistical management of the data and in the discussion of the experimental design; J. L. participated in the experimental design and in the discussion of the results; D. H. G. M. participated in the experimental design, cellular assays, sample collections and microscopic analysis. All authors participated in the discussion of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

1Metchnikoff, E (1908) The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
2Lilly, DM & Stillwell, RH (1965) Probiotics: growth-promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science 147, 747748.Google Scholar
3FAO/WHO (2002) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food (probiotic_guidelines.pdf, editor). London/Ontario: FAO/WHO.Google Scholar
4Kleerebezem, M, Hols, P, Bernard, E, et al. (2010) The extracellular biology of the Lactobacilli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34, 199230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Marteau, P & Boutron-Ruault, MC (2002) Nutritional advantages of probiotics and prebiotics. Br J Nutr 87, Suppl. 2, S153S157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Sharpe, ME, Davison, AL & Baddiley, J (1964) Teichoic acids and group antigens in Lactobacilli. J Gen Microbiol 34, 333340.Google Scholar
7Fischer, W, Mannsfeld, T & Hagen, G (1990) On the basic structure of poly(glycerophosphate) lipoteichoic acids. Biochem Cell Biol 68, 3343.Google Scholar
8Delcour, J, Ferain, T, Deghorain, M, et al. (1999) The biosynthesis and functionality of the cell-wall of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 76, 159184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Neuhaus, FC & Baddiley, J (2003) A continuum of anionic charge: structures and functions of d-alanyl-teichoic acids in gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67, 686723.Google Scholar
10Buckley, JM, Wang, JH & Redmond, HP (2006) Cellular reprogramming by gram-positive bacterial components: a review. J Leukoc Biol 80, 731741.Google Scholar
11Ryu, YH, Baik, JE, Yang, JS, et al. (2009) Differential immunostimulatory effects of Gram-positive bacteria due to their lipoteichoic acids. Int Immunopharmacol 9, 127133.Google Scholar
12Cerutti, A (2008) The regulation of IgA class switching. Nat Rev Immunol 8, 421434.Google Scholar
13Cox, F, Cook, E & Lutcher, C (1986) Lack of toxicity of oral and intrapulmonary group B streptococcal lipoteichoic acid. Pediatr Res 20, 11681173.Google Scholar
14Armstrong, BK & Kricker, A (2001) The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B 63, 818.Google Scholar
15Svobodova, A, Walterova, D & Vostalova, J (2006) Ultraviolet light induced alteration to the skin. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 150, 2538.Google Scholar
16Paz, ML, González Maglio, DH, Weill, FS, et al. (2008) Mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular stress progression after ultraviolet B irradiation in human keratinocytes. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 24, 115122.Google Scholar
17Gonzalez Maglio, DH, Paz, ML, Ferrari, A, et al. (2010) Alterations in skin immune response throughout chronic UVB irradiation-skin cancer development and prevention by naproxen. Photochem Photobiol 86, 146152.Google Scholar
18El-Abaseri, TB, Putta, S & Hansen, LA (2006) Ultraviolet irradiation induces keratinocyte proliferation and epidermal hyperplasia through the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Carcinogenesis 27, 225231.Google Scholar
19Ullrich, SE & Kripke, ML (1984) Mechanisms in the suppression of tumor rejection produced in mice by repeated UV irradiation. J Immunol 133, 27862790.Google Scholar
20Byrne, SN & Halliday, GM (2005) B cells activated in lymph nodes in response to ultraviolet irradiation or by interleukin-10 inhibit dendritic cell induction of immunity. J Invest Dermatol 124, 570578.Google Scholar
21Greene, MI, Sy, MS, Kripke, M, et al. (1979) Impairment of antigen-presenting cell function by ultraviolet radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76, 65916595.Google Scholar
22Gurish, MF, Lynch, DH & Daynes, RA (1982) Changes in antigen-presenting cell function in the spleen and lymph nodes of ultraviolet-irradiated mice. Transplantation 33, 280284.Google Scholar
23Gorman, S, Tan, JW, Yerkovich, ST, et al. (2007) CD4+ T cells in lymph nodes of UVB-irradiated mice suppress immune responses to new antigens both in vitro and in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 127, 915924.Google Scholar
24Loser, K, Apelt, J, Voskort, M, et al. (2007) IL-10 controls ultraviolet-induced carcinogenesis in mice. J Immunol 179, 365371.Google Scholar
25Beissert, S & Loser, K (2008) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of photocarcinogenesis. Photochem Photobiol 84, 2934.Google Scholar
26Tang, ML, Lahtiner, SJ & Boyle, RJ (2010) Probiotics and prebiotics: clinical effects in allergic disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 22, 626634.Google Scholar
27Gueniche, A, Benyacoub, J, Buetler, TM, et al. (2006) Supplementation with oral probiotic bacteria maintains cutaneous immune homeostasis after UV exposure. Eur J Dermatol 16, 511517.Google Scholar
28Arck, P, Handjiski, B, Hagen, E, et al. (2010) Is there a ‘gut-brain-skin axis’? Exp Dermatol 19, 401405.Google Scholar
29Morganti, P (2009) The photoprotective activity of nutraceuticals. Clin Dermatol 27, 166174.Google Scholar
30Bouilly-Gauthier, D, Jeannes, C, Maubert, Y, et al. (2010) Clinical evidence of benefits of a dietary supplement containing probiotic and carotenoids on ultraviolet-induced skin damage. Br J Dermatol 163, 536543.Google Scholar
31Roselli, M, Finamore, A, Britti, MS, et al. (2006) Probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis MB5 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protect intestinal Caco-2 cells from the inflammation-associated response induced by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. Br J Nutr 95, 11771184.Google Scholar
32Goldin, BR & Gorbach, SL (2008) Clinical indications for probiotics: an overview. Clin Infect Dis 46, Suppl. 2, S96S100(discussion S144–S151).Google Scholar
33Weill, FS, Cela, EM, Ferrari, A, et al. (2011) Skin exposure to chronic but not acute UV radiation affects peripheral T-cell function. J Toxicol Environ Health A 74, 838847.Google Scholar
34Morath, S, Geyer, A & Hartung, T (2001) Structure–function relationship of cytokine induction by lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus. J Exp Med 193, 393397.Google Scholar
35Dogi, CA, Weill, F & Perdigon, G (2010) Immune response of non-pathogenic gram(+) and gram( − ) bacteria in inductive sites of the intestinal mucosa study of the pathway of signaling involved. Immunobiology 215, 6069.Google Scholar
36Kim, JH, Seo, H, Han, SH, et al. (2005) Monoacyl lipoteichoic acid from pneumococci stimulates human cells but not mouse cells. Infect Immun 73, 834840.Google Scholar
37Kruisbeek, AM, Shevach, E & Thornton, AM (2004) Proliferative assays for T cell function. Curr Protoc Immunol (Chapter 3, Unit 3.12).Google Scholar
38Shreedhar, V, Giese, T, Sung, VW, et al. (1998) A cytokine cascade including prostaglandin E2, IL-4, and IL-10 is responsible for UV-induced systemic immune suppression. J Immunol 160, 37833789.Google Scholar
39Hooper, LV & Macpherson, AJ (2010) Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 159169.Google Scholar
40Ohmatsu, H, Kadono, T, Sugaya, M, et al. (2010) α4β7 Integrin is essential for contact hypersensitivity by regulating migration of T cells to skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126, 12671276.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Mean epidermal thickness, epidermal CD3+ cells and inguinal lymph node (ILN) cell number in chronically and long-term irradiated mice (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Percentage of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL)-positive cells in the epidermis after (a) chronic and (b) long-term irradiation from control mice and from mice receiving lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or PBS. Values are means (n 6 for chronically irradiated and n 8 for long-term irradiated mice), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05).

