This paper contains supplementary material that can be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org
Introduction
Humans have hunted for subsistence in the forests of Central and West Africa for millennia (Milner-Gulland et al., Reference Milner-Gulland and Bennett2003). However, for many people living in rural areas hunting has become an important source of revenue, driven by the high demand for bushmeat among urban populations (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Currie and Meeuwig2003; East et al., Reference East, Kümpel, Milner-Gulland and Rowcliffe2005). The commercial bushmeat trade has become central to many rural economies and a significant proportion of households rely on hunting as their primary source of income (Wilkie & Carpenter, Reference Wilkie and Carpenter1999). The problem has been further exacerbated by the construction of roads for commercial logging operations, which have made it easier to access previously unexploited wildlife populations and to transport meat to urban markets (Milner-Gulland et al., Reference Milner-Gulland and Bennett2003). As a result, wildlife is subject to increasingly unsustainable hunting pressure and numerous species have been extirpated locally (Bennett et al., Reference Bennett, Eves, Robinson and Wilkie2002; Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006).
Extensive bushmeat market and village-based surveys of hunter offtake have shown that mammals are affected most, followed by reptiles and birds (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007; Macdonald et al., Reference Macdonald, Johnson, Albrechsten, Dutton, Seymour and Dupain2011). However, these surveys may fail to detect bushmeat not extracted from the forest, such as animals consumed by hunters in camps, and may underestimate total offtake (Fa & García Yuste, Reference Fa and García Yuste2001; Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Rist et al., Reference Rist, Milner-Gulland, Cowlishaw and Rowcliffe2010; Whytock & Morgan, Reference Whytock and Morgan2010; Allebone-Webb et al., Reference Allebone-Webb, Kümpel, Rist, Cowlishaw, Rowcliffe and Milner-Gulland2011). It can be difficult to follow hunters, for logistical reasons, and many operate in secrecy because of the often illegal nature of their activities. For these reasons previous studies have used indirect methods, such as interviews with hunters, questionnaires and diaries, to quantify the number of animals discarded in the forest or consumed in hunting camps (Fa & García Yuste, Reference Fa and García Yuste2001; Kümpel, Reference Kümpel2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007; Rist et al., Reference Rist, Milner-Gulland, Cowlishaw and Rowcliffe2010; Allebone-Webb et al., Reference Allebone-Webb, Kümpel, Rist, Cowlishaw, Rowcliffe and Milner-Gulland2011). Although there is evidence that these methods can be effective tools for monitoring hunting activities (Jones et al., Reference Jones, Andriamarovololona, Hockley, Gibbons and Milner-Gulland2008; Rist et al., Reference Rist, Milner-Gulland, Cowlishaw and Rowcliffe2010), if participants perceive a threat to their livelihood or fear legal repercussions they may withhold information and results may be inaccurate (Jones et al., Reference Jones, Andriamarovololona, Hockley, Gibbons and Milner-Gulland2008). In Cameroon, for example, a number of frequently hunted species are legally protected (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Djeukam, Reference Djeukam2012), and the increasing enforcement of wildlife law (LAGA, 2012) means that hunters are likely to be evasive when answering questions about their activities. Thus, indirect measurements of hunter activity in the forest may be unreliable.
In the Ebo Forest, Cameroon, previous opportunistic observations of discarded animal remains in hunting camps and informal discussions with hunters suggest that hunters kill birds such as crowned eagles Stephanoaetus coronatus (Near Threatened; IUCN, 2013) for food when working from forest camps (Whytock & Morgan, Reference Whytock and Morgan2010). It is therefore possible that previous bushmeat surveys underestimated offtake of these and other birds, especially where animals consumed in camps were overlooked or under-reported. Hunting is considered a significant threat to many bird species in the tropical forests of Asia (Bennett et al., Reference Bennett, Nyaoi and Sompud1997; McConkey & Chivers, Reference McConkey and Chivers2004) but few studies have considered the fate of exploited bird populations in Central Africa. Crowned eagles, palm-nut vultures Gypohierax angolensis and black-casqued hornbills Ceratogymna atrata have been recorded occasionally in bushmeat surveys (Fa & García Yuste, Reference Fa and García Yuste2001; Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007). Although recorded in relatively low numbers these conspicuous, large-bodied birds are found at naturally low densities and are therefore particularly vulnerable to hunting pressure. Furthermore, long-lived raptors such as crowned eagles have low reproductive rates and even minimal hunting pressure can significantly perturb the balance between fecundity and longevity (Owens & Bennett, Reference Owens and Bennett2000). Several birds are legally protected from hunting in Cameroon (Djeukam, Reference Djeukam2012) and a permit must be obtained before killing or capturing crowned eagles or palm-nut vultures. It is therefore essential that offtake of these species is quantified accurately to inform future conservation action and legislative decisions (Trail, Reference Trail2007; Carrete et al., Reference Carrete, Sánchez-Zapata, Benítez, Lobón and Donázar2009; Whytock & Morgan, Reference Whytock and Morgan2010).
