Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:23:32.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can differences between continental and insular habitats influence the parasites communities associated with the endemic frog Haddadus binotatus?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2020

A. Aguiar*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP Rio Claro, Avenida 24 A, 1515 – Jardim Vila Bela, CEP 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
D.H. Morais
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia – UFU, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, LMG-746, Km 1, Monte Carmelo38500-000, MG, Brazil
F.H. Yamada
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Regional do Cariri/URCA, Campus Pimenta, Rua Cel. Antônio Luis, 1161, CEP 63105-000, Crato, Ceará, Brazil
L.A. dos Anjos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia e Zootecnia, Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista/UNESP, Passeio Monção, 226, CEP 15385-000, Ilha Solteira, São Paulo, Brazil
L.A.F. da Silva
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Parasitologia de Animais Silvestres/LAPAS, Setor de Parasitologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista/UNESP, Rua Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/n, CEP 18618-689, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
R.J. da Silva
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Parasitologia de Animais Silvestres/LAPAS, Setor de Parasitologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista/UNESP, Rua Prof. Dr. Antônio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/n, CEP 18618-689, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: A. Aguiar, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Habitats characterized by geographic isolation such as islands have been studied using different organisms as models for understanding the dynamic and insular patterns of biodiversity. Determinants of parasite richness in insular host populations have been conducted mainly with mammals and birds, showing that parasite richness decreases in insular areas. In the present study, we predicted that the type of environment (insular or continental) can influence the richness, diversity and abundance of parasites associated with the endemic frog Haddadus binotatus (Spix, 1824). We sampled frogs in two insular and two mainland fragments to survey their helminth parasites. The total richness was composed of 15 taxa of Nematoda and two of Acanthocephala, and the community composition of the two islands had more similarities between them than the two mainland localities. The insular effect was positive for richness and abundance of helminths, and no significant effect was observed on helminth diversity – even the mean diversity presented high numbers for the islands. We presumed that insular hosts could have lost some parasites in the colonization process when these continental islands were separated from the mainland, approximately 11,000 years ago. However, the high richness and abundance on islands can be explained by an epidemiological argument, which considers high population density due to insularity and other features of the host as factors that increase parasite transmission success among individuals.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Studies comparing islands and mainland communities have been mostly conducted using organisms such as plants and animals (e.g. mammals, birds and reptiles) for understanding insular patterns of biodiversity (Brown, Reference Brown1978; Mueller-Dombois, Reference Mueller-Dombois2001; Helmus et al., Reference Helmus, Mahler and Losos2014; Medina et al., Reference Medina, Vásquez, Moreno and Torres-González2015). These studies provide insights into the biogeography process where an island can act as a natural laboratory due to its isolation and dynamic (Lomolino, Reference Lomolino2000a).

According to the biogeography of islands theory, the insular dynamic is characterized by its reduced area, geographic isolation and age, which select species and diversity (MacArthur & Wilson, Reference MacArthur and Wilson1967). The equilibrium of these populations is adapted and efficient in their environment, but they are very sensitive due to isolation and reduced size, which can induce some extinctions (MacArthur & Wilson, Reference MacArthur and Wilson1967; Vitousek et al., Reference Vitousek, Loope and Andersen1995). In light of this theory, some studies (e.g. Lomolino, Reference Lomolino2000b; Losos & Schluter, Reference Losos and Schluter2000) have corroborated that small areas (such as islands) harbour low richness when compared to large areas (such as mainland), while other studies have found the opposite or no substantial effect in the relation of size to richness (e.g. Dunn & Loehle, Reference Dunn and Loehle1988; Lomolino, Reference Lomolino2000b).

Although insular research that use attributes of parasites are still scarce, some studies have demonstrated that prevalence and intensity of infection might be higher on islands, with the highest infection values on the smallest island (Casanova et al., Reference Casanova, Miquel and Fons1996; Miquel et al., Reference Miquel, Casanova, Fons, Feliu, Marchand, Torres and Clara1996) when compared to those of the mainland (Lewis, Reference Lewis1968; Gregory & Munday, Reference Gregory and Munday1976). Thus, more studies are needed on the ecology of parasites, which investigate the response between the effects of environmental and host features (Poulin, Reference Poulin2004). The parasites represent a hidden diversity (Poulin & Morand, Reference Poulin and Morand2000), and some research seeks to understand how this diversity and other parasitological parameters can be influenced by environmental conditions (Poulin, Reference Poulin2004). For example, host characters such as feeding, body size, sex, age, evolutionary history and the type of environment where the host lives can influence the parasite communities (Aho, Reference Aho, Esch, Bush and Aho1990; Barton, Reference Barton1999; Muzzall et al., Reference Muzzall, Gillilland, Summer and Mehene2001; Bolek & Coggins, Reference Bolek and Coggins2003; Brooks et al., Reference Brooks, León-Règagnon, McLennan and Zelmer2006; Hamann et al., Reference Hamann, Gonzalez and Kehr2006; Campião et al., Reference Campião, Ribas, Morais, Silva and Tavares2015).

