Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:23:13.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can RoTEM® analysis be applied for haemostatic monitoring in paediatric congenital heart surgery?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2011

Jo Bønding Andreasen ,
Anne-Mette Hvas ,
Kirsten Christiansen  and
Hanne Berg Ravn
Jo Bønding Andreasen*
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Centre for Haemophilia and Thrombosis, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
Anne-Mette Hvas
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Centre for Haemophilia and Thrombosis, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
Kirsten Christiansen
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Centre for Haemophilia and Thrombosis, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
Hanne Berg Ravn
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Centre for Haemophilia and Thrombosis, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
*
Correspondence to: Dr J. B. Andreasen, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Tel: +45 8949 8750; Fax: +45 8949 8809; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Successful management of bleeding disorders after congenital heart surgery requires detection of specific coagulation disturbances. Whole-blood rotation thromboelastometry (RoTEM®) provides continuous qualitative haemostatic profiles, and the technique has shown promising results in adult cardiac surgery.

Setting

To compare the performance of RoTEM® with that of conventional coagulation tests in children, we conducted a descriptive study in children undergoing congenital cardiac surgery. For that purpose, 60 children were enrolled and had blood samples taken before, immediately after, and 1 day after surgery. Conventional coagulation tests included: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, fibrin D-dimer, thrombin clotting time, factor XIII, and platelet count.

Results

Post-surgical haemostatic impairment was present to some degree in all children, as seen by pronounced changes in activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin clotting time, and platelet count, as well as RoTEM® analysis. RoTEM® showed marked changes in clotting time – prolonged by 7–18% – clot formation time – prolonged by 46–71% – maximum clot firmness – reduced by 10–19%, and maximum velocity – reduced by 29–39%. Comparison of the two techniques showed that conventional coagulation tests and RoTEM® performed equally well with regard to negative predictive values for excessive post-operative drain production – more than 20 millilitres per kilogram per 24 hours after surgery – with an area under the curve of approximately 0.65.

Conclusion

RoTEM® can detect haemostatic impairments in children undergoing cardiac surgery and the method should be considered as a supplement in the perioperative care of the children where targeted transfusion therapy is necessary to avoid volume overload.

Keywords

Childrencoagulationthromboelastometrybleeding
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , 28 October 2011 , pp. 684 - 691
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fenger-Eriksen, C, Anker-Moller, E, Heslop, J, Ingerslev, J, Sorensen, B. Thrombelastographic whole blood clot formation after ex vivo addition of plasma substitutes: improvements of the induced coagulopathy with fibrinogen concentrate. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 324–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Chan, AK, Leaker, M, Burrows, FA, et al. Coagulation and fibrinolytic profile of paediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77: 270–277.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Heimark, RL, Kurachi, K, Fujikawa, K, Davie, EW. Surface activation of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis and kinin formation. Nature 1980; 286: 456–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Williams, GD, Bratton, SL, Nielsen, NJ, Ramamoorthy, C. Fibrinolysis in pediatric patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12: 633–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Reed, RL, JrBracey, AW, Hudson, JD, Miller, TA, Fischer, RP. Hypothermia and blood coagulation: dissociation between enzyme activity and clotting factor levels. Circ Shock 1990; 32: 141–152.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Khuri, SF, Valeri, CR, Loscalzo, J, et al. Heparin causes platelet dysfunction and induces fibrinolysis before cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1008–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Slonim, AD, Luban, NL. Too much, too little, too soon, too late? Transfusion and long-term survival in children. Transfusion 2008; 48: 796–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Despotis, GJ, Joist, JH, Goodnough, LT. Monitoring of hemostasis in cardiac surgical patients: impact of point-of-care testing on blood loss and transfusion outcomes. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 1684–1696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Ak, K, Isbir, CS, Tetik, S, et al. Thromboelastography-based transfusion algorithm reduces blood product use after elective CABG: a prospective randomized study. J Card Surg 2009; 24: 404–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Cammerer, U, Dietrich, W, Rampf, T, Braun, SL, Richter, JA. The predictive value of modified computerized thromboelastography and platelet function analysis for postoperative blood loss in routine cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Royston, D, von, KS. Reduced haemostatic factor transfusion using heparinase-modified thrombelastography during cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 575–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Shore-Lesserson, L, Manspeizer, HE, DePerio, M, Francis, S, Vela-Cantos, F, Ergin, MA. Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 312–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Jenkins, KJ, Gauvreau, K, Newburger, JW, Spray, TL, Moller, JH, Iezzoni, LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 110–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Akobeng, AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 644–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Monagle, P, Barnes, C, Ignjatovic, V, et al. Developmental haemostasis. Impact for clinical haemostasis laboratories. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 362–372.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Gorlinger, K, Kong, R, Nimmo, A, Sorensen, B. Recommendations for using the ROTEM® in the management of perioperative bleeding in Cardiac Surgery. In: Recommendations from the ROTEM® Expert Meeting Working Group, 2007.Google Scholar
17.Miller, BE, Mochizuki, T, Levy, JH, et al. Predicting and treating coagulopathies after cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 1196–1202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Blome, M, Isgro, F, Kiessling, AH, et al. Relationship between factor XIII activity, fibrinogen, haemostasis screening tests and postoperative bleeding in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Gaarder, C, Naess, PA, Frischknecht, CE, et al. Scandinavian Guidelines – “The massively bleeding patient”. Scand J Surg 2008; 97: 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Chan, KL, Summerhayes, RG, Ignjatovic, V, Horton, SB, Monagle, PT. Reference values for kaolin-activated thromboelastography in healthy children. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1610–1613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Edwards, RM, Naik-Mathuria, BJ, Gay, AN, Olutoye, OO, Teruya, J. Parameters of thromboelastography in healthy newborns. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 99–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Oswald, E, Stalzer, B, Heitz, E, et al. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in children: age-related reference ranges and correlations with standard coagulation tests. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 827–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Reinhofer, M, Brauer, M, Franke, U, Barz, D, Marx, G, Losche, W. The value of rotation thromboelastometry to monitor disturbed perioperative haemostasis and bleeding risk in patients with cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008; 19: 212–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed