Introduction
Dementia has been identified as one of the most important contributors to disability, dependency, and transitioning into nursing home care in the elderly (Prince et al., Reference Prince, Prina and Guerchet2013). Fifty million people are currently living with dementia worldwide, and the total estimated global cost of dementia in 2018 was US$1 trillion (Patterson, Reference Patterson2018). As the world’s population ages, the prevalence of dementia is expected to increase, placing significant burdens on informal carers, the care system, and the economy (Livingston et al., Reference Livingston2017; Prince, Reference Prince2015; Wimo et al., Reference Wimo, Jönsson, Bond, Prince and Winblad2013).
Currently, about half of people with dementia in high-income countries are cared for in nursing homes (Prince et al., Reference Prince, Prina and Guerchet2013). The potential negative effects of institutionalization on the quality of life for people with dementia, future shortage of nursing home beds, and high direct costs associated with nursing home care make delaying the transition into nursing homes a priority in high-income countries (Prince et al., Reference Prince, Prina and Guerchet2013). The circumstances under which people with dementia are admitted to nursing home are multifactorial and often the result of complex interactions among characteristics of people with dementia, informal carers, and the care system (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016).
A substantial number of empirical studies considering factors associated with nursing home admission (NHA) in people with dementia have been summarized in four systematic reviews. All four identify carer burden and distress as a consistent and significant predictor of NHA (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Svendsboe2016; Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler, Yu, Krichbaum and Wyman2009; Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008; Toot et al., Reference Toot, Swinson, Devine, Challis and Orrell2017). Less is known about the effect of aspects of carer burden and distress on NHA.
One aspect of carer burden and distress found to predict NHA is increased role captivity, in terms of feeling trapped in care responsibilities (Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler2000). The finding replicates an earlier report by Aneshensel and colleagues (Reference Aneshensel, Pearlin, Mullan, Zarit and Whitlatch1995). Role overload, in terms of feeling overwhelmed and worn out by caregiving responsibilities, and worry/strain, was according to Gaugler et al. (Reference Gaugler2000) not found to predict NHA. However, the protective effect of being married and living with a family carer is documented in multiple studies (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016; Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008). Consistent and significant care-recipient predictors of NHA include severity of cognitive impairment, activities of daily living (ADL) deficiencies, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) of dementia (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016; Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler, Yu, Krichbaum and Wyman2009; Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008; Toot et al., Reference Toot, Swinson, Devine, Challis and Orrell2017). The effect of community-based services is unclear with both high and low levels of service use leading to NHA according to Toot et al. (Reference Toot, Swinson, Devine, Challis and Orrell2017) and Luppa et al. (Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008).
In most countries, resources available in the continuing care system are limited. A deeper understanding of the circumstances under which people with dementia require NHA represents important steps for improving the management of resources in dementia care. However, the burden placed on informal carers has to be taken into consideration. Carer distress is associated with impaired quality of life (Sörensen et al., Reference Sörensen, Duberstein, Gill and Pinquart2006), decline in general health, and psychiatric morbidities (Svendsboe et al., Reference Svendsboe2016; Ulstein, Reference Ulstein2007).
We have previously demonstrated that compared to people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), people diagnosed with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) had nearly 2 years shorter time until NHA (Rongve et al., Reference Rongve, Vossius, Nore, Testad and Aarsland2014). In addition to a DLB diagnosis, Rongve and colleagues (Reference Rongve, Vossius, Nore, Testad and Aarsland2014) found that higher RSS, sum scores predicted faster admission to a nursing home. In this study, we want to further explore this association. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have explored the association between the aspects of carer burden and distress, identified through individual items of a burden or distress scale, and the time until NHA.
We think that looking beyond the sum score of the RSS helps promote the development of flexible and tailored interventions and that accommodating the needs of informal carers might delay NHA. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the association between specific aspects of carer distress, identified through individual items of the RSS, and time until NHA in people with mild dementia.
Methods
This study is part of the Dementia Study of Western Norway (DemVest). The DemVest study is a longitudinal dementia cohort study with annual assessments of people referred to dementia clinics in Western Norway between 2005 and 2008. After 2008, people diagnosed with DLB and Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD) were selectively recruited to enhance the number of participants in these diagnostic groups (Aarsland et al., Reference Aarsland2008).
A first-time diagnosis of dementia was made, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), and mild dementia defined as Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score of at least 20 or a Clinical Dementia Rating-scale global score = 1.