To enhance our understanding of the relative effect of bushmeat hunting on birds and other animals not extracted from the forest, we examined discarded animal remains in semi-permanent hunting camps in the Ebo Forest. We quantified the number of animals discarded by hunters and predicted that large-bodied birds such as raptors and hornbills would be recorded more frequently than other taxa and that the number of bird carcasses would increase with the number of hunters using camps. Data were extrapolated to all known hunting camps in the Ebo Forest to estimate the minimum annual offtake for each species, and here we discuss the potential effect of hunting pressure on birds in the forests of West and Central Africa.
Study area
The proposed Ebo National Park (c. 1,136 km2) comprises lowland and submontane rainforest in the Littoral Region of Cameroon (Fig. 1). The forest lies within the Cross–Sanaga Region (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006) and the Gulf of Guinea Biodiversity Hotspot (Oates et al., Reference Oates, Bergl and Linder2004) and holds important populations of several range-restricted mammals, including drills Mandrillus leucophaeus and Nigeria–Cameroon chimpanzees Pan troglodytes ellioti, as well as the Critically Endangered Ebo gorilla Gorilla gorilla and Preuss's red colobus Procolobus preussi (Morgan, Reference B.J2011). The proposed National Park also forms the largest contiguous forest block within the Yabassi Important Bird Area, where several bird species on the IUCN Red List have been recorded, including crowned eagle, grey-necked rockfowl Picathartes oreas and grey parrot Psittacus erithacus (Fotso et al., Reference Fotso, Dowsett-Lemaire, Dowsett, Scholte, Languy, Bowden, Fishpool and Evans2001). For a detailed description of habitats and the anthropogenic history of the Ebo Forest see Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett (Reference Dowsett-Lemaire and Dowsett2001) and Morgan (Reference Morgan2008).
Fig. 1 The locations of 34 hunting camps in the vicinity of the proposed Ebo National Park, Cameroon, with an estimated total catchment area of 479 km2, based on a 2.5 km radius buffer around each camp. The 13 camps surveyed are indicated by grey filled circles. The rectangle on the inset indicates the location of the main map in Cameroon.
To date 34 semi-permanent hunting camps have been located in the Ebo National Park and its outliers (B. Morgan & E. Abwe, unpubl. data). We surveyed 13 of these: four and nine belonging to hunters from Mamba and Locndeng villages, respectively (Fig. 1). These villages were selected because hunters were willing to cooperate with the study and the villages could be accessed within the logistical and financial constraints of the project. Camps were distributed throughout a large area of the forest, at varying distances from the nearest village or access roads, and because of this were assumed to be a sufficiently representative sample. Anecdotal observations suggested that hunter behaviour in the Ebo Forest (Supplementary Material 1) is similar to that described elsewhere in Central Africa (Fa & García Yuste, Reference Fa and García Yuste2001; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007; Rist et al., Reference Rist, Milner-Gulland, Cowlishaw and Rowcliffe2010) and that results are likely to be representative of the wider region.