In this sense, amphibians are considered as good models for studying parasite communities due to their lifestyle, inhabiting both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, which allows contact with different parasite species. Numerous reproductive modes can be highlighted by the great ability of these vertebrates to exploit several types of microhabitats, especially those from the Atlantic Rain Forest (Myers et al., Reference Myers, Mittermeier, Mittermeier, Fonseca and Kent2000; Haddad & Prado, Reference Haddad and Prado2005). Haddadus binotatus ((Spix, 1824() (Anura, Craugastoridae) is an endemic frog from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. It lives on the forest floor and its distribution is from southern Bahia to Rio Grande do Sul States, Brazil (Frost, Reference Frost2020). This anuran species has an average size, with the female (46–63 mm) generally larger than the male (32–44 mm) (Heyer et al., Reference Heyer, Rand, Cruz, Peixoto and Nelson1990; Canedo & Rickli, Reference Canedo and Rickli2006). In the breeding season, the eggs are released as foam on land, and there is no tadpole stage in the development of these frogs (Hedges et al., Reference Hedges, Duellman and Heinicke2008; Frost, Reference Frost2020). Furthermore, they may prey on a variety of items of different sizes, representing an important component of the local food web as well as getting parasites by trophic transmission (Coco et al., Reference Coco, Júnior, Fusinatto, Kiefer, Oliveira, Araujo, Costa, Sluys and Rocha2014). Concerning the records of parasites, there are only two studies reporting the helminth fauna associated with H. binotatus (Travassos, Reference Travassos1925; Aguiar et al., Reference Aguiar, Morais, Cicchi and Silva2014), but no study has compared parasite communities between host populations from mainland and islands.

Several Brazilian islands of the Atlantic Forest, such as those from São Paulo State, can present similar characteristics to the mainland due to their continental origin, which occurred in the last glaciation during the Pleistocene (Martin et al., Reference Martin, Mörner, Flexor and Suguio1986). These characteristics of the continental island can result in similar fauna and phytophysiognomies as those of the continent, allowing comparisons between patterns of abundance and biodiversity from each locality.

Here, considering the ecology of insular environments and the features of parasites and the host species, we predicted that the type of environment (insular or continental) can influence the richness and abundance of parasites associated with the frog H. binotatus. To test this effect, we predicted that: (1) insular environments will be more similar to each other in respect to parasite community, as well as continental forest fragments sharing more similarities; (2) the fragments from the mainland will have higher species richness and diversity of parasites due to their wide area compared to the limited area of islands; and (3) the islands will present a higher abundance of parasites due to their limited area, which can promote more aggregation of the insular hosts and, thus, more reinfection and higher intensity of infection. Based on these predictions, we aimed to describe an effect of the environment (i.e. insular and continental) in the richness, diversity and abundance of the parasite community associated with populations of H. binotatus collected in continental and insular regions from the Atlantic Forest, south-eastern Brazil.

Materials and methods

Study areas and collection of amphibian hosts

Eighty-six specimens of H. binotatus were collected using pitfall traps or visual encounter surveys in four localities from the Atlantic Forest during the breeding seasons of the years 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009 and 2010: Núcleo Santa Virginia (NSV), Serra do Mar State Park (n = 23); municipality of São Luis do Paraitinga (SLP) (n = 30); Anchieta Island (ILA) (n = 9); and Moela Island (ILM) (n = 24). The localities from the continent are NSV (23°24′S, 45°03′W), which is located within a preserved area, and SLP (23°13′S, 45°18′W), which is located in a non-preserved area of a mountainous region of the Serra do Mar, São Paulo State. ILA (23°45′S, 45°033′W), belonging to the municipality of Ubatuba, is an insular protected area (Anchieta Island State Park), despite the intense influence of tourists and its short distance from the north coast of São Paulo State (approximately 800 m) (Guillaoumon et al., Reference Guillaoumon, Marcondes and Negreiros1989; Cicchi et al., Reference Cicchi, Serafim, Sena, Centeno and Jim2009). ILM (24°03′S, 46°16′W) is an insular concession of the Brazilian Navy due to the maintenance of a lighthouse there, and the island is 2.5 km from the southern coast of São Paulo State, in the municipality of Guarujá (fig. 1). Currently, both islands are considered protected areas, despite their past environmental impacts (Secretaria de Estado de Insfraestrutura e Meio Ambiente, 2019).