A diagnosis of AD was made according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and the Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (Mckhann et al., Reference McKhann, Drachman, Folstein, Katzman, Price and Stadlan1984) and a diagnosis of DLB according to the revised Consensus Guidelines for the Clinical Diagnosis of Probable and Possible Dementia With Lewy Bodies (McKeith et al., Reference McKeith, Dickson and Lowe2005). A pathological diagnosis was available for 56 patients in the DemVest cohort, showing a diagnostic accuracy of more than 80% (Skogseth et al., Reference Skogseth2017).
Eligibility criteria
This study included people diagnosed with AD and DLB with a participating primary carer (spouse/partner or adult child). All participants had mild dementia and were living at home at the time of inclusion and were later admitted to a nursing home. People diagnosed with AD and DLB and who are still living at home were excluded, along with patients with acute delirium or confusion, terminal illness, recently diagnosed with a major somatic illness, or previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder.
Ethics
The Regional Ethics Committee for Medical Research Ethics in Western Norway (DemVest REK 2010/633) and the Norwegian authorities for the collection of medical data approved the DemVest study. All participants, including people diagnosed with dementia and their primary carer, provided written consent.
Dependent variable
The time until NHA was measured as days from the date of inclusion and diagnosis until the date each participant was admitted to a nursing home.
Independent variables
Aspects of carer distress
Carer distress was assessed using the 15-item Norwegian Relative Stress Scale (RSS), which was translated and adapted to Norwegian language and culture with a Chronbach’s α of 0.91 (Ulstein et al., Reference Ulstein, Wyller and Engedal2007b).
The RSS is a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess various aspects of distress experienced by an informal carer providing care for a relative with dementia and include subjective emotional responses, restrictions in the carers’ social lives, and negative feelings associated with the person and his or her behaviors (Greene et al., Reference Greene, Smith, Gardiner and Timbury1982). The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each scored at five levels of intensity (0–4), with higher scores indicating more severe stress. A score above 23 on the RSS according to Ulstein et al. (Reference Ulstein, Wyller and Engedal2007a) indicates an increased risk of clinically significant psychological distress for the caregiver.
Covariates
In addition to sociodemographic variables such as sex, age, family relation (spouse or adult children), and dementia diagnosis, the cognitive functioning level was assessed by means of the Mini-Mental Status Evaluation (MMSE). The MMSE is a 30-point questionnaire that is used in both clinical and research settings to estimate the severity and progression of cognitive impairment (Folstein et al., Reference Folstein, Folstein and Mchugh1975).
NPSs were assessed using the validated Norwegian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) (Selbaek et al., Reference Selbaek, Kirkevold, Sommer and Engedal2008). The NPI is a widely used carer-based assessment scale developed to assess the psychopathology in people with dementia. The NPI rates each of the 12 NPSs on a frequency scale (0–4) and severity scale (0–3), with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms (Cummings, Reference Cummings1997).
The limitations in terms of daily activities were assessed using the Rapid Disability Rating Scale-2 (RDRS-2) and comprises items grouped into the following three domains: activities of daily living, degree of dependence, and cognitive impairment. All items are ranked on a scale (1–4), with higher scores indicating poorer function (Linn and Linn, Reference Linn and Linn1982). Because RDRS-2 exists in both a 19-item version and a 21-item version, z-scores were applied for this study.
Statistics
The characteristics of the entire sample (n = 107) are presented as proportions and mean values with standard deviations. Because of the highly nonnormal distribution of the individual RSS item scores, these were recoded into binary variables by comparing scores less than or equal to 1 (≤) versus scores greater than or equal to 2 (≥) in all analyses. First, mean values (days) with standard deviations until NHA are presented for participants scoring low (≤1) and high (≥2) on each individual RSS item. The independent t-test was applied to display the mean difference in time with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) until NHA between the two groups. Second, partial least square (PLS) regression models were used to study the associations between time until NHA and baseline items of the RSS. PLS regression allows for multivariate modeling in samples with many variables related to observations. We first ran a model by including only the 15 individual RSS items. Then, we made adjustments of diagnosis (AD versus DLB), sex (female versus male), age (years), number of children (≤1 versus ≥2), social status (in a relationship [married or partner] versus divorced/widow[er]), family relation (spouse versus child), MMSE total score, RDRS-2, z-score, duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis (years), and NPI total intensity. All continuous covariates were standardized to binary variables using a median split before being entered into the PLS model. To test the robustness of the findings, models were cross-validated, excluding every fourth subject. We report estimates of days living at home until NHA with CIs and the explained variance (R2) of the PLS models (model with only RSS items versus full model). All CIs not including the value of zero were considered statistically significant. The PLS analysis was performed using Sirius vs. 11.0 (Pattern Recognition Systems, Bergen, Norway), while other analyses were conducted using SPSS version 24.