Methods
Hunting camp surveys
During 1 July 2011–28 March 2012 camps were searched for animal remains discarded by hunters. These dates were chosen to cover both the wet and dry seasons (sensu Fa et al., Reference Fa, Johnson, Dupain, Lapuente, Köster and Macdonald2004, Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006), as hunting effort and species availability may vary seasonally. The survey period covered 272 days, with 94–265 survey days per camp (mean 196 ± SE 22 days). Meetings with local chiefs were held to explain the purpose of the study and seek permission to access camps before commencing fieldwork. Hunters in each village were employed as field assistants and porters, for a small fee. We used a global positioning system (GPS) to relocate camps and map established trails. Each camp was surveyed approximately once every 8 weeks, during daylight hours. This time-frame was considered short enough to ensure that remains such as bones and feathers were recorded before they decomposed beyond recognition, although some may have been removed by scavengers.
Surveys involved walking slowly within a 25 m radius of the camp, scanning the ground for animal remains. Searches were limited to 25 m because it was deemed unlikely that hunters would throw discarded remains beyond this distance in dense forest. Areas used regularly by hunters to prepare carcasses were also searched opportunistically. Opportunistic, informal interviews with hunters were used to estimate the number of hunters using camps between surveys. Animal parts were photographed alongside a unique data sheet showing the date, name of camp, name of nearest village, approximate number of hunters using the camp since the last survey, GPS location and an identification number. Once photographed, remains were destroyed or discarded far from camp to prevent repeat counts.
Remains were identified from photographs, using Borrow & Demey (Reference Borrow and Demey2004) for birds, Kingdon (Reference Kingdon1997) for mammals and Chirio & LeBreton (Reference Chirio and LeBreton2007) for reptiles. Crania, limb bones, and tail and primary feathers were counted to estimate the total number of individuals. Remains were identified to species level where possible. We use the term carcass to indicate that at least part of one individual was identified.
Data analysis
To estimate total harvest during the study period, results from the first visit to each camp were excluded from the analysis because of the presence of accumulated remains from an unknown time period. We used Spearman's rank correlation (r s ) to test for a relationship between the number of hunters using camps and the number of bird carcasses recorded. We also used r s to test for a relationship between the approximate adult body mass of birds identified to genus or species level and the number of carcasses identified. Adult body mass estimates were taken from Urban et al. (Reference Urban, Fry and Keith1982), Fry et al. (Reference Fry, Keith and Urban1988) and Ferguson-Lees & Christie (Reference Ferguson-Lees and Christie2001). Statistical analyses were carried out in Minitab v. 16 (Minitab, State College, USA) at a significance level of 0.05.
To estimate the minimum annual offtake for the study area we extrapolated mean totals for each species to the 34 known hunting camps in the Ebo Forest and then extrapolated the data to an entire year. Results were rounded to whole numbers. We estimated the catchment area of the 34 camps to compare our results with bushmeat data from previous urban market and village-based hunter surveys in the same region (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007). To do this we estimated the mean area exploited by an individual camp and extrapolated to all known camps. We assumed that camps were spatially distributed so that hunters could (1) exploit new areas of the forest, and (2) work simultaneously in neighbouring camps without significant interference. Camps were linked by well-maintained, established trails and these were mapped using a handheld GPS. We used these data to calculate the mean walking distance between adjacent camps and this was used as a proxy for the mean catchment diameter. Using ArcMap v. 10.0 (ESRI, Redlands, USA) we extrapolated results to all 34 camps and calculated their combined catchment area (Fig. 1).
Results
During 50 survey events we recorded 49 carcasses (mean 0.98 ± SE 0.11 per survey) comprising 21 species (Table 1). The mean number of carcasses recorded per camp was 3.77 ± SE 0.72 (range 0–8) and 2–7 surveys were carried out in each camp (mean 3.85 ± SE 0.39). The majority of carcasses were birds (55%) and mammals (43%). The most frequently recorded birds were hornbills (37%) and raptors (33%). Rodents, duikers and guenons were the most frequently recorded mammals, accounting for 19% of carcasses. The mean number of hunters using camps between surveys was 2.11 ± SE 0.31 (range 0–7) and the number was correlated positively with the total number of bird carcasses recorded (r s = 0.70, P < 0.001, n = 50 surveys). There was also a positive correlation between the number of carcasses recorded and the approximate adult body mass of bird species (r s = 0.73, P = 0.027, n = 25 carcasses), suggesting that larger species were killed more often than smaller species. It was not possible to identify the age of most individuals from remains, with the exception of one adult and three subadult palm-nut vultures, two juvenile African goshawks Accipiter tachiro and an adult African harrier-hawk Polyboroides typus. We were unable to identify the sex of any individuals.