Fig. 1. Map of the São Paulo coast, indicating the four localities where the anurans Haddadus binotatus were collected. Insular: (1) Moela Island and (2) Anchieta Island. Continental: (3) Núcleo Santa Virginia and (4) São Luis do Paraitinga.

The collected anurans were killed with thiopental sodic and then, after the necropsy and helminth survey were carried out, they were fixed with formaldehyde (10%), preserved in alcohol 70% and deposited at the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (ZUEC 24874 and 24875) and Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Regional do Cariri (URCA-H 10688–10700, 10946–10968).

Collection of helminths and procedures in the laboratory

All organs and body cavity were examined for helminths with the aid of a stereomicroscope. Recovered parasites were counted and site of infection registered. Nematodes were fixed using a hot solution with 93 parts of alcohol 70° GL, five parts of formalin, and two parts of acetic acid (AFA), while acanthocephalans were first kept on cold water for the exposition of proboscis and then fixed with AFA solution. Subsequently, all helminths were maintained in labelled bottles with alcohol 70%. In the laboratory, helminths were mounted in temporary slides for observation of taxonomic structures using a computerized system of image analysis (LAS DIC, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The nematodes were cleared with lactic acid or lactophenol, and acanthocephalans were stained with chloridric carmine, dehydrated with alcoholic series and then cleared with eugenol (Amato et al., Reference Amato, Boeger and Amato1991). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Coleção Helmintológica do Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu (CHIBB 8861–8887) of the Universidade Estadual Paulista/UNESP. The identification of parasite taxa was performed using Yamaguti (Reference Yamaguti1961, Reference Yamaguti1963), Vicente et al. (Reference Vicente, Rodrigues, Gomes and Pinto1991), Anderson et al. (Reference Anderson, Chabaud and Willmott2009), Gibbons (Reference Gibbons2010) and papers with species descriptions. In the morphological analyses, the presence of juveniles (larvae of Nematoda) and the absence of males (e.g. nematodes of Cosmocercidae) did not enable us to make any specific identifications since these helminths present conservative characters. Thus, we separated the cosmocercids into morphospecies based on the main morphological differences.

Data analysis

To characterize the helminth communities of each anuran population among the continents and islands localities, we analysed the prevalence, mean abundance, mean intensity of infection and mean richness according to Bush et al. (Reference Bush, Lafferty, Lotz and Shostak1997). To describe the diversity for each infracommunity, we used the Brillouin diversity index, and then we provided the mean diversity for the component community (bootstrap 95%). We performed a cluster analysis with the Bray–Curtis index (B) to explore potential similarities among helminth communities from each host population, taking into account the mean intensity of infection of each helminth taxa. These descriptive analyses were performed using Sigma-Stat version 3.1 (SigmaStat, 2005) and PAST (Hammer et al., Reference Hammer, Harper and Ryan2001), adopting a significance level at the value of P ≤ 0.05.

Accumulation curves for helminth species were generated to evaluate sampling effectiveness by randomizing samples 1000 times using EstimateS 9.1.0 (Colwell, Reference Colwell2006). According to Poulin (Reference Poulin1998), this estimator is the most invariable and it present reduced susceptibility for overestimation in the real richness, independently of how frequent species appear in the observed community. For constructing curves of observed and estimated richness, we used Statistica software version 7.1 (Statsoft, 2005).

We used generalized linear mixed models to investigate whether richness and abundance of parasites (response variables) are affected by the predictor variables ‘environment’ (insular or continental) and ‘locality’ (NSV, SLP, ILA and ILM) for each individual frog. These predictor variables were also used in linear mixed models to investigate the diversity as response variable. In each model set, we considered the ‘environment’ as a fixed effect and the ‘locality’ as random effect. For richness and abundance data, our models ran with negative binomial distribution using the ‘glmer.nb’ function in the lme4 package (Bates et al., Reference Bates, Maechler, Bolker and Walker2014) in R (R Development Core Team 2020, version 4.0.0). For diversity, a Gaussian distribution was most appropriate for the model, and we used the ‘lmer’ function in the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova et al., Reference Kuznetsova, Brockhoff and Christensen2017) in R (R Development Core Team 2020, version 4.0.0).

Results

A total of 86 specimens of H. binotatus were analysed from the following localities: NSV (n = 23), SLP (n = 30), ILA (n = 9) and ILM (n = 24). The sampling efforts were representative according to richness estimators (fig. 2). The overall richness of helminths (number of taxa) in each locality was as follows: eight (NSV), four (SLP), seven (ILA) and eight (ILM). Helminths identified up to the genus level (e.g. Ochoterenella sp., Oxyascaris sp., Rhabdias sp. and Physaloptera sp.) were considered the same morphospecies in the host populations, whereas Cosmocercidae sp. 1, Cosmocercidae sp. 2, Cosmocercidae sp. 3 and Cosmocercidae sp. 4 were treated as distinct species.