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Cytokine production in inguinal lymph node cells from (a, c, e) chronically and (b, d, f) long-term irradiated mice receiving lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or PBS and from the non-irradiated control group. Values are means (n 6 for chronically irradiated and n 8 for long-term irradiated mice), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05). IFN-γ, interferon-γ.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 T-cell populations in (c, e, g) chronically and (d, f, h) long-term irradiated mice receiving lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or PBS and in the non-irradiated control group. Values are means of total cell number (n 6 for chronically irradiated and n 8 for long-term irradiated mice), with standard errors represented by vertical bars. (a) Histogram showing the CD3+ population and (b) dot plot showing the CD3+CD4+CD8 and CD3+CD4CD8+ cells. FL1, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-CD3 detection; FL2, phycoerythrin (PE) anti-CD8 detection; FL4, Alexa Fluor 647 anti-CD4 detection. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05).

Figure 4

Fig. 4 (a) IgA-positive cells in the lamina propria of chronically irradiated mice. (b) Small-intestinal samples were stained with FITC-anti-IgA antibodies and positive cells were counted in forty fields per animal. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). † Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn).

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Antigen-presenting cells (APC) in the mesenteric lymph nodes of chronically irradiated mice were analysed. (b) Total dendritic cells (DC), (c) total activated APC and (d) total activated DC number were obtained from (a) the dot plot of double staining with anti-CD80 and anti-CD11c. FL1, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-CD80 detection; FL2, phycoerythrin (PE) anti-CD11c detection. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that of the control mice (P< 0·05). † Mean value was significantly different from that of the PBS-treated mice (P< 0·05).

Figure 6

Fig. 6 (a) Tumour appearance kinetics, (b) death curve considering the appearance of the fourth tumour as a death event and (c) tumour size kinetics. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean values were significantly different (P< 0·05). , PBS; , lipoteichoic acid; , control.