Table 1 The total and mean number of carcasses recorded in 13 hunting camps in and around the proposed Ebo National Park in Cameroon (Fig. 1) over 272 days during 2011–2012. Mean values were extrapolated to estimate annual offtake in all known hunting camps in the Ebo Forest and its outliers, with an estimated catchment of 479 km2. For comparison, we present annual estimates from two previous market and village-based studies carried out in the Cross–Sanaga region, adjusted for catchment size (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007). Mean adult body mass estimates are presented where possible (Urban et al., Reference Urban, Fry and Keith1982; Fry et al., Reference Fry, Keith and Urban1988; Kingdon, Reference Kingdon1997; Ferguson-Lees & Christie, Reference Ferguson-Lees and Christie2001).
1 Estimated from data presented in Willcox & Nambu (Reference Willcox and Nambu2007). Values given for total extrapolated harvest over the entire survey period (34 months) were used to calculate annual offtake per km2 of the study area (750 km2) and extrapolated to our estimated catchment.
2 Estimated from data presented in Fa et al. (Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006). Values given for total estimated annual extraction in urban and rural markets were used to calculate offtake per km2 of the study area (35,000 km2) and extrapolated to our estimated catchment.
* Species’ range extends into the study area (Borrow & Demey, Reference Borrow and Demey2004) but no carcasses were recorded.
The mean walking distance between 10 adjacent camps was 5 ± SE 0.5 km and the combined catchment area for all 34 camps was estimated to be 479 km2 (range 353–598 km2, using SE of mean walking distance; Fig. 1). Estimates of total bird offtake based on previous market and village-based studies carried out in the Cross–Sanaga region were similar when corrected for catchment area size but a much higher mammal offtake was estimated based on those studies (Table 1). Species composition differed between assessments, with a greater diversity of birds recorded in hunting camps compared to market and village-based surveys.
Discussion
Our results indicate that some large-bodied bird species are experiencing previously unrecognized levels of mortality from bushmeat hunting, which to the best of our knowledge has not been observed elsewhere in West and Central Africa. Our results are likely to be underestimates because some remains may have been permanently disposed of by hunters (such as on the campfire), removed by scavengers or decomposed between survey events. However, we observed a positive relationship between the number of hunters using camps and the number of bird carcasses recorded, which suggests that the proportion of bird carcasses overlooked during surveys and the effects of disposal by hunters, removal by scavengers or decomposition remained relatively constant. We conclude that some birds, particularly raptors and hornbills, are hunted more often than previous research suggests and this has important conservation implications for a number of species.
Our estimate of the total number of birds killed annually in the catchment area is similar to estimates based on market and village-based hunter surveys but species composition and estimates for individual species vary. However, extrapolated estimates of annual offtake per unit area should be interpreted with caution because catchment areas were estimated crudely in this study and those presented for comparison. In Sendje, Equatorial Guinea, the maximum daily distances travelled by hunters operating from camps was estimated to be 3.2 km (see Table 1 in Abernethy et al., Reference Abernethy, Coad, Taylor, Lee and Maisels2013), which is c. 20% further than our estimated catchment radius of 2.5 km. However, hunters in Sendje were almost exclusively trappers (Kümpel, Reference Kümpel2006) whereas gun-hunting is thought to be more common than trapping in the Ebo Forest. Gun-hunters probably operate over shorter distances, covering a wider area, and based on the geographical distribution and density of the known hunting camps in the Ebo Forest (Fig. 1) our catchment estimate seems reasonable.