Fig. 2. Sampling efforts in observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) richness within each community of helminths associated with Haddadus binotatus from ILA (Anchieta Island), ILM (Moela Island), NSV (Núcleo Santa Virginia) and SLP (São Luis do Paraitinga).

In NSV, we recorded 258 helminths associated with 22 of 23 sampled frogs (table 1); the mean diversity for the component community was 0.17 ± 0.05 (0–0.68) and the mean richness was 1.54 ± 0.16 (1–3). In SLP, 170 helminths were recorded in 24 of 30 sampled frogs (table 1). The mean diversity and the mean richness for the component community from SLP were 0.16 ± 0.04 (0–0.49) and 1.42 ± 0.10 (1–2), respectively. In this way, the samples from continental localities (NSV and SLP) numbered ten helminth taxa and shared two species (Oxyascaris sp. and Rhabdias sp.) (table 1).

Table 1. Helminths associated with populations of Haddadus binotatus from Núcleo Santa Virginia (NSV) (n = 23), São Luis do Paraitinga (SLP) (n = 30), Anchieta Island (ILA) (n = 9) and Moela Island (ILM) (n = 24), São Paulo State, Brazil.

NH, number of helminths recorded; P%, prevalence; MA, mean abundance; MII, mean intensity of infection; min–max, range; SE, standard error; SI, sites of infection; Cav, cavity; Lin, large intestine; Lu, lungs; Sin, small intestine; St, stomach.

In ILA, we recorded 695 helminths associated with eight of nine sampled frogs (table 1); the mean diversity for the component community was 0.21 ± 0.07 (0–0.46) and the mean richness was 1.87 ± 0.35 (1–4). In ILM, 435 helminths were recorded in all 24 sampled frogs (table 1). The mean diversity and the mean richness for the component community from ILM were 0.45 ± 0.08 (0–1.27) and 2.29 ± 0.22 (1–5), respectively. Thus, the samples from islands (ILA and ILM) numbered 11 helminth taxa and shared four species (Aplectana pintoi Travassos, Reference Travassos1925, Cosmocerca brasiliensis Travassos, Reference Travassos1925, Physaloptera sp. and Rhabdias sp.) (table 1).

The four populations of anurans shared only Rhabdias sp., whereas the anurans from islands shared four taxa (A. pintoi, C. brasiliensis, Physaloptera sp. and Rhabdias sp.), and the continental ones shared two (Oxyascaris sp. and Rhabdias sp.). In addition to Rhabdias sp., the comparisons NSV–ILM and SLP–ILA both presented Ochoterenella sp. and Oswaldocruzia subauricularis (Rudolphi, 1819), respectively.

A similarity cluster analysis (Bray–Curtis index, co-phenetic coefficient of 0.93), using the mean intensity of infection of each helminth taxa, showed two principal groups regarding the four anuran populations: (1) continental populations (NSV and SLP) (B = 0.06) and (2) the insular population (ILA and ILM) (B = 0.19).

Our models showed a significant influence of the environment on richness and abundance of helminths associated with H. binotatus (table 2), where the islands presented high richness and abundance of helminths. On the other hand, the effects of environment and locality were not significant for helminth diversity (table 2).

Table 2. Effects of environment and study site on response variables (richness, diversity and abundance of helminths associated with Haddadus binotatus from south-eastern Brazil).

Predictor variables included environment with two levels (continent and insular) and the studied sites with four levels (NSV, SLP, ILA and ILM). The study site was considered as random effects in the three models. Akaike information criterion (AIC) values are presented in the models with Negative Binomial distribution.

Discussion

This is the first study to compare helminth fauna of H. binotatus from island and continent localities and to verify a significative influence of environment on richness and abundance of helminth communities. We found high richness and abundance of helminths in hosts from the insular environments studied, and the findings suggested a greater similarity between islands than that found between continental fragments.

We detected eight new records of helminth associated with H. binotatus (Pseudoacanthocephalus lutzi (Hamann, 1891), C. brasiliensis, Cosmocerca parva, A. pintoi, Oxyascaris sp., Ochoterenella sp., O. subauricularis and Spiroxys sp.). As expected, no one of these four anuran populations presented trematodes in the component community, probably due to the direct reproductive mode of this frog, as they do not enter water bodies to spawn (Haddad & Sazima, Reference Haddad, Sazima and Morellato1992; Canedo & Rickli, Reference Canedo and Rickli2006). Consequently, the adult frogs and tadpoles are not infected with aquatic cercariae. Other studies (e.g. Bolek & Coggins, Reference Bolek and Coggins2003; Kehr & Hamann, Reference Kehr and Hamann2003; González & Hamann, Reference González and Hamann2006) have correlated the composition of the parasite community with the habit of hosts, suggesting the predominance of monoxenic nematodes in terrestrial frogs and trematodes in aquatic or semiaquatic amphibians.