Results
A total of 223 people diagnosed with mild dementia were recruited in the DemVest study. This study included 107 participants admitted to nursing home and their primary carer. Sixty-four persons were diagnosed with AD and 43 were diagnosed with DLB. The majority of patients were women (61.7%), with a mean age of 75.9 (SD, 7.4) and a mean MMSE score of 23.7 (SD, 2.9). All participants were living at home at the time of inclusion. Of the primary carers, 53.3% were adult children and 46.7% spouses/partners. For more details, see Table 1. Twenty-four percent of all participants (n = 107) were admitted to nursing home during the first year, and after 3 years, 70% were cared for in care homes, see Figure 1. The last participant to be admitted to a nursing home was admitted in June 2012. At that time, 17 people diagnosed with AD and 12 people diagnosed with DLB (n = 29), with a primary carer, had died at home before NHA. The remaining participants (n = 47) were living at home at this time.
Table 1. Descriptive analysis of patient and carer variables
Abbreviation: Mean; SD, standard deviation; NPI, Neuropsychiatric Inventory; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; RDRS-2, Rapid Disability Rating Scale-2; RSS, Relative Stress Scale.
Figure 1. Illustration of the proportion (%) of patients admitted to a nursing home.
An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare time living at home before NHA in participants scoring high (≥2) and low (≤1) on individual RSS items. Except for three RSS items, all group means were significantly different. The items with the highest mean difference were item 8 (How much has your social life been affected? (mean = 455, CI 253,656)), item 7 (Do you find it difficult to get away on holiday? (mean = 454, CI 257, 652)), item 1 (Do you ever feel you can no longer cope with the situation? (mean = 410, CI 193, 627)), and item 15 (Do you ever feel frustrated at times with …? (mean = 407, CI 205, 609)). These findings indicate that carers scoring high on specific RSS items are admitted to nursing home sooner. For more details, see Table 2.
Table 2. Mean difference in time living at home before NHA using an independent t-test to compare participants scoring low (≤1) and high (≥2) on the individual RSS items
Abbreviation: Mean; SD, standard deviation; mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
In the unadjusted PLS analysis, which determined only the effect of individual items of the RSS on time until NHA, the explained variance was 19.3%. The explained variance in the full PLS model, including the covariates, was 43%. Of the individual RSS items, the adjusted PLS model showed a high score on item 15 (Do you ever feel frustrated at times with the person you’re caring for? (estimate = 137, CI −209.5, −64.5)), item 8 (How much has your social life been (estimate = −118, CI −172, 6.4)), item 7 (Do you find it difficult to get away on holiday? (estimate = −116, CI −158.3, −73.7)), and item 1 (Do you ever feel you can no longer cope with the situation? (estimate = −63, CI −122.6, −3.4)). For more details, see Table 3 and Figure 2.
Table 3. Partial least square regression prediction analysis of baseline items of the Relative Stress Scale on time (days) living at home before nursing home admission
The most important items are shown in bold. The model is adjusted for patient sex, patient age and family relation to carer (spouse or adult children), patient marital status, number of children, patient diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies, MMSE (Mini Mental Status Evaluation), duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, NPI sum score, and RDRS-2 z-score.
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2. Illustration of findings of a partial least square regression prediction analysis of baseline items of the Relative Stress Scale on time (days) until nursing home admission.
Furthermore, the PLS model showed that covariates associated with shorter time until NHA include a diagnosis of DLB (estimate = −157.0; CI, −228.6, −85.4) and the carer being a child (estimate = −218; CI, −278.1, −157.9) and the person with dementia being divorced/widowed (estimate −199; CI, 267.5, −130.5), having a higher education (estimate = 92.5; CI, 9.1, 175.9), having a higher MMSE score (estimate = 127.0 (CI, 53.3, 200.7), having a higher RDRS-2, z-score (estimate = −100.3; CI, −143.0, −63.0), having a longer duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis (estimate = 74.2; CI, 1.5, 146.9), and having a higher total intensity score (frequency × intensity) on the NPI (estimate = −65; CI, −127.1, −2.9). Male sex, age, and number of children did not predict NHA (data not shown).