The most frequently recorded bird in this study, the white-thighed hornbill Bycanistes albotibialis, was not recorded in either of the studies presented for comparison, which recorded a combined total of nearly 250,000 carcasses and are the most extensive surveys of bushmeat carried out in the Cross–Sanaga region to date (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007). Offtake of the second-most frequently recorded bird, the palm-nut vulture, was also significantly underestimated by market and village-based hunter surveys. Additionally, although recorded in relatively low numbers, raptors formed a significant proportion of bird carcasses in our surveys but were recorded only rarely in other studies. Both of the studies used for comparison estimated higher levels of offtake for the black-casqued hornbill and crested guineafowl Guttera pucherani and also identified two additional bird species that were not detected in our study but which are known from the Ebo Forest: African grey parrot Psittacus erithacus (Vulnerable; IUCN, 2013) and pied kingfisher Ceryle rudis (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007). There may be a number of reasons for these disparities, for example geographical or cultural differences between the three study areas may explain the variation in bird composition, or levels of bird hunting pressure may have increased in the intervening period (more than a decade) between the studies.
We believe that geographical differences are unlikely to be significant because bushmeat from the Ebo Forest is sold in several of the markets surveyed by Fa et al. (Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; E. Abwe, pers. comm.) and all of the birds identified here are found throughout the Cross–Sanaga region, which encompasses all three study areas. Furthermore, many hunters from across Cameroon have migrated to the Ebo Forest in recent decades (E. Abwe, pers. comm.) and Mamba village was founded by immigrant hunters in the 1970s (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett, Reference Dowsett-Lemaire and Dowsett2001), suggesting that bird hunting is not a cultural tradition exclusive to the Ebo Forest. We cannot categorically rule out the possibility that bird hunting has increased in the past decade, perhaps as a result of the depletion of other more commercially valuable species or the increased availability of shotguns, making it easier to kill canopy-living birds. However, the Ebo Forest retains relatively healthy populations of threatened mammals such as the drill (Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Abwe, Dixson and Astaras2013), and shotguns were the most frequently used hunting method in the Banyang–Mbo Wildlife Sanctuary during 1999–2002 (Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007), suggesting that there may be an alternative explanation.
We propose that the differences between the three studies are likely to be related to the commercial demand for species, with hunters consuming species for which there is little demand and selling more profitable species, such as African grey parrot and crested guineafowl, in villages and markets. This would explain why so few mammal remains were recorded in hunting camps as these generally have high commercial value and are traded in significant numbers in urban and rural markets (Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007; Macdonald et al., Reference Macdonald, Johnson, Albrechsten, Dutton, Seymour and Dupain2011). However, we were unable to confirm this from our results as we did not record the number of birds traded in the region during the study period, or observe hunters consuming carcasses. We therefore recommend that future studies record simultaneously the number of kills reported by hunters and their financial value, and use direct methods to quantify bushmeat discarded in hunting camps and traded in markets. This would clarify whether the high level of bird hunting recorded was related to hunters consuming low-value species in camps, a temporal change in prey preferences, previous inaccurate reporting of harvest by hunters, or geographical variation between comparative studies.
The positive relationship between body mass and the number of bird carcasses recorded here has important implications for the conservation of large birds, such as hornbills and raptors, in the forests of Central Africa. Many hornbills are thought to be vulnerable to hunting pressure because of their low reproductive rates (Trail, Reference Trail2007). For example, populations of the yellow-casqued hornbill Ceratogymna elata (Vulnerable; IUCN, 2013) have experienced significant declines and range contractions in recent decades, which have been attributed partly to hunting pressure (BirdLife International, 2012). Results suggest that other forest hornbills, such as the range-restricted white-thighed hornbill, may be facing similar pressures. Hornbill population declines may also have important, broader implications for ecosystem function, as frugivorous species play an important role in seed dispersal and maintenance of forest structure (Brodie et al., Reference Brodie, Helmy, Brockelman and Maron2009; Poulsen et al., Reference Poulsen, Clark and Palmer2013). Therefore, excessive hunting of these species should be cause for concern and we recommend that further investigations are made into potential hornbill declines in West and Central Africa.