For each component community, a dominant species that presented the greatest prevalence and mean intensity of infection was observed (table 1). Haddadus binotatus from ILM presented a dominance by cysthacanths (Acanthocephala), which usually reach frogs by the trophic transmission of the first intermediate host (e.g. an arthropod) (Santos & Amato, Reference Santos and Amato2010). Besides the availability of an arthropod as prey for frogs, acanthocephalans demand a bird as final hosts, as reported in other studies that point out the important role of birds in parasite exchange among ecosystems (e.g. Karvonen & Valtonen, Reference Karvonen and Valtonen2004; Poulin & Leung, Reference Poulin and Leung2011). These parasites could finish their development in sea birds that usually nest or rest on coastal islands (Neves et al., Reference Neves, Vooren, Bugoni, Olmos, Nascimento, Neves, Bugoni and Rossi-Wongtschowski2006). In the other component communities, the nematodes C. parva, Cosmocercidae sp. 3 and C. brasiliensis were dominant in NSV, SLP and ILA, respectively. These nematodes are expected as dominant in this frog species, which occupies a terrestrial habit, thus enabling the contact between infective larvae from the soil and skin and eyes of the host (Anderson, Reference Anderson2000).

Despite the differences in the composition of parasite communities, some parasites were found in more than one host population (e.g. Rhabdias sp., C. brasiliensis and O. subauricularis), indicating a historic relationship between these hosts and parasites, which would have adapted to insular conditions since they were separated from the mainland by the ocean. When the islands were created, during the oscillations in the sea level approximately 11,000 years ago (Pleistocene) (Martin et al., Reference Martin, Mörner, Flexor and Suguio1986; Souza et al., Reference Souza, Suguio, Oliveira and Oliveira2005), insular hosts could have then retained these parasites.

In this context, the similarity in helminth fauna between ILM and ILA (B = 0.19) could also be explained by their continental origin, when they were considered as a continuous mainland. Moreover, comparable conditions imposed by this type of environment can contribute to the likeness on communities from these islands, even though they have a different history of human occupation and differences in the distance from the continent; it is possible that these recent factors were not sufficient to modify completely these two insular communities. In other words, ILM and ILA can share similar factors that modulate parasite communities. The proximity between ILA and the coast does not seem to contribute to the similarity with the communities from continent fragments since only Rhabdias sp. was verified in ILA and NSV, and comparing ILA and SLP only two taxa were shared (Rhabdias sp. and O. subauricularis). These findings corroborate the two groups formed (ILA–ILM and NSV–SLP) by cluster similarity analysis.

ILA and ILM presented the highest mean richness and mean abundance compared to fragments from the continent. We confirmed these findings by generalized linear mixed models, which showed the influence of insularity on the increase of richness and abundance of parasite of H. binotatus. The positive influence of these islands on richness was different from the others studies, which found that insularity affects decreasing parasite richness (e.g. Fromont et al., Reference Fromont, Morvilliers, Artois and Pontier2001; Bellocq et al., Reference Bellocq, Morand and Feliu2002). Some studies assume that high abundance could be an effect of the small competition caused by low richness in insular environments (Dobson, Reference Dobson1985; Fromont et al., Reference Fromont, Morvilliers, Artois and Pontier2001); however, our results do not corroborate with such studies, because in addition to the high richness we found high abundance in islands. In this context, two frameworks of determinants of parasite communities have been considered: the ‘founder effect’ and the ‘epidemiological argument’ (Poulin, Reference Poulin2004). The first derives from biogeography theory, and it assumes that insular hosts possess a subset of parasites, which was the result of a small number of migrants with few parasites species causing species loss during colonization (Miquel et al., Reference Miquel, Casanova, Fons, Feliu, Marchand, Torres and Clara1996; Morand & Guégan, Reference Morand and Guégan2000). In other words, insular hosts should harbour lower parasites richness than those on the mainland. Unlike the ‘founder effect’, our results showed a high richness and abundance in islands, which can probably be explained by the ‘epidemiological argument’. This argument considers high population density due to insularity and other features of the host as factors that increase parasite transmission success among individuals (Morand & Guégan, Reference Morand and Guégan2000; Poulin, Reference Poulin2004). Also, we cannot disregard the possible impact levels of human interference in these areas from the Atlantic Rain Forest as factors which can influence the parasite communities. In the diversity model, we did not verify a significative effect of insular or continental environment. However, considering the mean diversity of helminths, the islands presented the highest numbers, and, in the same sense of richness, this finding does not corroborate with the previous studies (e.g. Fromont et al., Reference Fromont, Morvilliers, Artois and Pontier2001; Bellocq et al., Reference Bellocq, Morand and Feliu2002).