Discussion
Findings of this study indicate that feeling frustration with the person one is caring for, feeling that the care responsibilities prevent one’s from being social outside of the home and getting away on holiday, and an overall feeling of not coping with the situation are important predictors of shorter time until NHA. In addition to identifying individual items of the RSS associated with time until NHA, this study suggests that the mechanism behind this is multifactorial.
Although overall carer burden and distress are shown to predict time until NHA (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016; Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler, Yu, Krichbaum and Wyman2009; Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008; Toot et al., Reference Toot, Swinson, Devine, Challis and Orrell2017), no studies have explored the predictive value of specific aspects of carer distress identified through factor analysis or individual items on a burden or distress scale on time until NHA. However, based on relevant findings (Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler2000; Adams, Reference Adams2006; Baek, Reference Baek2004) and Lazarus and Folkman (Reference Lazarus and Folkman1984) theory of stress and coping, we seek to shed some light on the possible mechanism behind our findings.
Feeling frustrated at times with the person one is caring for is likely related to the fact that carers of people with dementia have a broad range of emotions related to their caregiving experiences, many of which are negative. Negative feelings, according to Adams (Reference Adams2006), include feelings of impatience, frustration, resentment, and disappointment toward the person with dementia (Adams, Reference Adams2006). However, the handling and channeling of negative feelings differ and adds to the burden of care of informal carers. Some carers report hiding their frustration, while others report feelings of guilt and shame because they take their frustration out on the person with dementia. Recognizing and normalizing the occurrence of these feelings are therefore of great importance. The fact that feeling frustrated at times with the person one is caring for was associated with a shorter time until NHA, as opposed to getting upset with or being embarrassed by the person with dementia, further highlights the importance of distinguishing between negative emotions and the effects of these emotions.
The findings of this study further reveal that feeling trapped and tied up, in terms of feeling one’s social life has been affected and not being free to take a holiday, are aspects of carer distress predicting shorter time until NHA. These findings indicate that carers need to be able to take a break and have a social life outside of the house, free from care responsibilities, and thus we emphasize the importance of providing respite for informal carers. These findings correspond with findings in a study by Gaugler and colleagues (Reference Gaugler2000). They replicated an earlier report by Aneshensel and colleagues (1995) and found that role captivity was significant in precipitating NHA. Role captivity was in that study assessed using a 3-item scale focusing on the involuntary aspects of caregiving, referring to carers’ feelings of being trapped and having no choice in their role. Role overload, or the extent to which carers feel overwhelmed and worn out by caregiving responsibilities, was not significant (Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler2000). According to Baek (Reference Baek2004), measuring how often carers feel trapped by their relatives’ illness, want to run away, and want to be free to lead a life of their own, role captivity denoted how much carers want to give up their caregiving role.
The last RSS item to stand out as a significant predictor of shorter time until NHA was feeling that you no longer can cope with the situation and is associated with a shorter time until NHA. This might indicate that carers have reached a point where they feel they no longer can handle the care responsibilities and want to give up the caregiving role. According to Lazarus and Folkman (Reference Lazarus and Folkman1984), stress occurs when carers through appraisal see available resources and/or coping strategies to be inadequate (Lazarus and Folkman, Reference Lazarus and Folkman1984). Coping refers to a person’s efforts to manage demands and determines the effect of stressors on his or her well-being and possibly time until NHA. Giving informal carers the opportunity to influence decisions, and be involved in the planning of interventions, might further support informal carers’ effort to handle everyday care demands.
Finally, the findings of this study suggest that there is a multifactorial influence on time until NHA among people diagnosed with dementia (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016) and that carer distress is an important predictor of shorter time until NHA (Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008; Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler, Yu, Krichbaum and Wyman2009; Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016; Toot et al., Reference Toot, Swinson, Devine, Challis and Orrell2017). Based on the PLS model, being diagnosed with DLB and divorced/widowed and having a more severe cognitive decline and ADL impairments, longer duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, NPS, higher education, and carer being a child as opposed to spouse are associated with shorter time until NHA. To a large degree, these findings also correspond to existing evidence. It is well established that care-recipient variables, often referred to as primary stressors, including poorer cognition, greater severity of dementia, NPS, and ADL impairments, are consistent predictors of NHA along with carer burden and distress (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016; Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008; Gaugler et al., Reference Gaugler, Yu, Krichbaum and Wyman2009; Toot et al., Reference Toot, Swinson, Devine, Challis and Orrell2017; Dufournet et al., Reference Dufournet2019). According to a study comparing time until NHA among people diagnosed with DLB and AD, a diagnosis of DLB was associated with a shorter time to NHA (Rongve et al., Reference Rongve, Vossius, Nore, Testad and Aarsland2014). However, according to a review by Cepoiu-Martin and colleagues (Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016), the type of dementia did not predict NHA.