Raptors, especially large, long-lived species that exhibit low fecundity, are likely to be similarly vulnerable to increased mortality caused by hunting (Owens & Bennett, Reference Owens and Bennett2000; Krüger & Radford, Reference Krüger and Radford2008). Studies of Egyptian vultures Neophron percnopterus, for example, have shown that low levels of mortality caused by anthropogenic activity can have a significant negative effect on populations (Carrete et al., Reference Carrete, Sánchez-Zapata, Benítez, Lobón and Donázar2009). The raptor detected most commonly among remains, the palm-nut vulture, is broadly similar to the Egyptian vulture in terms of body size and life history and is found throughout West and Central Africa where the oil palm Elaeis guineensis is sufficiently common (Ferguson-Lees & Christie, Reference Ferguson-Lees and Christie2001). Palm-nut vultures have also been recorded in several previous bushmeat surveys carried out in Cameroon and elsewhere (Fa & García Yuste, Reference Fa and García Yuste2001; Fa et al., Reference Fa, Seymoura, Dupain, Aminc, Albrechtsend and Macdonald2006; Willcox & Nambu, Reference Willcox and Nambu2007) and have traditionally been attributed a sweet-meat taste by hunters (e.g. Ghana; Lowe, Reference Lowe1937). Our results suggest that populations of this potentially threatened species may be experiencing unsustainable levels of hunting pressure.
Contrary to our expectations we recorded no crowned eagle carcasses during the study, although these large eagles are known to be consumed by hunters in the Ebo Forest (Whytock & Morgan, Reference Whytock and Morgan2010). Apart from direct persecution, crowned eagles are likely to occur at relatively low densities in hunted areas because of their high nutritional needs and preference for commercial bushmeat species (Struhsaker & Leakey, Reference Struhsaker and Leakey1990; Shultz & Noë, Reference Shultz and Noë2002; cf. leopards: Henschel et al., Reference Henschel, Hunter, Coad, Abernethy and Mühlenberg2011). The species’ only known congener, Stephanoaetus mahery, became extinct in Madagascar c.1,100 years ago, probably as a result of anthropogenic pressures although it is not known if hunting was a contributory factor (Goodman, Reference Goodman1994). We suspect that crowned eagles may be among the birds most vulnerable to bushmeat hunting in the region, and further studies are needed to examine the potential effects of the direct and indirect threats posed by bushmeat hunting on populations of these and other large raptors.
In the wider region a number of studies on bushmeat harvest rates have attempted to account for the quantity of animals consumed by hunters in camps but indirect methods may have resulted in underreporting or species misidentification. Birds such as the Congo peacock Afropavo congensis (Vulnerable; IUCN, 2013), African fish-eagle Haliaeetus vocifer, crowned eagle and various hornbills, guineafowl, turacos and others have been reported from hunting camps in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Equatorial Guinea (T. Hart & J. Hart, pers. comm; Fa & García Yuste, Reference Fa and García Yuste2001; Kümpel, Reference Kümpel2006). Historical evidence suggests that birds such as raptors have always been targeted by hunters to some degree (Lindblom, Reference Lindblom1938). We therefore believe that our results are representative of the wider region, particularly where shotguns are widely used, and although market surveys and indirect surveys of hunter offtake are essential tools for quantifying bushmeat harvests, these methods may have underestimated hunting pressure for some vulnerable, large-bodied birds in West and Central Africa.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife and the Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation for permission to conduct this research. We thank field assistant Zacharie Bekokon for his determined fieldwork; the people of Locndeng and Mamba villages for their technical support and permission to carry out the research; the Ebo Forest Research Project staff for significant logistical and managerial support; and the Offield Family Foundation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Great Apes Conservation Fund, the Arcus Foundation, and the Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation for funding. The project would not have been possible without additional financial support from The Peregrine Fund, British Ecological Society, Leslie Brown Memorial Award (Raptor Research Foundation) and ACE Surveyors Ltd. Additional thanks are due to Alain Reygel for his assistance identifying remains, and to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
Biographical sketches
Robin Whytock's research interests include investigating the decline of Afro-Palaearctic migrants and the conservation ecology of birds in the Lower and Upper Guinean forests. Ralph Buij studies the ecology and conservation of avian and mammalian populations in the tropics of Central/West Africa and Indonesia, focusing on the effects of human infrastructure, land-use change, hunting, and protected area management. Munir Virani has studied the ecology and conservation of raptors in East Africa. His current research focuses on vulture conservation in East Africa and South Asia. Bethan Morgan is has lived and worked in central Africa, promoting the conservation and research of a range of threatened species.