The presence of a helminth species in a locality can depend on the probability of colonization from nearby localities and the habitat's general suitability for parasite establishment (Poulin & Leung, Reference Poulin and Leung2011). In other words, speciation, extinction and dispersion are the three main processes that could influence biological richness observed presently (Ricklefs, Reference Ricklefs1987; Poulin, Reference Poulin1995). This also explains the differences in the richness of helminth communities. According to Poulin (Reference Poulin2004), there is no general rule as a key factor promoting rich parasite faunas; a prediction can be important in one study and unimportant in another. There are several factors related to parasite colonization and extinction, and, for this reason, multivariate approaches are essential for understanding at least part of the contributory determinants of parasites richness (Poulin, Reference Poulin2019).

According to our proposed hypotheses, we confirmed that insular environments are more similar to each other in respect to parasite community, and continental forest fragments can also share more similarities; furthermore, the similarity index was higher between islands than fragments of the mainland. Our findings did not corroborate with the second hypothesis, since we found a significative increase of insular environment in parasite richness and no significant influence of environment on diversity, although the islands showed the highest numbers of mean diversity. On the other hand, the third hypothesis was confirmed, with a significative influence of insularity in abundance.

Thus, our findings fill some knowledge gaps concerning parasite communities of insular host populations with the conclusion that richness and abundance of helminth parasites of the frog H. binotatus are positively affected by the island environment.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge our colleagues from the laboratory who helped us in our fieldwork. We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers that provided constructive and useful suggestions. Our special thanks to A.C. Wunderlich and M.R. Lima for their help in the mixed models and interpretations, and R.A. Kalwashita-Ribeiro for map production.

Financial support

Financial support for this study was provided by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (A.A., MSc scholarship 130583/2011-1). We acknowledge the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for the scholarships granted to F.H. Yamada (2011/22603-3, 2014/14298-4), L.A. Anjos (FAPESP 12/20978-2) and for financial support (2008/50417-7, 2008/58180-6, 09/15104-0). L.A.F. da Silva is grateful for Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior/CAPES for her scholarship. R.J. da Silva (309125/2017-0) and D. H. Morais (313241/2018-0) are supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico/CNPq.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all activities contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards in this type of study (SISBIO collection permission number 31716-2; IBAMA permission number 567/05).