The evidence is further inconclusive regarding the effect of predisposing variables on time until NHA. However, several studies have found that being divorced or widowed, living alone, and carer being a child are associated with admission to nursing home (Luppa et al., Reference Luppa, Luck, Brahler, Konig and Riedel-Heller2008; Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016). In contrast to previous findings, older age was not associated with shorter time until NHA in this study (Cepoiu‐Martin et al., Reference Cepoiu-Martin, Tam-Tham, Patten, Maxwell and Hogan2016).
A range of interventions in dementia care aim to help informal carers handle the demands of caregiving, reduce stress, and delay NHA. The current evidence is, however, inconsistent. The findings of a meta-analysis conducted by Spijker and colleagues (Reference Spijker2008) showed that no pharmacological interventions significantly decreased the odds of institutionalization and significantly increased the time to institutionalization and that a combination of involvement and choice seems to be the main intervention characteristics that distinguished effective support programs from ineffective ones. According to Selwood and colleagues Reference Selwood, Johnston, Katona, Lyketsos and Livingston(2007), teaching carers coping strategies, especially individual interventions, appeared to improve carers’ psychological health.
Multicomponent interventions, according to Dickinson et al. (Reference Dickinson, Dow, Gibson, Hayes, Robalino and Robinson2017), appear to have considerable potential to improve the health of carers of people with dementia and lead to benefits in costs of dementia care. However, the caregiving experience, perceived stress, coping, and time until NHA are a result of multiple factors, and more research on the effect of interventions and respite care on the burden of care and the carers’ ability to stay in the caregiving role is needed.
Strengths and weaknesses of the study
The participants in the DemVest study were selected from a large, clinically defined cohort with rigorous diagnostic procedures, annual follow-up assessments, and low dropout. Sociodemographic data and data on the number of hours used on caregiving tasks on the carers were limited. This does not detract from our findings on the association between items of the RSS and time until NHA. It is, however, important to be aware that this might limit our understanding of why certain aspects of carer distress have a greater effect on time until NHA.
Furthermore, this study explores the association between specific aspects of carer distress and time until NHA in people with mild dementia using baseline data. Identifying aspects of carer distress that predict NHA is useful in planning early intervention. Furthermore, due to missing data on carer distress, baseline data were considered to be the most reliable. Exploring patterns of change could have further broadened our understanding of the circumstances under which people with dementia are admitted to nursing homes.
Implications and suggestions for future research
This study suggests that there is a multifactorial influence on time until NHA among people diagnosed with dementia and identifies aspects of carer distress associated with a shorter time until NHA.
Preservation of the informal care capacity represents important steps for improving the management of resources in dementia care. We think that looking beyond the sum score of the RSS promotes the development of flexible and tailored interventions. However, more research is needed in order to identify aspects of carer distress most strongly associated with NHA.
Based on the findings of this study, we argue that providing respite care is of great importance for informal carers, while at the same time pointing out the need to give informal carers the opportunity to influence decisions and be involved in the planning of interventions. This issue should be studied in future intervention studies.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Description of authors’ roles
Toril Marie Terum, John Roger Andersen, and Ingelin Testad designed this study, conducted the statistical analysis, and drafted the paper. Arvid Rongve, Ellen Svendsboe, and Dag Aarsland critically revised the paper for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version for submission. The manuscript contains original unpublished work and is not submitted for publication elsewhere.
Acknowledgments
Thanks goes to our sponsors: The Research Council of Norway, grant number 213375; the Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital; Western Norway University of Applied Science, Førde; the Center of Health Research, Førde Hospital Trust; and the Centre for Development of Institutional and Home Care Services (USHT), Sogn og Fjordane. Furthermore, this paper represents independent research parly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. Last but not least, we sincerely thank all participating patients and their carers and the research staff in the DemWest study and Helse Vest.
Open access