References

Aguiar, A, Morais, DH, Cicchi, PJP and Silva, RJ (2014) Evaluation of helminths associated with 14 amphibian species from a neotropical island near the southeast coast of Brazil. Herpetological Review 45, 227236.Google Scholar
Aho, JM (1990) Helminth communities of amphibians and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding patterns and process. pp. 157190in Esch, GW, Bush, AO and Aho, JM (Eds) Parasite communities patterns and processes. London, UK, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, JFR, Boeger, W and Amato, SB (1991) Protocolos para laboratório: coleta e processamento de parasitos de pescado. 81 pp. Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, UFRRJ.Google Scholar
Anderson, RC (2000) Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. 2nd edn. 672 pp. London, UK, CAB Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RC, Chabaud, AG and Willmott, S (2009) Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. 463 pp. London, UK, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, DP (1999) Ecology of helminth communities in tropical Australian amphibians. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 921926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D, Maechler, M., Bolker, B and Walker, S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. pp. R package version 1.1–6.Google Scholar
Bellocq, JG, Morand, S and Feliu, C (2002) Patterns of parasite species richness of Western Palaeartic micro-mammals: island effects. Ecography 25, 173183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolek, MG and Coggins, JR (2003) Helminth community structure of sympatric eastern American toad, Bufo americanus, northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens, and blue spotted salamander, Ambystoma laterale, from Southeastern Wisconsin. Journal of Parasitology 89, 673680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, DR, León-Règagnon, V, McLennan, DA and Zelmer, D (2006) Ecological fitting as a determinant of the community structure of platyhelminth parasites of anurans. Ecology 87, 7685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, JH (1978) The theory of insular biogeography and the distribution of boreal birds and mammals. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 2, 209227.Google Scholar
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM and Shostak, W (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al., revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campião, KM, Ribas, ACA, Morais, DH, Silva, RJ and Tavares, LER (2015) How many parasites species a frog might have? Determinants of parasite diversity in South American anurans. PLoS One 10(10), e0140577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canedo, C and Rickli, E (2006) Female reproductive aspects and seasonality in the reproduction of Eleutherodactylus binotatus (Spix, 1824) (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest fragment, Southeastern Brazil. Herpetological Review 37, 149151.Google Scholar
Casanova, JC, Miquel, J, Fons, R, et al. (1996) On the helminthofauna of wild mammals (Rodentia, Insectivora and Lagomorpha) in Azores archipelago (Portugal). Vie et Milieu 46, 253259.Google Scholar
Cicchi, PJP, Serafim, H, Sena, MA, Centeno, FC and Jim, J (2009) Herpetofauna em uma área de Floresta Atlântica na Ilha Anchieta, município de Ubatuba, sudeste do Brasil. Biota Neotropica 9(2), 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coco, L, Júnior, VNTB, Fusinatto, LA, Kiefer, MC, Oliveira, JCF, Araujo, PG, Costa, BM, Sluys, MV and Rocha, CFD (2014) Feeding habits of the leaf litter frog Haddadus binotatus (Anura, Craugastoridae) from two Atlantic Forest areas in southeastern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 86, 239249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colwell, RK (2006) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8. Available at http://purl.oclc.org/estimates in March 13, 2020.Google Scholar
Dobson, AP (1985) The population dynamics of competition between parasites. Parasitology 91, 317347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, CP and Loehle, C (1988) Species-area parameter estimation: testing the null model of lack of relationship. Journal of Biogeography 15, 721728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromont, E, Morvilliers, L, Artois, M and Pontier, D (2001) Parasite richness and abundance in insular and mainland feral cats: insularity or density? Parasitology 123, 143151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, DR (2020) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1. Available at https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php in March 13, 2020. New York, USA, American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Gibbons, L (2010) Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. Supplementary Volume. 416 pp. Wallingford, UK, CABI International.Google Scholar
González, CE and Hamann, MI (2006) Helmintos parásitos de Leptodactylus bufonius Boulenger, 1894 (Anura: Leptodactylidae) de Corrientes, Argentina. Revista Española de Herpetología 20, 3946.Google Scholar
Gregory, GG and Munday, BL (1976) Internal parasites of feral cats from the Tasmanian midlands and King island. Australian Veterinary Journal 52, 317320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillaoumon, JR, Marcondes, MAP, Negreiros, OC, et al. (1989) Plano de manejo do Parque Estadual da Ilha Anchieta. Available at http://s.ambiente.sp.gov.br/fundacaoflorestal/planos-manejo/PE-da-Ilha-Anchieta.pdf (accessed 13 March 2020).Google Scholar
Haddad, CFB and Prado, CPA (2005) Reproductive modes in frogs end their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55, 207217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, CFD and Sazima, I (1992) Anfíbios anuros da Serra do Japi. pp. 188211in Morellato, LPC (Ed.) História natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservação de uma área florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Campinas, Brazil, Editora Unicamp/Fapesp.Google Scholar
Hamann, MI, Gonzalez, CE and Kehr, AI (2006) Helminth community structure of the oven frog Leptodactylus latinasus (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Acta Parasitologica 51, 294299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, O, Harper, DAT and Ryan, PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electro 4, 19.Google Scholar
Hedges, SB, Duellman, WE and Heinicke, MP (2008) New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 1737, 1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmus, MR, Mahler, DL and Losos, JB (2014) Island biogeography of the Anthropocene. Nature 13, 543557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, WR, Rand, AS, Cruz, CAG, Peixoto, OL and Nelson, CE (1990) Frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de Zoologia 31, 231410.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A and Valtonen, ET (2004) Helminth assemblages of whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) in interconnected lakes: similarity as a function of species specific parasites and geographical separation. Journal of Parasitology 90, 471476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kehr, AI and Hamann, MI (2003) Ecological aspects of parasitism in the tadpole of Pseudis paradoxa from Argentina. Herpetological Review 34, 336341.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JW (1968) Studies on the helminth parasites of the Long-tailed field mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus sylvaticus from Wales. Journal of Zoology 154, 287312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomolino, MV (2000a) A call for a new paradigm of island biogeography. Global Ecology & Biogeography 9, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomolino, MV (2000b) Ecology's most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 27, 1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losos, JB and Schluter, D (2000) Analysis of an evolutionary species-area relationship. Nature 408, 847850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, RH and Wilson, EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. 224 pp. Princeton, New Jersey, USA, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, L, Mörner, NA, Flexor, JM and Suguio, K (1986) Fundamentos e reconstrução de antigos níveis marinhos do Quartenário. Boletim do Instituto de Geociências 4, 1161.Google Scholar
Medina, ES, Vásquez, AI, Moreno, MP and Torres-González, A (2015) Island effect on diversity, abundance and vegetation structure in the Chocó Region. Acta Botanica Brasilica 29(4), 509515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miquel, J, Casanova, JC, Fons, R, Feliu, C, Marchand, B, Torres, J and Clara, JP (1996) Ecological features on the helminth fauna of Muridae species (Rodentia) in Hyères Archipelago (Var, France). Vie et Milieu 46, 219223.Google Scholar
Morand, S and Guégan, JF (2000) Patterns of endemism in host-parasite associations: lessons from epidemiological models and comparative tests. Belgian Journal of Entomology 2, 135147.Google Scholar
Mueller-Dombois, D (2001) Island biogeography. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 3, 565580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzzall, PM, Gillilland, MG, Summer, CS and Mehene, CJ (2001) Helminth communities of green frogs Rana clamitans Latreille, from Southwestern Michigan. Journal of Parasitology 87, 962968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, Fonseca, GAB and Kent, J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neves, T, Vooren, CM, Bugoni, L, Olmos, F and Nascimento, L (2006) Distribuição e abundância de aves marinhas no sudeste-sul do Brasil. pp. 1135in Neves, T, Bugoni, L and Rossi-Wongtschowski, CLB (Eds) Aves oceânicas e suas interações com a pesca na região Sudeste-Sul do Brasil. São Paulo, São Paulo, Série documentos Revizee – Score Sul.Google Scholar
Poulin, R (1995) Phylogeny, ecology, and the richness of parasite communities in vertebrates. Ecological Monographs 65, 283302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R (1998) Comparison of three estimators of species richness in parasite component communities. Journal of Parasitology 84, 485490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R (2004) Macroecological patterns of species richness in parasite assemblages. Basic and Applied Ecology 5, 423434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R (2019) Best practice guidelines for studies of parasite community ecology. Journal of Helminthology 93(1), 811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R and Leung, TLF (2011) Body size, trophic level, and the use of fish as transmission routes by parasites. Oecologia 166, 731738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R and Morand, S (2000) The diversity of parasites. The Quarterly Review of Biology 75, 277293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Development Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.0.0. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, RE (1987) Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235, 167171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, VGT and Amato, SB (2010) Rhinella fernandezae (Anura, Bufonidae) a paratenic host of Centrorhynchus sp. (Acanthocephala, Centrorhynchidae) in Brazil. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81, 556.Google Scholar
Secretaria de Estado de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente (2019) Governo do Estado de São Paulo. APA Marinha do Litoral Centro, Plano de Manejo. Available at https://www.sigam.ambiente.sp.gov.br/sigam3/Repositorio/511/Documentos/APAM_LC/2019.02.26_Plano_Manejo_APAMLC.pdf (accessed 13 March 2020).Google Scholar
SigmaStat (2005) Systat Software version 3.1, Inc. 501 Canal Blvd, Suite E Point Richmond, CA 94804-2028 USA.Google Scholar
Souza, CRG, Suguio, K, Oliveira, AMS and Oliveira, PE (2005) Quaternário do Brasil. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, Editora Holos.Google Scholar
Statsoft Inc. (2005). Statistica (data analysis software system), version 7.1.Google Scholar
Travassos, L (1925) Contribuições para o conhecimento da fauna helmintológica dos batráchios do Brasil. Nematódeos intestinais. Sciencia Medica 3, 673687.Google Scholar
Vicente, JJ, Rodrigues, HO, Gomes, DC and Pinto, RM (1991) Nematóides do Brasil. Parte II: Nematóides de anfíbios. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 7, 549626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, PM, Loope, LL and Andersen, H (1995) Islands: biological diversity and ecosystem function. 238 pp. New York, USA, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguti, S (1961) Systema Helminthum – Nematodes. 1261 pp. London, UK, Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S (1963) Systema Helminthum – Acanthocephalans. 423 pp. London, UK, Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the São Paulo coast, indicating the four localities where the anurans Haddadus binotatus were collected. Insular: (1) Moela Island and (2) Anchieta Island. Continental: (3) Núcleo Santa Virginia and (4) São Luis do Paraitinga.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Sampling efforts in observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) richness within each community of helminths associated with Haddadus binotatus from ILA (Anchieta Island), ILM (Moela Island), NSV (Núcleo Santa Virginia) and SLP (São Luis do Paraitinga).

Figure 2

Table 1. Helminths associated with populations of Haddadus binotatus from Núcleo Santa Virginia (NSV) (n = 23), São Luis do Paraitinga (SLP) (n = 30), Anchieta Island (ILA) (n = 9) and Moela Island (ILM) (n = 24), São Paulo State, Brazil.

Figure 3

Table 2. Effects of environment and study site on response variables (richness, diversity and abundance of helminths associated with Haddadus binotatus from south-eastern Brazil).